The following is a selection of US law cases referred to in Real Estate Defined, with the corresponding Term.
This list is the Largest collection of Real Property Cases and Law Cases on related subjects (contract, tort, insurance, landlord & tenant, mortgage, trust, valuation … ).
SUBSCRIBE to view the full definition of the Term
or use the 15-day Free Trial.
Case | Citation | Term | |
41-6 Albert Palace Mansions (Freehold) Ltd v Craftrule Ltd | [2011] EWCA 1230, [2011] 19 EG 98 (CA) | leasehold enfranchisement(Eng) | |
41-60 Albert Palace Mansions (Freehold) Ltd v Craftrule Ltd | [2010] EWHC 1230, [2010] 31 EG 64 | leasehold enfranchisement | |
89 Holland Park (Management) Ltd | [2013] EWHC 391, [2013] PLSCS 66 | restrictive covenant | |
9 Cornwall Crescent London Ltd v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC | [2006] 1 WLR 1186 (CA) | extended lease | |
9 Cornwall Crescent London Ltd v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC | [2006] 1 WLR 1186 (CA) | leasehold enfranchisement(Eng) | |
A |
A Ketley Ltd v Scott | [1981] ICR 241, 130 NLJ 749 | usury |
AA Dickson & Co v O'Leary | [1980] 1 EGLR 25 (CA) | ready, able and willing (or) ready, willing and able | |
Abbey Homesteads Group Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport | (1982) 263 EG 983, 264 EG 151, 154, [1982] 2 EGLR 18 (LT) | compensation for severance(Eng) | |
Abbey Homesteads Group Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport | (1982) 263 EG 983, 264 EG 151, 154, [1982] 2 EGLR 18 (LT) | before-and-after method | |
Abbey National Building Society v Cann | [1991] 1 AC 56, [1990] 1 All ER 1085 (HL) | scintilla temporis(Lat) | |
Abbey National Building Society v Cann | [1991] 1 AC 56, [1990] 1 All ER 1085, 1101 (HL) | occupation | |
Abbey National plc v Commisioners for Revenue & Customs | [2006] EWCA Civ 886, [2006] 3 EGLR 153 | virtual assignment | |
Abbott v Abbott | [2007] UKPC 53 (PC) | matrimonial home(Eng) | |
Aberdeen City Council v Stewart Milne Group Ltd | [2011] UKSC 56, ;2011] PLSCS 291 (SC) | overage | |
Abernethie v AM and J Kleiman Ltd | (1969) 211 EG 405, [1970] 1 QB 10 | business | |
Abigail v Lapin | [1934] AC 491, 500 (PC) | caveat | |
Abram Steamship Co v Westvill Shipping Co | [1923] AC 773, 781 (HL) | rescission | |
Ackland v Lutley | (1839) 9 Ed & El 879, 894, 112 Eng Rep 1446 | time | |
Acton v Blundell | (1843) 12 M & W 324, 152 Eng Rep 1223 | water rights | |
Adagio Properties Ltd v Ansari | [1998] 35 EG 86, (CA) | notice | |
Adami v Lincoln Grange Management Ltd | [1997] EWCA Civ 3018, [1998] 1 EGLR 58 (CA) | repair | |
Adams and Wade Ltd v Minister of Housing and Local Government | (1965) 18 P & CR 60, 67 | reasonable effort or reasonable endeavour(Eng) | |
Adams v Green | (1978) 247 EG 49, 2 EGLR 46 | business tenancy(Eng) | |
Adams v Lindsell | (1818) 1 B & Ald 681, 106 Eng Rep 250 | acceptance | |
Addiscombe Garden Estates Ltd v Crabbe | [1958] 1 QB 513, [1957] 3 All ER 563 (CA) | business premises | |
Addiscombe Garden Estates Ltd v Crabbe | [1958] 1 QB 513, [1957] 3 All ER 563 (CA) | licence(BrE) or license(AmE) | |
Adelphi Estates v Christie | (1983) 47 P & CR 650 | concurrent lease | |
Adler v Blackman | [1953] 1 QB 146 (CA) | week-to-week tenancy(AmE) or weekly tenancy(BrE) | |
Afovos Shipping Co SA v Pagnan | [1983] 1 WLR 195, [1983] 1 All ER 449, 455 (HL) | breach of contract | |
Afovos Shipping Co SA v Pagnan | [1983] 1 WLR 195, [1983] 1 All ER 449 (HL) | date | |
A-G (ex rel Yorkshire Derwent Trust Ltd) v Brotherton | [1991] 1 AC 425, 436 (HL) | highway | |
A-G of Hong Kong v Humphreys Estate | [1987] 1 AC 114, 127H-128B (CA) | subject to contract | |
A-G of Ontario v Mercer | (1883) 8 App Cas 767, 772 (PC) | escheat | |
A-G of Ontario v Mercer | (1883) 8 App Cas 767, 772 (PC) | tenure | |
A-G of Southern Nigeria v John Holt & Co (Liverpool) Ltd | [1915] AC 599, 617 (PC) | easement | |
A-G of Southern Nigeria v John Holt & Co (Liverpool) Ltd | [1915] AC 599 (PC) | avulsion | |
A-G of Straits Settlement v Wemyss | (1888) 13 App Cas 192 (PC) | riparian rights | |
A-G of the Duchy of Lancaster v GE Overton (Farms) Ltd | [1982] Ch 277, 288 | treasure trove | |
AG Securities v Vaughan, Antoniades v Villiers | [1990] 1 AC 417, [1988] 3 All ER 1058 (HL) | exclusive occupation | |
AG Securities v Vaughan, Antoniades v Villiers | [1990] 1 AC 417, [1988] 3 All ER 1058 (HL) | licence(BrE) or license(AmE) | |
AG Securities v Vaughan, Antoniades v Villiers | [1990] 1 AC 417, [1988] 3 All ER 1058 (HL) | lease | |
A-G v Beynon | [1970] Ch 1 | highway | |
A-G v Biphosphated Guano Co | (1879) 11 Ch D 337 | notice | |
A-G v British Museum Trustees | [1903] 2 Ch 598 | treasure trove | |
A-G v Chambers | (1854) 4 De GM & G 206, 43 Eng Rep 486 | foreshore | |
A-G v Chambers | (1854) 4 De GM & G 206, 217–8, 43 Eng Rep 486 | shore | |
A-G v Colchester Corporation | [1952] Ch 586, 592 | stallage(Eng) | |
A-G v De Keyser's Royal Hotel | [1920] 1 AC 508, 576 (HL) | compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) | |
A-G v De Keyser's Royal Hotel | [1920] 1 AC 508 (HL) | compulsory purchase(Eng) | |
A-G v Earl of Lonsdale | (1868) LR 7 Eq 377, 388 | foreshore | |
A-G v Great Eastern Ry Co | (1880) 5 App Cas 473, 478 | compulsory purchase order (CPO)(Eng) | |
A-G v Hanmer | (1858) 27 LJ Ch 837, 840, 45 Eng Rep 80 | waste land | |
A-G v Jacobs-Smith | [1895] 2 QB 341 | value | |
A-G v Jewish Colonization Association | [1901] 1 KB 123, 143 (CA) | indenture | |
A-G v Moore | [1893] 1 Ch 676, 683 | treasure trove | |
A-G v P. Y. A. Quarries | [1957] 2 QB 169, 191 (CA) | nuisance | |
A-G v Pyle | (1738) 1 Atk 435, 26 Eng Rep 278 | rule against perpetuities (RAP) | |
A-G v Sands | (1669) Hard 488, 491, 145 Eng Rep 56 | trust | |
Ahmed v Kendrick | (1987) 56 P & CR 120 (CA) | equitable charge | |
Ainsdale Investments Ltd v First Secretary of State | [2004] EWHC 1010; [2004] 22 EG 141 | house | |
Ajit (Chintamanie) v Joseph Mootoo Sammy | [1967] 1 AC 255 (PC) | time is of the essence | |
Aker v Collingwood Housing Association | [2007] EWCA Civ 343, [2007] 25 EG 184 (CA) | duty of care | |
Aker v Collingwood Housing Association | [2007] EWCA Civ 343, [2007] 25 EG 184 (CA) | negligence | |
Akici v LR Butlin Ltd | [2005] EWCA Civ 1296, [2006] 1 WLR 201, 211 (CA) | notice | |
Akici v LR Butlin Ltd | [2005] EWCA Civ 1296, [2006] 1 WLR 201, 207 (CA) | occupation | |
Alan (WJ) & Co Ltd v El Nasr Export and Import Co | [1972] WLR 800, 814, [1972] 2 All ER 127, 140 (CA) | waiver | |
Alan Estates Ltd v WG Stores Ltd | [1981] 3 All ER 486 (CA) | escrow | |
Alan Wibberley Building Ltd v Insley | [1999] 1 WLR 894 (HL) | hedge and ditch presumption(Eng) | |
Alan Wibberley Building Ltd v Insley | [1999] 1 WLR 894, 895 (HL) | boundary line | |
Alan Wibberley Building Ltd v Insley | [1999] 1 WLR 894, 896 (HL) | plan | |
Alchemy Estates Ltd v Astor and another | [2008] EWHC 2675, [2008] 3 EGLR 143 | restraint on alienation | |
Alchemy Estates Ltd v Astor and another | [2008] EWHC 2675, [2008] 3 EGLR 143 | subject to contract | |
Alcock v Wraith | (1991) 59 BLR 20 | vicarious liability | |
Aldin v Latimer Clark, Muirhead & Co | [1894] 2 Ch 437 | derogation from grant | |
Aldred's Case | (1610) 9 Co Rep 57b | easement | |
Aldred's Case | (1610) 9 Co Rep 57b, 58a, 77 Eng Rep 816 | right of view or right to view | |
Aldridge v Ferne | (1886) 17 QBD 212 | outgoing | |
Alfred F Beckett v Lyons | [1967] Ch 449, 482B | easement | |
Allen v English | (1862) 3 F & F 50, 176 Eng Rep 22 | adverse possession | |
Ali v Lane | [2006] EWCA Civ 1532, [2007] 02 EG 126 (CA) | literal construction or literal meaning | |
Allen v Greenwood | [1980] Ch 119, 134, 135 (CA) | right of light(BrE) or right to light(AmE) | |
Allen v Matthews | [2007] EWCA Civ 216 (CA) | adverse possession | |
Allen v Veranne Builders Ltd | [1988] NPC 11 | scheme of development | |
Alliance and Leicester plc v Slayford | [2001] 1 All ER (Comm), (2001) 81 P & CR DG10 | recourse | |
Allied Dunbar Assurance plc v Homebase Ltd | [2002] 27 EG 144, [2002] 2 EGLR 23 (CA) | restraint on alienation | |
Allnatt London Properties v Newton | [1981] 2 All ER 290 | surrender-back clause | |
Altham's Case | (1610) 8 Co Rep 150b, 153b, 77 Eng Rep 701 | title | |
Amalgamated Investment & Property Co Ltd v John Walker and Sons Ltd | [1977] 1 WLR164, [1976] 3 All ER 509 (CA) | frustration | |
Amalgamated Property Co. v Texas Bank | [1982] QB 84, 131, [1981] 3 WLR 565, 583 (CA) | estoppel | |
Amec Developments Ltd v Jury's Hotel Management (UK) Ltd | [2001] 07 EG 163, (2001) P & CR 22 | damages | |
Ammonia Soda Company v Chamberlain | [1918] 1 Ch 266, 286, [1916–7] All ER Rep 708, 713 (CA) | fixed capital | |
Amoco Australia Pty Ltd v Rocca Bros. | [1975] AC 561 (PC) | solus agreement(BrE) | |
Amodu Tijani v The Secretary, Southern Nigeria | [1921] 2 AC 399, 407 (PC) | native title | |
Ampurius Nu Homes Ltd v Telford Homes (Creekside) Ltd | [2013] EWCA Civ 577, [2013] WLR (D) 202 (CA) | repudiation | |
Amyer v Pluck | (1971) 223 EG 33 | chilling a sale | |
Anchor Brewhouse Developments v Berkley House (Developments) Ltd | [1987] 2 EGLR 173 | trespass | |
Anderson Antiques (UK) Ltd v Anderson Wharf (Hull) Ltd | [2007] EWHC 2086 | writing | |
Anderson v Bostock | [1976] Ch 312 | appurtenance | |
Anderson v Commercial Union Assurance Co | (1885) 55 LJ QB 146, 149 (CA) | reinstatement | |
Andrews v Ramsay & Co | [1903] 2 KB 635, 638 | commission | |
Andrews v Ramsey & Co | [1903] 2 KB 635, 638 | good faith | |
Andrews v Waite | [1907] 2 Ch 500, 510 | right of light(BrE) or right to light(AmE) | |
Anglia Building Society v Sheffield City Council | (1982) 266 EG 311 (CA) | restraint on alienation | |
Anglia Building Society v Sheffield City Council | (1982) 266 EG 311 (CA) | change of use | |
Angus v Dalton | (1878) 4 QBD 162, 169 (CA) | natural rights | |
Ankerson v Connerly | [1907] 1 Ch 678 | encroachment or incroachment | |
Anno | (temp 1509–46) Bro NC 61, 73 ER 874 | gift | |
Anon. | (1478) YB 17, Edw. IV, 1 | bargain | |
Anon. | (1515) 3 Dyer 345a, 73 Eng Rep 776 | half a year or half year | |
Anstruther-Gough-Calthorpe v McOscar | [1924] 1 KB 716, 734 (CA) | repair | |
Appleby v Meyers | (1867) LR 2 CP 65 1 | lump-sum contract | |
Anstruther-Gough-Calthorpe v McOscar | [1924] 1 KB 716, 734 (CA) | repair | |
Arenas Limited v Waterfield | [2010] All ER 67, [2010] EWHC 115 | goods | |
Aribisala v St James' Homes (Grosvenor Dock) Ltd | [2007] EWHC 1694, 25 EG 183 | deposit | |
Armagas Ltd v Mundogas SA | [1985] 2 All ER 385 | ostensible authority | |
Armchair Passenger Transport Limited v Helical Bar Plc | [2003] EWHC 367 | expert witness | |
Arnold v Britton | [2015] UKSC 36, [2015] EGLR 53 (SC) | implied term or implied condition | |
Artworld Financial Corporation v Safaryan | [2009] EWCA Civ 303 (CA), 23 EG 94 (CA) | surrender | |
Ashbridge Investments Ltd v Minister of Housing and Local Government | [1965] 3 All ER 371, 374 (CA) | ultra vires(Lat) | |
Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold | [1988] 2 All ER 147, [1989] Ch 1 (CA) | rent | |
Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold | [1988] 2 All ER 147, [1989] Ch 1 (CA) | peppercorn rent | |
Ashbury Ry Carriage & Iron Co Ltd v Riche | [1875] LR 7 HL 653 (HL) | ultra vires(Lat) | |
Asher v Whitlock | (1865) LR 1 QB 1 | tacking | |
Ashworth Frazer Ltd v Gloucester City Council | [2002] UKHL 59, [2002] 05 EG 133 (HL) | restraint on alienation | |
Aslan v Murphy (Nos. 1 & 2) | 38 EG 109, [1990] 1 WLR 766, [1989] 3 All ER 130 (CA) | exclusive possession | |
Aslan v Murphy (Nos. 1 & 2) | 38 EG 109, [1990] 1 WLR 766, [1989] 3 All ER 130 (CA) | lodger | |
Associated Cinema Properties v Hampstead Borough Council | [1944] KB 412 (CA) | rateable occupation(Eng) | |
Associated Provincial Picture Houses, Limited v Wednesbury Corporation | [1948] 1 KB 223 (CA) | ultra vires(Lat) | |
Associated Provincial Picture Houses, Limited v Wednesbury Corporation | [1948] 1 KB 223, 228, 233 (CA) | certiorari(Lat) | |
Aston Charities Trust Ltd v Stepney Borough Council | [1952] 2 QB 642, (1952) 3 P & CR 82 (LT) | equivalent reinstatement(Eng) | |
Atcherley v Du Moulin | 2 K & J 186, 69 Eng Rep 746 | entitled | |
Athill v Athill | (1880) 16 Ch D 214 (CA) | collateral | |
Attorney General v Blake | [2001] 1 AC 268, 278G (HL) | damages | |
Attree v Hawe | (1878) 9 Ch D 337 (CA) | interest | |
Attwood v Bovis Homes Ltd | [2001] Ch 379, [2000] 4 All ER 948 | easement of drainage(BrE) | |
Attwood v Bovis Homes Ltd | [2001] Ch 379 | easement | |
Attwood v Lamont | [1920] 3 KB 571 | severance | |
Attwood v Llay Main Collieries | [1926] Ch 444, 458 | water rights | |
Attwood v Small | (1838) 6 Cl & F 232, 7 Eng Rep 684 (HL) | misrepresentation | |
Aubergine Enterprises Ltd v Lakewood International Ltd | [2001] 3 EGLR 71, [2002] EWCA Civ 177, [2002] 1 WLR 2149 (CA) | restraint on alienation | |
Aubergine Enterprises Ltd v Lakewood International Ltd | [2001] 3 EGLR 71, [2002] EWCA Civ 177, [2002] 1 WLR 2149 (CA) | subject to contract | |
Austerberry v Oldham Corporation | (1885) 29 Ch D 750 | restrictive covenant | |
Austin v Southwark LBC | [2010] UKSC 28, [2010] 35 EG 94, 101 (HL) | secure tenancy(Eng) | |
Aviva Insurance Ltd v Hackney Empire Ltd | [2012] EWCA Civ 1716, [2013] 1 WLR 3400 (CA) | guarantee or guaranty | |
Avocet Industrial Estates LLP v Merol Limited | [2011] EWHC 3422 | break clause | |
Avraamides v Colwill | 2006 EWCA Civ 1533 (CA) | privity of contract | |
Axa Equity and Law Home Loans Ltd v Hirani Watson | (1999) EGCS 90 | valuer | |
B |
|||
B.T.E. v Merseyside and Cheshire Rent Assessment Committee | (1991) 24 HLR 514 | fair rent | |
Back v Stacey | (1826) 2 C&P 465 | right of light(BrE) or right to light(AmE) | |
Backer v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1983] JPL 602 | caravan | |
Bacciottini v Gotelee & Goldsmith | [2016] WLR(D) 152, [2016] EWCA Civ 170 (CA) | damages | |
Bacon v Bacon | (1639) Toth 133, 134, 21 Eng Rep 146 | clog | |
Bagettes Ltd v GP Estates Ltd | [1956] Ch 290 (CA) | business tenancy(Eng) | |
Bailey v De Crespigny | (1869) LR 4 QB 180 | frustration | |
Bailey v Stephens | (1862) 12 CBNS 91, 142 ER 1077 | profit à prendre | |
Bain v Fothergill | [1874] LR 7 HL 158 (HL) | damages | |
Bain v Fothergill | [1874] LR 7 HL 158 (HL) | deposit | |
Bainbridge v Chertsey Urban DC | [1915] 84 LJ Ch 626 | estoppel | |
Baird Textile Holdings Ltd v Marks & Spencer plc | [2001] EWCA Civ 274, [2002] 1 All ER (Comm) 737 (CA) | subject to contract | |
Bakewell Management Ltd v Brandwood | [2004] 2 AC 519, [2004] 2 EGLR 15 (HL) | common land | |
Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council v Host Group Ltd | [1988] 1 WLR 348, 56 P & CR 31 | rent review clauseBrE | |
Bakewell Management Ltd v Brandwood | [2004] 2 AC 519, [2004] 2 EGLR 15 (HL) | squatting | |
Baker v Dewey | 1 B & C 704, 709, 107 Eng Rep 259, 260 (1823) | act of God | |
Baldwin's Ltd v Halifax Corp'n | (1916) 85 LJ KB 1769, 1774 | internal | |
Ball v Plummer | (1879) The Times, June 17 (CA) | double rent | |
Ballard (Kent) Ltd v Olliver Ashworth (Holdings) Ltd | [1997] 19 EG 161 | surface water | |
Ballard v Tomlinson | (1885) 29 Ch D 115, 121 | nuisance | |
Bamford v Turnley | (1862) 3 B & S 67, 77, 122 Eng Rep 27 | waiver | |
Banning v Wright | [1972] 1 WLR 972, 979, [1972] 2 All ER 987, 998 (HL) | strict settlement(Eng) | |
Bannister v Bannister | [1948] 2 All ER 133 (CA) | damages | |
Banque Bruxelles SA v Eagle Star | [1997] AC 191, 221 (HL) | insurance | |
Banque Financière de la Cité v Westgate Insurance Co Ltd | [1991] 2 AC 249, [1990] 2 Lloyd's Rep 377, [1990] 2 All ER 947 (HL) | planning gain(Eng) | |
Barber v Secretary of the Environment and Horsham DC | [1991] JPL 559) | power of sale | |
Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose Investments Ltd | [1970] AC 567 (HL) | resulting trust | |
Barclays Bank plc v Kingston | [2006] EWHC 533, [2006] 1 All ER (Comm) 519 | power of sale | |
Barclays Bank plc v Nylon Capital LLP | [2010] BLR 614, [2011] 2 Lloyd's Rep 347, (CA) | expert | |
Barclays Bank plc v O'Brien | [1993] 3 WLR 786, 792, [1993] 4 All ER 417, 423 (HL) | undue influence | |
Barff v Probyn | (1895) 64 LJ QB 557, [1895–9] All ER Rep 1038 | fixture | |
Barker v Barker | (1829) 3 Car & P 557, 172 Eng Rep 544 | right of entry | |
Barker v Barker | (1829) 3 Car & P 557, 172 Eng Rep 544 | landlord's access | |
Barling (David W.) Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1980] JPL 594) | material change in the use(Eng) | |
Barnes v Sheffield City Council | (1995) 27 HLR 719 (CA) | house in multiple occupation (HMO)(Eng) | |
Barnett v Covell | (1903) 68 JP 93, 94 | abut | |
Barnwell v Harris | (1809) 1 Taunt 430, 432, 127 Eng Rep 901 | chain of title | |
Barrett v Lounova (1982) Ltd | [1990] 1 QB 348, 358, [1989] 1 All ER 351, 357 (CA) | repair | |
Barrett v Morgan | [1998] 50 EG 87 | sublessee or sub-lessee | |
Barrett v White | (1855) 24 LJ Ch 724, 726 | money | |
Barry v Hasseldine | [1952] Ch 835, 838 | easement of necessity | |
Barton v Morris | [1985] 2 All ER 1032) | tenancy in common | |
Barvis Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment | (1971) 22 P & CR 710 | building | |
Barwick's Case | (1598) 5 Co Rep 93b, 94b | abeyance | |
Bashir v Commissioner of Lands | [1960] AC 44 (PC) | forfeiture | |
Bass Holdings Ltd v Lewis | [1986] 2 EGLR 40 (CA) | determinable | |
Bass Holdings Ltd v Morton Music Ltd | [1987] EGLR 214, [1988] 1 Ch 493 (CA) | break clause(BrE) | Bass Holdings Ltd v Lewis | [1986] 2 EGLR 40 (CA) | tenancy for life |
Batchelor v Marlow | [2003] 1 WLR 764, [2003] 4 All ER 78 (CA) | easement | |
Bates (Thomas) & Sons v Wyndham's (Lingerie) Ltd | [1981] 1 WLR 505, [1981] 1 All ER 1077 (CA) | rectification | |
Bates v Donaldson | [1896] 2 QB 241 (CA) | restraint on alienation | |
Batten Pooll v Kennedy | [1907] 1 Ch 256 | mine | |
Baxendale v Instow Parish Council | [1982] Ch 14, 20 | movable fee or movable freehold | |
Baxter v Mannion | [2011] 1 WLR 1594, [2011] 2 All ER 574 (CA) | rectification | |
Bayliffe v Butterworth | (1847) 1 Exch 425, 428, 154 Eng Rep 181, 182 | custom | |
Baynton v Morgan | (1888) 22 QBD 74, 82 (CA) | privity of contract | |
Bazalgette v Lowe | (1855) LJ Ch 368 | week | |
Beacon Carpets v Kirby | [1985] QB 755 (CA) | insurance | |
Beacon Life and Fire Assurance Co v Gibb | (1862) 1 Moore (NS) 73, 97, 15 Eng Rep 639 | premises | |
Beanby Estates Limited v Egg Stores (Stamford Hill) Ltd | [2003] 1 WLR 2064 (CA) | service | |
Beaufort (Duke of) v Bates | (1862) 3 De GF & J 381, 388, 45 Eng Rep 926 | trade fixture | |
Beaulane Properties Ltd v Palmer | [2005] 14 EG 129, [2005] 3 WLR 554 | adverse possession | |
Beaulane Properties Ltd v Palmer | [2006] Ch 79 | animus possidendi(Lat) | |
Beavers v Mason | (1978) 37 P&CR 452, 458 (CA) | check(AmE) or cheque(BrE) | |
Beavers v Mason | (1978) 37 P&CR 452, 458 (CA) | legal tender | |
Beavers v Mason | (1978) 37 P & CR 452 (CA) | rent | |
Beck v Scholz | [1953] 1 QB 570 (CA) | residence | |
Beckley v Newland | (1723) 2 P Wms 182, 186, 24 Eng Rep 691 | legacy | |
Beech v Kennerley | [2012] EWCA Civ 158, [2012] 09 EG 150 (CA) | terminus(Lat) | |
Beitov Properties Ltd v Martin | [2012] UKUT 133, [2012] 3 EGLR 21 (LC) | service charge | |
Belfast Corporation v 0. D. Cars Ltd | [1960] 1 All ER 69 | compensation for planning restrictions(Eng) | |
Bell v Alfred Franks and Bartlett Co Ltd | [1980] 1 All ER 362 | consent | |
Bell v General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corpn Ltd | [1998] 1 EGLR 69, 72 | business tenancy(Eng) | |
Bell v Lever Brothers, Limited | [1932] AC 161, 206, 217 (HL) | mistake | |
Bellcourt Estates Ltd v Adesina | [2005] EWCA Civ 208, [2005] 18 EG 150 (CA) | surrender | |
Bello v Idealview | [2009] EWHC 2808 | time is of the essence | |
Belmont Farm v Minister of Housing and Local Government | (1962) 106 Sol J 996 | agriculture | |
Belton v Bass, Ratcliffe & Gretton Ltd | [1922] Ch 449, 466, [1922] 91 LJ Ch 216 | power of sale | |
Belvedere Court Management Ltd v Frogmore Developments Ltd | [1997] QB 858 | company letting(Eng) | |
Bennett v Bennett | [1952] 1 KB 249, 260 (CA) | void contract | |
Bennett v Copeland Borough Council | [2004] EGCS 140, (2004) The Times, May 28 (CA) | residence | |
Bennett v Winterburn | [2016] EWCA 482, [2016] PLSCS 154 (CA) | as of right | |
Bennett v Winterburn | [2016] EWCA 482, [2016] PLSCS 154 (CA) | nec vi, nec clam, nec precario(Lat) | |
Bennett v Wormack | (1828) 3 Car & P 96, 98, 172 Eng Rep 339 | net rent or net rental | |
Bennett, Walden & Co v Wood | [1950] 2 All ER 134, 137 (CA) | offer | |
Bentall, Horsley and Baldry v Vicary | [1931] 1 KB 253 | exclusive agency | |
Bentall, Horsley and Baldry v Vicary | [1931] 1 KB 253 | sole agency | |
Bentley Bros v Metclafe & Co | [1906] 2 KB 548 (CA) | rent | |
Berger v Jenkinson | [1905] 1 Ch 456, 459 | restraint on alienation | |
Berkeley Community Villages Ltd v Pullen | [2007] EWHC 1330 (Ch), [2007] EGLR 101 | good faith | |
Berkley v Poulett | (1976) 241 EG 911 | fixture | |
Bernays v Prosser | [1963] 2 QB 592 (CA) | agricultural tenancy | |
Bernstein of Leigh (Baron) v Skyviews & General Ltd | [1978] QB 479, 485, [1977] 2 All ER 902, 905 | cujus est solum, ejus est usque ad coelum et ad inferos(Lat) | |
Bernstein of Leigh (Baron) v Skyviews & General Ltd | [1978] QB 479, 485, [1977] 2 All ER 902, 905 | land | |
Bernstein of Leigh (Baron) v Skyviews & General Ltd | [1978] QB 479, 487, [1977] 2 All ER 902, 906 | trespass | |
Bernstein of Leigh (Baron) v Skyviews & General Ltd | [1978] QB 479, 488, [1977] 2 All ER 902, 907 | air rights | |
Berridge v Ward | (1861) 10 CB (NS) 400, 415, 416, 142 Eng Rep 507, 513, 514 | ad medium filum or ad medium filum viæ(Lat) | |
Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd | [2012] 1 AC 955, [2011] 3 WLR 1091 (SC) | periodic tenancy | |
Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd | [2012] 1 AC 955, [2011] 3 WLR 1091 (SC) | term | |
Beswick v Beswick | [1968] AC 58, [1967] 2 All ER 1197 (HL) | restrictive covenant | |
Bettison v Langton | [2002] 1 AC 27 (HL) | profit à prendre | |
Bettison v Langton | [2002] 1 AC 27 (HL) | right of common | |
Bettison v Langton | [2002] 1 AC 27, 31 (HL) | levant et couchant(Eng) | |
Bettisworth's Case | (1580) 2 Co Rep 31b, 76 Eng Rep 482 | house | |
BHP Petroleum Great Britain Ltd v Chesterfield Properties Ltd | [2002] Ch 194, 211–2 (CA) | privity of contract | |
Bickel v Duke of Westminster | [1977] QB 517, 524, [1976] 3 All ER 801 (CA) | restraint on alienation | |
Bickmore v Dimmer | [1903] 1 Ch 158 | alteration | |
Birdlip Ltd v Hunter | [2016] EWCA Civ 603 (CA) | scheme of development | |
Biggs v Hoddinott | [1898] 2 Ch 307 | equity of redemption | |
Biggs v Hoddinott | [1898] 2 Ch 307, 314 | clog | |
Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd | [1992] 1 AC 494, 510 (HL) | forfeiture | |
Binions v Evans | [1972] Ch 359) | licence(BrE) or license(AmE) | |
Binions v Evans | [1972] Ch 359, 368 | constructive trust | |
Biondi v Kirklington & Piccadilly Estates Ltd | [1947] 2 All ER 59 | option to renew | |
Bircham & Co Nominees (No 2) Ltd v Worrell Holdings Ltd | (2001) 82 P & CR 34 | writing | |
Bird v MGahey | (1849) 2 Car & K 707, 175 Eng Rep 296 | quantum meruit(Lat) | |
Birmingham Corporation v Allen | (1877) 6 Ch D 284, 289 (CA) | neighbor(AmE) or neighbour(BrE) | |
Birmingham Corporation v West Midland Baptist (Trust) Association (Inc.) | [1970] AC 874, [1969] 3 All ER 172 (HL) | equivalent reinstatement(Eng) | |
Birmingham Corporation v West Midland Baptist (Trust) Association (Inc.) | [1970] AC 874, [1969] 3 All ER 192 (HL) | valuation date | |
Birmingham Midshires Mortgage Services Limited v Sabherwal | (2000) 80 P & CR 256 (CA) | overreachable interest(Eng) | |
Birmingham, Dudley and District Banking Co v Ross | (1888) 38 Ch D 295, 313 (CA) | derogation from grant | |
Bishop of Bath's Case | (1605) Co Rep 34b, 35b, 77 Eng Rep 303, 305–6 | term of years | |
Bishop of Peterborough v Catesby | (1608) Cro Jac 166, 79 Eng Rep 145 | year | |
Blackmore v Butler | [1954] 2 QB 171, 177 | agricultural land | |
Blackpool and Fylde Aero Club Ltd v Blackpool Borough Council | [1990] 1 WLR 1195 (CA) | offer | |
Blades v Higgs | (1865) 11 HL Cas 621 | ratione soli(Lat) | |
Bland v Moseley | (1587) | easement | |
Blankley v Godley | [1952] 1 All ER 436 | air rights | |
Blaydes v Selby | (1891) 7 TLR 567, 568 | tenant for life | |
Blount v Layard | [1891] 2 Ch 681 | right to fish | |
Blue Haven Enterprises Ltd v Tully | [2006] UKPC 17 (PC) | estoppel | |
Bluestorm Ltd v Portvale Holdings Ltd | [2004] 2 EGLR 34, [2004] 22 EG 142 (CA) | set-off or setoff | |
Blundell v Catterall | (1821) 5 B & Ald 268, 275, 106 ER 1190 | littoral rights | |
Blundell v Osdale Ltd | (1958) 171 EG 491 | structural repair | |
Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Co | (1856) 11 Exch 781, 784, 156 Eng Rep 1047 | negligence | |
Bocardo SA v Star Energy UK Onshore Ltd | [2010] UKSC 35, [2010] 31 EG 63 (SC) | damages | |
Bocardo SA v S and M Hotels Ltd | [1980] 1 WLR 17, 22, [1979] 3 All ER 737, 741 | restraint on alienation | |
Bocardo SA v Star Energy UK Onshore Ltd | [2010] UKSC 35, [2010] 31 EG 63 (SC) | trespass | |
Bolton Corp'nv Owen | [1962] 1 QB 471 (CA) | blight notice(Eng) | |
Bolton MBC v Torkington | [2004] Ch 66 (CA) | delivery | |
Bolton Partners v Lambert | (1889) 41 Ch D 295 | ratification | |
Bolton v Mahadeva | [1972] 2 All ER 1322, 1324 (CA) | entire contract | |
Boodle v Campbell | (1844) 7 Man & G 386, 135 Eng Rep 161 | constructive eviction | |
Borg v Khan | (1965) 17 P & CR 144 | boarding house | |
Borman v Griffith | [1930] 1 Ch 493 | agreement for a lease | |
Boroughes' Case, Boroughes v Taylor | (1596) 4 Co Rep 72b, 76 Eng Rep 1043 | rent | |
Boscawen v Bajwa | [1996] 1 WLR 328, 335 (CA) | subrogation | |
Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd; Malett & Sons (Antiques) Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties | [2006] EWCA Civ 594, [2006] 27 EG 156 (CA) | house | |
Bostock v Bryant | [1990] 2 EGLR 101 | rent | |
Boswell v Crucible Steel Co | [1925] 1 KB 119, 121 (CA) | internal | |
Botham v TSB Bank plc | (1996) 73 P & CR D1 (CA) | fixture | |
Bourne v Norwich Crematorium Ltd | [1967] 1 WLR 691, 696, [1967] 2 All ER 576, 578 | noscitur a sociis(Lat) | |
Bow's Emporium Ltd v AR Brett & Co Ltd | (1927) 44 TLR 194, 197, 199 (HL) | procuring cause | |
Bowes v Foster | (1858) 27 LJ Ex 262, 266 | release | |
Bowker v Burdekin | (1843) 11 M & W 147 | escrow | |
Bowles Case | (1615) 11 Co Rep 79b, 77 Eng Rep 1252 | issue | |
Boyers v Duke | [1905] 2 IR 617, 624 | quotation | |
Boyle v Fitzsimons | [1926] IR 378, 383) | flat | |
BP Refinery (Westport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings | [1977] 180 CLR 266, 16 ALR 363, 376 (PC) | implied term or implied condition | |
Bracewell v Appleby | [1975] Ch 408 | easement | |
Bracey v Read | [1963] Ch 88, [1962] 3 All ER 472 | business tenancy(Eng) | |
Bracey v Read | [1963] Ch 88, 94, [1962] 3 All ER 472, 476–7 | premises | |
Bradford & Anor v Keith James & Ors | [2008] EWCA Civ 837 (CA) | boundary line | |
Bradford & Anor v Keith James & Ors | [2008] EWCA Civ 837 (CA) | plan | |
Bradford & Bingley v Rashid | [2006] UKHL 37, [2006] 1 WLR 2066, 2086 (HL) | without prejudice | |
Bradley v Carritt | [1903] AC 253 (HL) | equity-participation loan or equity-participation mortgage | |
Bradshaw v Powley | (1979) 253 EG 693 | apportionment | |
Brakespear (W.H.) & Sons v Barton | [1924] 2 KB 88 | time | |
Bramwell v Bramwell | [1942] 1 All ER 137, 138 (CA) | mesne profits | |
Brazil (Concrete) Ltd v Amersham RDC | (1967) 18 P & CR 396, 399 (CA) | planning unit(Eng) | |
Brazil (Concrete) Ltd v Amersham RDC | (1967) 18 P & CR 396, 399 (CA) | Use Classes Order(Eng) | |
Breams Property Investments Co Ltd v Stroulger | [1948] 2 KB l, 7, [1948] 1 All ER 758, 759 (CA) | covenant | |
Brew Brothers Ltd v Snax (Ross) Ltd | [1970 1 QB 612, [1970] 1 All ER 587, 602 (CA) | repair | |
Brickfield Properties Ltd v Botten | [2103] UKUT 0133 (LC) | service charge | |
Bridge v Campbell Discount Co | [1962] AC 600, 620 (HL) | termination | |
Bright v Walker | (1834) 1 Cr M & R 221, 149 Eng Rep 1057 | prescription | |
Brightlife Ltd., In re | [1987] Ch 200, 205 | floating charge or floating lien | |
Brinkinbon Ltd v Stahag Stahl | [1983] 2 AC 34 (HL) | acceptance | |
British and Foreign Marine Insurance Co v Gaunt | [1921] 2 AC 41 (HL) | all-risks insurance | |
British Anzani (Felixstowe) Ltd v International Marine Management (UK) Ltd | [1980] QB 137, [1979] 2 All ER 1063, 1070 | set-off or setoff | |
British Broadcasting Corporation v Ioannu | [1975] 2 All ER 999, 1005 | fixed-term tenancy(Eng) | |
British Car Auctions v Wright | [1972] 1 WLR 1519 | auction | |
British Gas Corporation v University Superannuation Scheme Ltd | [1986] 1 EGLR 120, [1986] 1 All ER 978 | rent review clause(BrE) | |
British Movietonenews Ltd v London and District Cinemas Ltd | [1952] AC 166, [1952] 1 All ER 208 (HL) | quantum meruit(Lat) | |
British Railways Board v Glass | [1965] Ch 538 | prescription | |
British Railways Board v Glass | [1965] Ch 538, 568 [1964] 3 All ER 418 (CA) | easement | |
British Railways Board v Herrington | [1972] AC 877, 907, [1972] 1 All ER 749, 765 (HL) | negligence | |
British Railways Board v Herrington | [1972] AC 877, 907, [1972] 1 All ER 749, 765 (HL) | trespass | |
British Railways Board v Herrington | [1972] AC 877, 940, [1972] 1 All ER 749, 794 (HL) | negligence | |
British Russian Gazette and Trade Outlook Ltd v Associated Newspapers Ltd | [1933] 2 KB 616, 643–4 (CA) | accord and satisfaction | |
British Shipbuilders v VSEL Consortium plc | [1997] 1 Lloyds Rep 106, 109 | expert | |
British Steel Corp'n v Cleveland Bridge and Engineering Co Ltd | [1984] 1 All ER 504 | quantum meruit(Lat) | |
British Telecommunications plc v Sun Life Assurance Society plc | [1995] 4 All ER 44, [1996] Ch 69 (CA) | repair | |
British Wagon Co v Lea | (1880) 5 QBD 149 | general contractor (GC) | |
British Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Co Ltd v Underground Rys Co of London Ltd | [1912] AC 673, 689 (HL) | damages | |
Brogden v Directors of the Metropolitan RyCo | (1877) 2 App Cas 666, 672 (HL) | acceptance | |
Brooke v Bool | [1928] 2 KB 578, 587–8 | strict liability | |
Brooke v Clarke | (1818) 1 B & Ald 396, 399, 106 Eng Rep 146, 147 | extension | |
Brooks and Burton v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1978] 1 WLR 1294 | material change in the use(Eng) | |
Broughton v Snook | [1938] Ch D 505, [1938] 1 All ER 411 | part performance | |
Brown v Brash and Ambrose | [1948] 2 KB 255 (CA) | residence | |
Brown v Brashand Ambrose | [1948] 2 KB 247(CA) | occupation | |
Brown v Cole | (1845) 14 LJ Ch 167 | prepayment privilege | |
Brown v Gould | [1972] Ch 53, [1971] 2 All ER 1505 | rent | |
Brown v Gould | [1972] Ch 53, [1971] 2 All ER 1505 | right of pre-emption | |
Browne v Ryan | [1901] IR 653 (CA) | equity-participation loan or equity-participation mortgage | |
Browne v Ryan | [1901] IR 653, 676 (CA) | fetter | |
Broxbourne BC v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1979] 2 All ER 17 | certificate of lawfulness(Eng) | |
Brunner v Greenslade | [1971] Ch 993, [1970] 3 All ER 836 | scheme of development | |
Brunner v Greenslade | [1971] Ch 993, 1003, [1970] 3 All ER 836 | scheme of development | |
Bryanston Property Co Ltd v Edwards | [1944] KB 32, 36 | progressive rent | |
Bryant v Lefever | (1879) 4 CPD 172 (CA) | right to air | |
Bryant, Powis, and Bryant, Limited v La Banque du Peuple | [1893] AC 170, 177 (HL) | agent | |
Buchanan v Harrison | (1861) 31 LJ Ch 74 | personal estate | |
Buchmann v May | [1978] 2 All ER 993 | holiday let(Eng) | |
Buckingham County Council v Callingham | [1952] 2 QB 515 (CA) | building | |
Buckinghamshire County Council v Moran | [1990] Ch 623 (CA) | adverse possession | |
Budd v Marshall | (1880) 5 CPD 481 (CA) | tax | |
Bull v Bull | [1955] 1 QB 234 | tenancy in common | |
Bullen v Denning | (1826) 5 B & C 842, 851, 108 Eng Rep 313 | tree | |
Bullen v Denning | (1826) 5 B & C 847, 108 Eng Rep 313 | timber | |
Bullock v Secretary of State for the Environment | (1980) 40 P & CR 246, (1980) 254 EG 1097 | tree preservation order (TPO)(Eng) | |
Burchell v Hornsby | (1808) 1 Camp 360, 170 Eng Rep 985 | waste | |
Burdle v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1972] 1 WLR 207 | planning unit(Eng) | |
Burgess v Rawnsley | [1975] Ch 429, [1975] 3 All ER 142, 147 (CA) | joint tenancy | |
Burgess v Rawnsley | [1975] Ch 429, [1975] 3 All ER 142, 147 (CA) | severance | |
Burman v Mount Cook Land Ltd | [2001] EWCA Civ 1712 (CA) | notice | |
Burnett v Lynch | (1826) 5 B & C 589, 108 Eng Rep 220 | demise | |
Burrows v Brent London Borough Council | [1996] 1 WLR 1448, [1997] 11 EG 150 (HL) | ||
Burrows v Brent London Borough Council | [1996] 1 WLR 1448, [1997] 11 EG 150 (HL) | secure tenancy(Eng) | |
Burston Finance v Speirway | [1974] 1 WLR 1648, [1974] 3 All ER 735 | subrogation | |
Burt v Claude Cousins & Co Ltd | [1971] 2 QB 426, 435 (CA) | stakeholder | |
Burton v Liden | [2016] EWCA Civ 275 (CA) | estoppel | |
Bury v Thompson | [1895] 1 QB 696, 697 (CA) | notice to quit | |
Business Environment Bow Lane Ltd v Deanwater Estates Ltd | [2007] 19 EG 166, 168 | subject to contract | |
Bussey v Barnett | (1842) 9 M & W 312, 152 Eng Rep 132 | receipt | |
Butler and Baker's Case | (1591) 3 Co Rep 25a, 26b, 27a, 77 Eng Rep 285 | gift | |
Butler and Baker's Case | (1591) 3 Co Rep 25a, 76 Eng Rep 684 | escrow | |
Butler Machine Tool Co Ltd v Ex-Cell-O Corp'n (England & Wales) Ltd | [1979] 1 WLR 401, [1979] 1 All ER 965 (CA) | counter offer | |
Butler v Butler | (1884) 28 Ch D 66 | leasehold or leasehold interest | |
Butler v Butler | (1884) 28 Ch D 66 | real estate | |
Bybrook Barn Centre Ltd v Kent County Council | [2001] BLR 55, (2001) The Times, 5 January (CA) | nuisance | |
Byrne & Co v Van Tienhoven & Co | (1880) 5 CPD 344 | revocation | |
C |
|||
C.I.R. v Muller & Co.'s Margarine, Limited | [1901] AC 217, 223–4 (HL) | goodwill | |
CA Webber (Transport) Limited v Railtrack PLC | [2004] 14 EG 142, 1 WLR 320 (CA) | service | |
Caerphilly Concrete Products Ltd v Owen | [1972] 1 WLR372, 376, [1972] 1 All ER 248, 252 (CA) | perpetually renewable lease | |
Cafeteria (Keighley) Ltd v Harrison | (1956) 168 EG 689 | business tenancy(Eng) | |
Calcaria Construction Co (York) Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1974] 27 P & CR 435, (1974) 118 Sol J 421 | warehouse | |
Calthorpe v McOscar | [1924] 1 KB 716, 729 (CA) | tenantable repair | |
Calye's Case | (1584) 8 Co Rep 683, 77 Eng Rep 520 | inn | |
Camberwell and South London Building Society v Holloway | (1879) 13 Ch D 759; | lease | |
Cambridge University (Downing College) v Cambridge City Council and Allsop | (1971) 208 EG 805, 915 | contractor's basis or contractor's method(BrE) | |
Cambridge Water Co v Eastern Leather Plc | [1994] 2 WLR 53 (HL) | strict liability | |
Camden London Borough Council v Gunby | (1999) The Times, July 12 | owner | |
Camfield v Gilbert | (1803) 3 East 516, 102 Eng Rep 694 | devise | |
Campbell v Holyland | (1877) 7 Ch D 166, 172–5 | foreclosure | |
Campden Hill Towers Ltd v Gardner | [1977] QB 823 | external | |
Canonical UK Ltd v TST Milbank LLC | [2012] EWHC 3710, [2013] PLSCS 37 | break clause – rent payment | |
Camrose (Viscount) v Basingstoke Corporation | [1966] 3 All ER 161, 164 | planning assumptions(Eng) | |
Cantrell v Wycombe District Council | (2008) The Times, October 10 (CA) | positive covenant | |
Cardiff Rating Authority v Guest, Keen Baldwin's Iron and Steel Co Ltd | [1949] 1 KB 385, 396 (CA) | structure | |
Cardshops Ltd v Davies | [1971] 1 WLR 591 (CA) | business tenancy(Eng) | |
Cargill v Bower | (1878) 10 Ch D 502 | joint agent or joint broker | |
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co | [1893] 1 QB 256 (CA) | unilateral contract | |
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co | [1893] 1 QB 256, 268 (CA) | general offer | |
Carlisle and Cumberland Banking Company v Bragg | [1911] 1 KB 489 (CA) | non est factum(Lat) | |
Carpets of Worth v Wyre Forest Disrict Council | [1991] 2 PLR 84, (1991) 62 P & CR 334 | planning application(Eng) | |
Carr v Inland Revenue Commissioners | [1944] 2 All ER 163, 166 | profession | |
Carr-Saunders v Dick McNeil Associates Ltd | [1986] 1 WLR 922, 928G-H | daylight factor(Eng) | |
Carter v Boehm | (1766) 3 Burr 1905, 1910, 97 Eng Rep 1162 | good faith | |
Carter v Boehm | (1766) 3 Burr 1905, 1909, 97 Eng Rep 1162 | insurance | |
Carter v Carter | [1896] 1 Ch 62, 67 | disposal | |
Carter v Cole | [2006] EWCA Civ 398 (CA) | easement | |
Carter v Secretary of State for the Environment and Carrick DC | [1995] 1 JPL 311 (CA) | caravan | |
Cassell & Co Ltd v Broome | [1972] AC 1027, 1079, [1972] 1 All ER 801, 831 (HL) | rachmanism(Eng) | |
Cassell & Co Ltd v Broome | [1972] AC 1027, [1972] 1 All ER 801, 825–6 (HL) | damages | |
Castellain v Preston | (1883) 11 QBD 380, 403 (CA) | surety | |
Castellain v Preston | (1883) 11 QBD 380, 387, 388 (CA) | subrogation | |
Catesby's Case | (1607) 6 Co Rep 61b, 62a, 77 Eng Rep 346 | six months | |
Catesby's Case | (1607) 6 Co Rep 61b, 77 Eng Rep 346 | twelve months | |
Caunce v Caunce | [1969] 29 P & CR 877, [1969] 1 WLR 286, [1969] 1 All ER 722 | constructive notice | |
Caunce v Caunce | [1969] 29 P & CR 877, [1969] 1 WLR 286, [1969] 1 All ER 722, 724 | bona fide purchaser (BFP) | |
Cavalier v Pope | [1906] AC 428 (HL) | duty of care | |
Cave v Horsell | [1912] 3 KB 533, 544 (CA) | adjoining | |
Cave v Horsell | [1912] 3 KB 533, 544 (CA) | contiguous | |
Cave v Mills | (1862) 7 Hurl & N 913, 927–8, 158 Eng Rep 740 | estoppel | |
Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi; ParkingEye Limited v Beavis | [2015] 3 WLR 1373, [2015] UKSC 67 (SC) | penalty | |
Caxton Publishing Co v Sutherland Publishing Co | [1939] AC 178, 201–2 (HL) | conventional loan or conventional mortgage(US) | |
Cedar Rapids Manufacturing Power Company v Lacoste | [1914] AC 569 (PC) | special suitability or adaptability(Eng) | |
Celsteel Ltd v Alton House Holdings Ltd (No. 2) | [1987] 1 WLR 291, [1987] 2 All ER 290 | quiet enjoyment | |
Central Estates (Belgravia) Ltd v Woolgar (No. 2) | [1972] 1 WLR 1048, [1972] 3 All ER 610 (CA) | waiver | |
Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd | [1947] 1 KB 130 | estoppel | |
Centrovincial Estate plc v Bulk Storage Ltd | (1983) 268 EG 59, (1983) 46 P & CR 393 | privity of contract | |
Cerex Jewels Ltd v Peachey Property Corporation plc | (1986) 2 EG 971, [1986] 2 EGLR 651 | business tenancy(Eng) | |
CH Bailey v Memorial Enterprises | [1974] 1 WLR 728, 732 | rent | |
Chalmers v Pardoe | [1963] 1 WLR 670, 681–2 (PC) | estoppel | |
Chamberlain & Willows v HBS (Trust) Ltd | (1962) 184 EG 849 (CA) | commission | |
Chamberlain & Willows v Rose | (1924), unreported cited in Bentall Horsley and Baldry v Vicary [1931] 1 KB 261 n. | exclusive right to sell(AmE) | |
Chamberlain v Lee | (1840) 8 LJ Ch 266 | moiety | |
Chambers v Kingham | (1878) 10 Ch D 743 | merger | |
Channel Shipping (Newport) v Newport Borough Council | [1988] 16 EG 87 | exclusive occupation | |
Chapelton v Barry UDC | [1940] 1 KB 532 | exclusion clause(Eng) | |
Chappell & Co Ltd v Nestlé Co Ltd | [1960] AC 87, 114 (HL) | consideration | |
Chappell v Gregory | (1863) 34 Beav 250, 55 Eng Rep 631 | fit for the purpose or fit for the use | |
Charalambous v NG | [2014] EWCA Civ 1604, [2014] WLR(D) 540 (CA) | tenancy deposit scheme(Eng) | |
Charles Richards Ltd v Oppenheimer | [1950] 1 KB 616, [1950] 1 All ER 420 | time is of the essence | |
Charlie Properties Ltd v Risetall Ltd | [2014] EWHC 4057, [2104] PLSCS 336 | injunction | |
Charrington v Simons and Co | [1970] 1 WLR 725, 730 | specific performance | |
Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd | [2009] UKHL 38, [2009] 3 WLR 267, 278, 283 (HL) | literal construction or literal meaning | |
Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd | [2009] UKHL 38, [2009] 3 WLR 267, 278, 283 (HL) | void contract | |
Chartered Trust plc v Davies | [1997] 49 EG 135, [1997] 2 EGLR 83 (CA) | derogation from grant | |
Chasemore v Richards | (1859) 7 HL Cas 349, 11 Eng Rep 140 (HL) | surface water | |
Chasemore v Richards | (1859) 7 HL Cas 349, 11 Eng Rep 140 (HL) | water rights | |
Chasemore v Richards | (1859) 7 HL Cas 351, 379, 11 Eng Rep 140, 153 (HL) | natural rights | |
Chasen Ryder & Co v Hedges | [1993] 08 EG 119 | procuring cause | |
Chassagnou v France | (2000) 28 EHRR 615 at [82]-[85] | compensation for planning restrictions(Eng) | |
Chastey v Ackland | [1897] AC 155 (HL) | right to air | |
Chatsworth Estates Ltd v Fewell | [1931] Ch 224 | restrictive covenant | |
Chaudry v Prabhakar | [1988] 3 All ER 718 | agent | |
Chelsea Yacht & Boat Co Ltd v Pope | [2000] 22 EG 147, [2000] 1 WLR 1941, [2001] 2 All ER 409 (CA) | fixture | |
Chelsea Yacht & Boat Co Ltd v Pope | [2000] 22 EG 147, [2000] 1 WLR 1941, [2001] 2 All ER 409 (CA) | mobile home | |
Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Norgan | [1996] 1 All ER 449, 461, 462, [1996] 1 WLR 343, 357 (CA) | possession order(Eng) | |
Chelsfield MH Investments v British Gas plc | [1995] NPC 169 | use clause or user clause | |
Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Norgan | [1996] 1 All ER 449, 461, 462, [1996] 1 WLR 343, 357 (CA) | mortgagee | |
Cheryl Investments Ltd v Saldanha, Royal Life Saving Society v Page | [1979] 37 P & CR 349, [1979] 1 All ER 5 (CA) | business premises | |
Cheryl Investments Ltd v Saldanha, Royal Life Saving Society v Page | [1979] 37 P & CR 349, [1979] 1 All ER 5 (CA) | business tenancy(Eng) | |
Cheshire County Council v Woodward | [1962] 2 QB 133–4 | development | |
Chester v Buckingham Travel | [1981] 1 WLR 96, 101 | usual covenant | |
Chhokar v Chhokar | [1984] FLR 313, 317, [1984] Fam Law 269 (CA) | occupation | |
Chilton v London Corp'n | (1878) 7 Ch D 562 | common of pannage(Eng) | |
China Pacific S.A. v Food Corporation of India, The Winston | [1981] 3 All ER 688 | agency of necessity | |
Cholmondeley (Marquis) v Clinton (Lord) | (1817) 2 Mer 171, 359, 35 ER 905, 976 | possession order(Eng) | |
Chrisdell Ltd v Johnson | [1987] 2 EGLR 123, (1987) P & CR 257 (CA) | waiver | |
Christie Owen & Davies Ltd v Rapacioli | [1974] QB 781, [1974] 2 All ER 311 (CA) | exclusive agency | |
Christie Owen & Davies Ltd v Rapacioli | [1974] QB 781, [1974] 2 All ER 311 (CA) | ready, able and willing or ready, willing and able | |
Christie Owen & Davies plc v Ryelance | [2005] 18 EG 148 | purchaser | |
Christie Owen & Davies plc v Ryelance | [2005] 18 EG 148 | sole selling right(BrE) | |
Christie v Ovington | (1875) 1 Ch D 279 | bare trust(Eng) | |
Christopher Moran Holdings Ltd v Bairstow | [1999] 1 EGLR 1, [2000] AC 172 (HL) | disclaimer | |
Church of England & Wales Building Society v Piskor | [1954] Ch 553, [1954] 2 All ER 85 (CA) | tenancy by estoppel | |
Church v Brown | (1808)15 Ves 258, 33 Eng Rep 752, [1803–13] All ER Rep 440 (LC Ct) | unusual covenant(Eng) | |
Churchill v Evans | (1809) 1 Taunt 529, 127 Eng Rep 939 | fence | |
Churchward & Blight v Ford | (1857) 2 Hurl & N 446, 450, 157 Eng Rep 184, 186 | landlord | |
Churchward v Ford | [1857] 2 Hurl & N 446, 157 Eng Rep 184 | holding over | |
Cinderella Rockerfellas v Rudd | [2003] 1 WLR 2423 (CA) | hereditament | |
City and Metropolitan Properties Ltd v Greycroft | [1987] 1 WLR 1085 | privity of contract | |
City of Bradford District Council v Yorkshire Water Services Ltd | [2001] 10 EG 159 | sewer | |
City of London v Fell | [1994] 1 AC 458 (HL) | privity of contract | |
City of London v Tammy Samede and Others | [2012] 2 All ER 1039, [2012] EWCA Civ 160 (CA) | possession order(Eng) | |
City of London Building Society v Flegg | [1988] AC 54, [1987] 3 All ER 435 (HL) | overreachable interest(Eng) | |
City of London Building Society v Flegg | [1988] AC 54, [1987] 3 All ER 435 (HL) | tenancy in common | |
City of London Land Tax Commissioners v Central London Railway Co | [1913] AC 364, 371 (HL) | ad medium filum or ad medium filum viæ(Lat) | |
City of London Real Property Co Ltd v War Damage Commission | [1957] 1 All ER 526 | make good | |
Cityland and Property (Holdings), Ltd v Dabrah | [1968] Ch 166, [1967] 2 All ER 639 | charge by way of a legal mortgage(Eng) | |
Cityland and Property (Holdings), Ltd v Dabrah | [1968] Ch 166, [1967] 2 All ER 639 | equity of redemption | |
Clarence House Ltd v National Westminster Bank plc | [2010] 08 EG 106, 1 WLR 1216 (CA) | virtual assignment | |
Clark v Smith (16 July 1920, unreported) quoted in Hill v Rochard | [1983] WLR 478, [1983] 2 All ER 21 (CA) | suitable alternative accommodation(Eng) | |
Clarke v Dickson | (1858) 27 LJ QB 223, 225 | rescission | |
Clarke v Grant | [1950] 1 KB 104, [1949] 1 All ER 768 (CA) | waiver | |
Clarke v Ramuz | [1891] 2 QB 456, 462 (CA) | contract for sale | |
Clarke Investments Ltd v Pacific Technologies | [2013] EWCA Civ 750 (CA) | notice to complete (NTC)(Eng) | |
Clayton v Blakey | (1798) 8 Term Rep 3, 101 Eng Rep 1234 | tenancy at will | |
Clifton Securities v Huntley | [1948] 2 All ER 283) | mesne profits | |
Clift v Welsh Office | [1998] EWCA Civ 1273, [1999] 1 WLR 796, 801 (CA) | compensation for injurious affection(Eng) | |
Clothier v Snell | (1966) 198 EG 27 | bungalow | |
Clowes Developments (UK) Ltd v Walters | [2006] 1 P & CR 1 | adverse possession | |
Clun's Case | (1613) 10 Co Rep 127a, 77 Eng Rep 1117 | constructive eviction | |
Clun's Case | (1613) 10 Co Rep 127a, 128a, 77 Eng Rep 1117 | apportionment | |
Clun's Case | (1613) 10 Co Rep 127a, 128a, 77 Eng Rep 1117 | rent in advance or rent in arrears | |
Coatsworth v Johnson | (1886) 55 LJ QB 220 | agreement for a lease | |
Cobb v Stokes | (1807) 8 East 358, 103 Eng Rep 380 | tenancy for a fixed term | |
Cobbe v Yeoman's Row Management Limited | [2008] UKHL 55, [2008] 36 EG 142 (HL) | subject to contract | |
Cochrane v Moore | (1890) 25 QBD 57, 67 (CA) | gift | |
Cocking v Eacott | [2016] EWCA Civ 140, [2016] PLSCS 78 (CA) | nuisance | |
Cole v Harris | [1945] 1 KB 474, 479 | dwelling house or dwelling-house | |
Cole v Sury | (1627) Latch 264, 82 Eng Rep 378 | rent in advance or rent in arrears | |
Collen v Wright | (1857) 8 El & Bl 647, 120 Eng Rep 241 | breach of warranty of authority | |
Colles v Evanson | (1865) 19 CB (NS) 372, 19 Eng Rep 831 | abandonment | |
Collett v Curling | (1847) 10 QB 785, 116 Eng Rep 298 | rent in advance or rent in arrears | |
Collings v Lee and another | (2001) 82 P & CR 3, [2001] 2 All ER 332 (CA) | equitable interest | |
Collins v Collins | (1858) 26 Beav 306, 312, 53 Eng Rep 916, 918 | arbitration | |
Colls v Home and Colonial Stores Ltd | [1904] AC 179, 204 (HL) | daylight factor(Eng) | |
Colls v Home and Colonial Stores Ltd | [1904] AC 179, 204 (HL) | right of light(BrE) or right to light(AmE) | |
Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd v Melbourne Harbour Trust Commissioners | [1927] AC 343, 359 (PC) | compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) | |
Combe v Combe | [1951] 2 KB 215, 220, [1951] 1 All ER 767, 770 (CA) | estoppel | |
Commercial and Residential Property Development Co Ltd v Secretary of State | (1982) 80 LGR 443 | hostel | |
Commisioners of Customs & Excise v John Lewis Properties | [2002] 1 WLR 35 | virtual assignment | |
Commission for the New Towns v Cooper (Great Britain) Ltd | [1995] 2 EGLR 113, [1995] 2 All ER 929, 950–1 (CA) | exchange of contract(Eng) | |
Commissioners of Crown Lands v Page | [1960] 2 QB 274, [1960] 2 All ER 726 (CA) | constructive eviction | |
Commissioners of Crown Lands v Page | [1960] 2 QB 274, [1960] 2 All ER 726 (CA) | partial eviction | |
Commissioners of Crown Lands v Page | [1960] 2 QB 274, 280–2, [1960] 2 All ER 726, 728–9 (CA) | eviction | |
Compton Group Ltd v Estates Gazette | (1977) 244 EG 799, 801, [1977] 1 EGLR 73, 74 (CA) | rent review clause(BrE) | |
Connaught Restaurants v Indoor Leisure Ltd | [1993] 46 EG 184, [1994] 1 WLR 501 (CA) | set-off or setoff | |
Conquest v Ebbetts | [1896] AC 490 (HL) | damages | |
Constable's Case | (1601) 5 Co Rep 106a, 77 Eng Rep 218 | flotsam or flotsan | |
Constable's Case | (1601) 5 Co Rep 106a, 77 Eng Rep 218 | jetsam or jetsom | |
Cook v Bath Corp'n | (1868) LR 6 Eq 177, 18 LT 123 | abandonment | |
Cook v JD Wetherspoon | [2006] 2 P & CR 18, [2006] EWCA Civ 330 (CA) | plan | |
Cook v Shoesmith | [1951] 1 KB 752 (CA) | sublease or sub-lease | |
Cooke v Cholmondeley | (1858) 4 Drew 326, 328, 62 Eng Rep 126 | good repair | |
Cooper v Critchley | [1955] Ch 431, [1955] 1 All ER 520 (CA) | joint tenancy | |
Cooper v Critchley | [1955] Ch 431, [1955] 1 All ER 520 (CA) | land | |
Cooper v Critchley | [1955] Ch 431, [1955] 1 All ER 520 (CA) | interest | |
Cooper v Straker | (1888) 40 Ch D 27 | enjoyment | |
Co-operative Group Food Ltd v A&A Shah Properties Ltd | [2019] EWHC 941 (Ch), [2019] PLSCS 72 | authorised guarantee agreement (AGA)(Eng) | |
Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd v Argyll Stores (Holdings) Ltd | [1997] 2 WLR 898, [1997] 3 All ER 297 (HL) | continuous operation clause | |
Copeland v Greenhalf | [1952] 1 All ER 809 | easement | |
Corisand Investments Ltd v Druce and Co | (1978) 248 EG 315, 322 | mortgage value | |
Cornish v Abingdon | (1859) 4 Hurl & N 549, 157 Eng Rep 956 | mistake | |
Cornish v Searell | (1828) 8 B & C 471, 476, 108 Eng Rep 1118, 1119 | attornment | |
Corporation of City of London v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1971] 23 P & CR 169 | Use Classes Order(Eng) | |
Corpus Christi College, Oxford v Gloucestershire County Council | [1983] QB 360, 365, [1982] 3 All ER 995, 999 (CA) | common land | |
Corpus Christi College, Oxford v Gloucestershire County Council | [1983] QB 360, 365, [1982] 3 All ER 995, 998–9 (CA) | manor | |
Corson v Rhuddlan Borough Council | (1989) 59 P & CR 185 (CA) | rent | |
Cory (William) & Sons, Ltdv City of London Corp'n | (1951) 2 All ER 85 | breach of contract | |
Cosser v Collinge | (1832) 3 My & My 283, 40 Eng Rep 108 | insurance | |
Cottage Holiday Associates Ltd v Customs and Excise Comrs | [1983] QB 735 | discontinuous lease | |
Cottee v Richardson | (1851) 7 Exch 143, 149, 155 Eng Rep 892 | assignment | |
Cottrell v Watkins | (1839) 1 Beav 361, 365–6, 48 Eng Rep 980 | possessory title(Eng) | |
Cottrill v Steyning and Littlehampton Building Society | [1966] 2 All ER 265 | damages | |
Coulter's Case | (1598) 5 Co Rep 30a, 77 Eng Rep 98 | compensation for improvements | |
Countess of Shrewsbury's Case | (1600) 5 Co Rep 13b, 77 Eng Rep 68 | waste | |
Covas v Bingham | (1853) 23 LJ QB 26, 29 | as is or as it stands | |
Coventry v Lawrence | [2014] UKSC 13, [2014] 1 EGLR 147 (SC) | easement | |
Coventry v Lawrence | [2014] UKSC 13, [2014] AC 822, 857, 878, [2014] 2 All ER 622, 655, 677, sub nom Lawrence v Fen Tigers Ltd [2014] 2 WLR 433 (SC) | nuisance | |
Cox v Glue | (1848) 5 CB 533, 136 ER 987 | close | |
Crabb v Arun District Council | [1976] Ch 179, [1975] 2 All ER 865 | equitable easement(Eng) | |
Crabb v Arun District Council | [1976] Ch 179, [1975] 2 All ER 865 | estoppel | |
Crago v Julian | [1992] 1 WLR 372, [1992] 1 All ER 744 (CA) | legal lease(Eng) | |
Crago v Julian | [1992] 1 WLR 372 | equitable assignment | |
Crancour v Da Silvaesa | [1986] 1 EGLR 80, 85 | exclusive possession | |
Crancour v Da Silvaesa | [1986] 1 EGLR 80, 85 | lodger | |
Crane v Morris | [1965] 3 All ER 77 | tenancy at will | |
Craneheath Securities v York Montague Ltd | [1996] EGLR 130, 132 [1996] 07 EG 141 (CA) | professional negligence | |
Craven (Builders) Ltd v Secretatry of State | [2000] 1 EGLR 128 | repairs notice(Eng) | |
Crawford v Newton | (1886) 36 WR 54) | tenantable repair | |
Crawley v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1990] JPL 742) | shop | |
Credit Suisse v Beegas Nominees Ltd | [1994] 4 All ER 803 | repair | |
Creska Ltd v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC | [1998] 37 EG 165 (CA) | repair | |
Cresswell v Potter | [1978] 1 WLR 255 | fraudulent conveyance | |
Crest Nicholson Residential (South) Ltd v McAllister | [2004] 2 All ER 991n at [31]-[34], [2004] 1 WLR 2409 (CA) | restrictive covenant | |
Cresta Holdings Ltd v Karlin | [1958] 1 WLR 1055, [1959] 3 All ER 656, 657 (CA) | notice | |
Crewe Services and Investment Corporation v Silk | [1998] 2 EGLR 1 (CA) | schedule of dilapidations(BrE) | |
Cricket Ltd v Shaftesbury | [1999] 28 EG 127 | business tenancy(Eng) | |
Cricklewood Property and Investment Trust Ltd v Leighton's Investment Trust Ltd | [1945] 1 All ER 252 | frustration | |
Crofts v Haldane | (1867) LR 2 QB 194 | make good | |
Cromwell Development Ltd v Godfrey | [1998] EG 72, 75 (CA) | constructive re-entry | |
Croshaw v Pritchard | (1899) 16 TLR 45 | estimate | |
Crowborough Parish Council v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1981] JPL 281 | allotment | |
Crown Estate Commissioners v Signet Group plc | [1996] 2 EGLR 200 | change of use | |
Crown Estate Commissioners v Signet Group plc | [1996] 2 EGLR 200 | restraint on alienation | |
Cruttwell v Lye | (1810) 17 Ves Jun 335, 339, 34 Eng Rep 129, 131 | goodwill | |
Cryer v Scott Brothers (Sunbury) Ltd | (1988) 55 P & CR 183, 191 (CA) | building | |
Cubitt v Porter | (1828) 8 B & C 257, 8 Eng Rep 1039 | party wall | |
Cuckmere Brick Co Ltd v Mutual Finance Ltd | [1971] Ch 949, 965 (CA) | power of sale | |
Cuckmere Brick Co Ltd v Mutual Finance Ltd | [1971] Ch 949, 968, 969 (CA) | power of sale | |
Cuddon v Tite | (1858) 1 Giff 395, 398 | constructive trust | |
Cull v Backhouse | (1793) 6 Taunt 149, 128 Eng Rep 990 | subagent or sub-agent | |
Currie v Misa | (1875) LR 10 Ex 153, 162, aff'd (1876) 1 App Cas 554 (HL) | valuable consideration | |
Currie v Misa | (1875) LR 10 Ex 153, 162, aff'd (1876) 1 App Cas 554 (HL) | consideration | |
Curtis v Chemical Cleaning and Dyeing Co Ltd | [1951] 1 KB 805, [1951] 1 All ER 631 (CA) | misrepresentation | |
Curtis v London Rent Assessment Committee | [1999] QB 92 (CA) | fair rent | |
Cutter v Powell | (1795) 6 Term Rep 320, 101 Eng Rep 573 | lump-sum contract | |
Cutter v Powell | (1795) 6 TR 320, 101 ER 573 | entire contract | |
D |
|||
D & C Builders Ltdv Rees | [1966] 2 QB 617, [1965] 3 All ER 837 (CA) | estoppel | |
D & F Estates Ltd v The Church Commissioners for England & Wales | [1989] AC 177 (HL) | vicarious liability | |
Dagger v Shepherd | [1946] KB 223 (CA) | time | |
Dakin (H.) & Co Ltd v Lee | [1916] 1 KB 566 (CA) | entire contract | |
Dakin (H.) & Co Ltd v Lee | [1916] 1 KB 566 (CA) | part performance | |
Dakin (H.) & Co Ltd v Lee | [1916] 1 KB 566 (CA) | performance | |
Dallman v King | (1837) 4 Bing NC 105, 109, 132 Eng Rep 729, 731 | satisfactory completion | |
D'Almaine v Moseley | (1853) 1 Drew 629, 632, 61 Eng Rep 592 | estate | |
Dalton v Angus | (1881) 6 App Cas 740 (HL) | right of support or right to support | |
Dalton v Angus | (1881) 6 App Cas 740, 774 (HL) | nec vi, nec clam, nec precario(Lat) | |
Dalton v Angus | (1881) 6 App Cas 740, 821 (HL) | natural rights | |
Dalton v Angus | (1881) 6 App Cas 740, 821 (HL) | servitude | |
Dalton v Angus | (1881) 6 App Cas 740 (HL) | lateral support | |
Dalton v Angus | (1881) 6 App Cas 740, 773 (HL) | lost modern grant | |
Dalton v Angus | (1881) 6 App Cas 740, 773 (HL) | prescription | |
Dare v Heathcote | (1856) 25 LJ Ex 256 | prescription | |
Dashwood v Magniac | [1891] 3 Ch 306, 336 (CA) | good repair | |
Dashwood v Magniac | [1891] 3 Ch 357 | waste | |
Davenport v Hammersmith & Fulham London Borough Council | [1999] 2 PLR 96 | planning condition(Eng) | |
Davey v Durrant | (1857) 26 LJ Ch 830 | undervalue | |
David Blackstone Ltd v Burnetts (West End) Ltd | [1973] 1 WLR 1487, [1973] 3 All ER 610 | waiver | |
Davies v Collins | [1945] 114 LJ KB 199, 1 All ER 248 (CA) | subcontractor | |
Davies v Davies | (1888) 38 Ch D 499 | waste | |
Davies v Directloans | [1986] 1 WLR 823, 831) | usury | |
Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham UDC | [1956] AC 696 (HL) | quantum meruit(Lat) | |
Davis Contractors v Fareham UDC | [1956] 3 WLR 62, 63 | frustration | |
Davis v Gyde | (1835) 2 Ad & E 623, 111 Eng Rep 240 | payment | |
Davis v Gyde | (1835) 2 Ad & E 623, 111 Eng Rep 240 | cash | |
Davis v Jones | (1856) 17 CB 625, 139 Eng Rep 1222 | date | |
Dawkins (V.O.) v Royal Lemington Spa Corporation and Warwickshire County Council | (1961) 178 EG 461 | contractor's basis or contractor's method(BrE) | |
Dayani v Bromley London Borough Council | [1999] 3 EGLR 144 | waste | |
De Busche v Alt | (1878) 8 Ch D 286, 310 (CA) | subagent or sub-agent | |
De Medina v Norman | (1842) 11 LJ Ex 320, 322 | ready, able and willing or ready, willing and able | |
de Mulder v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1974] QB 792 | material change in the use(Eng) | |
De Nicholls v Saunders | (1870) LR 5 CP 89 | rent in advance or rent in arrears | |
Deacon v South-Eastern Railway Co. | (1889) 61 LT 377 | easement of necessity | |
Deacon v South-Eastern Railway Co. | (1889) 61 LT 377 | easement | |
Dean v Upton | (1990) The Times, 10 May (CA) | time is of the essence | |
Deansgate (Residential) Ltd v No 1 Deansgate RTM Company Ltd | [2013] UKUT 0580 (LC) | right to manage (RTM)(Eng) | |
Dear v Reeves | [2002] Ch 1 (CA) | right of pre-emption | |
Dear v Reeves | [2002] Ch 1, 10 (CA) | property | |
Dearle v Hall | (1828) 3 Russ 1, 38 ER 475 | equitable mortgage | |
Dearle v Hall | (1823) 3 Russ 1 | priority of a mortgage | |
Debbell v Dean and Chapter of Rochester Cathedral | [2016] EWCA Civ 1094 (CA) | duty of care | |
Delaware Mansions Ltd v Westminster City Council | [2001] UKHL 55, [2001] 44 EG 150 (HL) | tree | |
Dellafiora v Lester | [1962] 1 WLR 1208, [1962] 3 All ER 393 (CA) | ready, able and willing or ready, willing and able | |
Demetriou v Poolaction Ltd | [1991] 1 EGLR 100 (CA) | repair | |
Dendy v Evans | [1910] 1 KB 263 (CA) | relief | |
Dennard v Pricewaterhouse Coopers | [2010] EWHC 812 | professional negligence | |
Dennis Reed Ltd v Goody | [1950] 2 KB 277, 287, 288 (CA) | ready, able and willing or ready, willing and able | |
Department of the Environment v Allied Freehold Property Trust | [1992] 45 EG 156 | interim rent(Eng) | |
Department of the Environment v Royal Insurance | (1987) 54 P & CR 26 | occupation | |
Derby & Co Ltd v I.T.C. Pension Trust Ltd | [1977] 2 All ER 890 | subject to contract | |
Derry v Peek | (1889) 14 App Cas 337, 374 (HL) | fraud | |
Dewar v Dewar | [1975] 2 All ER 728,[1975] 1 WLR 1532 | gift | |
D'Eyncourt v Gregory | (1866) LR 3 Eq 396 | fixture | |
Di Luca v Juraise (Springs) Ltd | [1998] 2 EGLR 125 (CA) | time is of the essence | |
Dibble v Bowater | (1853) 2 E & B 564 | rent | |
Dimmock v Hallett | (1866) 2 Ch App 21 | misrepresentation | |
Director of Buildings and Lands v Shun Fung Ironworks Ltd | [1995] 2 AC 111, 125 (PC) | compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) | |
Dodd v Churton | [1897] 1 QB 562 | time is of the essence | |
Dodds v Acklom | (1843) 6 Man & G 672, 134 Eng Rep 1063 | surrender | |
Dodds v Walker | [1981] 1 WLR 1027, [1981] 2 All ER 609, 611 (HL) | month | |
Doe d Ambler v Woodbridge | (1829) 9 B & C 376, 109 Eng Rep 140 | waiver | |
Doe d Baker v Coombes | (1850) 9 CB 718, 137 Eng Rep 1073 | possession | |
Doe d Belasyse v Lucan | (1808) 9 East 448, 103 Eng Rep 644 | farm | |
Doe d Cheny v Batten | (1775) 1 Cowp 243, 98 Eng Rep 1066, [1775–1802] All ER Rep 594 | waiver | |
Doe d Clements v Collins | (1788) 2 Term Rep 498, 100 Eng Rep 268 | messuage | |
Doe d Clements v Collins | (1788) 2 Term Rep 498, 502, 100 Eng Rep 268 | house | |
Doe d Dymoke v Withers | (1831) 2 B & Ad 896, 902, 109 Eng Rep 1375 | rebuild | |
Doe d Hemming v Willetts | (1849) 7 CB 709, 715, 137 Eng Rep 280, 283 | premises | |
Doe d Holland v Worsley | (1807) 1 Camp 20, 170 Eng Rep 862 | assignment | |
Doe d Patrick v Beaufort (Duke of) | [1851] 6 Exch 498, 503, 155 Eng Rep 640 | holding over | |
Doe d Robertson v Gardiner | (1952) 12 CB 319, 138 Eng Rep 927 | perpetual lease | |
Doe dShore v Porter | (1789) 3 Term Rep 13, 100 Eng Rep 429 | tenancy from year to year | |
Doe dWilson v Phillips | (1824) 2 Bing 13, 130 Eng Rep 208 | forfeiture | |
Dogan v Semali Investments Ltd | [2005] EWCA Civ 1036, [2005] 3 EGLR 51 (CA) | business tenancy(Eng) | |
Doherty v Allman | (1878) 3 App Cas 709, 733–5 (HL) | waste | |
Domb v Isoz | [1980] Ch 557 | exchange of contract(Eng) | |
Doncaster BC v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1996] 2 PLR 39, 42–4 | sewer | |
Doran v Carroll | (1860) 11 Ir Ch Rep 379 | injunction | |
Dowling Kerr Ltd v Scott | [1996] EGCS 177 | sole selling right(BrE) | |
Downsview Nominees Ltd v First City Corp Ltd | [1993] AC 295 | power of sale | |
Dowty Boulton Paul Ltd v Wolverhampton Corpn | (No 2) [1976] Ch 13 | easement | |
Drebbond Ltd v HorshamDC | (1978) 246 EG 1013 | time is of the essence | |
Dresden Estates Ltd v Collinson | (1988) 55 P & CR 47 | exclusive possession | |
Drewery v Ware-Lane | [1960] 3 All ER 529, 532 (CA) | prospective purchaser | |
Drysdale v Hedges | [2012] EWHC B20, (2012) 162 NLJ 1056 | duty of care | |
Drysdale v Hedges | [2012] EWHC B20, (2012) 162 NLJ 1056 | negligence | |
Dubai Aluminium Co Ltd v Salaam | [2002] 3 WLR 1913 (HL) | vicarious liability | |
Dudley (Lord) v Dudley (Lady) | (1705) Prec Ch 241, 244, 24 Eng Rep 118, 119 | equity | |
Dudley and District Benefit Building Society v Emerson | [1949] Ch 707 | landlord | |
Duke of Norfolk's Case, Howard v Duke of Norfolk | (1681) 3 Ch Cas 1, 22 Eng Rep 931) | rule against perpetuities (RAP) | |
Duke of Westminster v Guild | [l985] 1 QB 689 | repair | |
Dumpor's Case | (1603) 4 Co Rep 119b, 76 Eng Rep 1110 | partial release | |
Dungannon (Lord) v Smith | (1846) 12 Cl & F 546, 563, 8 Eng Rep 1523 (HL) | rule against perpetuities (RAP) | |
Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage and Motor Co Ltd | [1915] AC 79, 86 (HL) | penalty | |
Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v Selfridge Co Ltd | [1915] AC 847, 855 (HL) | consideration | |
Dunton Properties Ltd v Coles, Knapp & Kennedy Ltd | (1959) 174 EG 723 | commission | |
Durrell v Evans | (1862) 1 Hurl & C 174, 191, 158Eng Rep 848 | signature | |
Dyer v Dorset CC | [1989] 1 QB 346, 351 (CA) | curtesy | |
Dyer v Dyer | (1788) 2 Cox 92, 30 Eng Rep 42 | implied trust | |
Dyer v Dyer | (1788) 2 Cox 92, 30 Eng Rep 42 | resulting trust | |
Dyer v Dyer | (1788) 2 Cox 92, 30 Eng Rep 42 | trust | |
Dyment v Boyden | [2005] 1 WLR 792, [2005] 06 EG 142 | relation back | |
E |
|||
E. Johnson Co (Barbados) Ltd v NSR Ltd | [1997] AC 400, 409–411, [1996] 3 WLR 583, 590–1 (PC) | specific performance | |
E.P. Nelson & Co v Rolfe | [1950] 1 KB 139 | exclusive agency | |
E.R. Ives Investments Ltd v High | [1967] 2 QB 379 (CA) | equitable easement(Eng) | |
E.R. Ives Investments Ltd v High | [1967] 2 QB 379 (CA) | estoppel | |
E.R. Ives Investments Ltd v High | [1967] 2 QB 379 (CA) | licence by estoppel(Eng) | |
E.W.P. Ltd v Moore | [1992] 1 All ER 880 (CA) | agricultural tenancy | |
E.W.P. Ltd v Moore | [1992] 1 All ER 880 (CA) | term of years | |
Eagle v Charing Cross Ry Co | (1867) LR 2 CP 638 | set-off or setoff | |
Eagling v Gardner | [1970] 2 All ER 838 | scheme of development | |
Earl of Cadogan v Sportelli | [2007] 2007 EWCA Civ 1042, [2007] RVR 314 (CA) | discount rate | |
Earl of Cadogan v Sportelli | [2007] 2007 EWCA Civ 1042, [2007] RVR 314 (CA) | marriage value (MV)(Eng) | |
Earl of Dunraven v Llewellyn | (1850) 15 QB 791 | right of common | |
Earl of Normanton v Giles | [1980] 1 WLR 28, [1980] 1 All ER 106 (HL) | agriculture | |
East Lindsey District Council v Thompson | (2001) 82 P & CR 33 | owner | |
Eastern Telegraph Co. Ltd v Dent | [1899] 1 QB 835 | restraint on alienation | |
Easton v Alce | (1861) 7 Hurl & N 452, 158 Eng Rep 549 | per annum (p.a.)(Lat) | |
Eastwood v Ashton | [1915] AC 900 (HL) | plan | |
Eastwood v Ashton | [1915] AC 900, 915–6 (HL) | parcels clause | |
Eastwood v Kenyon | (1840) 11 Ad & E 438, 113 Eng Rep 482 | consideration | |
Eaton Mansions (Westminster) Ltd v Stinger Compania de Inversion SA | [2011] EWCA Civ 607 (CA) | improvement | |
Eaton Mansions (Westminster) Ltd v Stinger Compania de Inversion SA | [2013] EWCA Civ 1308, [2013] PLSCS 257 (CA) | trespass | |
Eaton Square Properties Ltd v Shaw | [2011] EWHC 2115, 42 EG 122 | duty of care | |
Ebbetts v Conquest | [1895] 2 Ch 377, 382 | schedule of dilapidations(BrE) | |
Eccles v Bryant and Pollock | [1947] 2 All ER 865, [1948] Ch 93 (CA) | subject to contract | |
Edge Hill Light Ry Co v Secretary of State for War | (1956) 6 P & CR 211 (LT) | equivalent reinstatement(Eng) | |
Edgell v Day | (1865) LR 1 CP 80 | stakeholder | |
Edginton v Clark | [1964] 1 QB 367 (CA) | adverse possession | |
Edinburgh Street Tramways Co v Lord Provost, etc. of Edinburgh | (1894) AC 459, 475–6 (HL) | profits method of valuation(BrE) | |
Edlington Properties Ltd v JH Fenner & Co Ltd | [2006] EWCA Civ 403 (CA) | set-off or setoff | |
Edmund v Bushell and Jones | (1865) LR 1 QB 97 | undisclosed principal | |
Edward Owen Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd | [1977] 3 WLR 764 | performance bond | |
Edwards v Newland &Co (E Burchett Ltd), Third Parties | [1950] 1 All ER 1072 | general contractor (GC) | |
Edwards v Skyways Ltd | [1964] 1 All ER 494, 500 | ex gratia(Lat) | |
Edwards & Walkden (Norfolk) Ltd v City of London | [2012] EWHC Civ 2527 (Ch) | business tenancy (Eng) | |
Ee v Kakar | (1979) 40 P & CR 223) | subject to survey | |
Egan Lawson Ltd v Standard Assurance Co | [2001] 08 EG 168, 172 (CA) | procuring cause | |
Elitestone Ltd v Morris | [1997] EG 116, [1997] 2 All ER 513 (HL) | mobile home | |
Elitestone Ltd v Morris | [1997] 1 WLR 687, 698A, [1997] 2 All ER 513, 525 (HL) | fixture | |
Elitestone Ltd v Morris | [1997] 27 EG 116, [1997] 1 WLR 687, [1997] 2 All ER 513 (HL) | caravan | |
Elliot v Burn | [1935] AC 84 (HL) | right to let down the surface | |
Elliott v Bishop | (1854) 10 Exch 496, 156 ER 534 | trade fixture | |
Elliott v Bishop | (1854) 10 Exch 496, 509, 156 ER 534, 540 | fixture | |
Elliott v Popular Playhouse Ltd | (1909) April 1 | time | |
Ellis v Goulton | [1893] 1 QB 350 | deposit | |
Elliston v Reacher | [1909] 2 Ch 384 | scheme of development | |
Elmcroft Developments Ltd v Tankersley-Sawyer | (1984) 270 EG 140 (CA) | repair | |
Elmdene Estates Ltd v White | [1960] AC 528, 538, [1960] 1 All ER 306, 309 (HL) | licence(BrE) or license(AmE) | |
Elmdene Estates Ltd v White | [1960] AC 528, 538, [1960] 1 All ER 306, 309 (HL) | lease | |
Elmdene Estates Ltdv White | [1960] AC 528, [1960] 1 All ER 306 (HL) | premium | |
Elliott v Islington Borough Council | [2012] EWCA Civ 56, [2012] 07 EG 90 (CA) | quia timet(Lat) | |
Elwes v Maw | (1802) 3 East 38, 102 Eng Rep 510 | agricultural tenant's fixture(Eng) | |
Embrey v Owen | (1851) 6 Exch 353, 155 Eng Rep 579 | water rights | |
EMI Group Ltd v O & H Q1 Ltd | [2016] WLR(D) 150, [2016] EWHC 529 (Ch) | authorised guarantee agreement (AGA)(Eng) | |
Englewood Properties Ltd v Patel | [2005] 1 WLR 1961, [2005] 25 EG 194, 199–202 | contract for sale | |
English China Clays v Plymouth Corp'n | [1974] 2 All ER 243 | adjacent | |
English Exporters (London) Ltd v Eldonwall Ltd | [1973] Ch 415, 422B, [1973] 1 All ER 726 | hearsay | |
English Exporters (London) Ltd v Eldonwall Ltd | [1973] Ch 415, 422B, [1973] 1 All ER 726 | interim rent(Eng) | |
Entick v Carrington | (1765) 2 Wils KB 275, 291, 95 Eng Rep 807, 817 | trespass | |
Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corp'n | (1955) 2 All ER 495 | acceptance | |
Epps v Esso Petroleum Co Ltd | [1973] 1 WLR 1071, [1973] 2 All ER 465 | occupation | |
Erewash Borough Council v Ilkeston Consumer Co-operative Society | (1989) 87 LGR 96) | shop | |
Erimus Housing Ltd v Barclays Wealth Trustees (Jersey) Ltd | [2014] EWCA Civ 303, [2014] PLSCS 91 (CA) | tenancy at will | |
Errington v Aynesley | (1788) 2 Bro CC 341, 21 Eng Rep 440 | specific performance | |
Errington v Errington and Woods | [1952] 2 KB 290, 298, [1952] 1 All ER 149, 155 (CA) | licence(BrE) or license(AmE) | |
Errington v Errington and Woods | [1952] 2 KB 290, 298, [1952] 1 All ER 149, 154–5 (CA) | lease | |
Escalus Properties Ltd v Robinson | [1996] QB 231, 243, [1995] 3 WLR 524, 532 (CA) | rent | |
Espin v Pemberton | (1859) De GF & J 547, 554, 44 Eng Rep 1380 | constructive notice | |
Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Harper's Garage (Stourport) Ltd | [1968] AC 269, [1967] 1 All ER 699 (HL) | solus agreement(BrE) | |
Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Harper's Garage(Stourport) Ltd | [1968] AC 269, [1967] 1 All ER 699 (HL) | equity of redemption | |
Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon | [1976] QB 801, 820, [1976] 2 All ER 5, 16 (CA) | misrepresentation | |
Etam plc v Baker Almond (a firm) | [2001] EGCS 21 | letter of comfort | |
Ex parte Connolly to Sheridan and Russell | [1990] 1 IR 1, 6 | rack rent | |
Ex parte Gilchrist | [1886] 17 QBD 521, 531 (CA) | power | |
Ex parte Lewis | (1888) 21 QBD 191, 197 | highway | |
Eyre v New Forest Highway Board | (1892) 56 JP 517 | dedication | |
Eyre v New Forest Highway Board | (1892) 56 JP 517, 518 | highway | F |
F.W. Woolworth & Co Ltd v Lambert | [1937] Ch 37, [1936] 2 All ER 1523 (CA) | improvement | |
Fairclough v Swan Brewery Co Ltd | [1912] AC 565, [1911–13] All ER Rep 397 (PC) | equity of redemption | |
Fairlie v Fenton | (1870) LR 5 Exch 169 | broker | |
Fairman v Perpetual Investment Building Society | [1923] AC 74, 80 (HL) | invitee | |
Fairweather v St Marylebone Property Co Ltd | [1963] AC 510 (HL) | adverse possession | |
Farr Smith & Co Ltd v Messers Ltd | [1928] 1 KB 397, 408 | earnest money | |
Faviell v Gaskoin | (1852) Exch 273, 155 Eng Rep 949) | tenant-right | |
Fawcett Properties Ltd v Buckingham County Council | [1961] AC 636, 663 (HL) | option | |
Fawcett Properties Ltd v Buckingham County Council | [1961] AC 636, 663 (HL) | price | |
Fawcett Properties Ltd v Buckingham County Council | [1961] AC 636, 674 (HL) | planning condition(Eng) | |
Fawke v Viscount Chelsea | [1979] 1EGLR 89, [1980] QB 44 (CA) | business tenancy(Eng) | |
Federated Homes Ltd v Mill Lodge Properties Ltd | (1979) 254 EG 39, [1980] 1 WLR 594 | restrictive covenant | |
Feist v Societe Intercommunale Belge D'Électricité | [1934] AC 161; [1933] All ER Rep 228 | gold clause | |
Ferrihurst Ltd v Wallcite | [1999] Ch 355, 372) | interest | |
Festiniog Ry Co v Central Electricity Generating Board | (1962) 13 P & CR 248 (CA) | equivalent reinstatement(Eng) | |
FHR European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC | [2014] UKSC 45, [2014] WLR(D) 317 (SC) | fiduciary | |
Fibrosa Spolka Akoyjna v Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barbour Ltd | [1943] AC 32, 61 (HL) | quasi-contract | |
Field v Barkworth | [1986] 1 All ER 362 | assignment | |
Financial Conduct Authority v Asset Land Investment plc | [2016] UKSC 17, [2016] PLSCS 115 (SC) | collective investment scheme (CIS)(Eng) | |
Fir Mill Ltd v Royton UDC and Jones (V.O.) | (1960) 175 EG 1029, 1033 | rebus sic stantibus(Lat) | |
Fincar SRL v Mount Street Management | [1998] EWCA Civ 1851, [1999] L&TR 161, ?? (CA) | repair | |
Firle Investments Ltd v Datapoint International Ltd | [2000] All ER(D) 614 | repairs notice(Eng) | |
First Garden City Ltd v Letchworth Garden City Corporation | (1966) 200 EG 123, 460 | residual method of valuation(BrE) | |
First National Securities Ltd v Hegerty | [1985] QB 850, [1984] 3 All ER 641 | equitable charge | |
First National Securities Ltd v Hegerty | [1985] QB 850, [1984] 3 All ER 641 | jus accrescendi praefertur oneribus(Lat) | |
First National Securities v Jones | [1978] Ch 109 | seal | |
First Plus Financial Group plc v Hewett | [2010] 23 EG 108, [2010] All ER 248 (CA) | undue influence | |
First Secretary of State v Arun Distirct Council | [2006] 1 WLR 523, (2006) The Times, September 21 (CA) | enforcement notice | |
Firth v Staines | [1897] 2 QB 70, 75 | ratification | |
Fisher v Bell | [1961] 1 QB 394, [1960] 3 All ER 731, 733 | invitation to trade(AmE) or invitation to treat(BrE) | |
Fisher v Dixon | (1845) 12 Cl & F 312, 8 Eng Rep 1426 (HL) | fixture | |
Fitzgerald v Firbank | [1897] 2 Ch 96, 104 (CA) | disturbance | |
Fitzkriston LLP v Panayi | [2008] EWCA Civ 283, [2008] All ER (D) 165 (CA) | best rent | |
Fleming v Bank of New Zealand | [1900] AC 577, 586 (PC) | valuable consideration | |
Fletcher v Ashburner | (1779) 1 Bro CC 497, 499, 28 Eng Rep 1259, 1260 | conversion | |
Fletcher v Nokes | [1897] Ch 217, 274 | notice | |
Flureau v Thornhill | (1976) 2 Black W 1078, 96 Eng Rep 635 | damages | |
Flexman v Corbett | [1930] 1 Ch 672 | usual covenant | |
Flight v Bolland | (1828) 4 Russ 298, 38 Eng Rep 817) | specific performance | |
Flight v Booth | (1834) 1 Bing NC 370, 377, 131 Eng Rep 1160, LJ 4 CP 66, 69 | misdescription | |
Flint v Brandon | (1803) 8 Ves Jun 159, 32 Eng Rep 314) | specific performance | |
Floyer v Banks | (1863) 33 LJ Ch 3 | succession | |
Foley v Classique Coaches Ltd | [1934] 2 KB 1, [1934] All ER Rep 88 (CA) | conditional contract | |
Footwear Corporation Ltd v Amplight Properties Ltd | [1998] 2 EGLR 38 | restraint on alienation | |
Ford v Lacy | (1861) 7 Hurl & N 151, 158 Eng Rep 429 | avulsion | |
Fordham v Christie, Manson and Woods | (1977) 244 EG 213 | auctioneer | |
Formby v Barker | [1903] 2 Ch 539, 553 (CA) | restrictive covenant | |
Fortune v Wiltshire Council | [2013] 1 WLR 808, [2012] 3 All ER 797 (CA) | dedication | |
Forward v Pittard | (1785) Term Rep 27, 99 Eng Rep 953, 956 | act of God | |
Foster v Wright | (1878) 4 CPD 438 | accretion | |
Fouldes v Willoughby | (1841) 8 M & W 540, 551, 151 Eng Rep 1153 | conversion | |
Foundling Hospital Governors and Guardians v Crane | [1911] 2 KB 377 (CA) | escrow | |
Four-Maids Ltd v Dudley Marshall (Properties) Ltd | [1957] Ch 317, 320 | mortgagee | |
Four-Maids Ltd v Dudley Marshall (Properties) Ltd | [1957] Ch 317, 320 | possession order(Eng) | |
Forty-Five Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor (Mayfair) Estate | [2009] UKUT 234, [2010] 02 EG 84 (UT) | marriage value | |
Fowler v Hollins | (1872) LR 7 QB 616 | broker | |
Fox v Jolly | [1916] 1 AC 1, 17 (HL) | notice | |
Foxtons Ltd v Pelkey Bicknell | [2008] EWCA Civ 419, [2008] All ER D 328 (CA) | effective cause (BrE) | |
Foxtons Ltd v Thesleff | [2005] EWCA Civ, [2005] EG 140 (CA) | purchaser | |
Frank Warr & Co v London County Council | [1904] 1 KB 713 (CA) | licensee | |
Frawley (M & F) Ltd v Ve-Ri-Best Manufacturing Co Ltd | [1953] 1 All ER 51 (CA) | shop | |
Freeman & Lockyer v Bockhurst Park Properties | [1964] 2 QB 480, 502–3 (CA) | actual authority | |
Freeman d Vernon v West | (1763) 2 Wils KB 165, 95 Eng Rep 745 | abeyance | |
Freme v Clement | (1881) 18 Ch D 499, 504 | power of appointment | |
French v Elliott | [1960] 1 WLR 40, [1959] 3 All ER 866 | double rent | |
Friary Holroyd v Singleton | [1899] 1 Ch 86, 90 | assignee | |
Friend v Shaw | (1887) 20 QBD 374) | legal notice | |
Friends Life Ltd v Siemens Hearing Instruments Ltd | [2014] EWCA Civ 382, [2014] EGILR 29 (CA) | break clause(Eng) | |
Friends' Provident Life Office v British Railways Board | [1996] 1 All ER 336 (CA) | privity of contract | |
Frozen Value Ltd v Heron Foods Ltd | [2012] 3 All ER 1328, [2012] 3 WLR 437, [2012] 18 EG 102 (CA) | business tenancy (Eng) | |
Fry v Lane | (1888) 40 Ch D 312, 321 | unconscionable bargain | |
Fry v Lane | (1888) 40 Ch D 312, 322 | undervalue | |
Fuller v Happy Markets Ltd | [2001] 25 EG 159 | distress | |
Fuller v Happy Shopper Markets Ltd | [2001] 1 WLR 1681 | distress | |
Fullwood v Hurley | [1928] 1 KB 504 | dual agency | G |
G.E. Stevens (High Wycombe), Ltd v High WycombeCorporation | [1961] 2 All ER 738, 741 | private dwelling house | |
Gaia Ventures Ltd v Helical (Leisure Plaza) Ltd [2018] | EWCA 118, [2018] PLSCS 18 | as soon as practical or as soon as practicable | |
Gaidowki v Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge | [1975] 1 WLR 1066, 1069 | flying freehold(Eng) | |
Gallie v Lee | [1969] 2 Ch 37 | precedent | |
Gala Unity Ltd v Ariadne Road RTM Co Ltd | [2011] UKUT 425, [2012] 05 EG 84 (LC) | premises | |
Galloway v London Corporation | (1986) LR 1 HL 34 (HL) | compulsory purchase(Eng) | |
Gardiner v Williamson | (1831) 2 B & Ad 336, 109 Eng Rep 1168 | deed | |
Gardner v Hodgsons's Kingston Brewery Co Ltd | [1903] AC 229 (HL) | enjoyment | |
Gardner v Ingram | (1889) 61 LTNS 729, 730, [1886–90] All ER Rep 258, 260 | notice to quit | |
Gardner v Ingram | (1889) 61 LTNS 729, 730, [1886–90] All ER Rep 258, 260 | notice to quit | |
Garrard v Frankel | (1862) 30 Beav 445, 54 Eng Rep 961 | undervalue | |
Gas Light and Coke Co v Turner | (1840) 6 Bing NC 324, 133 Eng Rep 127 | change of use | |
Gaved v Martyn | (1865) 19 CB (NS) 732, 758 | easement of drainage(BrE) | |
Geary v JD Weatherspoon PLC | [2011] All ER (D) 97 (Jun), [2011] EWHC 1506 | invitee | |
Gedye Montrose | (1858) 26 Beav 45, 49 | constructive trust | |
General Estates Co Ltd v MHLG | [1965] EGD 98 | reasonably beneficial use(Eng) | |
Ghaldan v Godin-Mendoza | [2004] UKHL 30, (2004) The Times June 24 (HL) | statutory tenancy(Eng) | |
Houlder Bros & Co Ltd v Gibbs | [1925] 1 Ch 575, 583 (CA) | restraint on alienation | |
Gibson v Manchester City Council | [1979] 1 WLR 294, [1979] 1 All ER 972 (HL) | invitation to trade(AmE) or invitation to treat(BrE) | |
Gilbert (V.O.) v Hickinbottom & Sons Ltd | [1956] 2 QB 40, 48, [1956] 2 All ER 101, 103 (CA) | hereditament | |
Gillett v Holt | [2001] Ch 210, 225–6 [2000] 2 All ER 289 (CA) | estoppel | |
Gissing v Gissing | [1971] AC 886 (HL) | resulting trust | |
Gissing v Gissing | [1971] AC 886 (HL) | matrimonial home(Eng) | |
Gissing v Gissing | [1971] AC 886, 905B-C (HL) | implied trust | |
Gladstone v Bower | [1960] 2 QB 384, [1959] 3 All ER 479 (CA) | agricultural tenancy | |
Gladstone v Bower | [1960] 2 QB 384, [1960] 3 All ER 353, 357 (CA) | tenancy from year to year | |
Glamorgan County Council v Carter | [1963] 1 WLR 1 | use | |
Glentree Estates Ltd v Favermead Ltd | [2010] EWCA Civ 1473, [2011] EGLR 23 (CA) | procuring cause(AmE) or effective cause(BrE) | |
Global Grange Ltd v Marazzi | [2002] EWHC 3010 (Ch), [2003] 2 EGLR 42 | business tenancy(Eng) | |
Go West Ltd v Spigarolo | [2003] EWCA Civ 17, [2003] QB 1140 (CA) | restraint on alienation | |
Goding v Frazer | [1967] 1 WLR 293 | gentleman's agreement | |
Goldeneagle Properties Ltd v Thornbury Court Ltd | [2008] EWCA Civ 864, [2008] 45 EG 102 (CA) | leasehold enfranchisement(Eng) | |
Goldsmith's Co v West Metropolitan Ry Co | [1904] 1 KB 5 | date | |
Goldsmiths' Company v West Metropolitan Railway | [1903] 1 KB 1, 5 (CA) | time | |
Goldstein v Levy Gee (a firm) | [2003] EWHC 1574 (Ch), [2003] PNLR 35 | professional negligence | |
Goodman v Harvey | (1835) 4 Ad & El 870, 111 Eng Rep 1011 | bona fide purchaser (BFP) | |
Goodrich v Paisner | [1957] AC 65, [1956] 2 All ER 176, 187 (HL) | living room | |
Goodtitle v Gibbs | (1826) 5 B & C 709, 717, 108 Eng Rep 264 | habendum | |
Gordon v Selico | (1986) 278 EG 53 | caveat emptor(Lat) | |
Gordon v Selico | (1986) 278 EG 53 | repair | |
Gordon v Selico | [1986] 1 EGLR 71 | specific performance | |
Gott v Gandy | (1853) El & Bl 845, 118 Eng Rep 984, 985 | implied covenant | |
Gott v Gandy | (1853) El & Bl 845, 118 Eng Rep 984, 985 | repair | |
Government of the State of Penang v Beng Hong Oon | [1972] AC 425, 437–9, [1971] 3 All ER 1163, 1172–3 (PC) | foreshore | |
Government Stock and Other Securities Investment CoLtdv Manila Ry CoLtd | [1897] AC 81, 86 (HL) | floating charge or floating lien | |
Governors of the Peabody Donation Fund v Higgins | [1983] 1 WLR 1091, 1095E-G | restraint on alienation | |
Grice v Dudley | [1958] Ch 329 | notic to treat(Eng) | |
Graham & Scott (Southgate) Ltd v Oxlade | [1950] 2 KB 257 (CA) | ready, able and willing or ready, willing and able | |
Graham and Scott (Southgate) Ltd v Oxdale | [1950] 2 KB 257 (CA) | subject to survey | |
Granada Theatres v Freehold Investments (Leytonstone) Ltd | [1959] Ch 592, [1959] 1 All ER 176 (CA) | repairs notice(Eng) | |
Granada Theatres v Freehold Investments (Leytonstone) Ltd | [1959] Ch 592, [1959] 1 All ER 176 (CA) | right of entry | |
Granada Theatres v Freehold Investments (Leytonstone) Ltd | [1959] Ch 592, [1959] 1 All ER 176 (CA) | structural repair | |
Graves v Dolphin | (1826) 1 Sim 66, 57 ER 504 | restraint on alienation | |
Grand v Gill | [2010] EWCA Civ 554, [2011] 21 EG 95 (CA) | structure | |
Graves v Weld | (1833) 5 B & Ad 105, 119, 110 Eng Rep 731 | emblements | |
Graves v Weld | (1833) 5 B & Ad 105, 110 Eng Rep 731 | way-going crop | |
Gray v Spyer | [1922] 2 Ch 22 | tenancy from year to year | |
Graysim Holdings Ltd v P&O Property Holdings Ltd | [1996] AC 329 (HL) | business tenancy(Eng) | |
Graysim Holdings Ltd v P&O Property Holdings Ltd | [1996] AC 329 (HL) | occupation | |
Great Estates Group Ltd v Digby | [2011] EWCA Civ, [2011] 43 EG 104 (CA) | sole agency | |
Great Western Forests of Dean Collieries Co Ltd v Trafalgar Colliery Co Ltd | (1887) 3 TLR 725 | gale | |
Great Western Ry Co v Smith | (1876) 2 Ch D 235, aff'd (1877) 3 App Cas 165 (HL) | sublessee or sub-lessee | |
Great Yarmouth Corporation v Groom | (1862) 1 Hurl & C 102, 158 Eng Rep 818 | stallage(Eng) | |
Greatrex v Hayward | (1858) 8 Ex 291 | easement of drainage(BrE) | |
Green v Baverstock | (1863) 32 LJ CP 181 | puffer | |
Green v Eales | (1841) 2 QB 225, 237 | external | |
Green v King | (1778) 2 Bl W 1212, 1214, 96 Eng Rep 713, 714 | tenancy by the entirety | |
Greenaway v Adams | (1806) 12 Ves Jun 395, 33 Eng Rep 149 | assignment | |
Greenhalgh v British Railways Board | [1969] 2 QB 286, 293 , [1969] 2 All ER 114, 117 (CA) | visitor | |
Greenwich Healthcare National Health Service Trust v London and Quadrant Housing Trust | [1998] 1 WLR 1749, 1754 | easement | |
Greenwood v Martins Bank Ltd | [1933] AC 51, 57 (CA) | representation | |
Greer v Downs | [1927] 2 KB 238 (CA) | undisclosed principal | |
Gregg v Richards | [1926] Ch 521 | habendum | |
Gregg v Wells | (1839) 10 Ad & E 90, 98, 113 Eng Rep 35, 38 | representation | |
Grey v Pearson | (1857) 6 HL Cas 61, 106, 10 Eng Rep 1216, 26 LJ Ch 472, 481 (HL) | literal construction or literal meaning | |
Grice v Dudley | [1958] Ch 329 | compulsory purchase order (CPO)(Eng) | |
Griffith v Pelton | [1958] Ch 205, 225, [1957] All ER 75, 83 (CA) | option | |
Griffiths v Young | [1970] Ch 675 | memorandum | |
Gribbon v Luton | [2002] QB 902 | deposit/restitution | |
Grimes v Hawkins | [2011] EWHC 2004 | duty of care | |
Grimes v The Trustees of the Essex Farm & Union Hunt | [2017] EWCA Civ 361, [2017] PLSCS 109 (CA) | service | |
Grosvenor (Lord) v Hampstead Junction Ry Co | (1857) De GF & J 446, 44 Eng Rep 796 | house | |
Grosvenor Hotel Co v Hamilton | [1894] 2 QB 836 | derogation from grant | |
Groveside Properties Ltd v Westminster Medical School | (1983) 267 EG 593 | business premises | |
Guildford RDC v Fortescue | [1959] 2 QB 112, 125 (CA) | material change in the use(Eng) | |
Gundry v Dunham | (1916) 85 LJ KB 416, 422 (CA) | rack rent | |
Gurton v Parrott | [1981] 18 EG 161 | business tenancy(Eng) | |
Gutteridge v Munyard | (1834) 7 Car & P 129, 173 Eng Rep 57 | keep in repair | |
H |
|||
Hackney Borough Council v Dore | [1922] 1 KB 431 | force majeure(Civ) | |
Hadley v Baxendale | (1854) 23 LJ Ex 179, 9 Ex 341, 156 Eng Rep 145 | consequential damages | |
Hadley v Baxendale | (1854) 23 LJ Ex 179, 9 Ex 341, 156 Eng Rep 145 | damages | |
Haffner v Cordingly | (1908) 8 WLR 743 (CA) | completion | |
Hagee (London) Ltd v A.B. Erikson and Larson | [1975] All ER 234 (CA) | business tenancy(Eng) | |
Haines v Welch | (1868) LR 4 CP 91 | emblements | |
Halford v Brooks | [1991] 3 All ER 559, 573 (CA) | knowledge | |
Halifax Building Society v Keighley | [1931] 2 KB 248 | mortgagee clause | |
Halifax Building Society v Thomas | [1996] Ch 217 | power of sale | |
Hall v Warren | (1804) 9 Ves Jun 605, 32 Eng Rep 738 | specific performance | |
Halsall v Brizell | [1957] Ch 169 | positive covenant | |
Hamer v Sharp | (1874) LR 19 Eq 113 | estate agent(BrE) | |
Hammerton v Honey | (1874) 24 WR 603 | custom | |
Hammonds v Barclay | (1802) 2 East 227, 235, 102 Eng Rep 356 | lien | |
Hampshire County Council v Milburn | [1991] 1 AC 325 [1990] 2 All ER 257, 258 (HL) | waste land | |
Hampshire v Wickens | (1878) 7 Ch D 555 | tax | |
Hampshire v Wickens | (1878) 7 Ch D 555 | usual covenant | |
Hampstead Way Investments Ltd v Lewis-Weare | [1985] 1 WLR 164, [1985] 1 All ER 164 (HL) | residence | |
Hampton and Sons, Ltd v George | [1939] 3 All ER 627 | exclusive agency | |
Hancock and Wills (a firm) v GMS Syndicate Ltd | (1983) 265 EG 469 | occupation | |
Hancock v B. W. Brazier (Anerley) Ltd | [1966] 1 WLR 1317 | fit for human habitation(Eng) | |
Hanson v Newman | [1934] Ch 298, 305 | damages | |
Hanson v Newman | [1934] Ch 298, 305 | schedule of dilapidations(BrE) | |
Harbert's Case | (1584) 3 Co Rep 11b, 76 Eng Rep 647 | inverse order of alienation | |
Hare v Nicoll | [1966] 2 QB 130, [1966] All ER 285 (CA) | time is of the essence | |
Harington v Hoggart | (1830) 1 B & Ad 577, 109 Eng Rep 902 | deposit | |
Harley Queen v Forsyte Kerman | [1985] 1 EGLR 82 | business premises | |
Harmer v Jumbil (Nigeria) Tin Areas Ltd | [1921] 1 Ch 200, 225 (CA) | derogation from grant | |
Harold Wood Brick Co v Ferris | [1935] 2 KB 198 | time is of the essence | |
Harper v Aplin | (1886) 54 LTNS 383 | waste | |
Harris v De Pinna | (1886) 33 Ch D 238 (CA) | right of light(BrE) or right to light(AmE) | |
Harris v Flower | (1904) 74 LJ Ch 127 | easement | |
Harris v Nickerson | (1873) 26 LTNS 410 | auction | |
Harrison & Hetherington Ltd v Cumbria County Council | (1985) 275 EG 457 (HL) | equivalent reinstatement(Eng) | |
Harrods v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions | (2002) The Times, April 3 (CA) | development | |
Harrow London Borough v Qazi | [2004] 1 AC 983, 990, [2003] 4 All ER 461, 465 (HL) | home | |
Hart v Windsor | (1843) 12 M & W 68, 87, 152 Eng Rep 1114 | fit for the purpose or fit for the use | |
Hartley v Minister of Housing and Local Government | [1970] 1 QB 420, 421 (CA) | abandonment | |
Harvey v Crawley Development Corporation | [1957] 1 QB 485, 494, [1957] 1 All ER 504, 507 (CA) | compensation for disturbance(Eng) | |
Haskell v Marlow | [1928] 2 KB 45 | fair wear and tear(BrE) | |
Hatfield v Moss | [1988] 2 EGLR 58, [1988] 40 EG 112 (CA) | plan | |
Hawkesbrook Leisure Ltd v The Reece-Jones Partnership | [2003] EWHC 3333, [2004] 25 EG 172, 175 | business | |
Hayne v Cummings | (1864) 16 CB (NS) 421, 143 Eng Rep 1191,1194 | covenant | |
Haynes v Ford | [1911] 2 Ch 237, 256 | shop | |
Haynes v Ford | [1911] 2 Ch 237, 256 | warehouse | |
Haynes v Harwood | [1935] 1 KB 146, [1934] All ER Rep 103 (CA) | volenti non fit injuria(Lat) | |
Haywood v Brunswick Permanent Benefit Building Society | (1881) 8 QBD 403 (CA) | restrictive covenant | |
Heath v Milward | (1835) 4 LJCP 292 | close | |
Heaven v Pender | (1883) 11 QBD 502, 509 (CA) | negligence | |
Heaven v Pender | (1883) 11 QBD, 503, 509 (CA) | duty of care | |
Hedley Byrne and Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd | [1964] AC 465, 503 (HL) | duty of care | |
Heffer v Martyn | (1867) 36 LJ Ch 327 | bidding agreement | |
Hely-Hutchinson v Brayhead Ltd | [1968] 1 QB 549, 583 (CA) | actual authority | |
Hely-Hutchinson v Brayhead Ltd | [1968] 1 QB 549, 583 (CA) | agent | |
Henderson v Arthur | [1907] 1 KB 10 (CA) | rent | |
Henderson v Easton | (1851) 17 QB 701 | tenancy in common | |
Henley v Cohen | [2013] EWCA Civ 480, [2013] PLSCS 91 (CA) | house | |
Henniker (Doe d) v Watt | (1828) 8 B & C 308, 108 Eng Rep 1057 | covenant | |
Henniker (Doe d) v Watt | (1828) 8 B & C 308, 315, 108 Eng Rep 1057, 1060 | condition | |
Henry Boot Construction Ltd. v Alstom Construction Ltd. | [2005] EWCA Civ 814, [2005] 1 WLR 3850 (CA) | entire contract | |
Henry Boot v Alstom | [2000] 16 Const LR 27, 69 Con LR 27, [2000] Build LR 247 (CA) | fair rates and prices(Eng) | |
Henthorn v Fraser | [1892] 2 Ch 27 | offer | |
Heron Corporation Ltd v Manchester City Council | [1978] 3 All ER 1240 | planning permission(Eng) | |
Hesketh v Willis Cruisers Ltd | (1968) 19 P & CR 573 (CA) | ad medium filum aquæ(Lat) | |
Heslop v Burns | [1974] 1 WLR 1247 | exclusive possession | |
Heyman v Darwins Ltd | [1942] AC 356 (HL) | repudiation | |
Hidderley v Warwick County Council | (1963) 107 Sol J 156 | agriculture | |
Hiern v Mill | (1806) 13 Ves Jun 114, 33 Eng Rep 237 | imputed notice | |
Hiern v Mill | (1806) 13 Ves Jun 120, 33 Eng Rep 237, 239 | notice | |
Highland & Universal Properties v Safeway Properties | (2000) SC 297 | continuous operation clause | |
Hill v Barclay | (1810) 16 Ves Jun 404, 33 Eng Rep 1037 | specific performance | |
Hill v Booth | [1930] 1 KB 381 (CA) | additional rent | |
Hill v Debenham, Tewson & Chinnocks | (1958) 171 EG 835 | structural survey | |
Hill v Harris | [1965] 2 QB 601, [1965] 2 All ER 358 (CA) | fit for the purpose or fit for the use | |
Hill v Harris | [1965] 2 QB 601, [1965] 2 All ER 358 (CA) | use clause or user clause | |
Hill v Hasier | [1921] 3 KB 643 | entitled | |
Hill v Rochard | [1983] WLR 478, [1983] 2 All ER 21 (CA) | suitable alternative accommodation(Eng) | |
Hillingdon Estates Co v Stonefield Estate | [1952] Ch 677 | frustration | |
Hilton v Plustitle Ltd | [1989] 1 WLR 149 | company letting(Eng) | |
Hindcastle v Barbara Attenborough Associates Ltd | [1997] AC 70, [1996] 1 All ER 737 (HL) | disclaimer | |
Hindcastle v Barbara Attenborough Associates Ltd | [1997] AC 70, [1996] 1 All ER 737 (HL) | insolvency or insolvent | |
Hindcastle v Barbara Attenborough Associates Ltd | [1997] AC 70, [1996] 1 All ER 737 (HL) | owner | |
Hobbs v Midland Ry Co | (1882) 20 Ch D 431) | superfluous land(Eng) | |
Hoddell v Smith | (1976) 240 EG 295, 301 | negotiation | |
Hodges & Sons (G. T.) v Hackbridge Park Residential Hotel Ltd | ,[1940] 1 KB 404, [1939] 4 All ER 347 (CA) | commission | |
Hodgkinson v Crowe | (1875) LR 19 Eq 591) | unusual covenant(Eng) | |
Hodgson v Marks | [1971] Ch 892, [1971] 2 All ER 684 (CA) | interest | |
Hoenig v Isaacs | [1952] 2 All ER 176, 181–2 (CA) | lump-sum contract | |
Hoenig v Isaacs | [1952] 2 All ER 176 (CA) | substantial performance | |
Hoggan v Esquimalt & Nanaimo Ry Co | [1894] AC 429, 434 (PC) | squatting | |
Holbeck Hall Hotel Ltd v Scarborough Council | [2000] 2 QB 836, [2000] 2 WLR 1396 (CA) | right of support or right to support | |
Holden v White | [1982] 2 QB 679, 683 (CA) | easement | |
Holding & Barnes plc v Secretary of State for the Environment Transport and the Regions | [2003] 2 AC 295 295 (HL) | called-in planning application(Eng) | |
Holding and Management Ltd v Property Holding and Investment Trust plc | [1990] 1 All ER 938, 945, [1990] 1 EGLR 65, 68 (CA) | repair | |
Holding & Management (Solitaire) Ltd v 1-16 Finland Street RTM Co Ltd | [2008] 1 EGLR 107 (LT) | leasehold enfranchisment(Eng) | |
Holding & Management (Solitaire) Ltd v 1-16 Finland Street RTM Co Ltd | [2008] 1 EGLR 107 (LT) | right to manage(Eng) | |
Holdings & Management (Solitaire) Ltd v Norton | [2012] UKHT 1 (LC) | restraint on alienation | |
Holland v Hodgson | (1872) LR 7 CP 335 | fixture | |
Holles v Wyse | (1693) 2 Vern 289, 290, 23 Eng Rep 787 | penalty | |
Holliday v Beckland District Council | [2012] UKUT 193, [2012] 49 EG 68 (LC) | compensation for severance | |
Holme v Brunskill | [1878] 2 QBD 495 | guarantee or guaranty | |
Homes Ltd v Robinson | [2004] EGLR 93, [2005] 1 P & CR 30 (CA) | easement | |
Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha | [1962] 2 QB 26, 1 All ER 474 (CA) | term | |
Honywood v Honywood | (1874) LR 18 Eq 306, 309 | timber | |
Hooper v Ramsbottom | (1815) 6 Taunt 12, 128 Eng Rep 936 | escrow | |
Hopper v Liverpool Corp'n | (1943) 88 Sol J 213 | determinable fee simple(Eng) | |
Horn v Sunderland Corporation | [1941] 2 KB 26, 42, [1941] 1 All ER 480, 491 (CA) | compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) | |
Horn v Sunderland Corporation | [1941] 2 KB 26, 53, [1941] 1 All ER 480, 499 (CA) | disturbance | |
Horne & Meredith Properties Ltd v Cox and Billingsley | Estates Gazette 23 Mar 2013, 73, [2014] PLSCS 93 | business tenancy(Eng) | |
Horn v SunderlandCorporation | [1941] 2 KB 26, 42, [1941] 1 All ER 480, 491 (CA) | compensation for disturbance(Eng) | |
Horsey Estates Ltd v Steiger | [1899] 2 QB 79, 89, 68 LJ QB 743, 749 (CA) | personal covenant | |
Horsey Estates Ltd v Steiger | [1899] 2 QB 79, 93, 68 LJ QB 743, 751 (CA) | sublease or sub-lease | |
Hosebay Ltd v Day; Lexgorge Ltd v Howard de Walden Estates | [2012] UKSC 41, [2012] 42 EG 132 (SC) | house | |
Household Fire & Accident Insurance Co v Grant | (1879) LR 4 Ex D 216 | acceptance | |
Hoveringham Gravels Ltd v Chiltern DC | (1979) 252 EG 815 | compensation for severance(Eng) | |
Howard v Earl of Digby | (1834) 2 Cl & F 634, 6 Eng Rep 1293 (HL) | pin money | |
Howe v Smith | (1844) 27 Ch D 89 | deposit | |
Howe v Smith | (1844) 27 Ch D 89, 101 | earnest money | |
Howell v Richards | (1809) 11 East 633, 641–2, 103 Eng Rep 1150, 1154 | quiet enjoyment | |
Howell v Richards | (1809) 11 East 633, 642, 103 Eng Rep 1150 | covenant for possession(US) | |
Howkins v Jardine | [1951] 1 All ER 320 | agricultural holding(Eng) | |
HSBC Bank plc v Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (UK) Ltd | (2001) The Times, June 11 | literal construction or literal meaning | |
Hua Chiao Commercial Bank Ltd v Chiaphua Industries Ltd | [1987] AC 99, 107, [1987] 1 All ER 1110, 1112 (HL) | covenant running with the land | |
Hudson v Temple | (1860) 29 Beav 536, 54 Eng Rep 735 | time is of the essence | |
Hughes v Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council | [1991] 1 AC 382, 392, [1991] 1 All ER 295, 301 (HL) | compensation for disturbance(Eng) | |
Hughes v Metropolitan Ry Co | [1877] 2 App Cas 439, 448 (HL) | estoppel | |
Hughes v Pump House Hotel Co | [1902] 2 KB 190 (CA) | absolute assignment | |
Hughes v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions | [2000] 1 PLR 76, [2000] JPL 826, (2000) The Times, February 18 (CA) | abandonment | |
Hughes v Young | (1863) 32 LJ Ch 137 | entitled | |
Hull and Humber Investment Co v Hull Corporation | [1965] 2 QB 145 | notice to treat(Eng) | |
Humble v Hunter | (1848) 12 QB 310 | undisclosed principal | |
Hunt v Luck | [1902] 1 Ch 428 | constructive notice | |
Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd | [1997] AC 655, 695B, [1997] 2 All ER 426, 441 (HL) | nuisance | |
Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd | [1997] AC 655, [1997] 2 All ER 426 (HL) | right to air | |
Hyams v Titan Properties Ltd | (1972) 24 P & CR 359 (CA) | business tenancy(Eng) | |
Hyatt v Griffiths | (1851) 17 QB 509 | holding over | |
Hyde v Wrench | (1840) 3 Beav 334, 49 Eng Rep 132 | counter notice(Eng) | |
Hynes v Vaughan | [1985] 50 P & CR 444 | vacant possession | |
Hyundai Shipping & Heavy Industries Co Ltd v Papadopoulos | [1980] 1 WLR 1129 (HL) | deposit | |
HXRUK II (CHC) Limited v Marcus Alexander Heaney | [2010] EWHC 2245, [2010] 44 EG 126 | right of light | I |
Ibrahim v Roversions Ltd | [2001] 30 EG 116 | main structure | |
IDCGroup Ltd v Clark | [1992] 1 EGLR 187 (CA) | easement | |
Illingworth v Houldsworth | [1904] AC 355, 358 (HL) | floating charge or floating lien | |
Imperial College of Science and Technology v Ebdon | [1986] RA 233, (1987) 281 EG 419 (CA) | contractor's all-risks insurance | |
In re Scott & Alvarez's Contract, Scott v Alvarez | [1865] 2 Ch 633 (CA) | specific performance | |
In re Southern Rhodesia | [1991] AC 211, 233-4 (PC) | terra nullius(Lat) | |
In the matter of Kayley Vending Limited | [2009] BCC 578, [2009] EWHC 904 | pre-pack sale | |
Inclusive Technology v Williamson | [2009] EWCA Civ 718, [2009] 39 EG 110, [2010] 1 P & CR 2 | business tenancy(Eng) | |
Indermaur v Dames | (1866) LR 1 CP 288 | invitee | |
Industrial Properties (Barton Hill) Ltd v Associated Electrical Industries Ltd | [1977] QB 58, [1977] 2 WLR 747 (CA) | equitable lease | |
Industrial Properties (Barton Hill) Ltd v Associated Electrical IndustriesLtd | [1977] QB 58, [1977] 2 WLR 747 (CA) | tenancy by estoppel | |
Inland Revenue Commissioners v Buchanan | [1958] Ch 289, 296 (CA) | disposition | |
Inland Revenue Commissioners v Clay and Buchanan | [1914] 3 KB 466, 475 (CA) | open market | |
Inland Revenue Commissioners v Clay and Buchanan | [1914] 3 KB 466, 475 (CA) | open market value (OMV)(BrE) | |
Inland Revenue Commissioners v Clay and Buchanan | [1914] 3 KB 466, 478 (CA) | willing buyer or willing seller | |
Inland Revenue Commissioners v Gribble | [1913] 3 KB 212, 218 (CA) | purchaser | |
Inland Revenue Commissioners v Maxse | [1919] 1 KB 647, 657 (CA) | profession | |
Inland Revenue Commissioners v Maxse | [1919] 1 KB 647, 657 (CA) | profession | |
Inner London Education Authority v ?? | [1990] JPL 200 | office | |
Inntrepreneur Pub Company (GL) v East Crown Ltd | [2000] 2 Lloyd's Rep 11, at para. 7 | entire agreement clause (EAC) | |
International Drilling Fluids Ltd v Louisville Investments (Uxbridge) Ltd | [1986] Ch 513, 519–22 (CA) | restraint on alienation | |
International Drilling Fluids Ltd v Louisville Investments (Uxbridge) Ltd | [1986] 1 Ch 513, 521C-D | restraint on alienation | |
International Traders Ferry Ltd v Adur District Council | [2004] 2 PLR 106, [2004] 23 EG 122 (CA) | interest | |
International Traders Ferry Ltd v Adur District Council | [2004] 2 PLR 106, [2004] 23 EG 122 (CA) | occupier | |
Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society | [1998] 1 WLR 896, 1 All ER 98, 114 (HL) | words | |
Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society | [1998] 1 WLR 896, 912 (HL) | literal construction or literal meaning | |
Inwards v Baker | [1965] 2 QB 29, [1965] 1 All ER 446 (CA) | licence by estoppel(Eng) | |
Inwards v Baker | [1965] 2 QB 29, [1965] 1 All ER 446 (CA) | mistaken improver | |
Iqbal v Thakrar | [2004] 3 EGLR 21 (CA) | improvement | |
Irani Finance Ltd v Singh | [1971] Ch 59, 80 | conversion | |
IRC v Bullock | [1976] 1 WLR 1178 | domicile | |
Iron Co v Dodson | 7 Lea 373 | contractor | |
Irvine v Moran | [1991] 1 EGLR 261, 262 | structure | |
Isaaks v Charlton Triangle Homes Ltd | [2015] EWHC 2611, [2016] PLSCS 100 | alteration | |
Ivorygrove Ltd v Global Range Ltd | [2003] 1 WLR 2090, [2003] 2 EGLR 87 | business tenancyEng | J |
J. A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd v Graham | [2002] 1 AC 419 at [36] (HL) | adverse possession | |
J. A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd v Graham | [2002] 1 AC 419, [2002] 3 All ER 865, 887–8 (HL) | animus possidendi(Lat) | |
J. A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd v Kingswood Borough Council | [2000] RVR 40 (CA) | compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) | |
Jackson v Mulvaney | [2003] 1 WLR 360 | jus spatiandi(Lat) | |
Jacobs v Batavia and General Plantations Trust | [1924] 1 Ch 287, 295 | express term or express condition | |
Jacobs v Revell | [1900] 2 Ch 858) | misdescription | |
Jaggard v Sawyer | [1995] 1 WLR 269 (CA) | damages | |
James v Heim Gallery (London) Ltd | (1980) 41 P & CR 269, 280 | estoppel | |
James v James | (1873) LR 16 Eq 153 | equitable mortgage | |
James v James | (1869) 19 LT 809 | gift | |
James v Smith (1921) | [1931] 2 KB 317 n., 322 (CA) | ready, able and willing or ready, willing and able | |
James v United Kingdom | (8793/79) (1986) EHRR 123 | leasehold enfranchisement(Eng) | |
Jarvis & Sons Ltd v Westminster City Corporation | [1970] 1 WLR 643, 647–8 (HL) | practical completion | |
Jarvis Interiors ltd v Galliard Homes Ltd | (2000) BLR, 71 Con LR 219 (CA) | letter of intent (LOI) | |
Javad v Aqil | [1991] 1 WLR 1007, 1012, [1991] 1 All ER 243 | tenancy at will | |
Jeakes v White | (1851) 6 Exch 873, 881, 155 Eng Rep 800, 803 | good title | |
Jenkin R Lewis & Sons Ltd v Kerman | [1971] Ch 477 | surrender | |
Jenkins v Jackson | (1889) 40 Ch D 74) | peaceably and quietly | |
Jennings v Broughton | (1854) 5 De GM & G 126, 43 Eng Rep 818 | puffing | |
Jervis v Pillar Denton Ltd | [2014] EWCA Civ 180, [2014] EGILR 25 (CA) | apportionment | |
Jervis v Pillar Denton Ltd | [2014] EWCA Civ 180, [2014] EGILR 25 (CA) | rent in advance or rent in arrears | |
Jeune v Queens Cross Properties Ltd | [1974] Ch 97 | specific performance | |
Jeune v Ward | (1818) 1 B & Ald 653, 659, 106 Eng Rep 240, 242 | acceptance | |
Jewelcraft v Pressland | [2015] EWCA Civ 1111, [2015] PLSCS 300 (CA) | house | |
JLK v Ezekwe | [2017] UKUT 277, [2017] PLSCS 146 (LC) | dwelling house or dwelling-house | |
John Laing Construction v Amber Pass | [2004] 204 EG 128, [2004] 2 EGLR 128 | yielding and paying | |
Johnson v Agnew | [1980] AC 367 (HL) | rescission | |
Johnson v Agnew | [1980] AC 367, 398E (HL) | election | |
Johnson v Humphrey | [1946] 1 All ER 460, 174 LT 324 | time is of the essence | |
Johnston & Sons Ltd v Holland | [1988] 1 EGLR 264 | derogation from grant | |
Johnston v Duke of Westminster | [1986] AC 839, 845 (HL) | letting value | |
Joint London Holding Ltd v Mount Cook Ltd | (2005) The Times, October 11 | ordinary meaning rule | |
Jolley v Sutton London Borough Council | [2000] 1 WLR 1082 (HL) | negligence | |
Jones v Green | [1925] 1 KB 659 | fit for human habitation(Eng) | |
Jones v Jones | [1977] 1 WLR 438) | tenancy in common | |
Jones v Lavington | [1903] 1 KB 253, 257–8 (CA) | let | |
Jones v Lowe | [1945] KB 73, 77, [1945] 1 All ER 194, 197 | prospective purchaser | |
Jones v Manchester Passenger Transport Executive | [1998] 36 EG 150 (LT) | blighted land(Eng) | |
Jones v Morgan | [2001] EWCA Civ 995, (2001) 82 P & CR DG20 (CA) | clog | |
Jones v Morgan | [2001] EWCA Civ 995, (2001) 82 P & CR DG20 (CA) | equity of redemption | |
Jones v Price | [1965] 2 QB 618, 631 (CA) | easement | |
Jordeson v Sutton Southcoates and Drypool Gas Company | [1899] 2 Ch 217 (CA) | right of support or right to support | |
Joyce v Rigolli | [2004] 1 P & CR DG22 | writing | |
Joyner v Weeks | [1881] 2 QB 31 | schedule of dilapidations(BrE) | K |
K/S Victoria Street v House of Fraser (Stores Management) Limited | [2011] EWCA 330, 32 EG 56 (CA) | authorised guarantee agreement (AGA) | |
Kammins Ballrooms Co Ltd v Zenith Investments (Torquay) Ltd | [1971] AC 850, 873, 883, [1970] 2 All ER 871, 886, 894 (HL) | waiver | |
Kaye v Massbetter Ltd | (1990) 62 P & CR 558, [1991] 39 EG 129 | company letting(Eng) | |
Keen v Mear | [1920] 2 Ch 579 | estate agent(BrE) | |
Keeves v Dean | [1924] 1 KB 685, 686 (CA) | statutory tenancy(Eng) | |
Keighley, Maxsted and Co v Durant | [1901] AC 240 (HL) | undisclosed principal | |
Keighley, Maxsted and Co v Durant | [1901] AC 240 (HL) | ratification | |
Kelley v Battershell | [1949] 2 All ER 830 | letting scheme | |
Kelly v Rodgers | [1892] 1 QB 910 | quiet enjoyment | |
Kelsen v Imperial Tobacco Co Ltd | [1957] 2 QB 334, [1957] 2 All ER 343 | ad coelum usque ad centrum or ad coelum usque ad inferos(Lat) | |
Kelsen v Imperial Tobacco Co Ltd | [1957] 2 QB 334, [1957] 2 All ER 343 | trespass | |
Kelsen v Imperial Tobacco Co Ltd | [1957] 2 QB 334, [1957] 2 All ER 343 | air rights | |
Kemp v Ballachulish Estate Co Ltd | (1933) SC 478, 488 | agricultural holding(Eng) | |
Kendal v Micfield | (1740) Barn C 46, 47–8, 27 Eng Rep 549 | habendum | |
Kendall v Hamilton | (1879) 4 App Cas 504 (HL) | election | |
Kenney v Wexham | (1822) 6 Madd 355, 357, 56 ER 1126, 1127 | specific performance | |
Kenny v Preen | [1963] 1 QB 499, [1962] 3 All ER 814 (CA) | quiet enjoyment | |
Kenny v Preen | [1963] 1 QB 499, 511 (CA) | enjoyment | |
Kent County Council v Secretary of State for the Environment and Canterbury City Council | [1995] JPL 610 | conservation area(Eng) | |
Kenyon Stevenson v Kenyon | [1946] 2 All ER 595 | living room | |
Keppel v Wheeler | [1927] 1 KB 577, 584 (CA) | subject to contract | |
Keppel v Wheeler | [1927] 1 KB 577, 586 (CA) | estate agent(BrE) | |
Keppel v Wheeler | [1927] 1 KB 577 (CA) | commission | |
Keppell v Bailey | (1834) 2 My & K 517, 537, 39 Eng Rep 1042 | covenant running with the land | |
Keppell v Bailey | (1834) 2 My & K 517, 537, 39 Eng Rep 1042 | jus spatiandi(Lat) | |
Kerkslake v White | (1819) 2 Stark 509, 171 Eng Rep 719, 720) | messuage | |
Kilmartin SCI (Hulton House) Ltd v Safeway Stores plc | [2006] EWHC 60, [2006] 09 EG 184 | usable area | |
King v David Allen & Sons, Billposting Ltd | [1916] 2 AC 54 (HL) | personal right | |
King v Travellers' Insurance Association Ltd | [1931] 48 TLR 53 | ejusdem generis(Lat) | |
King v Wilson | (1843) 6 Beav 124, 126, 49 Eng Rep 772 | time is of the essence | |
King's Motors (Oxford) Ltd v Lax | [1969] 3 All ER 665 | option | |
Kings Motors (Oxford) Ltd v Lax | [1969] 3 All ER 665 | price | |
Kingsbury v Collins & Elmes | (1827) 4 Bing 202, 130 Eng Rep 746 | emblements | |
Kingsnorth Finance Co Ltd v Tizard | [1986] 2 All ER 54, [1986] 1 WLR 783 | imputed notice | |
Kingsnorth Finance Co Ltd v Tizard | [1986] 2 All ER 54, [1986] 1 WLR 783 | occupation | |
Kingston v Ambrian Investment Co | [1975] 1 All ER 120, 125 (CA) | escrow | |
Kingston-upon-Hull Corporation v Clayton | [1963] AC 28 (HL) | rateable occupation(Eng) | |
Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corp | (1989) 43 BLR 40, 48 (CA) | letter of comfort | |
Kling v Keston Properties Ltd | (1983) 49 P & CR 212, 215 | interest | |
Kling v Keston Properties Ltd | (1983) 49 P & CR 212, 215 | right of pre-emption | |
Knight Sugar Co Ltdv Alberta Ry and Irrigation Co | [1938] 1 All 266, 269 (PC) | merger | |
Knightsbridge Estates Trust Ltd v Byrne | [1939] Ch 441, [1938] 4 All ER 618, 626 (CA), aff'd [1940] AC 613, [1940] 2 All ER 401 (HL) | usury | |
Knightsbridge Estates Trust Ltd v Byrne | [1939] Ch 441, 455, 457, [1938] 2 All ER 444, 455, 457 when interest rate fixed (CA), aff'd [1940] AC 613, [1940] 2 All ER 401 (HL) | equity of redemption | |
Knightsbridge Estates Trust Ltd v Byrne | [1939] Ch 441, 457 [1938] 4 All ER 618, 626 (CA), aff'd [1940] AC 613, [1940] 2 All ER 401 (HL) | unconscionable bargain | |
Koufos v Czarnikow, The Heron II | [1969] 1 AC 350, [1967] 3 All ER 686 (HL) | damages | |
Kreglinger v New Patagonia Meat and Cold Storage Co Ltd | [1914] AC 25 (HL) | equity of redemption | |
Kreglinger v New Patagonia Meat and Cold Storage Co Ltd | [1914] AC 25, 53, 61 (HL) | once a mortgage, always a mortgage | |
Krell v Henry | [1903] 2 KB 740 (CA) | frustration | |
Kruse v Johnson | [1898] 2 QB 91, 96 | bylaw or by-law | |
Kurtz and Co v Spence and Sons | (1887) 57 LJ Ch 238, 241 | without prejudice | L |
Lace v Chandler | [1944] KB 368, 370 (CA) | term | |
Ladies Hosiery and Underwear v Parker | [1930] 1 Ch 304 | week-to-week tenancy(AmE) or weekly tenancy(BrE) | |
Ladyman v Wirral Estates Ltd | [1968] 2 All ER 197, 19 P & CR 781 | time | |
Laing (John) and Sons Ltd v Assessment Committee for Kingswood Assessment Area | [1949] 1 KB 344, 350 (CA) | rateable occupation(Eng) | |
Laiqat v Majid | [2005] EWHC 1305, [2005] 26 EG 130 | trespass | |
Lake v Bayliss | [1974] 1 WLR 1073, 1076D-E, 2 All ER 1114 | constructive trust | |
Lake v Bennet | [1970] 1 QB 663 (CA) | house | |
Lake v Craddock | (1732) 3 P Wms 158, 159, 24 Eng Rep 1011 | tenancy in common | |
Lake v Craddock | (1732) 3 P Wms 158, 160, 24 Eng Rep 1011 | partnership | |
Lake v Dean | (1860) 28 Beav 607, 54 Eng Rep 499 | possession | |
Lake v Dean | (1860) 28 Beav 607, 54 Eng Rep 499 | taking possession | |
Lakeman v Mountstephen | (1874) LR 7 HL 17, 23 (HL) | guarantee or guaranty | |
Lamb v Boyden | [1961] CLY 4906) | year capped | |
Lambe v Secretary of State for War | [1955] 2 QB 612 (CA) | special suitability or adaptability(Eng) | |
Lambe v Secretary of State for War | [1955] 2 QB 612 (CA) | compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) | |
Lampleigh v Braithwait | (1615) Hob 105, 80 Eng Rep 255 | consideration | |
Lampson v City of Quebec | [1921] 1 AC 294, 295 (PC) | emphyteotic lease | |
Land Reclamation Co Ltd v Basildon DC | [1978] 2 All ER 1162, 1166–7, aff'd [1979] 2 All ER 993 (CA) | use and occupation | |
Land Reclamation Co Ltd v Basildon DC | [1979] 3 WLR 767, [1979] 2 All ER 993 | business tenancy(Eng) | |
Landeau v Marchbank | [1949] 2 All ER 172 | damages | |
Lane (W. J.) v Spratt | [1970] 2 QB 486–7 | warranty | |
Langford Property CoLtd v Tureman | [1949] 1 KB 29 (CA) | residence | |
Langham House Developments Ltd v Brompton Securities Ltd | (1980) 256 EG 719 | expert | |
Lanoy v Athol | (1742) 2 Atk 444, 446, 26 Eng Rep 668, 669 | marshalling | |
Lanphier v Phipos | [1838] 8 Car & P 475, 479, 173 Eng Rep 581, 583 [1835–42] All ER Rep 421, 422 | professional negligence | |
Latham v Johnson (Richard) and Nephew Ltd | [1913] 1 KB 398, 416 (CA) | trespass | |
Latimer v Garney | [2006] EWCA Civ, [2006] 50 EG 86 | damages | |
Law v Jones | [1974] Ch 112, [1973] 2 All ER 437 (CA) | subject to contract | |
Law v Redditch Local Board | [1892] 1 QB 132 | liquidated damages | |
Lawrence v Coventry (No 2) | [2014] UKSC 46, [2014] PLSCS 223 (SC) | nuisance | |
Lawton v Lawton | (1743) 3 Atk 13 | trade fixture | |
Leakey v National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or National Beauty | [1980] QB 485, 524 (CA) | encroachment or incroachment | |
Leakey v National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or National Beauty | [1980] QB 485 (CA) | nuisance | |
Leakey v National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or National Beauty | [1980] QB 485 (CA) | right of support or right to support | |
Lebeaupin v Richard Crispin & Co | [1920] 2 KB 714, 719 | force majeure(Civ) | |
Lee v Barrey | [1957] 1 All ER 191 | boundary | |
Lee v Ministry of Transport | [1966] 1 QB 111, [1965] 2 All ER 986 (CA) | compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) | |
Lee-Parker v Izzet | [1971] 1 WLR 1688 | set-off or setoff | |
Lee-Parker v Izzet (No. 2) | [1972] 1 WLR 775, [1972] 2 All ER 800 | conditional contract | |
Lee-Parker v Izzet (No. 2) | [1972] 1 WLR 775, [1972] 2 All ER 800 | subject to finance or subject to financing | |
Lee-Verhulst (Investments) Ltd v Harwood Trust | [1973] 1 QB 204 (CA) | business tenancy(Eng) | |
Lee-Verhulst (Investments) Ltd v Harwood Trust | [1973] 1 QB 204 (CA) | occupation | |
Leicester (Earl of) v Wells-next-the-Sea UDC | [1973] Ch 110, 119) | incorporeal hereditament | |
Leicester City Council v Leicestershire County Council | (1995) 70 P & CR 435) | set-off or setoff | |
Leigh v Dickeson | (1884–85) 15 QBD 60, 65 | tenancy in common | Lejonvarn v Cromwell Mansions Management Company Ltd | [2011] EWHC 3838, [2012] 25 EG 90 | ad coelum usque ad centrum or ad coelum usque ad inferos(Lat) |
Lemmon v Webb | [1895] AC 1 (HL) | tree | |
Lemmon v Webb | [1894] 3 Ch 1, 11, 24 (CA) | tree | |
Lemon v Lardeur | [1946] KB 613 (CA) | time | |
Lennon v Napper | (1802) 2 Sch & L 684 | time is of the essence | |
Leschallas v Woolf | [1908] 1 Ch 641 | trade fixture | |
Lever Brothers, Limited v Bell | [1931] 1 KB 557, 564 (CA) | mistake | |
Lewin v End | [1906] AC 299, 304 (HL) | dwelling house or dwelling-house | |
Lewis (Jenkin R) & Sons Ltd v Kerman | [1971] Ch 477, 496, [1970] 3 All ER 414, 419 (CA) | surrender | |
Lewis Bowles Case | (1615) 11 Co Rep 79b | waste | |
Lewis v Baker | [1905] 1 Ch 46 | lease | |
Lewis v Mid Glamorgan CC | [1995] 1 All ER 760, 776 (HL) | waste land | |
Lewis v South Western Ry | (1852) 22 LJ Ch 209 | completion | |
Lewis v Stephenson | (1898) 67 LJ QB 296 | option to renew | |
Lewis v Weldcrest | [1978] 1 WLR 1107, [1978] 3 All ER 1226 | business premises | |
Lewis v Weldcrest | [1978] 1 WLR 1107, [1978] 3 All ER 1226 (CA) | business | |
Liford's Case | (1614) 11 Co Rep 46b, 77 Eng Rep 1206, 1215 | mill | |
Liggins v Inge | (1831) 7 Bing 682, 131 Eng Rep 263 | water rights | |
Lim Teng Huan v Ang Swee Chuan | [1992] 1 WLR 113, 117 (PC) | estoppel | |
Linden Gardens Trust Ltd v Lenesta Sludge Disposals Ltd | [1994] 1 AC 85, 108 (HL) | lease | |
Lindenau v Desborough | (1828) 8 B & C 586, 592, 108 Eng Rep 1160 | utmost good faith | |
Lindsay Petroleum Co v Hurd | (1874) LR 5 PC 221, 239, 240 (PC) | laches | |
Line v Stephenson | (1838) 5 Bing NC 678, 132 Eng Rep 950 | demise | |
Lister v Lane and Nesham | [1893] 2 QB 212 (CA) | repair | |
Lister v Pickford | (1865) 3 Beav 576, 580, 55 Eng Rep 757 | appurtenance | |
Littlewood etc. Stores v I.R.C | [1961] 3 All ER 259, 264 (CA) | convertible security | |
Littlewoods Mail Order Stores Ltd v Inland Revenue Cmrs | [1963] AC 135 [1962] 2 WLR 1228 (PC) | excambion(Scot) | |
Liverpool City Council v Irwin | [1977] AC 239, [1976] 2 All ER 39 (HL) | duty of care | |
Liverpool City Council v Irwin | [1977] AC 239, [1976] 2 All ER 39 (HL) | implied covenant | |
Liverpool City Council v Irwin | [1977] AC 239, [1976] 2 All ER 39 (HL) | repair | |
Livestock Underwriting Agency Ltd v Corbett and Newson Ltd | [1955] 165 EG 469 | business tenancy(Eng) | |
Llewellyn v Earl of Jersey | (1843) 11 M & W 183, 189, 152 Eng Rep 767 | falsa demonstratio non nocet cum de corpore constat(Lat) | |
Lloyd v Banks | (1868) 37 LJ Ch 882 | actual notice | |
Lloyd v Grace, Smith & Co | [1912] AC 716 (HL) | vicarious liability | |
Lloyd v Jones | (1848) 6 CB 81, 90, 136 Eng Rep 1182 | hereditament | |
Lloyd v Nowell | (1895) 2 Ch 744 | waiver | |
Lloyd v Sadler | [1978] 1 QB 774, 783B/D | tenant | |
Lloyd v Stanbury | [1971 2 All ER 267, 275 | damages | |
Lloyd v Sutcliffe | [2007] EWCA Civ 153 (CA) | entire agreement clause (EAC) | |
Lloyds Bank Ltd v Bundy | [1975] QB 326, [1974] 3 All ER 757, 767 (CA) | undue influence | |
Lloyds Bank plc v Hawkins | [1998] 47 EG 137 | all monies mortgage | |
Lloyds Bank plc v Rosset | [1991] 1 AC 107, [1990] 1 All ER 1111 (HL) | overriding interest(Eng) | |
Lloyds Bank plc v Rosset | [1991] 1 AC 107, [1990] 1 All ER 1111 (HL) | constructive trust | |
Lock v Bell | [1931] 1 Ch 35 | time is of the essence | |
Lockhart v Hardy | (1846) 9 Beav 379, 50 Eng Rep 389 | recourse | |
Lockwood v Wood | (1844) 6 QB 50, 64 | customary right(Eng) | |
London & Blenheim Estates Ltd v Ladbroke Retail Parkes Ltd | [1992] 1 WLR 1278) | easement | |
London & Blenheim Estates Ltd v Ladbroke Retail Parkes Ltd | [1992] 1 WLR 1278) | easement | |
London (City of) v Greyme | (1607) Cro Jac 181, 79 Eng Rep 158 | waste | |
London (City of) v Nash | (1747) 3 Atk 512, 26 Eng Rep 1095) | rebuild | |
London and Cheshire Insurance Co Ltd v Laplagrene Property Co Ltd | [1971] Ch 499 | overriding interest(Eng) | |
London and Cheshire Insurance Co Ltd v Laplagrene Property Co Ltd | [1971] Ch 499, 514C-D | constructive trust | |
London and County (A. & D.) Ltd v Wilfred SportsmanLtd | [1971] Ch 764 | concurrent lease | |
London and Harrogate Securities Ltd v Pitts [ | 1976] 3 All ER 809, 814–5 | per cent or percent | |
London Corporation v Riggs | (1880) 13 Ch D 798 | easement of necessity | |
London County Council v Allen | [1914] 3 KB 642 | restrictive covenant | |
London County Council v Marks and Spencer | [1953] AC 535 (HL) | building operations(Eng) | |
London Permanent Benefit Building Society v de Baer | [1969] 1 Ch 321, 336 | possession order(Eng) | |
London Tara Hotel Ltd v Kensington Close Hotel Ltd | [2011] EWCA Civ 1356, [2011] 48 EG 86 (CA) | as of right | |
London Regional Transport v Imperial Group Pension Trust Ltd | (1987) 284 EG 1593 | notice to treat(Eng) | |
Longbottom v Berry | (1869) LR 5 QB 137 | fixture | |
Longman v Viscount Chelsea | (1989) 2 EGLR 242 | delivery | |
Lord Chichester v Coventry | (1867) 36 LJ Ch 673, 685 (HL) | satisfaction | |
Lord v Colvin | (1859) 28 LJ Ch 366 | domicile | |
Lory v London Borough of Brent | [1971] 1 WLR 823, [1971] 1 All ER 1042 | grazing licence(Eng) | |
Lory v London Borough of Brent | [1971] 1 WLR 823, 827, [1971] 1 All ER 1042, 1046 | good husbandry(Eng) | |
Lott v Outhwaite | (1803) 10 TLR 76) | quantum meruit(Lat) | |
Lotus Ltd v British Soda Co Ltd | [1972] Ch 123) | right of support or right to support | |
Lovell and Christmas Ltd v Wall | [1911] 104 LTNS 88, 93 | rectification | |
Lowe (Inspector of Taxes) v J.W. Ashmore Ltd | [1971] 1 All ER 1057, 1068 | profit à prendre | |
Lowe v Mack | (1905) 92 LTNS 349, 350 | valuer | |
Lower v Sorrell | [1963] 1 QB 959, 975, [1962] 3 All ER 1074, 1083 (CA) | notice to quit | |
Lucena v Craufurd | (1806) 2 Bos & PNR 269, 301, 127 Eng Rep 630, 642 (HL) | insurance | |
Lucena v Craufurd | (1806) 2 Bos & PNR 269, 322–3, 127 Eng Rep 630, 643 (HL) | insurable interest | |
Luganda v Service Hotels Ltd | [1969] 2 Ch 209, [1969] 2 All ER 692 (CA) | residence | |
Luganda v Service Hotels Ltd | [1969] 2 Ch 209, 219, [1969] 2 All ER 692, 695 (CA) | exclusive occupation | |
Luganda v Service Hotels Ltd | [1969] 2 Ch 209, [1969] 2 All ER 692 (CA) | dwelling house or dwelling-house | |
Lurcott v Wakeley | [1911] 1 KB 905, 923 (CA) | repair | |
Luxor (Eastbourne) Ltd v Cooper | [1941] AC 108, 137 (HL) | implied term or implied condition | |
Luxor (Eastbourne) Ltd v Cooper | [1941] AC 108, 141 (HL) | quantum meruit(Lat) | |
Luxor (Eastbourne) Ltd v Cooper | [1941] AC 108, 142 (HL) | sale | |
Luxor (Eastbourne) Ltd v Cooper obiter | [1941] AC 108, 142 (HL) | commission | |
Luxor(Eastbourne) Ltdv Cooper | [1941] AC 108, 129 (HL) | ready, able and willing or ready, willing and able | |
Lynall v IRC | (1972) AC 680 (HL) | open market | |
Lynch v Dalzell | (1729) 4 Bro PC 431, 2 Eng Rep 292 (HL) | insurable interest | |
Lynch v Thorne | [1956] 1 WLR 303, [1956] 1 All ER 744 (CA) | implied term or implied condition | |
Lyon v Fishmongers' Co | (1876) App Cas 662 (HL) | riparian rights | |
Lyon v Greenhow | (1892) 8 TLR 457 | tax | |
Lyon v Reed | (1844) 13 M & W 285, 305–8, 153 Eng Rep 118 | surrender | |
Lysaght v Edwards | (1876) 2 Ch D 499, 506 | contract for sale | |
Lysaght v Edwards | (1876) 2 Ch D 499, 506 | constructive trust | |
Lyus v Prowsa Developments Ltd | [1982] 1 WLR 1044 | constructive trust | |
return to top | M |
||
M.E.P.C. Ltd. v. Christian-Edwards | [1981] AC 205 | good title | |
M'Alister (Donaghue) v Stevenson | [1932] AC 562, 580 (HL) | duty of care | |
M'Alister (Donaghue) v Stevenson | [1932] AC 562, 580 (HL) | neighbor(AmE) or neighbour(BrE) | |
Mackenzie v Duke of Devonshire | [1896] AC 400, 408 (HL) | recital | |
Mackworth v Hellard | [1921] 2 KB 755 (CA) | low rent(Eng) | |
Maddison v Alderson | (1883) 8 App Cas 485 (HL) | part performance | |
Madrassa Anjuman Islamia of Kholwad v Municipal Council of Johannesburg | [1922] 1 AC 500, 504 (PC) | occupation | |
Freifeld v West Kensington Court Ltd | [2015] EWCA Civ, [2015] EGLR 60 (CA) | relief | |
Magnic Ltd v Ul-Hassan | [2015] EWCA Civ 24 (CA) | relief | |
Magnohard Ltd v Cadogan Estates Ltd | [2012] EWCA Civ 594 (CA) | house | |
Majorstake Ltd v Curtis | [2006] 37 EG 194 (CA) | leasehold enfranchisement(Eng) | |
Majorstake Ltd v Curtis | [2008] UKHL 10, [2008] 14 EG 102 (HL) | premises | |
Makro Properties Ltd v Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council | [2012] EWHC 2250, [2012] PLSCS 150 | rateable occupation(Eng) | |
Malayan Credit Ltd v Jack Chia-MPH Ltd | [1986] AC 549, 560 (PC) | tenancy in common | |
Malcomson v O'Dea | (1863) 10 HL Cas 593, 11 Eng Rep 1155 (HL) | riparian rights | |
Malekshad v Howard de Walden Estates Ltd | [2004] 1 WLR 862, [2004] 4 All ER 162 (HL) | house | |
Mallick v Liverpool City Council | [1999] 33 EG 77, 80 (CA) | compensation for disturbance(Eng) | |
Manchester City Council v Pinnock | [2010] UKSC 45, [2010] 3 WLR 1441 (SC) | demoted tenancy(Eng) | |
Manchester Corporation v The Countess Ossalinsky | (1883) QBD unreported | compensation for disturbance(Eng) | |
Manchester Diocesan Council for Education v Commercial and General Investments Ltd | [1969] 3 All ER 1593 | offer | |
Manchester Ship Canal Co v Manchester Racecourse Co | [1900] 2 Ch 352 | right of first refusal | |
Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Ry v Anderson | [1958] 2 Ch 394 | quiet enjoyment | |
Manjang v Drammeh | (1990) 61 P & CR 194, 197 (PC) | easement of necessity | |
Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Asssurance Co Ltd | [1997] AC 749, 780 [1997] 2 WLR 945, 975 (HL) | break clause | Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd | [1997] AC 749, [1997] 2 WLR 945 | literal construction or literal meaning |
Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Asssurance Co Ltd | [1997] AC 749, 780 [1997] 2 WLR 945, 975 (HL) | notice | |
Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd | [1997] AC 749, [1997] 2 WLR 945 | time is of the essence | |
Mansi v Elstree RDC | [1965] JPL 596, (1964) 16 P&CR 153 | enforcement notice | |
Marchant v Chartes | [1977] 1 WLR 1181, [1977] 3 All ER 918 (CA) | exclusive possession | |
Marchant v Chartes | [1977] 1 WLR 1182, 1185, [1977] 3 All ER 918, 922 (CA) | lease | |
Marchday Group plc v British Telecommunications plc | [2003] EWHC 2627 | damages | |
Marchday Group plc v British Telecommunications plc | [2003] EWHC 2627 | schedule of dilapidations(BrE) | |
Marcroft Wagons Ltd v Smith | [1951] 2 KB 496, 501 (CA) | statutory tenancy(Eng) | |
Maredelanto Camania Naviera SA v Bergbau-Handel Gmbh, The Mihalis Angelos | [1971] 1 QB 164, 196, [1970] 3 All ER 125, 131 (CA) | breach of contract | |
Mareva Compania Naviera SA of Panama v International Bulk Carriers SA | [1975] 2 Lloyd's Rep 509 (CA) | Mareva injunction(Eng) | |
Markham v Paget | [1908] 1 Ch 697 | demise | |
Marks and Spencer Ltd v Chandler (V.O.) | (1959) R & IT 639 | quantity allowance(BrE) | |
Marks and Spencer v Collier (V.O.) | [1966] RA 107, 122 (LT) | zoning method(BrE) | |
Marks and Spencer Plc v BNP Parisbas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd | [2015] UKSC 72, [2015] PLSCS 341 (SC) | apportionment | |
Marks and Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd | [2014] EWCA Civ 603, [2014] 2 EGLR 48 (CA) | break clause | |
Marks and Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd | [2015] UKSC 72, at 21, [2015] PLSCS 341 (SC) | implied term or implied condition | |
Marks v Board | (1830) 46 TLR 424 | subject to survey | |
Marks v Warren | [1979] 1 All ER 29, 31 | assignment | |
Marks v Warren | [1979] 1 All ER 29, 31 | sublease or sub-lease | |
Marlborough Park Services Ltd v Rowe | [2006] EWCA Civ 436, [2006] 23 EG 166 (CA) | structural repair | |
Marlbray Ltd v Ltd v Laditi | [2016] EWCA Civ 476, [2016] PLSCS 152 (CA) | deposit | |
Marquess of Devonshire v O'Brien | (1887) 19 LR Ir 390 | market | |
Marsden v Edward Heyes Ltd | [1927] 2 KB 1 | implied covenant | |
Marsden v Edward Heyes, Ltd | [1927] 2 KB 1 (CA) | repair | |
Marsden v Edward Heyes, Ltd | [1927] 2 KB 1 (CA) | improvement | |
Marsh Ltd v Cooper | [1969] 1 WLR 803, [1969] 2 All ER 498, 500 (CA) | living room | |
Marsh v Curteys | (1596) Cro Eliz 528, 78 Eng 775 | waiver | |
Marsh, Ltd v Cooper | [1969] 2 All ER 498 (CA) | assured tenancy(Eng) | |
Marshall v Green | (1875) 1 CPD 40 | fructus(Lat) | |
Marshall v Rubypoint | [1997] 1 EGLR 69 (CA) | damages | |
Martin Grant & Co Ltd v Sir Lindsay Parkinson & Co Ltd | (1985) 3 Con LR 12 (CA) | implied term or implied condition | |
Martyn v Clue | (1852) 18 QB 661 | covenant running with the land | |
Martyn v Williams | (1857) 1 Hurl & N 817, 827, 156 Eng 1430 | tenement | |
Mary Portington's Case | (1613) 10 Co Rep 35b, 41b, 42a, 77 Eng Rep 976 | conditional fee simple(Eng) | |
Mary Portington's Case | (1613) 10 Co Rep 35b, 42a, 77 Eng Rep 976 | fee simple conditional | |
Maryland Estates v Abbathure Flat Management Co Ltd | [1999] 06 EG 177 | marriage value (MV)(Eng) | |
Maryland Estates v Joseph | [1998] 1 WLR 83 | rent in advance or rent in arrears | |
Mason v Armitage | (1800) 13 Ves Jun 25, 33 Eng Rep 204 | chilling a sale | |
Mason v Clarke | [1954] 1 All ER 189, 191 (CA) | reservation | |
Mason v Hill | (1833) 5 B & Ad 1, 110 Eng Rep 692 | water rights | |
Mason v Totalfinaelf UK Ltd | [2003] 3 EGLR 19, [17]-[23] | repair | |
Mason v Totalfinelf UK Ltd | [2003] 3 EGLR 19 | repairs notice(Eng) | |
Masters and Great Western Railway Co, Re | [1900] 2 QB 687 | injurious affection | |
Matos e Silva, LDA and others v Portugal | (1997) 24 EHRR 573 at [86]-[93] | compensation for planning restrictions(Eng) | |
Matsoukis v Priestman & Co | [1915] 1 KB 681 | force majeure(Civ) | |
Mattey Securities Ltd v Ervin | [1998] 34 EG 91 (CA) | surrender | |
Matthews v Goodday | (1861) 31 LJ Ch 282, 282–3 | equitable charge | |
Matthews v Smallwood | [1910] 1 Ch 777, 784 | reddendum | |
Matthews v Smallwood | [1910] 1 Ch 777, 786 | waiver | |
Matthey v Curling | [1922] 2 AC 180, 200 (HL) | eviction | |
Maunsell v Olins | [1975] AC 373, 383, 386, 392 (HL) | premises | |
May and Butcher Ltd v R | [1934] 2 KB 17, [1929] All ER Rep 679 (CA) | conditional contract | |
Mayflower Cambridge Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment | (1975) 30 P & CR 28, 31–2 | hotel | |
Mayho v Buckhurst | (1617) Cro Jac 438, 79 Eng Rep 374 | covenant running with the land | |
Mayor, etc. of Southend-on-Sea v White | (1900) 65 JP 7 | rateable occupation(Eng) | |
McAuley v Bristol City Council | [1992] QB 134, [1991] 45 EG 155 | duty of care | McAuley v Bristol City Council | [1992] QB 134, [1991] 45 EG 155 | negligence |
McCall v Abelesz | [1976] QB 585, 594E (CA) | quiet enjoyment | |
McCallum v Hicks | [1950] 2 KB 271 (CA) | ready, able and willing or ready, willing and able | |
McCann & Co (John) v Pow | [1975] 1 All ER 129 (CA) | subagent or sub-agent | |
McCarthy v Metropolitan Board of Works | (1872) LR 8 CP 191, 208, aff'd (1874) LR 7 HL 243 (HL) | injurious affection | |
McCartney v Londonderry and Lough Swilly Ry Co | [1904] AC 301, 306–7 (HL) | water rights | |
McCausland v Duncan Lawrie | [1997] 1 WLR 38, [1996] 4 All ER 995 (CA) | writing | |
McClinton v McFall | (1974) 232 EG 707 | agricultural land | |
McCombie v Grand Junction Co Ltd | [1962] 1 WLR 581, [1962] 2 All ER 65, Note (CA) | business tenancy(Eng) | |
McDermott v Department of Transport | (1984) 48 P & CR 351 | blight notice(Eng) | |
McDonald v Fernandez | [2003] EWCA Civ 1219, [2003] 42 EG 128 (CA) | notice | |
McDonald's Property Co Ltd v HSBC Bank plc | [2001] 36 EG 181, 185 | time is of the essence | |
McEllistrim v Ballymacelligott Co-operative Agricultural and Dairy Society | [1919] AC 548, 562 (HL) | non-competition clause | |
McEllistrim v Ballymacelligott Co-operative Agricultural and Dairy Society | [1919] AC 548, 562 (HL) | restrictive covenant | |
McIlkenny v Chief Constable of the West Midlands | [1980] 2 All ER 227, 235 | estoppel | |
McInnes v Clarke | [1955] 1 All ER 346 | accommodation agent(Eng) | |
McKenzie v McKenzie | [2003] EWHC 601 | joint tenancy | |
McManus v Cooke | (1887) 35 Ch D 681 | part performance | |
McManus v Fortescue | [1907] 2 KB 1, 6 (CA) | reserve price(BrE) or reserved price(AmE) | |
McNerny v Lambeth London Borough Council | [1989] 19 EG 77, Caf | furnished tenancy(Eng) | |
McPhail v persons, names unknown, Bristol Corporation v Ross and another | [1973] 3 All ER 393, 395 (CA) | squatter | |
McPhail v Philips | [1904] 1 IR 155, 159 | effects | |
Medford v Blake | [2000] Ch 86, 102F-H (CA) | receiver | |
Medforth v Blake | [1999] 29 EG 119, 124 (CA) | power of sale | |
Medforth v Blake | [1999] 29 EG 119, 126 (CA) | receiver | |
Mehta v J Pereira Fernandez SA | [2006] EWHC 813, [2006] WLR 1543 | service | |
Mehta v J Pereira Fernandez SA | [2006] EWHC 813, [2006] WLR 1543 | signature | |
Mehta v J Pereira Fernandez SA | [2006] EWHC 813, [2006] WLR 1543 | writing | |
Mellor v Walmesley | [1905] 2 Ch 164 | foreshore | |
Mellor v Watkins | (1874) LR 9 QB 400 | sublessee or sub-lessee | |
MEPC Ltd v Christian Edwards | [1979] 3 WLR 713, 720 | good title | |
Mercantile Marine Insurance Co v Titherington | (1864) 5 B & S 765, 767, 122 Eng Rep 1015 | day | |
Mercer v Denne | [1904] 2 Ch 534 | customary right(Eng) | |
Mercer v Liverpool, St Helens and South Lancashire Rail Co | [1904] AC 461 (HL) | notice to treat(Eng) | |
Mercury Communications Ltd v Director General of Telecommunications | [1996] 1 WLR 48, [1996] 1 All ER 575 (HL) | expert | |
Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Liverpool Overseers | (1873) LR 9 QB 84, 97 | profits method of valuation(BrE) | |
Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Proctor | [1923] AC 253 (HL) | invitee | |
Methuen-Campbell v Walters | [1979] 247 EG 899, [1979] 1 All ER 606, 621 (CA) | curtilage | |
Metropolitan Board of Works v McCarthy | (1874) 43 LJCP 390 | compensation for injurious affection(Eng) | |
Metropolitan Property Holdings v Finegold | [1975] 1 WLR 349; | fair rent | |
Metropolitan Water Board v Paine | [1907] 1 KB 285, 291 | premises | |
Meux v Cobley | [1892] 2 Ch 253, 263 | waste | |
Meux v Cobley | [1892] 2 Ch 253, 262 | waste | |
Mew v Tristmire Ltd | [2012] 1 WLR 852, [2011] HLR 47 (CA) | mobile home | |
Michael v Miller | [2004] EWCA Civ 282, [2004] 2 P & CR D12 (CA) | power of sale | |
Michell v Michell | (1820) 5 Madd 69, 71, 56 Eng Rep 821 | effects | |
Micklethwait v Micklethwait | (1858) 28 LJ CP 121, 127 | settled estate(Eng) | |
Micklethwait v Newlay Bridge Co | [1886] 33 Ch D 133 | contiguous | |
Midland Bank Ltd v Farmpride Hatcheries Ltd | [1980] 260 EG 494 (CA) | constructive notice | |
Midland Bank Trust Co Ltd v Green | [1981] AC 513, [1981] 1 All ER 153 (HL) | money's worth(Eng) | |
Midland Bank Trust Co Ltd v Green | [1981] AC 513, [1981] 1 All ER 153 (HL) | value | |
Midland Bank Trust Co Ltd v Green | [1981] AC 513, [1981] 1 All ER 153 (HL) | money or money's worth(Eng) | |
Midland Bank Trust Co Ltd v Green | [1981] AC 513, 531–2, [1981] All ER 153 (HL) | bona fide purchaser (BFP) | |
Midland Railway Co v Checkley | (1867) LR 4 Eq 19, 25 | mineral | |
Midland Ry Co v Haunchwood Brick and Tile Co | (1880) 20 Ch D 552 | mine | |
Midtown Ltd v City of London Real Property Co Ltd | [2005] EWHC 33, [2005] 14 EG 130 | restrictive covenant | |
Migotti v Colvill | (1879) 4 CPD 233 (CA) | month | |
Mikeover Ltd v Brady | [1989] 3 All ER 618 | joint tenancy | |
Miller and Aldworth v Sharp | [1899] 1 Ch 622 | part performance | |
Miller v Cannon Hill Estates Ltd | [1931] 2 KB 113 | implied warranty | |
Miller v Jackson | [1977] QB 966, 980, [1977] 3 All ER 338, 344 (CA) | nuisance | |
Miller v Race | (1758) 1 Burr 452, 97 Eng Rep 398 | cash | |
Millman v Ellis | (1996) 71 P & CR 158; | quasi-easement | |
Mills v Brooker | [1919] 1 KB 555, 557 | tree | |
Milman v Lane | [1901] 2 KB 745, 747 (CA) | heirs and assigns | |
Milmo v Carreras | [1946] KB 306, 310, [1946] 1 All ER 288, 290 (CA) | privity of estate | |
Milmo v Carreras | [1946] KB 306, 311–2, [1946] 1 All ER 288, 290 (CA) | sublease or sub-lease | |
Milmo v Carreras | [1946] KB 306, 310, [1946] 1 All ER 288, 290 (CA) | assignment | |
Minister for Public Works v Thistlethwayte | (1954) AC 490, 491 (PC) | market value (MV) | |
Ministry of Transport v Lee | [1966] 1 QB 111, 122, [1965] 2 All ER 986, 990 (CA) | compensation for disturbance(Eng) | |
Mint v Good | [1951] 1 KB 517 | landlord's access | |
Mirvahedy v Henley | (2003) The Times, March 24 (HL) | strict liability | |
Mitchell v Mosley | [1914] 1 Ch 450 | corporeal hereditament | |
Smith v Hughes | (1871) LR 6 QB 607 | agreement | |
Smith v Marrable | (1843) 11 M & W 5, 152 Eng Rep 693 | warranty of habitability(US) | |
Mixnam's Properties v Chertsey UDC | [1964] 1 QB 214, 226–7 (CA) | planning condition(Eng) | |
Mixnam's Properties v Chertsey UDC | [1965] AC 735, 751, 761 (HL) | planning condition(Eng) | |
Moffatt v Kazana | [1969] 2 QB 151 | fixture | |
Moir v Williams | [1892] 1 QB 264 | building | |
Monomart (Warehouses) Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment | (1977) 34 P & CR 305 | warehouse | |
Monson (Lord) v Bound | [1954] 1 All ER 228 | agricultural holding(Eng) | |
Montague v Browning | [1954] 1 WLR 1039, [1954] 2 All ER 601 (CA) | rent | |
Moore and Co v Landauer and Co | [1921] 1 KB 73) | performance | |
Moore v Bennett | (1678) 2 Ch Cas 246 [22 Eng Rep 928]) | notice | |
Moore v Rawson | (1824) 3 B & C 332, 107 Eng Rep 756 | easement | |
Moorhouse v Colvin | [1851] 15 Beav 341, 349, 51 Eng Rep 570 | conditional contract | |
Moorjani v Durban Estates Ltd | [2015] EWCA Civ 1252, [2016] EGLR 13 (CA) | damages | |
Morcom v Campbell-Johnson | [1956] 1 QB 106, 115, [1955] 3 All ER 264, 266 (CA) | improvement | |
Morcom v Campbell-Johnson | [1956] 1 QB 106, 115, [1955] 3 All ER 264, 266 (CA) | repair | |
Moresk Cleaners Ltd v Hicks | [1966] 2 Lloyd's Rep 338, 342 | architect | |
Morgan v Davies | (1878) 3 CPD 260 | half a year or half year | |
Morgan v Jones | [2001] EWCA Civ 995, (2001) The Times, July 24 (CA) | clog | |
Morgan v Liverpool Corporation | [1927] 2 KB 131 | fit for human habitation(Eng) | |
Morgan v Swansea Urban Sanitary Authority | (1878) 9 Ch D 582, 585–6 | bare trust(Eng) | |
Morrison Holdings v Manders Property (Wolverhampton) Ltd | [1976] 2 All ER 205, 210 (CA) | occupation | |
Morton v Copeland | (1855) 16 CB 535, 139 Eng 861 | signature | |
Mortgage Express v Countrywide Surveyors | [2016] EWHC 224, [2016] PLSCS 49 | deceit | |
Morton v Copeland | (1855) 16 CB 535, 139 Eng 861 | X | |
Moschi v Lep Air Services Ltd | [1973] AC 331, 344G, 351G (HL) | surety | |
Moses v Macferlan | (1760) 2 Burr 1005, 97 Eng Rep 676 | restitution | |
Moss v Hancock | [1899] 2 QB 111 | cash | |
Moss v Hancock | [1899] 2 QB 111, 116 | money | |
Mote v Gould | (1935) 152 LT 347 | commission | |
Mount Carmel Investments v Peter Thurlow Ltd | [1988] 1 WLR 1078 | tacking | |
Mountford v Scott | [1974] 1 All ER 248, 254, aff'd [1975] Ch 258 (CA) | option | |
Mountford v Scott | [1974] 1 All ER 248, aff'd [1975] Ch 258 (CA) | option to purchase | |
Mountview Estates Ltd v London Borough of Enfield | (1968) 20 P & CR 729, 733 | compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) | |
Muldoon v Mays of Lilliput Ltd | (1993) 14 EG 100 | valuer | |
Mullens v Miller | (1882) 22 Ch D 199 | estate agent(BrE) | |
Multiservice Bookbinders Ltd v Marden | [1979] Ch 84, [1978] 2 All ER 489 | unconscionable bargain | |
Multiservice Bookbinding Ltd v Marden | [1979] Ch 84, [1978] 2 All ER 489 | equity of redemption | |
Murdoch Lownie Ltd v Newman | [1949] 2 All ER 783 | ready, able and willing or ready, willing and able | |
Murrayfield Real Estate Co v Edinburgh Magistrates | [1912] SC 217, 221–2 | back-to-back house | |
Muscat v Smith | [2003] 1 WLR 2853, 40 EG 148 (CA) | set-off or setoff | |
Mustafa v Baptist Union Corporation Ltd | (1983) 266 EG 813 | particulars of sale | |
MW Trustees Ltd & Ors v Telular Corporation /em> | [2011] EWHC 104 (Ch), [2011] L & TR 19< | break clause | |
N |
|||
Nash v Eads | (1880) 25 Sol J 95 | power of sale | |
National Association of Local Government Officers v Bolton Corporation | [1943] AC 166, 185 (HL) | trade | |
National Bank of Greece SA v Pinios Shipping Co | (No 1) [1990] 1 AC 637 (HL) | simple interest | |
National Car Parks v The Trinity Development Company (Banbury) Limited | [2002] 2 P & CR 18 | licence(BrE) or license(AmE) | |
National Carriers Ltd v Panalpina (Northern) Ltd | [1981] AC 675, [1981] 1 All ER 161 (HL) | reinstatement clause | |
National Carriers Ltd v Panalpina Ltd | [1981] 1 All ER 161 | frustration | |
National Electric Theatres v Hudgell | [1939] Ch 553 | compensation for improvements | |
National Provincial Bank Ltd v Hastings Car Mart Ltd | [1964] 1 Ch 665, 686, [1964] 1 All ER 688, 695 (CA) | licence by estoppel(Eng) | |
National Provincial Bank v Ainsworth Ltd | [1965] AC 1175, 1237–8, [1965] 2 All ER 472, 478 (HL) | equitable interest | |
National Westminster Bank Ltd v Hart | [1983] QB 773, [1983] 2 All ER 177 (CA) | estoppel | |
National Westminster Bank plc v Morgan | [1985] 1 AC 686, [1985] 1 All ER 821 (HL) | undue influence | |
Naylor v Uttoxeter Urban District Council | (1974) 231 EG 619 | business tenancy(Eng) | |
NCR Ltd v Riverland Portfolio No 1 Ltd | [2004] EWHC 921, [2004] EG 110 | reverse premium | |
NCR v Riverland Portfolio No 1 Ltd (No 2) | [2004] EWHC 2073, [2004] PLSCS 181 | restraint on alienation | |
NCR v Riverland Portfolio No 1 Ltd (No 2) | [2005] EWCA Civ 312, [2005] 22 EG 134, 139 (CA) | restraint on alienation | |
Neale v Del Soto | [1945] 1 KB 144 | living room | |
Nelson Developments v Taboada | (1992) 24 HLR 462 | attendance(Eng) | |
New Windsor Corp'n v Mellor | [1975] Ch 380, 392H, [1975] 3 All ER 44 (CA) | customary right(Eng) | |
New Zealand Government Property Corporation v H M and S Ltd | [1982] QB 1145, [1982] 262 EG 765, [1982] 1 All ER 624 (CA) | fixture | |
New Zealand Government Property Corporation v H M and S Ltd | [1982] QB 1145, [1982] 262 EG 765, [1982] 1 All ER 624 (CA) | trade fixture | |
Newbury DC v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1981] AC 578, 599, 618, [1980] 1 All ER 731, 739, 754 (HL) | planning condition(Eng) | |
Newbury DC v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1981] AC 578, 599–600, [1980] 1 All ER 731, 739 (HL) | planning purpose(Eng) | |
Newcastle City Council v Royal Newcastle Hospital | [1959] AC 248 (PC) | use | |
Newcastle City Council v Royal Newcastle Hospital | [1959] AC 248, 255 (PC) | occupier | |
Newham LBC v Hawkins | [2005] 2 EGLR 51 | holding over | |
Newham LBC v Hawkins | [2005] 2 EGLR 51 | secure tenancy(Eng) | |
Newlon Housing Trust v Alsulaimen | [1998] 3 WLR 451, 455, [1998] 4 All ER 1 (HL) | disposition | |
Newman v Bennett | [1981] QB 726, [1980] 3 All ER 449, 452 | vicinage | |
Newman v Dorrington Developments Ltd | [1975] 1 WLR 1642, [1975] 3 All ER 928) | rack rent | |
Newman v Lawson | (1971) 22 P & CR 852, 859 | right of light(BrE) or right to light(AmE) | |
Newman v Real Estate Debenture Corp'n Ltd | [1940] 1 All ER 131 | derogation from grant | |
Newman v Rogers | (1793) 4 Bro CC 391, 29 Eng Rep 950 | time is of the essence | |
Newman v Slade | [1926] 2 KB 328 | week-to-week tenancy(AmE) or weekly tenancy(BrE) | |
News Group Newspapers Ltd v SOGAT'82 | [1986] IRLR 346 | nuisance | |
Nicholson v Chapman | (1793) 2 Bl H 254, 126 Eng Rep 536) | quasi-contract | |
Nicholas Prestige Homes v Neal | [2010] EWCA Civ 1552, [2010] All ER (D) 22 (CA) | acceptance | |
Nicholas Prestige Homes v Neal | [2010] EWCA Civ 1552, [2010] All ER (D) 22 (CA) | sole selling right(BrE) | |
Nicholas Prestige Homes v Neal | [2010] EWCA Civ 1552, [2010] All ER (D) 22 (CA) | writing | |
Nickerson v Barraclough | [1981] Ch 426, [1979] 3 All ER 312 (CA) | appurtenance | |
Nickerson v Barraclough | [1981] Ch 426, [1979] 3 All ER 312 (CA) | easement of necessity | |
Ninety Broomfield Road RTM Co Ltd v Triplerose Ltd | [2013] UKHT 0606 (LC), [2014] PLSCS 4 | clog | |
Noakes & Co Ltd v Rice | [1902] AC 24, [1900–3] All ER Rep 34 (HL) | clog | |
Noakes & Co Ltd v Rice | [1902] AC 24, [1900–3] All ER Rep 34 (HL) | equity of redemption | |
Noakes & CoLtdv Rice | [1902] AC 24, 33–4, [1900–3] All ER Rep 34 (HL) | once a mortgage, always a mortgage | |
Nocton v Lord Ashburton | [1914] AC 932, 962 (HL) | misrepresentation | |
Hodgson v Marks | [1971] Ch 892, [1971] 2 All ER 684 (CA) | occupation | |
Nonentities Society Trustees v Kidderminster Borough Council | (1970) 22 P & CR 224 (LT) | equivalent reinstatement(Eng) | |
North Eastern Properties Ltd v Coleman and another | [2010] 12 EG 97 (CA) | writing | |
North Shore Rly Co v Pion | (1889) 14 App Cas 612, 620 (PC) | riparian rights | |
North Staffordshire Railway Co v Lawton | (1863) 3 NR 31 | immediate possession | |
North West Metropolitan Regional Hospital Board v T A Bickerton & Son Ltd | [1970] 1 WLR 607, [1970] 1 All ER 1039 (HL) | nominated subcontractor | |
Northland Airliners v Dennis Ferranti Meters | [1970] 114 Sol J 845 | acceptance | |
Northampton Regional Livestock Centre Co Ltd v Cowling | [2014] EWHC 30, [2014] PLSCS 30 | dual agency | |
Northampton Regional Livestock Centre Co Ltd v Cowling | [2014] EWHC 30, [2014] PLSCS 30 | vicarious liability | |
Northumberland v A-G | [1905] AC 406, 410 (HL) | disposition | |
Norwich Union Life Insurance Society v Shopmoor Ltd | [1999] 1 WLR 531, 545, [1998] All ER Rev 282 | restraint on alienation | |
Nugent v Smith | (1875) 1 CPD 19, 34, (1876) 1 CPD 423, 434 (CA) | act of God | |
NYK Logistics (UK) Ltd v Ibrend Estates BV | [2011] EWCA Civ 683, [2011] 25 EG 104 (CA) | break clause(Eng) | |
NYK Logistics (UK) Ltd v Ibrend Estates BV | [2011] EWCA Civ 683, [2011] 25 EG 104 (CA) | vacant possession | |
O |
|||
O'Brien v Robinson | [1973] AC 912, [1973] 1 All ER 583 (HL) | repair | |
O'Connor and others v Old Etonian Housing Association Ltd | [2002] EWCA Civ 150, [2002] 14 EG 127, 129 (CA) | proper working order | |
O'May v City of London Real Property Co Ltd | 1983] 2 AC 726, 740, 748 [1982] 1 All ER 660, 665, 671 (HL) | business tenancy(Eng) | |
O'May v City of London Real Property Co Ltd | [1983] 2 AC 726, 748, [1982] 1 All ER 660, 671 (HL) | clear lease(Eng) | |
Oakden v Pike | (1865) 34 LJ Ch 620, 12 LT 527 | notice to complete (NTC)(Eng) | |
Oakglade Investments Ltd v Dhand | [2012] EWCA Civ 286, [2012] 12 EG 93 (CA) | absolute title | |
Oakwood Court (Holland Park) Ltd v Daejen Properties Ltd | [2007] 1 EGLR 121 | leasehold enfranchisement(Eng) | |
Ocean Estates Ltd v Pinder | [1969] 2 AC 19, 25 (PC) | absolute title | |
Ocean Estates Ltd v Pinder | [1969] 2 AC 19, 25 (PC) | absolute title | |
Oceanbulk Shipping & Trading SA v TMT Asia Limited | [2011] 1 AC 662, [2010] 4 All ER 1011, (SC) | without prejudice | |
Oceanseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock & Engineering Co Ltd | [1961] AC 388, 442–3 (PC) | negligence | |
Ofulue v Bossert | [2009] 2 All ER 223, ?? [2009] 1 AC 990, ?? (HL) | adverse possession | |
Ofulue v Bossert | [2009] 2 All ER 223, [2009] 1 AC 990 (HL) | without prejudice | |
Ogilvie v Foljambe | (1817) 3 Mer 53, 36 Eng Rep 21 | signature | |
Old Gate Estates Ltd v Toplis | [1939] 3 All ER 209 | valuer | |
Oldfield (or Bowles) v Round | (1800) 5 Ves Jun 509, 31 Eng Rep 707 | defect of title | |
Olivant v Wright | (1875) 1 Ch D 650 | will | |
Olivant v Wright | (1875) 1 Ch D 650 | deed | |
Oliver v Nautilus Steam Shipping Co | [1903] 2 KB 639 (CA) | without prejudice | |
Oliver v Symonds | [2012] EWCA Civ 267, [2012] 22 EG 86 (CA) | easement | |
Olympia & York Canary Wharf Ltd v Oil Property Investments Ltd | (1994) 29 EG 121, (1994) 29 P & CR 43, 48-50 (CA) | restraint on alienation | |
OM Property Management Ltd v Burr | [2013] 2 P & CR 11, [2013] 1 WLR 3071 (CA) | infer | |
Oppenheimer v Minister of Transport | [1942] 1 KB 242 | interest | |
Oppenheimer v Minister of Transport | [1942] 1 KB 242 | notice to treat(Eng) | |
Orakpo v Manson Investments Ltd | [1978] AC 95, [1977] 3 All ER 1 (HL) | subrogation | |
Orman Bros v Greenbaum | [1955] 1 WLR 248, [1954] 3 All ER 731, 732 (CA) | termination | |
Oscar Chess, Ltd v Williams | [1957] 1 All ER 325, 328 (CA) | warranty | |
Osman v J Ralph Moss Ltd | [1970] 1 Lloyd's Rep 313 (CA) | breach of warranty of authority | |
Ottercroft Ltd v Scandia Care Ltd | [2016] EWCA Civ, [2016] PLSCS (CA) | injunction | |
Otter v Norman | [1989] AC 129, 143, 146 (CA) | board | |
Owen v Gadd | [1956] 2 QB 99 (CA) | quiet enjoyment | |
Oxley v Hiscock | [2005] 3 WLR 715 at [69] | resulting trust | |
P |
|||
Page v More | (1850) 15 QB 684 | time | Paddico (267) Ltd v Kirkless Metropolitan Council | [2012] EWCA Civ 262, [2012] 11 EG 92 (CA) | locality |
Paddington Basin Developments Ltd v West End Quay Estate Management Ltd | [2010] 27 EG 86 | service charge | |
Paine v Cork Co | (1900) 69 LJ Ch 158) | sell | |
Paine v Meller | (1801) 6 Ves Jun 350, 31 Eng Rep 1088, 1089 | constructive trust | |
Paine v Meller | (1801) 6 Ves Jun 350, 31 Eng Rep 1088, 1089 | damnum fatale(Lat) | |
Paine v Meller | (1801) 6 Ves Jun 350, 31 Eng Rep 1088, 1089 | property insurance | |
Palacath v Flanagan | [1985] 2 All ER 161 | expert | |
Palk v Mortgage Services Funding plc | [1993] Ch 330 | power of sale | |
Pall Mall Invstments (London) Ltd v Gloucester City Council | [2014] EWHA 2247 (Admin) | rateable occupation(Eng) | |
Palmer v Johnson | (1884) 13 QBD 351 (CA) | merger | |
Palmer v McNamara | [1991] 1 EGLR 121 | living room | |
Palser v Grinling | [1948] AC 291 (HL) | material change in the use(Eng) | |
Palser v Grinling | [1948] AC 291, 310 (HL) | attendance(Eng) | |
Panayi v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1985] JPL 783 | hostel | |
Paradine v Jane | (1647) Aleyn 26, 82 Eng Rep 897 | reinstatement clause | |
Parente v Bayville Marine Inc., etc. | [1975] 1 Lloyd's Rep 333 | latent defect | |
Parker v Camden LBC | [1986] Ch 162, 174C (CA) | specific performance | |
Parker v Flint | (1699) 12 Mod 254, 88 Eng Rep 1303 | hotel | |
Parker v McKenna | (1874) 10 Ch App 96, 119, [1874–80] All ER Rep 443, 456 (CA) | agency | |
Parker v Webb | (1693) 3 Salk 5, 91 ER 656 | covenant running with the land | |
Parkes v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1979] 1 All 211, 213 | building operations(Eng) | Parkes v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1979] 1 All 211, 213 | operations(Eng) | Parkes v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1979] 1 All 211, 213 | use | Parkus v Greenwood | [1950] Ch 644, [1950] 1 All ER 436 | perpetually renewable lease |
Parmar v Upton | [2015] EWCA Civ 795, [2015] PLSCS 231 (CA) | hedge and ditch presumption(Eng) | |
Parris v Williams | [2008] EWCA Civ 1147, [2008] 43 EG 194 (CA) | constructive trust | |
Parshall v Hackney | [2013] WLR (D) 124, [2013] 2 EGLR 37 (CA) | adverse possession | |
Parsons v Trustees of Henry Smith's Charity | [1974] 1 WLR 435 (HL) | house | |
Pascoe v Turner | [1979] 1 WLR 431 | estoppel | |
Patel v Keles | [2009] EWCA Civ 1187, [2010] 2 WLR 1159 (CA) | business tenancy | |
Patel v Hooper & Jackson | [1999] 1 WLR 1792, [1999] 1 All ER 992 (CA) | damages | |
Patel v K&J Restuarants Ltd | [2010] EWCA Civ 1211, [2011] 1 P & CR DG7 (CA) | assessment | |
Patton v Todd | [2012] EWHC 1248, [2012] 31 EG 48 | ad medium filum or ad medium filum viæ(Lat) | |
Pavilion Property Trustees Ltd v Permira Advisors LLP | [2014] EWHC 145, [2014] PLSCS 38 | authorised guarantee agreement (AGA)(Eng) | |
Payne v Cardiff RDC | [1932] 1 KB 241) | power of sale | |
Payne v Cave | (1789) 3 Term Rep 148, 100 Eng Rep 502 | revocation | |
Payne v Cave | (1789) 3 Term Rep 148, 100 Eng Rep 502 | auction | |
Payne v Cave | (1789) 3 Term Rep 148, 100 Eng Rep 502 | offer | |
Payne v Inwood | (1997) P & CR 42 (CA) | quasi-easement | |
Peacock v Custins | (2002) 81 P&CR 479, [2001] 2 All ER 827 (CA) | easement | |
Peacock v Freeman | (1888) 4 TLR 541 | sale | |
Peardon v Underhill | (1850) 16 QB 120 | common of turbary(Eng) | |
Pearks v Moseley | (1880) 5 App Cas 714, 723 (HL) | class gift | |
Pearson v Dublin Corporation | [1907] AC 351, 365 (HL) | exclusion clause(Eng) | |
Pearson v IRC | [1981] AC 753, 772 (HL) | possession | |
Pearson v IRC | [1981] AC 753, 772 (HL) | contingent estate or contingent interest | |
Pearson v IRC | [1981] AC 753, 772 (HL) | remainder | |
Pearson v IRC | [1981] AC 753, 772 (HL) | vested estate | |
Peckham v Ellison | (2000) 79 P & CR 276, 291 | implied grant | |
Pembery v Lamdin | [1940] 2 All ER 434 | external | |
Pembery v Lamdin | [1940] 2 All ER 434 | improvement | |
Peninsular Maritime Ltd v Padseal Ltd | (1981) 259 EG 860, 866 | forfeiture | |
Pennine Raceway Ltd v Kirklees Metropolitan Council | [1983] QB 382, [1982] 3 All ER 628 (CA) | proprietary interest | |
Penton v Barnett | [1898] 1 QB 276) | waiver | |
Penton v Roberts | (1801) 2 East 88, 102 Eng Rep 302 | trade fixture | |
Percival Ltd v LCC Asylums and Mental Deficiency Committee | (1918) 87 LJ KB 677 | tender | |
Percy Bilton Ltd v Greater London Council | [1980] 2 All ER 623 (HL) | liquidated damages | |
Performing Rights Society Ltd v Mitchell and Booker (Palais de Danse), Ltd | [1924] 1 KB 762, 768 (citing Pollock on Torts, 12th ed. p. 80) | independent contractor | |
Perkins v West Wiltshire DC | (1976) 31 P & CR 427 | blight notice(Eng) | |
Perrin v Northampton Borough Council | [2006] EWHC 2331, [2006] 48 EG 232 (TCC) | tree preservation order (TPO)(Eng) | |
Perry v Clissold | [1907] AC 73 (PC) | tacking | |
Perry v Davis | (1858) 3 CB (NS) 769, 773, 140 Eng Rep 945 | waiver | |
Perry v Sidney Phillips & Son | [1982] 1 All ER 1005, 1010 | structural survey | |
Persimmon Homes Ltd v Ove Arup & Partners Ltd | [2017] EWCA Civ 373, [2017] PLSCS 112 (CA) | contra proferentem(Lat) | |
Petre v Petre | (1853) 1 Drew 371, 397–8, 61 Eng Rep 493 | fraud | |
Petticoat Lane Rentals Ltd v Secretary of State | [1971] 1 WLR 1112, 1117 | planning unit(Eng) | |
Peyman v Lanjani | [1985] Ch 457, 485–9, [1985] 3 All ER 703, 722–7 (CA) | ||
Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd | [1953] 1 QB 401, [1953] 1 All ER 482 (CA) | invitation to trade(AmE) or invitation to treat(BrE) | |
Phelps v City of London Corporation | [1916] 2 Ch 255 | quiet enjoyment | |
Phene v Popplewell | (1862) 12 CB (NS) 334, 142 Eng Rep 1171 | surrender | |
Philips Electronic Grand Public SA v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd | [1995] EMLR 472, 481–2 | implied term or implied condition | |
Philips v Mobil Oil Co Ltd | [1989] 1 WLR 888 (CA) | estate contract(Eng) | |
Phillips v Beal | (1858) 25 Beav 25, 27, 53 Eng Rep 545 | devise | |
Phillips v Phillips | (1862) 4 De GF & J 211, 218, 45 Eng Rep 1164) | mere equity(Eng) | |
Phipps v Boardman | [1965] Ch 992, 1018–9 (CA) | agent | |
Phipps v Boardman | [1965] Ch 992, 1018–9 (CA) | fiduciary | |
Phipps v Boardman | [1966] 3 All ER 721, [1967] 2 AC 46 (HL) | fiduciary | |
Phipps v Pears | [1965] 1 QB 76, 82G–83A, [1964] 2 All ER 35 (CA) | negative easement | |
Phipps v Pears | [1965] 1 QB 76, 83, [1964] 2 All ER 35, 37 (CA) | right of support or right to support | |
Phipps v Pears | [1965] 1 QB 76, 83, [1964] 2 All ER 35, 37 (CA) | right of view or right to view | |
Phipps v Pears | [1965] 1 QB 76, 83, [1964] 2 All ER 35, 37 (CA) | easement | |
Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd | [1980] AC 827, 846 (HL) | breach of contract | |
Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd | [1980] AC 827, 846 (HL) | contra proferentem(Lat) | |
Pickering v Busk | (1812) 15 East 38, 43, 104 Eng Rep 758 | auctioneer | |
Pilcher v Rawlins | (1872) 7 Ch App 259 (CA) | priority of a mortgage | |
Pilcher v Rawlins | (1872) 7 Ch App 259, 268 (CA) | bona fide purchaser (BFP) | |
Pimms Ltd v Tallow Chandler Company | [1964] 2 QB 547, 564 (CA) | restraint on alienation | |
Pinnel's Case | (1602) 5 Co Rep 117a, 77 Eng Rep 237 | part payment or partial payment | |
Pinner v Everett | [1962] 3 All ER 257, 258 (HL) | words | |
Pioneer Aggregates (UK) Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1985] AC 132, [1984] 2 All ER 358 (HL) | abandonment | |
Pips (Leisure Productions) Ltd v Walton | (1982) 43 P & CR 415, 420 | reasonable effort or reasonable endeavour | |
Pirabakaran v Patel | [2006] 1 WLR 3112, [2006] 3 EGLR 23 (CA) | forfeiture | |
Pitcher v Tovey | (1692) 4 Mod 71, 87 Eng Rep 268 | rent | |
Pitt v PHH Asset Management Ltd | [1994] 1 WLR 327, [1993] 4 All ER 961 | writing | |
Pitt v PHH Asset Management Ltd | [1994] 1 WLR 327, [1993] 4 All ER 961 | lock-out agreement | |
Planché v Colburn | (1831) 8 Bing 14, 131 Eng Rep 305 | quantum meruit(Lat) | |
Pledge v White | [1896] AC 187, 198 (HL) | consolidation | |
Plough Investments Ltd v Manchester City Council | [1989] 1 EGLR 244 | right of entry | |
Pointe Gourde Quarrying and Transport Co Ltd v Sub-Intendent of Crown Lands | [1947] AC 565, 572 (PC) | compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) | |
Pointon York Group plc v Poulton | [2006] EWCA Civ 1001, [2006] 38 EG 192 (CA) | occupation | |
Pointon York Group plc v Poulton | [2006] EWCA Civ 1001, [2006] 38 EG 192 (CA) | premises | |
Poland v Earl of Cadogan and another | [1980] 3 All ER 544 (CA) | residence | |
Pole v Leask | (1863) 33 LJ Ch 892 | power of attorney | |
Pollard v Gare | [1901] 1 Ch 834 | derogation from grant | |
Pomfret v Ricroft | (1669) 1 Wms Saund 321, 85 Eng Rep 454 | easement of necessity | |
Ponsford v HMS Aerosols Ltd | [1979] AC 63, 83 (HL) | reasonable rent(Eng) | |
Poole's Case | (1703) 1 Salk 368, 91 Eng Rep 320 | fixture | |
Poole's Case | (1703) 1 Salk 368, 91 Eng Rep 320 | trade fixture | |
Port of London v Orsett Union Assessment Committee | [1920] AC 273 (HL) | rebus sic stantibus(Lat) | |
Port v Griffiths | [1938] 1 All ER 295 | derogation from grant | |
Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trustees v Hampshire County Council | (1980) 253 EG 1236 | set-off or setoff | |
Posner v Scott-Lewis | [1987] 1 Ch 25 | specific performance | |
Post Office v Aquarius Properties Ltd | [1987] 281 EG 798, [1987] 1 All ER 1055 (CA) | inherent defect or inherent vice | |
Post Office v Aquarius Properties Ltd | [1987] 281 EG 798, [1987] 1 All ER 1055 (CA) | repair | |
Powell v McFarlane | (1977) 38 P & CR 452, 470–1 | possession | |
Powell v McFarlane | (1977) 38 P & CR 452, 471–2 | animus possidendi(Lat) | |
Powys v Blagrave | (1854) 4 De GM & G. 448, 43 Eng Rep 582 | waste | |
Prasad v Wolverhampton Borough Council | [1983] 2 WLR 946, [1983] 2 All ER 140 (CA) | disturbance payment(Eng) | |
Prasad v Wolverhampton Borough Council | [1983] 2 WLR 946, [1983] 2 All ER 140 (CA) | compensation for disturbance(Eng) | |
Precious v Reedie | [1924] 2 KB 149, 150 | month-to-month tenancy(AmE) or monthly tenancy(BrE) | |
Prest v Secretary of State for Wales | (1983) 266 EG 527, 528 | compulsory purchase(Eng) | |
Price v West London Investment Building Society | [1964] 1 WLR 616, 621 (CA) | abode | |
Prickett v Badger | (1856) 1 CB (NS) | quantum meruit(Lat) | |
Pritaur Kaur v S Russell and Sons | [1973] QB 336 | time | |
Pritchard v Briggs | [1980] Ch 338, [1980] 1 All ER 294 (CA) | equitable interest | Pritchard v Briggs | [1980] Ch 338, 418, [1980] 1 All ER 294, 328-9 (CA) | option |
Pritchard v Briggs | [1980] Ch 338, 418, [1980] 1 All ER 294, 328-9 (CA) | right of pre-emption | |
Pritaur Kaur v S Russell and Sons | [1973] 1 QB 336 | time | |
Propert v Parker | (1832) 3 My & K 280, 40 Eng Rep 107 | usual covenant | |
Prophet plc v Huggett | [2014] EWCA Civ 1013 (CA) | restrictive covenant | |
Property and Bloodstock Ltd v Emerton | [1968] 94, 118 | conditions of sale | |
Property Holding and Investment Trusty v London Rent Assessment Board (or Lewis) | (1969) 20 P & CR 808 | service charge | |
Proudfoot v Hart | (1890) 25 QBD 42 (CA) | repair | |
Proudfoot v Hart | (1890) 25 QBD 42, 52 (CA) | tenantable repair | |
Proudfoot v Hart | (1890) 25 QBD 42, 52 (CA) | tenantable repair | |
Proudreed Ltd v Microgen Holdings plc | [1996] 1 EGLR 89 (CA) | surrender | |
Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body | [1992] 2 AC 386, [1992] 3 All ER 504 (HL) | term | |
Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body | [1992] 2 AC 386, [1992] 3 All ER 504 (HL) | lease | |
Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Waterloo Real Estate Inc | [1999] 2 EGLR 85 (CA) | adverse possession | |
Pugh v Arton | (1869) LR 8 Eq 626 | fixture | |
Pugh v Duke of Leeds | (1777) 2 Cowp 714, 717, 98 Eng Rep 1323, 1324) | time | |
Pugh v Duke of Leeds | (1777) 2 Cowp 714, 720, 98 Eng Rep 1323 | date | |
Pumpernicks of Piccadilly Ltd v Land Securities Ltd | [2002] Ch 332, 3 All ER 609 (CA) | eggshell tenancy(BrE) | |
Purefoy v Rogers | (1671) 2 Wms Saund 380, 85 Eng Rep 1181 | executory interest | |
Pwllbach Colliery Co Ltd v Woodman | [1915] AC 634, 646 (HL) | implied easement | |
Pwllbach Colliery Co Ltd v Woodman | [1915] AC 634, 646 (HL) | implied grant | |
Pyrke v Waddingham | (1852) 10 Hare 1 | good title | |
Pyx Granite Co Ltd v Ministry of Housing and Local Government | [1958] 1 QB 554, 572 (CA) | planning condition(Eng) | |
Pyx Granite Co Ltd v Ministry of Housing and Local Government | [1958] 1 QB 554, 572 (CA) | planning gain(Eng) | |
Pyx Granite Co Ltd v Ministry of Housing and Local Government | [1958] 1 QB 554, 572 (CA) | ultra vires(Lat) | |
Q |
|||
Quadrangle Development & Construction Co Ltd v Jenner | [1974] 1 WLR 68 (CA) | notice to complete (NTC)(Eng) | |
Queen's Club Gardens Estates Ltd v Bignell | [1924] 1 KB 126 | week-to-week tenancy(AmE) or weekly tenancy(BrE) | |
Quennell v Maltby | [1979] 1 WLR 318, 322, [1979] 1 All ER 568, 571 (CA) | mortgagee | |
Quick v Taff-Ely Borough Council | [1986] QB 809, [1985] 3 All ER 321 (CA) | inherent defect or inherent vice | |
R |
|||
R (on the application of Alconbury Developments Limited) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions | [2003] 2 AC 295, 325 [2001] 2 All ER 929, 981 (HL) | compulsory purchase(Eng) | |
R (on the application of Alconbury Developments Limited) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions | [2003] 2 AC 295, 325 [2001] 2 All ER 929, 981 (HL) | compensation for planning restrictions(Eng) | |
R (on the application of Alconbury Developments Limited) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions | [2003] 2 AC 295, [2001] 2 All ER 929, 981 (HL) | police powers(US) | |
R (on the application of Barkas) v North Yorkshire County Council | [2014] UKSC 31, [2014] 2 WLR 1360, [2014] EGILR 33 (SC) | as of right(BrE) | |
R (on the application of Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council) v Secretary of State | [2012] EWHC 1366, [2012] 34 EG 48 | compulsory purchase(Eng) | |
R (on the application of Best) v Chief Land Registrar | [2015] EWCA Civ 17, [2015] 2 P & CR 1 (CA) | squatting | |
R (on the application of Cooper Estates Strategic Land Ltd v Wiltshire Council | [2019] EWCA Civ 640, [2019] PLSCS 9 (CA) | planning application(Eng) | |
R (on the application of Derwent Holdings Ltd) v Trafford Borough Council | [2011] EWCA Civ 832, [2011] PLSCS 190 CA) | planning application(Eng) | |
R (on the application of Garner) v Elmbridge Borough Council | [2011] EWHC 86 | listed building(Eng) | |
R (on the application of Health and Safety Executive) v Wolverhampton City Council | [2012] UKSC 34, [2012] PLSCS 172 (SC) | revocation order(Eng) | |
R (on the application of Powell) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council | [2007] EWHC 2051 | compensation for planning restrictions(Eng) | |
R (on the application of Powell) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council | [2007] EWHC 2051 | compulsory purchase(Eng) | |
R (on the application of Telford Trustees No 1 Ltd) v Telford and Wrekin Council | [2011] JPL 1596, [2011] EWCA Civ 896 (CA) | planning condition(Eng) | |
R (on the application of Telford Trustees No 1 Ltd) v Telford and Wrekin Council | [2011] JPL 1596, [2011] EWCA Civ 896 (CA) | planning permission(Eng) | |
R (on the application of Westminster City Council) v National Asylum Support Service | [2002] 4 All ER 654, 657, [2002] 1 WLR 2956, 2959 (HL) | words | |
R (on application of ZH & CN) v Lewisham London Borough Council | [2014] UKSC 62 (SC) | dwelling house or dwelling-house | |
R v Architects' Registration Tribunal, ex parte Jaggar | (1945) 61 TLR 445, 446 | architect | |
R v Arkwright | (1848) 12 QB 960, 970, 116 Eng Rep 1130 | upon | |
R v Barnsley Metropolitan BC, ex p Hook | [1976] 3 All ER 452 | market | |
R v Bethnal Green and Paddington Rent Tribunals, ex parte Rowton Houses Ltd | (1947) 91 Sol J 255 | residence | |
R v Boyesen | [1982] 2 All ER 161, 163 | possession | |
R v Brettell | (1832) 3 B & Ad 424, 427, 110 Eng Rep 152 | mine | |
R v Burke | [1991] 1AC 135 (HL) | harassment | |
R v Corby DC, ex parte McLean | [1975] 1 WLR 735 | redevelopment | |
R v Ditcheat | (1829) 9 B & C 176, 183, 109 Eng Rep 66 | holding | |
R v Dyer | (1703) 6 Mod 41, 87 Eng Rep 803 | year | |
R v Harfield | [1993] 2 PLR 23 | enforcement notice | |
R v Hendon RDC, ex parte Chorley | [1933] 2 KB 696 | ultra vires(Lat) | |
R v Hillingdon LBC, ex parte Royco Homes Ltd | [1974] 2 All ER 643 | planning gain(Eng) | |
R v Hinks | [2001] 2 AC 241, (2000) The Times, Oct 27 (HL) | appropriation | |
R v IRC, Re Nathan | (1884) 12 QBD 461, 478–9 | mandamus(Lat) | |
R v Jones, R v Smith | [1976] 1 WLR 672, [1976] 3 All ER 54 (CA) | trespass | |
R v Langford | (1842) Car & M 602, 604, 174 Eng Rep 653, 654 | demolition | |
R v Lewis | (1869) 15 Digest (Repl) 1179 | mock auction | |
R v London Borough of Camden, ex parte Bellamy | [1992] JPL 255) | listed building(Eng) | |
R v London School Board | (1886) 17 QBD 738, 741 (CA) | hypothetical | |
R v Minister of Housing and Local Government, ex parte Chichester RDC | [1960] 2 All ER 407, 410 | reasonably beneficial use(Eng) | |
R v Morton | (1873) 42 LJ MC 58 | deed | |
R (on the application of Newhaven Port & Properties Ltd) v East Sussex County Council | [2015] UKSC 7, at para. 26, [2015] EGLR 29 (SC) | beach | |
R (on the application of Newhaven Port & Properties Ltd) v East Sussex County Council | [2015] UKSC 7, [2015] EGLR 29 (SC) | green(Eng) | |
R v Oxfordshire County Council, ex parte Sunningwell | [2000] 1 AC 335, 358 (HL) | enjoyment | |
R v Paddington (V.O.), ex parte Peachey Property Corp'n Ltd | [1966] 1 QB 380, 412, [1965] 2 All ER 836, 848 (CA) | rateable value (RV)(Eng) | |
R v Paddington (V.O.), ex parte Peachey Property Corp'n Ltd | [1966] 1 QB 380, 412, [1965] 2 All ER 836, 848 (CA) | hypothetical | |
R v Paulson | [1921] AC 271 (PC) | waiver | |
R v Rent Officer of the Nottinghamshire Registration Area, ex parte Allen | (1986) 52 P & CR 41 | caravan | |
R v Saintiff | (1704) 6 Mod 255, 87 Eng Rep 1002 | highway | |
R v Secretary of State for the Environment, ex p Billson | [1999] QB 374 | common land | |
R v Silverlock | (1894) 2 QB 766 | expert witness | |
R v South Middlesex Rent Tribunal, ex parte Beswick | (1976) 32 P & CR 67 | exclusive occupation | |
R v St Pancras Assessment Committee | (1877) 2 QBD 581, 588 | occupation | |
R v St Pancras Assessment Committee | (1877) 2 QBD 581, 588 | rateable occupation(Eng) | |
R v Thanet District Council | [2001] 81 P & CR 37, 54 | material change in the use(Eng) | |
R v Tower Hamlets LBC, ex parte Subhan (Abdul) | (1992) 24 HLR 541 | suitable alternative accommodation(Eng) | |
R v West Oxfordshire DC, ex parte Pearce Homes Ltd | [1986] JPL 523) | planning permission(Eng) | |
R v Westminster City Council ex parte Monahan> | [1989] PLR 36, 1990] 1 QB 87 (CA) | planning application(Eng) | |
R v Westbrook, R v Everist | (1847) 10 QB 203 | royalty | |
R v Wicks | [1997] 2 All ER 801 (HL) | enforcement notice | |
R v Williams | [1942] AC 541, 555 (PC) | specialty contract | |
R v Yeovil Borough Council, ex parte Trustees of Elim Pentecostal Church | (1972) 23 P & CR 39 | planning permission(Eng) | |
R (Sainsbury's Supermarket Ltd) v Wolverhampton City Council | [2011] EWHC 2856, [2012] 04 EG 108, 118 | compulsory purchase | |
Race v Ward | (1855) 4 El & Bl 702, 119 Eng Rep 259 | water rights | |
Rainbow Estates Ltd v Tokenhold Ltd | [1998] 2 EGLR 34, 24 EG 123 | specific performance | |
Raineri v Miles | [1981] AC 1050, [1980] 2 All ER 145 (CA) | specific performance | |
Raineri v Miles | [1981] AC 1050, [1980] 2 All ER 145 (CA) | time is of the essence | |
Rains v Buxton | (1880) 14 Ch D 537, 539–40 | dispossession | |
Rama Corp'n v Proved Tin and General Investments Ltd | [1952] 2 QB 147, 149 | ostensible authority | |
Ramsden v Dyson | (1866) LR 1 HL 129, 170 (HL) | licence by estoppel(Eng) | |
Ramsden v Dyson | (1866) LR 1 HL 129, 170 (HL) | mistaken improver | |
Ramsden v Dyson and Thornton | (1866) LR 1 HL 129, 170 (HL) | estoppel | |
Ramsey v Blair | (1876) 1 AC 701 (HL) | outstroke | |
Randall v Stevens | (1853) 2 El & Bl 64, 118 Eng Rep 907 | adverse possession | |
Rashid v Rashid | [2017] UKUT 332, [2017] PLSCS 177 (UT) | adverse possession | |
Ratcliffe v McConnell | [1999] 1 CL 472 (CA) | trespass | |
Ratners (Jewelers) Ltdv Lemnoll Ltd | (1980) 255 EG 987 | interim rent(Eng) | |
Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Davstone (Holdings) Ltd | [1980] QB 12, 21, [1979] 1 All ER 929, 937 | inherent defect or inherent vice | |
Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Hillingdon LBC | (1968) 20 P & CR 483, 493 (LT) | severance | |
Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Hillingdon LBC | (1968) 20 P & CR 483 (LT) | house | |
Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Newham LBC | (1975) RA 410 | completion notice(Eng) | |
Rawlence v CroydonCorporation | [1952] 2 QB 803, [1952] 2 All ER 543 (CA) | rack rent | |
Rawlings v General Trading Co | [1920] 3 KB 30 | bidding agreement | |
Rawlinson v Ames | [1925] Ch 26 | part performance | |
Ray v Fairway Motors (Barnstable) Ltd | (1968) P & CR 261 | easement | |
RB Policies at Lloyd's v Butler | [1950] 1 KB 76, 81 | adverse possession | |
Re 1-4 White Row Cottages Bewerley | [1991] 4 All ER 50, 53 | dwelling house or dwelling-house | |
Re 88 Berkeley Road, London NW9 | [1971] Ch 648, [1977] 1 All ER 254 | service | |
Re Arnold | (1863) 33 Beav 163, 172–3, 55 Eng Rep 329 | vested estate | |
Re Barnes's Will Trusts, Prior v Barnes | [1975] 1 WLR 515, [1972] 2 All ER 639 | money | |
Re Barnes's Will Trusts, Prior v Barnes | [1975] 1 WLR 515, [1972] 2 All ER 639 | money | |
Re Bass Ltd's Application | (1973) 26 P & CR 156 | restrictive covenant | |
Re Beddoe, Downes v Cottam | [1893] 1 Ch 554 | cost | |
Re Bradford City Premises | [1928] Ch 138, 143 | open space | |
Re Bruce Halsey and Bruce | [1905] 2 Ch 378 | enfranchisement | |
Re Casey's Patents, Stewart v Casey | [1892] 1 Ch 104 | consideration | |
Re Clarise Properties Ltd | [2012] UKUT 4 (LC) | leasehold enfranchisement (Eng) | |
Re Collins' Applications | (1974) 30 P & CR 527, ?? | restrictive covenant | |
Re Cooper's Conveyance Trust | [1956] 1 WLR 1096 | possibility of reverter | |
Re Couston, ex parte Watkins | (1873) 8 Ch App 520, 529 | reputed owner | |
Re Crispin's Will Trusts | [1975] Ch 245, [1974] 3 All ER 299 | chattel | |
Re Daintrey, ex parte Holt | [1893] 2 QB 116 | without prejudice | |
Re Dance's Way | [1962] 1 Ch 490 | reservation | |
Re Darnley's Will Trusts | [1970] 1 All ER 319 | protector of the settlement(Eng) | |
Re Davies | [1956] Ch 131 | jus spatiandi(Lat) | |
Re Davis, ex parte Rawlings | (1888) 22 QBD 193 (CA) | licence(BrE) or license(AmE) | |
Re Douglas's Will Trusts, Lloyd's Bank v Nelson | [1959] 2 All ER 620, 623 | security | |
Re Doyle and O'Hara Contract | [1899] 1 IR 113 | assignment | |
Re Draper's Conveyance | [1969] 1 Ch 486 | severance | |
Re Ecclesiastical Commissioners for England & Wales's Conveyance | [1936] Ch 430, 440 | adjoining | |
Re Ellenborough Park | [1956] Ch 131, 176 (CA) | jus spatiandi(Lat) | |
Re Ellis and Ruislip-Northwood UDC | [1920] 1 KB 343, 370 (CA) | amenity | |
Re Guyton and Rosenberg's Contract | [1901] 2 Ch D 591 | leasehold or leasehold interest | |
Re Harker's Will Trusts | [1938] Ch 323 | dotard | |
Re Harker's Will Trusts | [1938] Ch 323 | timber | |
Re Harrison's Trusts, Harrison v Harrison | (1884) 28 Ch D 227 | timber | |
Re Hector Whaling Ltd | [1936] Ch 208 | clear day | |
Re Holliday | [1922] 2 Ch 698 | subinfeudation(Eng) | |
Re Hollis' Hospital Trustees and Hague's Contract | [1912] 1 Ch 337 | condition subsequent | |
Re Hoyle | [1893] 1 Ch 84 | memorandum | |
Re Hull and Selby Ry Co | (1839) 5 M & W 327, 151 Eng Rep 139, 140 | dereliction | |
Re Hunter's Lease, Giles v Hutchings | [1942] Ch 124, [1942] 1 All ER 27, 29 | privity of estate | |
Re Jones | (1884) 26 Ch D 736, 743 (CA) | entitled | |
Re King | [1963] Ch 459, 497 (CA) | covenant | |
Re Leach | [1912] 2 Ch 422 | determinable interest | |
Re Leeds and Batley Breweries Ltd v Bradbury's Lease | [1920] 2 Ch 548 | covenant running with the land | |
Re Lees, ex parte Collins | (1875) 10 Ch App 367, 372 (CA) | condition | |
Re Leveson-Gower's Settled Estate | (1905) 2 Ch 95, 98 | addition | |
Re Longlands Farm, Long Common, Botley, Hants, Alford v Superior Developments Ltd | [1968] 3 All ER 552, [1968] 207 EG 847 (CA) | option | |
Re Lucas and Chesterfield Gas and Water Board | [1909] 1 KB 16, 35 (CA) | special suitability or adaptability(Eng) | |
Re Macgowan, Macgowan v Murray | [1891] 1 Ch 105, 116 (CA) | negotiation | |
Re Martin's Application | [1989] 05 EG 85 | interest | |
Re Mayo | [1943] 2 All ER 440 | joint tenancy | |
Re Mellor | [1929] 1 Ch 46 | money | |
Re National Savings Bank Association | (1867) 15 WR 753 | part performance | |
Re Niyazi's Will Trusts | [1978] 3 All ER 785, 788–9 | hostel | |
Re Ogle's Settled Estate | [1927] 1 Ch 229, 233–4 | compound settlement(Eng) | |
Re Ogle's Settled Estate | [1927] 1 Ch 233 | compound settlement(Eng) | |
Re Palmiero: debtor 3666 of 1999 | [1999] 38 EG 195, 196 | fixture | |
Re Polemis and Furness, Withy and Co | [1921] 3 KB 560, 577 (CA) | damages | |
Re Puckett and Smith's Contract | [1902] 2 Ch 258 | misdescription | |
Re Ray | [1896] 1 Ch 476 | assurance | |
Re Richmond Borough Justices | (1893) 10 TLR 68 | rent | |
Re Rosher (1884) | 26 Ch D 801 | restraint on alienation | |
Re Russ and Brown's Contract | (1934) Ch 34 | misdescription | |
Re Sandbach | [1951] Ch 791, 803 (CA) | redemption | |
Re Sandilands | [1871] LR 6 CP 411, 413 | seal | |
Re Spollon and Long's Contract | [1936] Ch 713, 718 | good title | |
Re Stanley, Stanley v Tenant | [1906] 1 Ch 131, 134 | company | |
Re Strand and Savoy Properties Ltd | [1960] Ch 582, [1960] 2 All ER 327 | reversionary lease | |
Re Tamplin and Son, ex parte Barnett | (1890) 59 LJ QB 194, 195 | true owner | |
Re The Duty on the Estate of the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales | (1889) 22 LR QBD 279, 293 | trade | |
Re Thompson and Cottrell's Contract | [1943] Ch 97) | misdescription | |
Re Webb's Lease | [1951] Ch 808 | implied reservation | |
Re Wells (Sir Thomas Spencer) | [1933] Ch 29 (CA) | equity of redemption | |
Re Wembley Park Estate Co Ltd's Transfer | [1968] Ch 491, [1968] 1 All ER 457 | scheme of development | |
Re Weston and Thomas' Contract | [1907] 1 Ch 244 | without prejudice | |
Re Whaley, Whaley v Roehrich | [1908] 1 Ch 615 | fixture | |
Re White Rose Cottage | [1965] Ch 951 | equitable mortgage | |
Re Windle | [1975] 1 WLR 1628 | part performance | |
Re Y | [1985] Fam 136 | home | |
Re Yates | (1888) 38 Ch 112, 120–212 | fixture | |
Reading v A-G | [1951] AC 507, 516 | fiduciary | |
Record v Bell | [1991] 1 WLR 853, [1991] 4 All ER 471 | writing | |
ReDolphin's Conveyance | [1970] Ch 654, 662, [1970] 2 All ER 664 | scheme of development | |
Redspring v Francis | [1973] 1 WLR 134, [1973] 1 All ER 640 (CA) | suitable alternative accommodation(Eng) | |
ReDugdale | (1888) 38 Ch D 176 | restraint on alienation | |
ReDummelow, ex parte Ruffle | (1873) 8 Ch App 1001 (CA) | contingent liability | |
ReEllenborough Park | [1956] Ch 131 (CA) | easement | |
Rees v Skerrett | [2001] 1 WLR 1541 (CA) | right of support or right to support | |
Reeve v Hartlepool BC | (1975) 30 P & CR 517, 524 | occupation | |
Reeve v Lisle | [1902] AC 461 (HL) | once a mortgage, always a mortgage | |
Reeve v Lisle | [1902] AC 461 (HL) | option | |
Reeve v Lisle | [1902] AC 461 (HL) | equity of redemption | |
Regan v Paul Properties DPF No 1 Ltd | [2006] 46 EG 210, 216 (CA) | damages | |
Regan v Paul Properties DPF No 1 Ltd | [2006] 46 EG 210, 216 (CA) | injunction | |
Regent Oil Co v J.A. Gregory (Hatch End) Ltd | [1966] Ch 402, 431, [1965] 3 All ER 673, 681 | charge by way of a legal mortgage(Eng) | |
Regent Oil Co v J.A. Gregory (Hatch End) Ltd | [1966] Ch 402, 432–3, [1965] 3 All ER 673, 680 | charge by way of a legal mortgage(Eng) | |
Regent Oil Co v J.A. Gregory (Hatch End) Ltd | [1966] Ch 402, 432–3, [1965] 3 All ER 673, 680 | solus agreement(BrE) | |
Regency Villas Title Ltd v Diamond Resorts (Europe) Ltd | [2015] EWHC 3564, [2015] WLR (D) 506 | easement | |
Regency Villas Title Ltd v Diamond Resorts (Europe) Ltd | [2015] EWHC 3564, [2015] WLR (D) 506 | jus spatiandi(Lat) | |
Regis Property Co v Dudley | [1959] AC 370, 410 (HL) | fair wear and tear(BrE) | |
Regus (UK) Limited v Epcot Solutions Limited | [2007] All ER (D) 93 | exclusion clause(Eng) | |
Reid v Bickerstaff | [1909] 2 Ch 305, 319, [1908–10] All ER Rep 298 (CA) | scheme of development | |
Renewal Leeds Ltd v Lowry Properties Ltd | [2010] EWHC 2902, [2011] PLSCS 22 | overage | |
Reniger v Fogassa | (1550) 1 Plowd 1, 17a, 75 Eng Rep 1, 27 | agreement | |
Republic of India v India Steamship Co Ltd (No 2) | [1998] AC 878, 891 (HL) | estoppel | |
ReSearle | [1912] 1 Ch 610 | tenancy from year to year | |
Reynolds v Ashby & Sons | [1904] AC 466, 473–4 (HL) | fixture | |
Rhodes v Macalister | (1923) 29 Com Cas 19, 28 | dual agency | |
Rhodia International Holdings Ltd v Huntsman International LLC | [2007] EWHC 292, [2007] 2 All ER (Comm) 577, 591-2 | reasonable effort or reasonable endeavour | |
Rhone v Stephens | [1994] 2 AC 310, 317B-C, [1994] 2 All ER 65 (HL) | restrictive covenant | |
Rhone v Stephens | [1994] 2 AC 310, 321, [1994] 2 All ER 65, 71 (HL) | positive covenant | |
Rice v Rice | (1853) 2 Drew 73, 78, 61 Eng Rep 646, 648) | qui prior est tempore, potior est jure or qui prior est in tempore, prior est in jure(Lat) | |
Richards v Rose | (1853) 9 Exch 218, 156 ER 93, 94–5 | implied grant | |
Riches v Westminster Bank Ltd | [1947] 1 AC 390, 398, 400 (HL) | interest | |
Ridgen v Vallier | (1751) 2 Ves Sen 282, 28 Eng Rep 163 | tenancy in common | |
Ridley v Oster | [1939] 1 All ER 618) | misdescription | |
Rigby v Connol | (1880) 14 Ch D 482, 487 | specific performance | |
Right d Flower v Darby and Bristow | (1786) 1 Term Rep 159, 162, 99 Eng Rep 1029 | tenancy for a fixed term | |
Right d Flower v Darby and Bristow | (1786) 1 Term Rep 159, 99 Eng Rep 1029 | tenancy at sufferance | |
Rimmer v Knowles | (1874) 30 LTNS 496 | commission | |
Rimmer v Liverpool City Council | [1985] QB 1 | negligence | |
Riverside Housing Association Ltd v White | [2007] UKHL 20 (HL) | time is of the essence | |
Riverside Park Ltd v NHS Property Services Ltd | [2016] EWHC 1313, [2016] PLSCS 222 | vacant possession | |
Roadside Group Ltd v Zara Commercial Ltd | [2010] EWHC 1950 (Ch), [2010] 33 EG 70 | use clause | |
Robert Addie & Sons (Collieries) Ltd v Dumbreck | [1929] AC 365, 376 (HL) | trespass | |
Roberts (A) and Co v Leicestershire County Council | [1961] Ch 555, [1961] 2 All ER 545 | rectification | |
Roberts v Church Commissioners for England & Wales [1972] 1 QB 278 (CA) | leasehold enfranchisement(Eng) | ||
Roberts v J Hampson & Co | [1989] 2 All ER 504, 513 | structural survey | |
Robertson v French | (1803) 4 East 130, 135, 102 Eng Rep 779 | ordinary meaning rule | |
Robinson Brothers (Brewers) Ltd v Houghton and Chester le Street Assessment Committee | [1937] 2 KB 445, 468 (CA) | rebus sic stantibus(Lat) | |
Robinson v Harman | (1848) 1 Exch 850, 855, 154 Eng Rep 363, 365 | breach of contract | |
Robinson v Jenkins | (1890) 24 QBD 275 | chattel | |
Robinson v Wall | [1847] 2 Ph 372, 375, 41 Eng Rep 986 | without reserve | |
Rochester (Dean and Chapter) v Pierce | (1808) 1 Camp 466, 170 Eng Rep 1023 | use and occupation | |
Roddy v Fitzgerald | (1858) 6 HL Cas 823, 10 Eng Rep 1518 (HL) | issue | |
Rodway v Landy | [2001] Ch 703 | trust of land(Eng) | |
Rogers v Hosegood | [1900] 2 Ch 388, 396 | restrictive covenant | |
Rogers v Islington London Borough Council | [1999] 37 EG 178 (CA) | house in multiple occupation (HMO)(Eng) | |
Rogers v Kingston-upon-Hull Dock Co | (1864) 34 LJ Ch 165 | six months | |
Roland House Gardens Ltd v Cravitz | (1974) P & CR 432 | occupier | |
Rolfe v Peterson | (1772) 2 Bro P C 436, 1 Eng Rep 1048 | acceleration clause | |
Rolls v Miller | (1884) 27 Ch D 88 | business | |
Romulus Trading Co Ltd v Comet Properties Ltd | [1996] 2 EGLR 70 | derogation from grant | |
Rondel v Worsley | [1967] 1 AC 191, 244, [1967] 3 All ER 993, 1009 (HL) | professional negligence | |
Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank plc | [2000] QB 263 (CA) | foreclosure | |
Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank plc | [2000] QB 263 (CA) | mortgagee | |
Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank plc | [2000] QB 263 (CA) | possession order(Eng) | |
Roscorla v Thomas | (1842) 3 QB 234 | consideration | |
Rose v Spice | [1911] 2 KB 234, 241-2 (CA) | relief | |
Rosenbaum v Belson | [1900] 2 Ch 271 | sell | |
Ross River Football Club Ltd v Cambridge City Football Club | [2007] EWHC Civ 2115, [2008] 1 All ER 1004 | good faith | |
Rowles v Mason | (1612) 2 Brownl & G 192, 198, 123 Eng Rep 892 | prescription | |
Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No. 2) | [2002] 2 AC 773 at [11] (HL) | undue influence | |
Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors v Shepherd | (1947) 149 EG 370 | quantity surveyor(BrE) | |
Rozanes v Bowen | (1928) 32 Ll L Rep 98, 102 | utmost good faith | |
Rush and Tompkins v Greater London Council | [1989] AC 1280, 1287, 1299-1300 (CA) | without prejudice | |
Russel v Russel | (1783) 1 Bro CC 269, 28 Eng Rep 1121 | mortgage | |
Ruxley Electronics & Construction Ltd v Forsyth | [1995] 3 WLR 118, [1995] 3 All ER 268, [1996] AC 344 (HL) | damages | Rust v Goodale | [1957] Ch 33 | equitable mortgage |
Ryan v Mutual Tontine Westminster Chambers Association | (1893) 62 LJ Ch 252 (CA) | specific performance | |
Ryan v Thomas | (1911) 55 Sol J 364 | option | |
Rye v Rye | [1962] AC 496, [1962] 1 All ER 146 (HL) | conveyance | |
Rylands v Fletcher | (1868) LR 1 Ex 265, 279 | strict liability | |
S |
|||
Salt v Marquess of Northampton | [1892] AC 1, 5 (HL) | equity of redemption | |
Sampson v Hodson-Pressinger | [1981] 3 All ER 710, 714, [1981] 261 EG 895 (CA) | quiet enjoyment | |
Samuel v Jarrah Timber and Wood Paving Corp'n Ltd | [1904] AC 323 (HL) | option | |
Samuel v Jarrah Timber and Wood Paving Corp'n Ltd | [1904] AC 323 (HL) | equity of redemption | |
Sanders v Anglia Building Society | [1971] AC 1004 (HL) | non est factum(Lat) | |
Sanderson v Berwick-on-Tweed Corp'n | (1884) 13 QBD 547 (CA) | quiet enjoyment | |
Sanderson v Collins | [1904] 1 KB 628 (CA) | vicarious liability | |
Sandill v Franklin | (1875) LR 10 CP 377 | time | |
Saner v Bilton | (1878) 7 Ch D 815 | landlord's access | |
Saner v Bilton | (1878) 7 Ch D 815 | repair | |
Sansom v Metcalfe Hambleton & Co | [1998] PNLR 542, 547 [1998] 26 EG 154 (CA) | professional negligence | |
Santley v Wilde | [1899] 2 Ch 474 (CA) | equity of redemption | |
Santley v Wilde | [1899] 2 Ch 474 (CA) | equity-participation loan or equity-participation mortgage | |
Santley v Wilde | [1899] 2 Ch 474 (CA) | mortgage | |
Sargeant v Macepark (Whittlebury) Ltd | [2004] EWHC 1333, [2004] 38 EG 164, 169–71 | improvement | |
Sarson v Roberts | [1895] 2 QB 395 | furnished tenancy(Eng) | |
Sarson v Roberts | [1895] 2 QB 395 | fit for human habitation(Eng) | |
Satef-Huttenes Albertus SpA v Paloma Tercera Shipping Co SA (The Pegase) | [1981] Lloyd's Rep 175, 183 | damages | |
Saunders v Maltby | (1976) 239 EG 205 | rebus sic stantibus(Lat) | |
Saunders v Soper | [1975] AC 239 (HL) | accommodation agent(Eng) | |
Savage v Dent | 93 Eng Rep 1034 | vacant possession | |
Savil Bros Ltd v Bethell | [1902] 2 Ch 523 | exception | |
Savills Land & Property Ltd v Kibble | [1998] EGCS 170 (CA) | ready, able and willing or ready, willing and able | |
Savills Land & Property Ltd v Kibble | [1998] EGCS 170 (CA) | ready, able and willing or ready, willing and able | |
Sawyer v H and G Simmonds Ltd | (1966) 197 EG 879 | negligence | |
Saxon v Blake | (1861) 29 Beav 438, 54 Eng Rep 697 | undisclosed principal | |
Say v Smith | (1530) 1 Plow Rep 269, 75 ER 410, 417 | id certum est quod certum reddi potest(Lat) | |
Scales v Pickering | (1829) 4 Bing 453 | footway | |
Scarf v Jardine | (1882) 7 App Cas 345, 351 (HL) | novation | |
Scarfe v Adams | [1981] 1 All ER 843 (CA) | plan | |
Scatterwood v Edge | (1699) 1 Salk 229, 91 Eng Rep 203 | perpetuity | |
Schiller v Peterson & Co Ltd | [1924] 1 Ch 394 (CA) | month | |
Schnabel v Allard | [1967] 1 QB 627, 631, [1966] 3 All ER 816 (CA) | week-to-week tenancy(AmE) or weekly tenancy(BrE) | |
Schroeder (A) Music Co Ltd v Macaulay | [1974] 1 WLR 1308, 1316, [1974] 3 All ER 616, 624 (HL) | adhesion contract | |
Scoble v Secretary of State in Council for India | [1903] 1 KB 494, 504 (CA) | annuity | |
Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages Ltd | [2014] UKSC 52, [2014] PLSCS 288 (SC) | overriding interest(Eng) | Scottish & Newcastle plc v Rogue (No 2) | [2007] EWCA Civ 150, [2007] 15 EG 148 (CA) | privity of contract |
Scottish CWS Ltd v Ulster Farmers' Mart Co Ltd | [1959] 2 All ER 486, 495 (HL) | market | |
Scribes West Ltd v Relsa Anstalt | [2004] EWCA Civ 1774, [2005] 09 EG 190) | virtual assignment | |
Sebag v Abitbol | (1816) 4 M & S 462, 463, 105 Eng Rep 905 | laches | |
Secretan v Hart | [1969] 3 All ER 1196, 1199 | money's worth(Eng) | |
Secretarial & Nominees Co Ltd v Thomas | [2005] EWCA Civ 1008, [2005] 44 EG 136 (CA) | tenant | |
Security Trust Co v Royal Bank of Canada | [1976] AC 503, 517 (PC) | escrow | |
Seddon Properties v Secretary of State for the Environment | (1978) 248 EG 949 | ultra vires(Lat) | |
Seddon v Smith | (1877) 36 LT 168, 169 | adverse possession | |
Seddon v Smith | (1877) 36 LT 168, 169 | animus possidendi(Lat) | |
Sedleigh-Denfield v O'Callaghan | [1940] AC 880, 903 (HL) | nuisance | |
Sedleigh-Denfield v O'Callaghan | [1940] AC 880, 903 (HL) | occupier | |
Sedleigh-Denfield v O'Callaghan | [1940] AC 880, 903 (HL) | sic utere tuo ut alienum non lædas(Lat) | |
Segal Securities Ltd v Thoseby | [1963] 1 QB 887, [1963] 2 WLR 403 | waiver | |
Selkirk v Romar Investments Ltd | [1963] 1 WLR 1415, 1422 (PC) | rescission | |
Sen v Headley | [1991] 2 All ER 636 (CA) | donatio mortis causa(Lat) | |
Serjeant v Nash, Field & Co | [1903] 2 KB 304, 315 (CA) | assignment | |
Seton v Slade | (1802) 7 Ves Jun 265, 273, 32 Eng Rep 108 | once a mortgage, always a mortgage | |
Sevenoaks, Maidstone and Tunbridge Ry Co v London: Chatham and Dover Ry Co | (1879) 11 Ch D 625, 634–5 | maintenance | |
Severn Trent Water Ltd v Barnes | [2004] EWCA civ 570, [2004] 26 EG 194, 197 (CA) | damages | |
Shallcross v Oldham | (1862) 2 Johns & Hem 609, 70 Eng Rep 1202 | fiduciary | |
Shanly v Ward | (1913) 29 TLR 715 | restraint on alienation | Sharma v Simposh Ltd | [2012] 6 EG 92, 96, [2012] 3 WLR 503 (CA) | deposit/restitution |
Sharpe v Duke Street Securities NV | [1987] 55 P & CR 331 (CA) | house | |
Shaw v Foster | (1872) LR 5 HL 321 (HL) | constructive trust | |
Shebelle Enterprises v The Hampstead Garden Suburb Trust Ltd | [2013] EWHC 948, [2013] PLSCS 78 | quiet enjoyment | |
Sheffield District Railway Co v Great Central Railway Co | (1911) 27 TLR 451, 452 | reasonable effort or reasonable endeavour | |
Sheik v O'Connor | [1987] 2 EGLR 269 | vacant possession | |
Shelfer v City of London Electric Lighting Co | [1895] 1 Ch 287, 346 | injunction | |
Shell-Mex and BP Ltd v Manchester Garages | [1971] 1 All ER 841 | business tenancy(Eng) | |
Shephard v Cartwright | [1955] AC 431, [1954] 3 All ER 649, [1954] 3 WLR 967 | advancement | |
Shepherd v Croft | [1911] 1 Ch 521, 529 | patent defect | |
Shiloh Spinners Ltd v Harding | [1973] AC 691, [1973] 1 All ER 90 (HL) | equitable easement(Eng) | |
Shiloh Spinners Ltd v Harding | [1973] AC 691, [1973] 1 All ER 90 (HL) | positive covenant | |
Shiloh Spinners Ltd v Harding | [1973] AC 691, 719, [1973] 1 All ER 90 (HL) | legal interest | |
Shiloh Spinners Ltd v Harding | [1973] AC 691, 721, [1973] 1 All ER 90, 99 (HL) | equitable interest | |
Shiloh Spinners Ltd v. Harding | [1973] AC 691, 722 (HL) | time is of the essence | |
Shirlaw v Southern Foundries (1926)Ltd | [1939] 2 KB 206, 227, [1939] 2 All ER 113, 124 | implied term or implied condition | |
Shirlcar Properties Ltd v Heinitz | (1983) 268 EG 362 | subject to contract | |
Shirley v Newman | (1795) 1 Esp 266, 170 Eng Rep 352 | tenancy from year to year | |
Shrewsbury's (Countess of) Case | (1600) 5 Co Rep 13b, 77 Eng Rep 68 | tenancy at will | |
Siddiqui v Rashid | [1980] 1 WLR 1018, 1023 | suitable alternative accommodation(Eng) | |
Sidebotham v Holland | [1895] 1 QB 383 (CA) | notice to quit | |
Sidebotham v Holland | [1895] 1 QB 383 (CA) | tenancy from year to year | |
Silven Properties Ltd v Royal Bank of Scotland plc | [2003] 50 EG 96, [2004] 1 WLR 997 (CA) | power of sale | |
Silven Properties Ltd v Royal Bank of Scotland plc | [2003] 50 EG 96, [2004] 1 WLR 997 at [23], [29] (CA) | receiver | |
Simmonds v Cockell | [1920] 1 KB 843 | unoccupied | |
Simmons v Dobson | [1991] 1 WLR 720, [1991] 4 All ER 25, 27 | lost modern grant | |
Simmons v Dobson | [1991] 1 WLR 720, [1991] 4 All ER 25 | prescription | |
Simon v Anglo American Telegraph Co. | (1879) 5 QBD 188 (CA) | estoppel | |
Simpson v Connolly | [1953] 2 All ER 477 | sale | |
Sims v Landray | [1894] 2 Ch 318, 320 | auctioneer | |
Sinclair Group Investments (Kensington) Ltd v Walsh | [1995] EGSC 65 | additional rent | |
Sinclair-Lockhart's Trustees v Central Land Board | (1951) 1 P & CR 320 | curtilage | |
Singer and Friedlander Ltd v John D. Wood and Co | (1977) 243 EG 212, 213 | valuer | |
Sitwell v Earl of Londesborough | [1905] 1 Ch 460 | right to let down the surface | |
Six Carpenters' Case | (1610) 8 Co Rep 146a, 77 Eng Rep 695 | trespass | |
Skaife v Jackson | (1824) 3 B & C 421, 107 Eng Rep 790 | receipt | |
Skerrits of Nottingham Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment | [2000] JPL 1025 (CA) | building operations(Eng) | |
Skips A/S Nordheim v Petrofina SA (The Varenna) | [1984] QB 599, 618 (CA) | condition | |
Slater v Clay Cross | [1956] 2 QB 264 (CA) | invitee | |
Sleafer v Lambeth Borough Council | [1960] 1 QB 43, [1959] 3 All ER 378 (CA) | repair | |
Sloan Stanley Estate Trustees v Barribal | (1994) 9444 EG 237 (CA) | set-off or setoff | |
Smalley v Quarrier | [1975] 1 WLR 938, 943, [1975] 2 All ER 688, 693 (CA) | protected tenancy(Eng) | |
Smith and Denis v Jafton Properties | [2013] PLSCS 80 | flat | |
Smith and Snipes Hall Farm Ltd v River Douglas Catchment Board | [1949] 2 KB 500, [1949] All ER 179 (CA) | positive covenant | |
Smith and Snipes Hall Farm Ltd v River Douglas Catchment Board | [1949] 2 KB 500, [1949] All ER 179 (CA) | restrictive covenant | |
Smith v Anderson | (1880) 15 Ch D 247, 275 (CA) | trustee | |
Smith v Austin Lifts Ltd | [1959] 1 WLR 100 | volenti non fit injuria(Lat) | |
Smith v Baker and Sons | [1891] AC 325, 355 (HL) | volenti non fit injuria(Lat) | |
Smith v Bradford Metropolitan Council | (1982) 44 P & CR 171 | duty of care | |
Smith v Bradford Metropolitan Council | (1982) 44 P & CR 171 | duty of care | |
Smith v Bradford Metropolitan Council | (1982) 44 P & CR 171 | negligence | |
Smith v Bradford Metropolitan Council | (1982) 44 P & CR 171 | premises | |
Smith v Brudenell-Bruce | [2001] EG 143, [2002] 2 P & CR 4, [12] | as of right | |
Smith v Brown | (1871) 40 LJ QB 218 | cycle | |
Smith v City Petroleum Co Ltd | [1940] 1 All ER 260 | trade fixture | |
Smith v Clay | (1767) 3 Bro CC 646, 29 Eng Rep 743, 744 | laches | |
Smith v Eric S Bush a firm | [1990] 1 AC 831, 847, [1989] 2 All ER 514 (HL) | duty of care | |
Smith v Giddy | [1904] 2 KB 448 | tree | |
Smith v Giuliani | (1925) SC (HL) 45, 56 | common interest | |
Smith v Lambeth Assessment Committee | (1882) 10 QBD 327 (CA) | exclusive occupation | |
Smith v Land and House Property Corp'n | (1884) 28 Ch D 7 (CA) | auctioneer | |
Smith v Land and House Property Corp'n | (1884) 28 Ch D 7, 15 (CA) | misrepresentation | |
Smith v Marrable | (1843) 11 M & W 5, 152 Eng Rep 693 | fit for human habitation(Eng) | |
Smith v Marrable | (1843) 11 M & W 5, 152 Eng Rep 693 | furnished tenancy(Eng) | |
Smith v Oliver | (1989) 2 PLR 1 | tree preservation order (TPO)(Eng) | |
Smith v Peat | (1853) 9 Exch 161, 156 Eng Rep 69 | damages | |
Smith v Scott | [1973] Ch 314 | nuisance | |
Smith v Scott | (1832) 1 LJ CP 143 | hotel | |
Smith v Smith | [1939] 4 All ER 312, 315) | outgoing | |
Smith v Smith | [1939] 4 All ER 312, 84 Sol J 27 | tax | |
Smith v Spaul | [2003] QB 983 (CA) | lessee | |
Smith v The Mayor, etc. of Harwich | (1857) 2 CB (NS) 651, 669, 140 Eng Rep 572 | implied term or implied condition | |
Smith v Titanate Ltd | [2005] 20 EG 262 | business tenancy(Eng) | |
Smith v Titanate Ltd | [2005] 20 EG 262 | occupation | |
Somerville v Somerville | (1801) 5 Ves Jun 750, 787, 31 Eng Rep 839, 858 | domicile | |
Sorrell v Fitch | [1977] AC 728 (HL) | stakeholder | |
South Lakeland DC v Secretary of State for the Environment and Carlisle Diocesan Parsonages Board | [1991] JPL 144, 151 | conservation area(Eng) | |
South Staffordshire Water Co v Sharman | [1896] 2 QB 44 | fixture | |
Southby v Hutt | (1837) My & C 213, 40 ER 616 | deducing title(Eng) | |
Southend-on-Sea Borough Council v Armour | [2014] EWCA Civ 231, [2014] PLSCS 85 (CA) | introductory tenancy(Eng) | |
Southern Center of Theosophy Inc. v State of South Australia | [1982] AC 706, 716, [1982] 1 All ER 238 (PC) | accretion | |
Southern Center of Theosophy Inc. v State of South Australia | [1982] AC 706, 716, [1982] 1 All ER 238 (PC) | reliction | |
Southwark LBC v Mills | [2001] 1 AC 1, 10 (HL) | enjoyment | |
Southwark LBC v Mills | [2001] 1 AC 1, 8C (HL) | keep in repair | |
Southwark LBC v Mills | [2001] 1 AC 1, 8C (HL) | nuisance | |
Southwark LBC v Mills | [2001] 1 AC 1, 10 (HL) | peaceably and quietly | |
Southwark LBC v Mills | [2001] 1 AC 1 (HL) | quiet enjoyment | |
Sovmots Investments Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1979] AC 144, [1977] 2 All ER 385 (HL) | land | |
Sovmots Investments Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1979] AC 144, 168, [1977] 2 All ER 385, 391 (HL) | derogation from grant | |
Sovmots Investments Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1979] AC 144, [1977] 2 All ER 385, 393 (HL) | compulsory purchase order (CPO)(Eng) | |
Spackman v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1977] 1 All ER 257 | road | |
Sparks v Leeds City Council | (1977) 244 EG 56 (LT) | equivalent reinstatement(Eng) | |
Spath Holme Ltd v Greater Manchester and Lancashire RAC | (1995) 28 HLR 107 (CA) | fair rent | |
Speedwell Estates Ltd v Dalziel | [2001] EWCA Civ 1277, [2002] 1 EGLR 55 (CA) | notice | |
Spencer v Harding | (1870) LR 5 CP 561 | request for bid (RFB) or request for proposal (RFP) | |
Spencer v Registrar of Titles | [1906] AC 503, 507 (PC) | habendum | |
Spencer's Case | (1583) 5 Co Rep 16a, 77 Eng Rep 72 | let | |
Spencer's Case | (1583) 5 Co Rep 16a, 16b, 77 Eng Rep 72, 74 | covenant of warranty(US) | |
Spencer's Case | (1583) 5 Co Rep 16a, 77 Eng Rep 72 | covenant | |
Spiro v Glencrown Properties Ltd | [1991] Ch 537, [1991] 1 All ER 600 | ready, able and willing or ready, willing and able | |
Spitzel v Chinese Corporation Limited | (1899) 80 LT 349, 351 | escrow | |
Spring House (Freehold) Ltd v Mount Cook Land Ltd | [2002] 1 P & CR DG23, [2002] 2 All ER 822(CA) | premises | |
Spyer v Phillipson | [1931] 2 Ch 183 | trade fixture | |
SS Global Ltd v Sava | [2008] EWCA Civ 1308, [2008] 48 EG 101 (CA) | adverse possession | |
SS Global Ltd v Sava | [2008] EWCA Civ 1308, [2008] 48 EG 101 (CA) | animus possidendi(Lat) | |
St Aubyn v St Aubyn | (1861) 1 Drew & Sm 611, 618–9, 62 Eng Rep 512, 515 | determination | |
Stack v Dowden | [2007] UKHL 17, [2007] 2 AC 432, [2007] 2 WLR 831 (HL) | constructive trust | |
Stack v Dowden | [2007] UKHL 17, at 126, [2007] 2 AC 432, 472 [2007] 2 WLR 831, 867 (HL) | impute | |
Stack v Dowden | Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, [2007] 2 AC 432, [2007] 2 WLR 831, (HL) | matrimonial home(Eng) | |
Stack v Dowden | [2007] UKHL 17, [2007] 2 AC 432, [2007] 2 WLR 831 (HL) | resulting trust | |
Stadium Capital [No 2] Ltd v St Marylebone Property Co plc | [2010] UKSC 20, [2010] 20 EG 144 (SC) | damages | |
Standard Chartered Bank v Walker | [1982] 3 All ER 938, 1 WLR 1410, 1415 | power of sale | |
Starmark Enterprises v CPL Distributution Ltd | [2002] 2 WLR 1009, [2002] 3 All ER 264 (CA) | time is of the essence | |
Startup v Macdonald | (1843) 6 Man & G 593, 134 Eng Rep 1029 | time | |
State Bank of India v Sood | [1997] Ch 276, 281, 288–92 (CA) | overreachable interest(Eng) | |
State Trust Corp'n of Victoria v Taylor | [1993] 1 VR 282, 286) | personal effects | |
Staves & Staves v Leeds City Council | (1990) 23 HLR 107 | structure | |
Steadman v Steadman | [1976] AC 536, 2 All ER 977 (HL) | part performance | |
Steadman v Steadman | [1976] AC 536, 2 All ER 977 (HL) | writing | |
Steadman v Steadman | [1976] AC 536, 561, 2 All ER 977, 998 (HL) | res gestae(Lat) | |
Stearn v Twitchell | [1985] 1 All ER 631 | correlative water rights(US) | |
Steinberg and Sykes v Secretary of State | [1989] JPL 258 | conservation area(Eng) | |
Stephens v Cuckfield Rural District Council | [1960] 2 All ER 716 | open land | |
Sternbaum v Dhesi | [2016] EWCA Civ 155, [2016] PLSCS 91 (CA) | negligence | |
Stevens v Bromley London Borough Council | [1972] Ch 400 | interest | |
Sternbaum v Dhesi | [2016] EWCA Civ 155, [2016] PLSCS 91 (CA) | negligence | |
Stevens v Bromley London Borough Council | [1972] Ch 400 | occupier | |
Stevens v Gourley | (1859) 7 CB (NS) 99, 112, 141 Eng Rep 752 | building | |
Stevens v London Borough of Bromley | [1972] 1 All ER 712 | enforcement notice | |
Stevens v Willing & Co Ltd | [1929] WN 53 | building | |
Stewart v Watts | [2016] EWCA Civ 1247, [2016] PLSCS 342 (CA) | licence(BrE) or license(AmE) | |
Steyning & Littlehampton Building Society v Wilson | [1951] Ch 1018, 1020 | attornment | |
Stickney v Keeble | [1915] AC 386 (HL) | time is of the essence | |
Stockdale v Ascherberg | [1904] 1 KB 447, 450 (CA) | outgoing | |
Stockport Corp'n v Rollinson | (1910) 102 LTNS 567 | abut | |
Stokes v Cambridge | (1961) 13 P & CR 77 | compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) | |
Stokes v Salomons | (1851) 9 Hare 75, 80, 68 Eng Rep 421, 423 | proceeds | |
Stormdale & Ball Ltd v Burden | [1952] Ch 223, [1952] 1 All ER 59 | interest | |
Strand Securities Ltd v Caswell | [1965] Ch 958, 979–80 (CA) | overriding interest(Eng) | |
Straudley Investments Ltd v Mount Eden Land Ltd | (1997) 74 P &CR 306, [1996] EGCS 153 (CA) | restraint on alienation | |
Street v Essex County Council | (1965) 193 EG 537 | development | |
Street v Mountford | [1985] AC 809, 816B-C, [1985] 2 All ER 289 (HL) | exclusive possession | |
Street v Mountford | [1985] AC 809, 818, [1985] 2 All ER 289 (HL) | licence(BrE) or license(AmE) | |
Street v Mountford | [1985] AC 809, 818, [1985] 2 All ER 289 (HL) | lease | |
Street v Mountford | [1985] AC 809, 818A, [1985] 2 All ER 289 (HL) | lodger | |
Strode v Parker | (1694) 2 Vern 316, 23 Eng Rep 804 | penalty | |
Stuart v Joy | [1904] 1 KB 362 | privity of contract | |
Sudbrook Trading Estate Ltd v Eggleton | [1983] 1 AC 444, [1982] 3 All ER 1 (HL) | option | |
Sudbrook Trading Estate Ltd v Eggleton | [1983] 1 AC 444, 477, [1982] 3 All ER 1, 5 (HL) | valuer | |
Suffolk County Council v Mason | [1979] AC 705, 710, [1979] 2 All ER 369, 371 (HL) | cartway | |
Suffolk County Council v Mason | [1979] AC 705, 727, [1979] 2 All ER 369, 384 (HL) | carriageway(BrE) | |
Suffolk County Council v Mason | [1979] AC 705, 710, [1979] 2 All ER 369, 371 (HL) | highway | |
Suffolk County Council v Mason | [1979] AC 705, 727, [1979] 2 All ER 369, 384 (HL) | driftway | |
Suh and another v Mace (UK) Ltd | [2016] EWCA Civ 4, [2016] PLSCS 19 (CA) | ||
Suisse Atlantique Société d'Armement Maritime SA v NV Rotterdamsche Kolen Centrale | [1966] 1 AC 361, 431–2 (HL) | exclusion clause(Eng) | |
Sumeghovo v Mahon | (2002) The Times, November 6 (CA) | principal home(Eng) | |
Summers v Salford Corp'n | [1943] AC 283, 289 (HL) | unfit for human habitation(Eng) | |
Suurpere v Nice | [2011] EWHC 2003, [2011] 39 EG 110 | tenancy deposit scheme(Eng) | |
Suh and another v Mace (UK) Ltd | [2016] EWCA Civ 4, [2016] PLSCS 19 (CA) | without prejudice | |
Sutcliffe v Lloyd | [2007] EWCA Civ 153, [2007] 22 EG 162, 166 (CA) | estoppel | |
Sutcliffe v Thackrah | [1974] AC 727 (HL) | certificate of valuation | |
Sutton v Norwich Corporation | (1858) 27 LJ Ch 742 | sewer | |
Swift (P & A) Investments v Combined English Stores Group plc | [1989] AC 632, 642, [1988] 2 All ER 885, 890 (HL) | covenant running with the land | |
Swindon Waterworks Co Ltd v Wilts and Berks Canal Navigation Co | (1875) LR 7 HL 697 | water rights | |
Swiss Bank Corpn v Lloyds Bank Ltd | [1982] AC 584, 594–5, [1980] 2 All ER 419, 425 (HL) | equitable charge | |
Sydall v Castings Ltd | [1967] 1 QB 302, 314, [1966] 3 All ER 770, 774 (CA) | word of art | |
Sykes v Harry | [2001] 1 QB 1014, 1025–6, [2001] EG 221 (CA) | duty of care | |
Sykes v Harry | [2001] 1 QB 1014, 1025–6, [2001] EG 221 (CA) | negligence | |
Sykes v Taylor-Rose | [2004] EWCA Civ 299 (CA) | caveat emptor(Lat) | |
T |
|||
Tailors of Aberdeen v Coutts | (1840) 1 Robin 296 (HL) | real burden(Scot) | |
Take Harvest Ltd v Liu | [1993] AC 552, [1993] 2 All ER 459 (PC) | surrender | |
Tamares (Vincent Square) Ltd v Fairpoint Properties (Vincent Square) Ltd (No 2) | [2007] 07 EG 143, [2007] 1 WLR 2167, 2173-4 | damages | |
Tamares (Vincent Square) Ltd v Fairpoint Properties (Vincent Square) Ltd | [2007] 07 EG 143, [2007] 1 WLR 2148, 2153 | right of light(BrE) or right to light(AmE) | |
Tan v Sitkowski | [2007] 06 EG 165 (CA) | dwelling house or dwelling-house | |
Tandon v Trustees of Spurgeons Homes | [1982] AC 755, 761 (HL) | house | |
Target Homes Ltd v Clothier | [1994] 1 All ER 439 | mortgagee | |
Tate v Latham and Son | [1897] 1 QB 502, 506 (CA) | defect | |
Tatem (W.J.) Ltd v Gamboa | [1939] 1 KB 139 | frustration | |
Tayleur v Wilden | (1868) LR 3 Ex 303, 18 LT 655 | notice to quit | |
Taylor v Beal | (1591) Cro Eliz 222, 78 Eng Rep 478 | set-off or setoff | |
Taylor v Caldwell | (1863) 3 B & S 826, 121 Eng Rep 309 | licence(BrE) or license(AmE) | |
Taylor v Caldwell | (1863) 3 B & S 826, 121 Eng Rep 309 | reinstatement clause | |
Taylor v Corporation of St Helens | (1877) 6 Ch D 264, 277 (CA) | watercourse or water course | |
Taylor v Corporation St Helens | (1877) 6 Ch D 264, 273 (CA) | stream | |
Taylor v Couch | [2012] EWHC 1213 (Ch) | interest reversionary(Eng) | |
Taylor v Couch | [2012] EWHC 1213 (Ch) | right of pre-emption | |
Taylor v Hall | (1870) IR 4 CL 467 | quantity surveyor(BrE) | |
Taylor v Taylor | (1875) LR 20 Eq 155, 157 | advancement | |
Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Co Ltd | [1982] QB 133, 151, [1981] 1 All ER 897, 915 | estoppel | |
Tecbild Ltd v Chamberlain | (1969) 20 P & CR 633, 642 (CA) | dispossession | |
Tecbild Ltd v Chamberlain | (1969) 20 P & CR 633, 642 (CA) | adverse possession | |
Tehidy Minerals Ltd v Norman | [1971] 2 QB 528, [1971] 2 All ER 475 (CA) | lost modern grant | |
Tehidy Minerals Ltd v Norman | [1971] 2 QB 528, 547–52, [1971] 2 All ER 475, 487–91 (CA) | prescription | |
Telereal Trillium v Hewitt | [2019] UKSC 23, 58 [2019] PLSCS 90 (SC) | rateable value (RV)(Eng) | |
Tenant v Adamczyk | [2005] 41 EG 205 | adverse possession | |
Tenant v Trenchard | (1869) 4 Ch App 537 | equitable charge | |
Tenarro Ltd v Majorarch Ltd | [2003] EWHC 2601 (Ch) | deposit | |
Tendier v Sproule | [1947] 1 All ER 193 | boarding house | |
Tennant v Smith | [1892] AC 150, 156 (HL) | money's worth(Eng) | |
Terrapin International Ltd v IRC | [1976] 2 All ER 461, 465 | escrow | |
Terrell v Murray | (1901) 17 TLR 570 | fair wear and tear(BrE) | |
Tesco Stores Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1995] 2 All ER 636, 642, 647, 657 (HL) | planning application(Eng) | |
Tesco Stores Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1995] 1 WLR 759 | planning obligation(Eng) | |
Texaco Antilles Ltd v Kernochan | [1973] AC 609, [1973] 2 All ER 118 (PC) | scheme of development | |
Thames and Mersey Marine Insurance Co v Hamilton, Fraser and Co | (1887) 12 App Cas 484, 490 (HL) | ejusdem generis(Lat) | |
Thames Guaranty Ltd v Campbell | [1985] 2 All ER 585 | equitable charge | |
Thames Guaranty Ltd v Campbell | [1985] QB 210 | equitable mortgage | |
The Antaios Compania Neviera S.A. v. Salen Rederierna A.B. | [1985] 1 AC 191, 201 [HL] | literal construction or literal meaning | |
The Carlgarth; The Otarania | [1927] P 93, 110 (CA) | invitee | |
The Creative Foundation v Dreamland Leisure Limited | [2015] EWHC 2556, [2015] PLSCS 263 | fixture | |
The Commonwealth v Arklay | (1952) 87 CLR 169, 170 | market value (MV) | |
The Five Steel Barges | (1890) 15 PD 142, 146 | quasi-contract | |
The Kanchenjunga | [1990] 1 Lloyd's Rep 391, 398 | rescission | |
The Merak | [1976] 1 Lloyd's Rep 81 | subject to survey | |
The Moorcock | (1889) 14 PD 64, [1886–90] All ER Rep 530, 535 | implied term or implied condition | |
The Prior's Case | (1368) YB 42 Edw. III, Pl. 14 | positive covenant | |
The Prior's Case | (1368) YB 42 Edw. III, Pl. 14 | restrictive covenant | |
The Scaptrade (Scandinavian Trading Tanker Co AB v Flota Petrolera Ecuatoriana | [1983] 2 All ER 763, 766, [1983] 2 AC 694, 700 (HL) | time is of the essence | |
The Trustees of the St Clement Danes Holborn Estate Charity v The Greater London Council | (1966) 198 EG 1045 | project valuation(BrE) | |
Theed v Debenham | (1876) 2 Ch D 165 | day work or day-work | |
Thomas v Cook | (1818) 2 B & Ald 119, 106 Eng Rep 310 | surrender | |
Thomas v Hayward | (1869) LR 4 Ex 311 | privity of estate | |
Thomas v Sorrell | (1673) Vaugh 330, 351, 124 Eng Rep 1098, 1109 | lease | |
Thomas v Sorrell | (1673) Vaugh 330, 351, 124 Eng Rep 1098, 1109 | licence(BrE) or license(AmE) | |
Thomas v Sorrell | (1673) Vaugh 330, 351, 124 Eng Rep 1098, 1109 | licensee | |
Thomas v Thomas | (1835) 2 Cr M & R 34, 150 Eng Rep 15 | unity of possession | |
Thomas v Thomas | (1835) 2 Cr M & R 35, 39, 150 Eng Rep 15, 17 | easement of eavesdrop or easement of eaves-dropping | |
Thompson v Clive Alexander & Partners | [1993] 59 BLR 77 | fit for human habitation(Eng) | |
Thompson v Lacy | (1820) 3 B & Ald 283, 287, 106 Eng Rep 667 | inn | |
Thompson v McCullough | [1947] 1 All ER 265 | escrow | |
Thompson v Ward | (1871) 40 LJ CP 169, 188 | lodger | |
Thornborough v Baker | (1675) 2 Swans App 628, 630, 36 Eng Rep 1000 | equity of redemption | |
Thorner v Major | [2009] 13 EG 142, 1 WLR 776 (HL) | estoppel | |
Throckmerton v Tracy | (1555) 1 Plowd 145, 160, 75 Eng Rep 222 | reversion | |
Tickle v Brown | (1836) 4 Ad & E 369, 111 Eng Rep 826 | enjoyment | |
Tickle v Brown | (1836) 4 Ad & E 369, 382, 11 Eng Rep 826 | right | |
Tidswell v Whitworth | (1867) LR 2 CP 326 | assessment | |
Tiffany Investments Ltd v Bircham & Co Nominees (No 2) Ltd | [2003] 12 EG 127, [2004] 2 EGLR 31 | right of pre-emption | |
Tilley v Thomas | (1867) LR 3 Ch App 61 (CA) | time is of the essence | |
Times Fire Assurance Co v Hawke | (1858) 1 F & F 407, 175 Eng Rep 783 | reinstatement | |
Timmins v Rowlinson | (1765) 3 Burr 1603, 97 Eng Rep 1003) | notice to quit | |
Timothy Taylor Ltd v Mayfair House Corporation | [2016] EWHC 1075, [2016] PLSCS 136 | quiet enjoyment | |
Tito v Waddell (No. 2) | [1977] Ch 106 | beach | |
Tiverton Estates Ltd v Wearwell Ltd | [1975] Ch 146, 159 (CA) | subject to contract | |
Toff v McDowell | (1993) 25 HLR 650 | quiet enjoyment | |
Toller v Law Accident Insurance Society Ltd | [1936] 2 All ER 952, 956, 958 (CA) | repudiation | |
Tomlin v Standard Telephone and Cables Ltd | [1969] 3 All ER 201 (CA) | without prejudice | |
Tomlinson v Congleton | [2003] 1 AC 46 (HL) | trespass | |
Toms v Wilson | (1862) 4 B & S 442, 122 Eng Rep 524 | foreclosure | |
Topfell Ltd v Galley Properties Ltd | [1979] 1 WLR 447 | vacant possession | |
Tophams Ltd v Earl of Sefton | [1967] 1 AC 50, 73, 81, [1966] 1 All ER 1039 (HL) | restrictive covenant | |
Torkington v Magee | [1902] 2 KB 427, 430 | chose | |
Torminster Properties Ltd v Green | [1983] 1 WLR 676, [1983] 2 All ER 457 (CA) | surrender | |
Total Clothing Ltd v Guinea Properties & Management Ltd | (1991) 64 P & CR 452) | writing | |
Tottenham UDC v Rowley | [1912] 2 Ch 633, 646–7 (CA) | dedication | |
Toulmin v Millar | (1887) 58 LT 96, 3 TLR 836 (HL) | commission | |
Toulmin v Millar | (1887) 58 LT 96, 3 TLR 836 (HL) | procuring cause | |
Town Centre Securities Ltd v Wm Morrison Supermarkets Ltd. | (1982) 263 EG 435 | hearsay | |
Transco plc v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council | [2016] EWCA Civ 372, ?? (CA) | contra proferentem(Lat) | |
Transfield Shipping Inc (Appellants) v Mercator Shipping Inc (The Achilleas) | [2009] 1 AC 91 (HL) | damages | |
Transocean Drilling UK Ltd v Providence Resources plc | [2016] EWCA Civ 372, ?? (CA) | contra proferentem(Lat) | |
Trego v Hunt | [1896] AC 7 (HL) | goodwill | |
Treloar v Nute | [1976] 1 WLR 1295, [1977] 1 All ER 230, 234 (CA) | adverse possession | |
Treloar v Nute | [1976] 1 WLR 1295, [1977] 1 All ER 230, 234 (CA) | ouster | |
Treseder-Griffin v Co-op Insurance Society Ltd | [1956] 2 QB 127, 2 All ER 33 | gold clause | |
Trevail v C & A Modes Ltd | [1967] RA 124, 132 (LT) | zoning method(BrE) | |
Trocette Property Co Ltd v Greater London Council | (1974) 28 P & CR 408, 416 (CA) | willing buyer or willing seller | |
Trocette Property Co Ltd v Greater London Council | (1974) 28 P & CR 408 (CA) | compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) | |
Trollope and Colls v North West Metropolitan Regional Hospital Board | [1973] 1 WLR 601, 607, [1973] 2 All ER 260, 266 (HL) | implied term or implied condition | |
Trollope and Colls v North West Metropolitan Regional Hospital Board | [1973] 1 WLR 601, 607, [1973] 2 All ER 260, 266 (HL) | time is of the essence | |
Trow v Ind Coope (West Midlands) Ltd | [1967] 2 QB 899, [1967] 2 All ER 900 (CA) | date | |
Trow v Ind Coope (West Midlands) Ltd | [1967] 2 QB 899, [1967] 2 All ER 900 (CA) | time | |
Trustees of the Methodist Secondary Schools Deed v O'Leary | (1990) 23 HLR 418, [1992] NPC 149 (CA) | business tenancy(Eng) | |
Tse Kwong Lam v Wong Chit Sen | [1983] 1 WLR 1349, [1983] 3 All ER 54, 59, 60 (PC) | power of sale | |
Tulk v Moxhay | (1848) 2 Ph 774, 41 Eng Rep 1143 | equitable servitude(US) | |
Tulk v Moxhay | (1848) 2 Ph 774, 41 Eng Rep 1143 | real burden(Scot) | |
Tulk v Moxhay | (1848) 2 Ph 774, 41 Eng Rep 1143 | scheme of development | |
Tulk v Moxhay | (1848) 2 Ph 774, 41 Eng Rep 1143 | sublessee or sub-lessee | |
Tulk v Moxhay | (1848) 2 Ph 774, 41 Eng Rep 1143 | restrictive covenant | |
Turner v Barlow | (1863) 3 F & F 950, 176 Eng Rep 430 | month | |
Turner v Jacob | [2006] EWHC 1317 | constructive trust | |
Turner v Wright | (1860) 2 De GF & J 234, 243, 45 Eng Rep 612 | waste | |
Tutton v Darke, Nixon v Freeman | (1860) 5 Hurl & N 647, 157 Eng Rep 1338 | day | |
Tweedle v Atkinson | (1861) 1 B & S 393, 121 Eng Rep 763 | good consideration | |
Tweedle v Atkinson | (1861) 30 LJ QB 265, 1 B & S 393, 121 Eng Rep 763 | privity of contract | |
Tweedle v Atkinson | (1861) 1 B & S 393, 121 Eng Rep 763 | consideration | |
Tyne Boiler Works Co v Longbenton | (1886) 56 LJ MC 8, 12 | attached | |
Tyrringham's Case | (1584) 4 Co Rep 36b, 37a, 76 Eng Rep 973, 975 | right of common | |
Tyrringham's Case | (1584) 4 Co Rep 36b, 38a, 76 Eng Rep 973, 980 | unity of possession | |
Tyrringham's Case | (1584) 4 Co Rep 36b, 76 Eng Rep 973 | vicinage | |
U-Z |
|||
Ulster Bank v Synnott | [1871] IR 5 Eq 595, 612 | per pro or per procurationem(Lat) | |
Unilever plc v The Procter and Gamble Company | [2000] FSR 344 | without prejudice | |
Union Eagle Ltd v Golden Acheivement Ltd | [1997] AC 514, [1997] 2 All ER 215 (PC) | time is of the essence | |
Union Lighterage Co v London Graving Dock Co | [1902] 2 Ch 557, 573 (CA) | easement of necessity | |
Union Lighterage Cov London Graving Dock Co | [1902] 2 Ch 557, 571 (CA) | prescription | |
United Australia Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd | [1941] AC 1, 30, [1940] 1 All ER 20 (HL) | election | |
United Bank of Kuwait Plc v Sahib | [1997] Ch 107 (CA) | mortgage | |
United Bank of Kuwait Plc v Sahib | [1997] Ch 107 (CA) | equitable mortgage | |
United Bank of Kuwait Plc v Sahib | [1997] Ch 107 (CA) | writing | |
United Dominions Trust (Commercial) Ltd v. Eagle Aircraft Services Ltd | [1968] 1 WLR 74, [1968] 1 All ER 104, 108 (CA) | synallagmatic contract | |
United Scientific Holdings Ltd v Burnley Borough Council | [1978] AC 904, 935, [1977] 2 All ER 62, 76 (HL) | rent | |
United Scientific Holdings Ltd v Burnley Borough Council | [1978] AC 904, 944–6, [1977] 2 All ER 62, 83–5 (HL) | time is of the essence | |
United Scientific Holdings Ltd v Burnley Borough Council | [1978] AC 904, 948, [1977] 2 All ER 62, 87 (HL) | rent review clause(BrE) | |
United States of America v Motor Truck Ltd | [1924] AC 196, 202 (PC) | rectification | |
Universe Tankships Inc. of Monrovia v International Transport Workers' Federation | [1982] 2 All ER 88 | duress | |
Upton v Townsend | (1855) 17 CB 65 | constructive eviction | |
Upton v Townsend | (1855) 17 CB 65 | eviction | |
Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins | [2001] UKHL 43, [2002] 1 AC 301, 310 (HL) | dwelling house or dwelling-house | |
Urban Ventures Ltd v Thomas & Others | [2016] EWCA Civ 30, [2016] EGLR 18 (CA) | further advance(BrE) or future advance(AmE) | |
Urban Ventures Ltd v Thomas & Others | [2016] EWCA Civ 30, [2016] EGLR 18 (CA) | tacking | |
Uttlesford DC v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1992] JPL 171) | planning unit(Eng) | |
Van Dal Footwear Ltd v Ryman Ltd | [2010] 1 All ER 883 (CA) | damages | |
Vanaston v Mackarly | (1796) 2 Lev 99, 83 Eng Rep 468) | quarterly | |
Vane v Barnard (Lord) | (1716) 2 Vern 738, 23 Eng Rep 1082 | waste | |
Vernon v Bethell | (1762) 2 Eden 110, 113, 28 Eng Rep 838 | duress | |
Vernon v Bethell | (1762) 2 Eden 110, 113, 28 Eng Rep 838 | equity of redemption | |
Vernon v Bethell | (1762) 2 Eden 110, 113, 28 Eng Rep 838 | unconscionable bargain | |
Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd | [1949] 2 KB 528 | damages | |
Victoria University of Manchester v Hugh Wilson | (1984) 2 Con LR 430 | latent defect | |
Vincent v Premo Enterprises (Voucher Sales) Ltd | [1969] 2 All ER 944 | delivery | |
Vine (R.A.) (Engineering) Ltd v Havant Borough Council | [1989] 39 EG 164 (CA) | before-and-after method | |
Vowles v Miller | (1810) 3 Taunt 137, 128 Eng Rep 54 | hedge and ditch presumption(Eng) | |
Vyner (Frank) and Sons Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1971] 243 EG 597, [1977] JPL 795 | material change in the use(Eng) | |
Vynior's Case | (1609) 8 Co Rep 81b, 82a, 77 Eng Rep 597 | will | |
Vyvyan v Arthur | (1823) 1 B & C 410, 107 Eng Rep 152) | reddendum | |
Waite v Jennings | [1906] 2 KB 18 | fine | |
Waites Ltd v Hambledon Court Ltd | [2014] EWHC 651, [2014] PLSCS 86 | ad coelum usque ad centrum or ad coelum usque ad inferos(Lat) | |
Waitt v Morris | [1994] 2 EGLR 224 | extended lease | |
Walford v Miles | [1992] 2 AC 128 (HL) | lock-out agreement | |
Walker v Boyle | [1982] 1 All ER 634, 640) | exclusion clause(Eng) | |
Walker v Wilsher | (1889) 23 QBD 335, 337 (CA) | without prejudice | |
Wallace v Evershed | [1899] 1 Ch 891, 894 | floating charge or floating lien | Wallace v Manchester CC | (1998) EGLR 38 | damages |
Wallingford v Mutual Society | (1880) 5 App Cas 685, 702, [1874–80] All ER Rep Ext 1386 (HL) | penalty | |
Wallis v Hands | (1893) 2 Ch 75 | interesse termini(Lat) | |
Wallis v Russell | [1902] 2 IR 585, 615 | caveat emptor(Lat) | |
Walsh v Allweather Mechanical Grouting Co Ltd | [1959] 2 QB 300, 308 | closed contract(Eng) | |
Walsh v Lonsdale | (1882) 21 Ch D 9 (CA) | specific performance | |
Walsingham's Case | (1579) 2 Plowd 547, 555, 75 Eng Rep 805, 816–7 | doctrine of estates | |
Walsingham's Case | (1579) 2 Plowd 547, 555, 75 Eng Rep 805, 816f | estate | |
Warburton v Loveland | (1831) 2 Dow & Cl 480, 489, 6 Eng Rep 806 | literal construction or literal meaning | |
Ward v Paterson | [1929] 2 Ch 396 | bungalow | |
Ware v Cann | (1830) 10 B & C 433, 437, 109 ER 511 | restraint on alienation | |
Ware v Verderber | (1978) 247 EG 1081 | contract for sale | |
Waring v Foden | [1932] 1 Ch 276 (CA) | mineral | |
Warlow v Harrison | (1858) 1 El & El 316, 120 Eng Rep 925 | without reserve | |
Warlow v Harrison | (1859) 1 El & El 309, 120 Eng Rep 925 | invitation to trade(AmE) or invitation to treat(BrE) | |
Warmington v Miller | [1973] QB 877 (CA) | agreement for a lease | |
Warnford Investments Ltd v Duckworth | [1979] Ch 127, [1978] 1 All ER 517 | privity of contract | |
Warr (Frank) & Co v London CC | [1904] 1 KB 713 (CA) | use | |
Warren v Keen | [1954] 1 QB 15, [1953] 2 All ER 1118 (CA) | waste | |
Warren v Keen | [1954] 1 QB 15, 20, [1953] 2 All ER 1118, 1121 (CA) | tenant-like manner(Eng) | |
Warren v Keen | [1954] 1 QB 15, 20, [1953] 2 All ER 1118, 1121 (CA) | wind and water tight(BrE) | |
Warwickshire CC v Atherstone Common Right Proprietors | (1964) 65 LGR 439 | street works(Eng) | |
Waters v Welsh Development Agency | [2004] [2004] 1 WLR 1304 (HL) | compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) | |
Waters v Welsh Development Agency | [2004] 1 WLR 1304 (HL) | compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) | |
Wates v Rowland | [1952] 2 QB 12, 23 (CA) | improvement | |
Watkins v Nash | (1875) LR 20 Eq 262 | escrow | |
Watkins v Nash | (1875) LR 20 Eq 262 | escrow | |
Watson v Gray | (1880) 14 Ch D 192, 194–5 | party wall | |
Watson-Smyth v Secretary of State for the Environment | (1991) 64 P & CR 156) | ha-ha | |
Watts v Morrow | [1991] 1 WLR 1421, 1430, [1991] 4 All ER 937, 945 (CA) | damages | |
Webb v Bird | (1862) 13 CB (NS) 841, 143 Eng Rep 332 | natural rights | |
Webb v London Borough of Barnet | [1989] 11 EG 80, (1989) 25 HLR 257 (CA) | dwelling house or dwelling-house | |
Webb v Pollmount | [1966] Ch 584, 595–6 | interest | |
Webb Resolutions v E.Surv | [2012] EWHC 3653, [2013] PNLR 15 | contributory negligence | |
Webb Resolutions v E.Surv | [2012] EWHC 3653, [2013] PNLR 15 | professional negligence | |
Webber v Lee | (1882) 9 QBD 315 | interest | |
Wedd v Porter | [1916] 2 KB 91 (CA) | holding over | |
Wedd v Porter | [1916] 2 KB 91, 102 (CA) | husband-like manner(Eng) | |
Weir v Area Estates Ltd | [2010] 10 EG 121 | vacant possession | |
Weld-Blundell v Synott | [1940] 2 KB 107 | power of sale | |
Welden v Bridgewater | (1595) Cro Eliz 421, 78 Eng Rep 662 | lot meadows(Eng) | |
Weldon Plant Ltd v The Commission for New Towns | [2001] 77 Con LR 1, [2000] Build LR | fair rates and prices(Eng) | |
Weldon v Dicks | (1878) 10 Ch D 247, 262 | acquiescence | |
Welford and Others v EDF Energy network (LPN) Ltd | [2007] EWCA Civ 293, [2007] 24 EG 170 (CA) | compensation for disturbance(Eng) | |
Wellington (Mayor of) v Lower Hutt (Mayor of) | [1904] AC 773, 775–6 (PC) | adjacent | |
Welsh v Greenwich London Borough Council | (2001) P & CR 12; [2000] EGCS 84 (CA) | good condition | |
Wenlock (Baroness) v River Dee Company | (1885) 10 App Cas 354 (HL) | ultra vires(Lat) | |
West Bromwich Building Society v Bullock | [1936] 1 All ER 887 | assumption | |
West End Investments (Cowell Group) v Birchlea Ltd | [2015] EWHC 3381, [2016] 4 WLR 4 | house | |
West Midland Baptist (Trust) Association (Inc.) v Birmingham Corporation | [1968] 1 All ER 205, 216 (CA), aff'd [1970] AC 874, [1969] 3 All ER 172, 184 (HL) | notice to treat(Eng) | |
Western Heritable Investment Co Ltd v Husband | [1983] 2 AC 849, 859, [1983] 268 EG 266 (HL) | fair rent | |
Western Trading Ltd v Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) Plc | [2015] EWCA 1003, [2016] PLSCS 270 (CA) | reinstatement basis | |
Westminster City Council v Great Portland Estates | [1985] AC 661, 670 (HL) | planning application(Eng) | |
Westminster City Council v Southern Ry Co | (1936) AC 511, 529 (HL) | rateable occupation(Eng) | |
Westminster City Council v Tomlin | (1988) 28 RVR 196 | rateable occupation(Eng) | |
Westminster Corporation v Southern Ry Co | (1936) AC 511, 532, [1936] 2 All ER 322 (HL) | exclusive occupation | |
Weston v Arnold | (1873) 8 Ch App 1084, 1089 | party wall | |
Weston v Metropolitan Asylum District Managers | (1882) 9 QBD 404 | additional rent | |
Wettern Electric Ltd v Welsh Development Agency | [1983] 1 QB 796, [1983] 2 All ER 629 | implied term or implied condition | |
Whalley v Ramage | (1862) 10 WR 315) | instroke | |
Wheat v E. Lacon and Co Ltd | [1966] AC 552, 578,581 (HL) | occupier | |
Wheeldon v Burrows | (1879) 12 Ch D 31, 49 (CA) | implied grant | |
Wheeldon v Burrows | (1879) 12 Ch D 31, 49 (CA) | quasi-easement | |
Wheeldon v Burrows | (1879) 12 Ch D 31, 49–50 (CA) | implied reservation | |
Wheeler v Keeble (1914) Ltd | [1920] 1 Ch 57 | forfeiture | |
Wheeler v Mercer | [1957] AC 426, 427, [1956] 3 All ER 631, 634 (HL) | business tenancy(Eng) | |
Wheeler v Mercer | [1957] AC 426, 427, [1956] 3 All ER 631, 634 (HL) | tenancy at will | |
Wheeler v Smith | [1926] EGD 194 | sublease or sub-lease | |
Whelton Sinclair (a firm) v Hyland | [1992] 41 EG 112, [1992] 2 EGLR 158 | time | |
Whicker v Hume | (1851) 14 Beav 509, 518, 50 Eng Rep 404 | bequest or bequeath | |
Whitbread plc v UCB Corporate Services | (2000) The Times, June 22, [2000] 35 EG 136 (CA) | simple interest | |
White v Bijou Mansions Ltd | [1938] Ch 351, 361, [1938] 1 All ER 546 (CA) | scheme of development | |
White v Elmdene Estates Ltd | [1959] 2 All ER 605, 610–11 | payment | |
White v Foljambe | (1805) 11 Ves 337, 345–6, 32 Eng Rep 1121 | open contract | |
White v Grand Hotel Eastbourne Ltd | [1913] 1 Ch 113 (CA) | easement | |
White v Taylor (No. 2) | [1969] 1 Ch 160 | ancillary easement | |
Whitgift Homes Ltd v Stocks | [2001] EWCA Civ 1732, [2001] 48 EG 130 (CA) | scheme of development | |
Whitley v Stumbles | [1930] AC 544 (HL) | premises | |
Whitley v Stumbles | [1930] AC 544, 546 (HL) | premises | |
Whitley v Stumbles | [1930] AC 544 (HL) | business tenancy(Eng) | |
Whitman v Kershaw | (1896) 16 QBD 613 (CA) | security deposit | |
Whittington v Corder | (1852) 20 LT OS 175 | occupation | |
Wickham Machine Tool Sales Ltd v Schuler AG | [1972] 2 All ER 1181 | condition | |
Wickham v Hawker | (1840) 7 M & W 63, 151 Eng Rep 679 | reservation | |
Wickman Machine Tools Sales Ltd v L Schuler AG | [1974] AC 235 (HL) | warranty | |
Wigginton & Milner Ltd v Winster Engineering Ltd | [1978] 1 WLR 1462, [1978] 3 All ER 436 (CA) | plan | |
Wildtree Hotels Ltd v Harrow LBC | (2000) 150 NLJ 984 (HL) | compensation for injurious affection(Eng) | |
Wilkes v Goodwin | [1923] 2 KB 86, 93 (CA) | board | |
Wilkinson v Martin | (1873) 8 Car & P 1, 5, 173 Eng Rep 373, 375 | procuring cause | |
William Boyer & Sons Ltd v Adams | (1976) 32 P&CR 89 | business tenancy(Eng) | |
William Boyer & Sons Ltd v Adams | (1976) 32 P&CR 89 | occupation | |
William Boyes and Sons Ltd v Adams | (1975) 32 P & CR 89 | business premises | |
William Cory & Sons Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners | [1964] 3 All ER 66, 71A-C (CA) | escrow | |
William Hill (Southern) Ltd v Cabras Ltd | [1987] 1 EGLR 37 | easement | |
William Lacey (Hounslow) Ltd v Davies | [1957] 1 WLR 932 | quantum meruit(Lat) | |
William Sindall plc v Cambridgeshire County Council | [1994] 1 WLR 1016, 1025, [1994] 3 All ER 932, 942 (CA) | knowledge | |
Williams & Glyn's Bank Ltd v Boland | [1979] Ch 312, 331, [1979] 2 All ER 697, 703 (CA) | matrimonial home(Eng) | |
Williams & Glyn's Bank Ltd v Boland | [1981] AC 487, 505, [1980] 2 All ER 408, 413 (HL) | possession | |
Williams & Glyn's Bank Ltd v Boland | [1981] AC 487, 505–6, [1980] 2 All ER 408, 413 (HL) | occupation | |
Williams & Glyn's Bank Ltd v Boland | [1981] AC 487, 505, [1980] 2 All ER 408, 413 (HL) | overreachable interest(Eng) | |
Williams & Glyn's Bank Ltd v Boland | [1981] AC 487, 505, [1980] 2 All ER 408, 413 (HL) | overriding interest(Eng) | |
Williams (VO) v Scottish and Newcastle Retail Ltd | [2001] EGCS 26, (2001) The Times, March 6 (CA) | rebus sic stantibus(Lat) | |
Williams Brothers Direct Supply Ltd v Raftery | [1958] 1 QB 159, 170-173 | abandonment | |
Williams v Burrell | (1845) 1 CB 429, 135 Eng Rep 596 | implied covenant | |
Williams v Gabriel | [1906] 1 KB 155 | quiet enjoyment | |
Williams v Hensman | (1861) 1 John & Hem 546, 557, 70 Eng Rep 862 | joint tenancy | |
Williams v Hensman | (1861) 1 John & Hem 546, 557, 70 Eng Rep 862 | severance | |
Williams v Kiley t/a CK Supermarkets Ltd | [2003] 1 P & CR D38 | letting scheme | |
Williams v Lake | [1859] 29 LJ QB 1, 3 | note | |
Williams v Ministry of Housing and Local Government | (1967) 65 LGR 425 | material change in the use(Eng) | |
Williams v Sandy Lane (Chester) Ltd | [2006] EWCA Civ 1738, [2007] 07 EG 144, 148 (CA) | prescription | |
Williams v Sandy Lane (Chester) Ltd | [2006] EWCA Civ 1738, [2007] 07 EG 144, 154 (CA) | abandonment | |
Williams v Underwood | (1983) 45 P & CR 235, 256 | abandonment | |
Willingale v Globalgrange Ltd | [2002] 2 EGLR 55 | notice | |
Wilson v Finch Hatton | (1877) 2 Exch D 336 | furnished tenancy(Eng) | |
Wilson v First County Trust Ltd (No 2) | [2003] UKHL 40, [2003] 3 WLR 568 (HL) | possessions | |
Wily v Endeavour Health Care Services Pty Ltd | [2003] NSWCA 312 | option | |
Wimbledon and Putney Commons Conservators v Dixon | (1875) 1 Ch D 374 | easement | |
Windmill Investments (London) v Milano Restaurants | [1962] 2 QB 373, 376 | waiver | |
Winn v Bull | (1877) 7 Ch D 29 | subject to contract | |
Winter v Owens | [1950] IR 225, 226–7 | conacre(Irl) | |
Winter v Traditional & Contemporary Contracts Ltd | [2008] 03 EG 180 (CA) | restrictive covenant | |
Wipperman and Buckingham v London Borough of Barking | (1965) 17 P & CR 225) | material change in the use(Eng) | |
Wirral Rural DC v Carter | [1903] 1 KB 646, 651 | reputed owner | |
Wolfe v Shelley | [1581] 1 Co Rep 93b, 76 Eng Rep 206 | heir (f. heiress) | |
Wolverhampton Corporation v Emmons | [1901] 1 KB 515 (CA) | specific performance | |
Wong v Beaumont Properties Trust Ltd | [1965] 1 QB 173, [1964] 2 All ER 119 | implied easement | |
Wong v Beaumont Property Trust Ltd | [1965] 1 QB 173 | easement of necessity | |
Wood v Leadbitter | (1845) 13 M & W 838, 845, 153 Eng Rep 351 | licence(BrE) or license(AmE) | |
Wood v Secretary of State for the Environment | [1973] 1 WLR 707, [1973] 2 All ER 404, 408–9 | planning unit(Eng) | |
Woodhouse v Walker | (1880) 5 QBD 404, 406–7 | waste | |
Woods v Pope | (1895) 6 C & P 732 | damages | |
Woods v Pope | (1895) 6 C & P 732 | schedule of dilapidations(BrE) | |
Woodyer v Hadden | (1813) 5 Taunt 125, 137, 128 Eng Rep 634 | decrement | |
Woollerton and Wilson Ltd v Richard Costain Ltd | [1971] 1 WLR 411, [1970] 1 All ER 483 | trespass | Woolway (VO) v Mazars LLP | [2015] UKSC 53, at paras. 6, 12, [2015] PLSCS 240 (SC) | heraditament |
Woolworth v Lambert | [1937] Ch 37, [1936] 2 All ER 1523 | improvement | |
Woolworth v Lambert | [1937] Ch 37, [1936] 2 All ER 1523 | restraint on alienation | |
Woozley v Woodall Smith | [1950] 1 KB 325) | low rent(Eng) | |
Workers Trust & Merchant Bank Ltd v Dojap Investments Ltd | [1993] AC 573, [1993] 2 All ER 370 (PC) | deposit | |
Wragg v Lovett | [1948] 2 All ER 968, 969 (CA) | estate agent(BrE) | |
Wright v Carter | [1903] 1 Ch 27 | fraudulent conveyance | |
Wright v Shelton | (1853) 18 Jur 445 | worldly estate or worldly goods | |
Wringe v Cohen | [1940] 1 KB 229 | nuisance | |
Wrotham Park Estate Co Ltd v Parkside Homes Ltd | [1974] 1 WLR 798, 815 | damages | |
Wyatt v Harrison | (1823) 2 B & Ad 871, 110 Eng Rep 320 | lateral support | |
Wyatt v Harrison | (1823) 2 B & Ad 871, 110 Eng Rep 320 | natural rights | |
Wyatt v Harrison | (1823) 2 B & Ad 871, 110 Eng Rep 320 | right of support or right to support | |
Wycombe Health Authority v Barnett | (1982) 47 P & CR 570, 264 EG 619 (CA) | tenant-like manner(Eng) | |
Wycombe Health Authority v Barnett | (1982) 5 HLR 84, 91 | proper working order | |
Wyld v Silver | [1962] 1 Ch 570 | fair | |
Xenos v Wickham | (1866) LR 2 HL 296, 312 (HL) | delivery | |
Yandle and Sons v Sutton | [1922] 2 Ch 199, 210 | patent defect | |
Yarmouth v France | (1887) 18 QBD 647 | plant | |
Yaxley v Gotts | [2000] Ch 162, 176, 193 (CA) | writing | |
Yelloly v Morley | (1910) 27 TLR 20 | repairs notice(Eng) | |
Yelloly v Morley | (1910) 27 TLR 20 | use clause or user clause | |
Yeoman's Row Management Limited v Cobbe | [2006] EWCA Civ 1139 (CA) | subject to contract | |
York v Stone | (1709) 1 Salk 158, 91 Eng Rep 146 | joint tenancy | |
Yorkbrook Investments Ltd v Batten | [1985] 2 EGLR 100 | set-off or setoff | |
Yuen Kun Yeu v A-G of Hong Kong | [1987] 1 AC 175, 194 (PC) | duty of care | |
Z Ltd v A and Others | [1982] 1 All ER 556, 572 (CA) | Mareva injunction(Eng) | |
Zarb v Parry | Zarb v Parry [2012] 2 All ER 320, 333-4, [2012] 03 EG 88, 93 (CA) | adverse ossession | |
Zarb v Parry | [2012] 2 All ER 320, 329 [2012] 03 EG 88, 91 (CA) | permission | |
Zarb v Parry | [2012] 2 All ER 320, 338 [2012] 03 EG 88, 96 (CA) | possession | |
Zermalt Holdings S.A. v Nu-Life Upholstery Repairs Ltd | [1985] EGLR 14 | arbitrator | |
Zetland (Earl of) v Lord Advocate | (1878) 3 App Cas 505, 518 (HL) | ancestor | |
Zinc Cobham Ltd v Adda Hotels | [2018] EWHC 1025 (Ch) | specific performnce | |
Samarenko v Dawn Hill House Limited | [2011] EWCA Civ 1445 (CA) | deposit | |
Scullion v Bank of Scotland (t/a Colleys) | [2011] EWCA Civ 693, [2011] 25 EG 105 (CA) | duty of care | |
Phillips v Francis | [2010] 24 EG 118, [2010] L & TR 28 | dwelling or dwelling-house | |
Phillips v Francis | [2013] EWHC 3650 (Ch), [2013] 1 EGLR 47 | service charge | |
Oliver v Symonds | [2012] EWCA Civ 267, [2012] 22 EG 86 (CA) | easement | |
Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government | [2011] UKSC 15, [2011] 15 EG 93 (SC) | enforcement notice | |
Jones v Kaney | [2011] 2 WLR 823, [2011] 14 EG 95 (SC) | expert witness | |
Jones v Kaney | [2011] 2 WLR 823, [2011] 14 EG 95 (SC) | professional negligence | |
Jenson v Faux | [2011] EWCA Civ 423, [2011] PLSCS 107 (CA) | fit for habitation | |
R (Smith) v Land Registry | [2010] 11 EG 121, [2010] WLR (D) 72 (CA) | highway | |
Dominion Corporate Trustees Ltd v Debenham Properties Ltd | [2010] NPC 63, [2010] All ER (D) 264 | literal construction | |
Furmedge v Chester-Le-Street District Council | [2011] EWHC 1226, [2011] All ER (D) 162 | negligence | |
Derrick Barr and Others v Biffa Waste Services Limited | [2011] EWCA Civ 312 (CA) | nuisance | |
Hotgroup plc v Royal Bank of Scotland plc | [2010] All ER (D) 280, [2010] 23 EG 107 | notice | |
Lambert v Barratt Homes Ltd [Manchester Division] | [2010] EWCA Civ 68, [2010] EG 72, 75 (CA) | nuisance | |
Link Lending Ltd v Hussein | [2010] WLR (D) 424, [2010] 18 EG 98 (CA) | occupation | |
Link Lending Ltd v Bustard | [2010] EWCA Civ 424, [2010] 28 EG 86, 88 (CA) | occupation | |
Clarence House Ltd v National Westminster Bank plc | [2010] 08 EG 106, 1 WLR 1216 (CA) | possession |
(suffixes such as (US) (Eng) (F) indicate the country of primary, but not necessarily exclusive, use).