|
41-60 Albert Palace Mansions (Freehold) Ltd v Craftrule Ltd |
[2011] EWCA 1230, [2011] 19 EG 98 (CA) |
leasehold enfranchisement(Eng) |
|
9 Cornwall Crescent London Ltd v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC |
[2006] 1 WLR 1186 (CA) |
extended lease |
|
9 Cornwall Crescent London Ltd v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC |
[2006] 1 WLR 1186 (CA) |
leasehold enfranchisement(Eng) |
|
A Ketley Ltd v Scott |
[1981] ICR 241, 130 NLJ 749 |
usury |
|
A.P. Stephens v Scottish Boatowners Mutual Insurance Association (The Talisman) |
[1989] 1 Lloyd's Rep 535 |
reasonable effort or reasonable endeavour |
|
Abbey Homesteads Group Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport |
(1982) 263 EG 983, 264 EG 151, 154, [1982] 2 EGLR 18 (LT) |
compensation for severance(Eng) |
|
Abbey Homesteads Group Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport |
(1982) 263 EG 983, 264 EG 151, 154, [1982] 2 EGLR 18 (LT) |
before-and-after method |
|
Abbey National Building Society v Cann |
[1991] 1 AC 56, [1990] 1 All ER 1085 (HL) |
scintilla temporis(Lat) |
|
Abbey National Building Society v Cann |
[1991] 1 AC 56, [1990] 1 All ER 1085, 1101 (HL) |
occupation |
|
Abbey National plc v Commisioners for Revenue & Customs |
[2006] EWCA Civ 886, [2006] 3 EGLR 153 |
virtual assignment |
|
Abbott v Abbott |
[2007] UKPC 53 (PC) |
matrimonial home(Eng) |
|
Abernethie v AM and J Kleiman Ltd |
(1969) 211 EG 405, [1970] 1 QB 10 |
business |
|
Abigail v Lapin |
[1934] AC 491, 500 (PC) |
caveat |
|
Abram Steamship Co v Westvill Shipping Co |
[1923] AC 773, 781 (HL) |
rescission |
|
Ackland v Lutley |
(1839) 9 Ed & El 879, 894, 112 Eng Rep 1446 |
time |
|
Acton v Blundell |
(1843) 12 M & W 324, 152 Eng Rep 1223 |
water rights |
|
Adagio Properties Ltd v Ansari |
[1998] 35 EG 86, (CA) |
notice |
|
Adami v Lincoln Grange Management Ltd |
[1997] EWCA Civ 3018, [1998] 1 EGLR 58 (CA) |
repair |
|
Adams and Wade Ltd v Minister of Housing and Local Government |
(1965) 18 P & CR 60, 67 |
reasonably beneficial use(Eng) |
|
Adams v Green |
(1978) 247 EG 49, 2 EGLR 46 |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Adams v Lindsell |
(1818) 1 B & Ald 681, 106 Eng Rep 250 |
acceptance |
|
Adams v Richardson and Starling Ltd |
[1969] 2 All ER 1221, [1969] 1 WLR 1645 (CA) |
defects liability period |
|
Addiscombe Garden Estates Ltd v Crabbe |
[1958] 1 QB 513, [1957] 3 All ER 563 (CA) |
business premises |
|
Addiscombe Garden Estates Ltd v Crabbe |
[1958] 1 QB 513, [1957] 3 All ER 563 (CA) |
licence(BrE) or license(AmE) |
|
Adelphi Estates v Christie |
(1983) 47 P & CR 650 |
concurrent lease |
|
Adler v Blackman |
[1953] 1 QB 146 (CA) |
week-to-week tenancy(AmE) or weekly tenancy(BrE) |
|
Afovos Shipping Co SA v Pagnan |
[1983] 1 WLR 195, [1983] 1 All ER 449, 455 (HL) |
breach of contract |
|
Afovos Shipping Co SA v Pagnan |
[1983] 1 WLR 195, [1983] 1 All ER 449 (HL) |
date |
|
A-G (ex rel Yorkshire Derwent Trust Ltd) v Brotherton |
[1991] 1 AC 425, 436 (HL) |
highway |
|
A-G of Hong Kong v Humphreys Estate |
[1987] 1 AC 114, 127H-128B (CA) |
subject to contract |
|
A-G of Ontario v Mercer |
(1883) 8 App Cas 767, 772 (PC) |
escheat |
|
A-G of Ontario v Mercer |
(1883) 8 App Cas 767, 772 (PC) |
tenure |
|
A-G of Southern Nigeria v John Holt & Co (Liverpool) Ltd |
[1915] AC 599, 617 (PC) |
easement |
|
A-G of Southern Nigeria v John Holt & Co (Liverpool) Ltd |
[1915] AC 599 (PC) |
avulsion |
|
A-G of Straits Settlement v Wemyss |
(1888) 13 App Cas 192 (PC) |
riparian rights |
|
A-G of the Duchy of Lancaster v GE Overton (Farms) Ltd |
[1982] Ch 277, 288 |
treasure trove |
|
AG Securities v Vaughan, Antoniades v Villiers |
[1990] 1 AC 417, [1988] 3 All ER 1058 (HL) |
exclusive occupation |
|
AG Securities v Vaughan, Antoniades v Villiers |
[1990] 1 AC 417, [1988] 3 All ER 1058 (HL) |
licence(BrE) or license(AmE) |
|
AG Securities v Vaughan, Antoniades v Villiers |
[1990] 1 AC 417, [1988] 3 All ER 1058 (HL) |
lease |
|
A-G v Biphosphated Guano Co |
(1879) 11 Ch D 337 |
notice |
|
A-G v British Museum Trustees |
[1903] 2 Ch 598 |
treasure trove |
|
A-G v Chambers |
(1854) 4 De GM & G 206, 43 Eng Rep 486 |
foreshore |
|
A-G v Chambers |
(1854) 4 De GM & G 206, 217-8, 43 Eng Rep 486 |
shore |
|
A-G v Colchester Corporation |
[1952] Ch 586, 592 |
stallage(Eng) |
|
A-G v De Keyser's Royal Hotel |
[1920] 1 AC 508, 576 (HL) |
compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) |
|
A-G v De Keyser's Royal Hotel |
[1920] 1 AC 508 (HL) |
compulsory purchase(Eng) |
|
A-G v Earl of Lonsdale |
(1868) LR 7 Eq 377, 388 |
foreshore |
|
A-G v Great Eastern Ry Co |
(1880) 5 App Cas 473, 478 |
compulsory purchase order (CPO)(Eng) |
|
A-G v Hanmer |
(1858) 27 LJ Ch 837, 840, 45 Eng Rep 80 |
waste land |
|
A-G v Jacobs-Smith |
[1895] 2 QB 341 |
value |
|
A-G v Jewish Colonization Association |
[1901] 1 KB 123, 143 (CA) |
indenture |
|
A-G v Moore |
[1893] 1 Ch 676, 683 |
treasure trove |
|
A-G v P. Y. A. Quarries |
[1957] 2 QB 169, 191 (CA) |
nuisance |
|
A-G v Pyle |
(1738) 1 Atk 435, 26 Eng Rep 278 |
rule against perpetuities (RAP) |
|
A-G v Sands |
(1669) Hard 488, 491, 145 Eng Rep 56 |
trust |
|
Ahmed v Kendrick |
(1987) 56 P & CR 120 (CA) |
equitable charge |
|
Ainsdale Investments Ltd v First Secretary of State |
[2004] EWHC 1010; [2004] 22 EG 141 |
house |
|
Ajit (Chintamanie) v Joseph Mootoo Sammy |
[1967] 1 AC 255 (PC) |
time is of the essence |
|
Aker v Collingwood Housing Association |
[2007] EWCA Civ 343, [2007] 25 EG 184 (CA) |
duty of care |
|
Akici v Butlin |
[2005] EWCA Civ 1296, [2006] 1 WLR 201 (CA) |
notice |
|
Alan (WJ) & Co Ltd v El Nasr Export and Import Co |
[1972] WLR 800, 814, [1972] 2 All ER 127, 140 (CA) |
waiver |
|
Alan Estates Ltd v WG Stores Ltd |
[1981] 3 All ER 486 (CA) |
escrow |
|
Alan Wibberley Building Ltd v Insley |
[1999] 1 WLR 894 (HL) |
hedge and ditch presumption(Eng) |
|
Alan Wibberley Building Ltd v Insley |
[1999] 1 WLR 894, 895 (HL) |
boundary line |
|
Alan Wibberley Building Ltd v Insley |
[1999] 1 WLR 894, 896 (HL) |
plan |
|
Alcock v Wraith |
(1991) 59 BLR 20 |
vicarious liability |
|
Aldin v Latimer Clark, Muirhead & Co |
[1894] 2 Ch 437 |
derogation from grant |
|
Aldred's Case |
9 Co Rep at 57b |
easement |
|
Aldred's Case |
(1610) 9 Co Rep 57b, 58a, 77 Eng Rep 816 |
right of view or right to view |
|
Aldridge v Ferne |
(1886) 17 QBD 212 |
outgoing |
|
Aldwych Club Ltd v Copthall Property Co Ltd |
(1962) 186 EG 219 |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Alfred F Beckett v Lyons |
[1967] Ch 449, 482B |
easement |
|
Ali v Lane |
[2006] EWCA Civ 1532, [2007] 02 EG 126 (CA) |
literal construction or literal meaning |
|
Allen v Greenwood |
[1980] Ch 119, 134, 135 (CA) |
right of light(BrE) or right to light(AmE) |
|
Allen v Matthews |
[2007] EWCA Civ 216 (CA) |
adverse possession |
|
Allen v Veranne Builders Ltd |
[1988] NPC 11 |
scheme of development |
|
Alliance and Leicester plc v Slayford |
[2001] 1 All ER (Comm), (2001) 81 P & CR DG10 |
recourse |
|
Allied Dunbar Assurance plc v Homebase Ltd |
[2002] 27 EG 144, [2002] 2 EGLR 23 (CA) |
restraint on alienation |
|
Allison Ltd v Limehouse & Co |
[1992] AC 105, 113, 124 (CA) |
personally |
|
Allnatt London Properties v Newton |
[1981] 2 All ER 290 |
surrender-back clause |
|
Altham's Case |
(1610) 8 Co Rep 150b, 153b, 77 Eng Rep 701 |
title |
|
Amalgamated Investment & Property Co Ltd v John Walker and Sons Ltd |
[1977] 1 WLR164, [1976] 3 All ER 509 (CA) |
frustration |
|
Amalgamated Property Co. v Texas Bank |
[1982] QB 84, 131, [1981] 3 WLR 565, 583 (CA) |
estoppel |
|
Amec Developments Ltd v Jury's Hotel Management (UK) Ltd |
[2001] 07 EG 163, (2001) P & CR 22 |
damages |
|
Amarjee v Barrowfen Properties Ltd |
[1993] EGLR 133 |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Ammonia Soda Company v Chamberlain |
[1918] 1 Ch 266, 286, [1916-7] All ER Rep 708, 713 (CA) |
fixed capital |
|
Amoco Australia Pty Ltd v Rocca Bros. |
[1975] AC 561 (PC) |
solus agreement(BrE) |
|
Amodu Tijani v The Secretary, Southern Nigeria |
[1921] 2 AC 399, 407 (PC) |
native title |
|
Amyer v Pluck |
(1971) 223 EG 33 |
chilling a sale |
|
Anchor Brewhouse Developments v Berkley House (Developments) Ltd |
[1987] 2 EGLR 173 |
trespass |
|
Anderson Antiques (UK) Ltd v Anderson Wharf (Hull) Ltd |
[2007] EWHC 2086 |
writing |
|
Anderson v Bostock |
[1976] Ch 312 |
appurtenance |
|
Anderson v Commercial Union Assurance Co |
(1885) 55 LJ QB 146, 149 (CA) |
reinstatement |
|
Andrews v Ramsay & Co |
[1903] 2 KB 635, 638 |
commission |
|
Andrews v Ramsey & Co |
[1903] 2 KB 635, 638 |
good faith |
|
Andrews v Waite |
[1907] 2 Ch 500, 510 |
right of light(BrE) or right to light(AmE) |
|
Anglia Building Society v Sheffield City Council |
(1982) 266 EG 311 (CA) |
restraint on alienation |
|
Anglia Building Society v Sheffield City Council |
(1982) 266 EG 311 (CA) |
change of use |
|
Angus v Dalton |
(1878) 4 QBD 162, 169 (CA) |
natural rights |
|
Ankerson v Connerly |
[1907] 1 Ch 678 |
encroachment or incroachment |
|
Anon. |
(1478) YB 17, Edw. IV, 1 |
bargain |
|
Anon. |
(1515) 3 Dyer 345a, 73 Eng Rep 776 |
half a year or half year |
|
Anstruther-Gough-Calthorpe v McOscar |
[1924] 1 KB 716, 734 (CA) |
repair |
|
Appleby v Meyers |
(1867) LR 2 CP 65 1 |
lump-sum contract |
|
Aribisala v St James' Homes (Grosvenor Dock) Ltd |
[2007] EWHC 1694, 25 EG 183 |
deposit |
|
Armagas Ltd v Mundogas SA |
[1985] 2 All ER 385 |
ostensible authority |
|
Armchair Passenger Transport Limited v Helical Bar Plc |
[2003] EWHC 367 |
expert witness |
|
Artworld Financial Corporation v Safaryan |
[2009] EWCA Civ 303 (CA), 23 EG 94 (CA) |
surrender |
|
Ashbridge Investments Ltd v Minister of Housing and Local Government |
[1965] 3 All ER 371, 374 (CA) |
ultra vires(Lat) |
|
Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold |
[1988] 2 All ER 147, [1989] Ch 1 (CA) |
rent |
|
Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold |
[1988] 2 All ER 147, [1989] Ch 1 (CA) |
peppercorn rent |
|
Ashbury Ry Carriage & Iron Co Ltd v Riche |
[1875] LR 7 HL 653 (HL) |
ultra vires(Lat) |
|
Ashdale Land & Property Co Ltd v Maioriello |
[2010] EWHC 3296, [2011] 07 EG 10 |
easement |
|
Asher v Whitlock |
(1865) LR 1 QB 1 |
tacking |
|
Ashworth Frazer Ltd v Gloucester City Council |
[2002] UKHL 59, [2002] 05 EG 133 (HL) |
restraint on alienation |
|
Aslan v Murphy (Nos. 1 & 2) |
38 EG 109, [1990] 1 WLR 766, [1989] 3 All ER 130 (CA) |
exclusive possession |
|
Aslan v Murphy (Nos. 1 & 2) |
38 EG 109, [1990] 1 WLR 766, [1989] 3 All ER 130 (CA) |
lodger |
|
Associated Cinema Properties v Hampstead Borough Council |
[1944] KB 412 (CA) |
rateable occupation(Eng) |
|
Associated Provincial Picture Houses, Limited v Wednesbury Corporation |
[1948] 1 KB 223 (CA) |
ultra vires(Lat) |
|
Associated Provincial Picture Houses, Limited v Wednesbury Corporation |
[1948] 1 KB 223, 228, 233 (CA) |
certiorari(Lat) |
|
Aston Charities Trust Ltd v Stepney Borough Council |
[1952] 2 QB 642, (1952) 3 P & CR 82 (LT) |
equivalent reinstatement(Eng) |
|
Atcherley v Du Moulin |
2 K & J 186, 69 Eng Rep 746 |
entitled |
|
Athill v Athill |
(1880) 16 Ch D 214 (CA) |
collateral |
|
Attorney General v Blake |
[2000] 4 All ER 385, 391, [2001] 1 AC 268, 278G (HL) |
damages |
|
Attorney General v Blake |
[2000] 4 All ER 385, 391, [2001] 1 AC 268, 278G (HL) |
trespass |
|
Attree v Hawe |
(1878) 9 Ch D 337 (CA) |
interest |
|
Attwood v Bovis Homes Ltd |
[2001] Ch 379, [2000] 4 All ER 948 |
easement of drainage(BrE) |
|
Attwood v Bovis Homes Ltd |
[2001] Ch 379 |
easement |
|
Attwood v Lamont |
[1920] 3 KB 571 |
severance |
|
Attwood v Llay Main Collieries |
[1926] Ch 444, 458 |
water rights |
|
Attwood v Small |
(1838) 6 Cl & F 232, 7 Eng Rep 684 (HL) |
misrepresentation |
|
Austerberry v Oldham Corporation |
(1885) 29 Ch D 750 |
restrictive covenant |
|
Austin v Southwark LBC |
[2010] UKSC 28, [2010] 35 EG 94, 101 (HL) |
secure tenancy/tolerated trespasser |
|
Avocet Industrial Estates LLP v Merol Limited |
[2011] EWHC 3422 |
break clause |
|
Avocet Industrial Estates LLP v Merol Limited |
[2011] EWHC 3422 |
check(AmE) or cheque(BrE) |
|
Avocet Industrial Estates LLP v Merol Limited |
[2011] EWHC 3422 |
rent |
|
Avon Estates Ltd v Evans |
[2013] EWHC 1635, [2013] PLSCS |
T mark(BrE) |
|
Avraamides v Colwill |
2006 EWCA Civ 1533 (CA) |
privity of contract |
|
Axa Equity and Law Home Loans Ltd v Hirani Watson |
(1999) EGCS 90 |
valuer |
|
Ayannuga v Swindells [2012] EWCA Civ 1789, [2012] PLSCS 23 (CA) |
[2012] EWCA Civ 1789, [2012] PLSCS 23 (CA) |
tenancy deposit scheme(Eng) |
Top
|
B.T.E. v Merseyside and Cheshire Rent Assessment Committee |
(1991) 24 HLR 514 |
fair rent |
|
Back v Stacey |
(1826) 2 C&P 465 |
right of light(BrE) or right to light(AmE) |
|
Backer v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1983] JPL 602 |
caravan |
|
Bacon v Bacon |
(1639) Toth 133, 134, 21 Eng Rep 146 |
clog |
|
Bagettes Ltd v GP Estates Ltd |
[1956] Ch 290 (CA) |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Bailey v De Crespigny |
(1869) LR 4 QB 180 |
frustration |
|
Bailey v Stephens |
(1862) 12 CBNS 91, 142 ER 1077 |
profit à prendre |
|
Bain v Fothergill |
[1874] LR 7 HL 158 (HL) |
damages |
|
Bain v Fothergill |
[1874] LR 7 HL 158 (HL) |
deposit |
|
Bainbridge v Chertsey Urban DC |
[1915] 84 LJ Ch 626 |
estoppel |
|
Baird Textile Holdings Ltd v Marks & Spencer plc |
[2001] EWCA Civ 274, [2002] 1 All ER (Comm) 737 (CA) |
subject to contract |
|
Baker v Dewey |
1 B & C 704, 709, 107 Eng Rep 259, 260 (1823) |
act of God |
|
Bakewell Management Ltd v Brandwood |
[2004] 2 AC 519 (HL) |
common land |
|
Baldwin's Ltd v Halifax Corp'n |
(1916) 85 LJ KB 1769, 1774 |
internal |
|
Ball v Plummer |
(1879) The Times, June 17 (CA) |
double rent |
|
Ballard (Kent) Ltd v Olliver Ashworth (Holdings) Ltd |
[1997] 19 EG 161 |
surface water |
|
Ballard v Tomlinson |
(1885) 29 Ch D 115, 121 |
nuisance |
|
Bamford v Turnley |
(1862) 3 B & S 67, 77, 122 Eng Rep 27 |
waiver |
|
Banner Properties Ltd v McGurran Construction Ltd |
[2009] NICA 49, [2010] NI 97 |
subject to contract |
|
Banning v Wright |
[1972] 1 WLR 972, 979, [1972] 2 All ER 987, 998 (HL) |
strict settlement(Eng) |
|
Bannister v Bannister |
[1948] 2 All ER 133 (CA) |
damages |
|
Banque Bruxelles SA v Eagle Star |
[1997] AC 191, 221 (HL) |
insurance |
|
Banque Financière de la Cité v Westgate Insurance Co Ltd |
[1991] 2 AC 249, [1990] 2 Lloyd's Rep 377, [1990] 2 All ER 947 (HL) |
planning gain(Eng) |
|
Barber v Secretary of the Environment and Horsham DC |
[1991] JPL 559) |
power of sale |
|
Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose Investments Ltd |
[1970] AC 567 (HL) |
resulting trust |
|
Barclays Bank plc v Kingston |
[2006] EWHC 533, [2006] 1 All ER (Comm) 519 |
power of sale |
|
Barclays Bank plc v Nylon Capital LLP |
[2010] BLR 614, [2011] 2 Lloyd's Rep 347, (CA) |
expert |
|
Barclays Bank plc v O'Brien |
[1993] 3 WLR 786, 792, [1993] 4 All ER 417, 423 (HL) |
undue influence |
|
Barff v Probyn |
(1895) 64 LJ QB 557, [1895-9] All ER Rep 1038 |
fixture |
|
Barker v Barker |
(1829) 3 Car & P 557, 172 Eng Rep 544 |
right of entry |
|
Barker v Barker |
(1829) 3 Car & P 557, 172 Eng Rep 544 |
landlord's access |
|
Barker v Eynon |
[1974] All ER 905 |
floating charge or floating lien |
|
Barling (David W.) Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1980] JPL 594) |
material change in the use(Eng) |
|
Barnes v Sheffield City Council |
(1995) 27 HLR 719 (CA) |
house in multiple occupation (HMO)(Eng) |
|
Barnett v Covell |
(1903) 68 JP 93, 94 |
abut |
|
Barnwell v Harris |
(1809) 1 Taunt 430, 432, 127 Eng Rep 901 |
chain of title |
|
Barrett v Lounova (1982) Ltd |
[1990] 1 QB 348, 358, [1989] 1 All ER 351, 357 (CA) |
repair |
|
Barrett v Morgan |
[1998] 50 EG 87 |
sublessee or sub-lessee |
|
Barrett v White |
(1855) 24 LJ Ch 724, 726 |
money |
|
Barry v Hasseldine |
[1952] Ch 835, 838 |
easement of necessity |
|
Barton v Morris |
[1985] 2 All ER 1032) |
tenancy in common |
|
Barwick's Case |
(1598) 5 Co Rep 93b, 94b |
abeyance |
|
Bashir v Commissioner of Lands |
[1960] AC 44 (PC) |
forfeiture |
|
Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council v Host Group Ltd |
[1988] 1 WLR 348, 56 P & CR 31 |
rent review clause(Eng) |
|
Bass Holdings Ltd v Lewis |
[1986] 2 EGLR 40 (CA) |
determinable |
|
Bass Holdings Ltd v Lewis |
[1986] 2 EGLR 40 (CA) |
tenancy for life |
|
Batchelor v Marlow |
[2003] 1 WLR 764, [2003] 4 All ER 78 (CA) |
easement |
|
Bates (Thomas) & Sons v Wyndham's (Lingerie) Ltd |
[1981] 1 WLR 505, [1981] 1 All ER 1077 (CA) |
rectification |
|
Bates v Donaldson |
[1896] 2 QB 241 (CA) |
restraint on alienation |
|
Batten Pooll v Kennedy |
[1907] 1 Ch 256 |
mine |
|
Baxendale v Instow Parish Council |
[1982] Ch 14, 20 |
movable fee or movable freehold |
|
Baxter v Mannion |
[2011] 1 WLR 1594, [2011] 2 All ER 574 (CA) |
rectification |
|
Baygreen Properties Ltd v Gil |
[2002] EWCA Civ 340, [2002] 2 EGLR 42 (CA) |
grounds for possession(Eng) |
|
Baygreen Properties Ltd v Gil |
[2002] EWCA Civ 340, [2002] 2 EGLR 42 (CA) |
set-off or setoff |
|
Bayliffe v Butterworth |
(1847) 1 Exch 425, 428, 154 Eng Rep 181, 182 |
custom |
|
Baynton v Morgan |
(1888) 22 QBD 74, 82 (CA) |
privity of contract |
|
Bazalgette v Lowe |
(1855) LJ Ch 368 |
week |
|
Beacon Carpets v Kirby |
[1985] QB 755 (CA) |
insurance |
|
Beacon Life and Fire Assurance Co v Gibb |
(1862) 1 Moore (NS) 73, 97, 15 Eng Rep 639 |
premises |
|
Beanby Estates Limited v Egg Stores (Stamford Hill) Ltd |
[2003] 1 WLR 2064 (CA) |
service |
|
Beard v Porter |
[1948] 1 KB 321, [1947] 2 All ER 407 (CA) |
vacant possession |
|
Beaufort (Duke of) v Bates |
(1862) 3 De GF & J 381, 388, 45 Eng Rep 926 |
trade fixture |
|
Beaulane Properties Ltd v Palmer |
[2005] 14 EG 129, [2005] 3 WLR 554 |
adverse possession |
|
Beaulane Properties Ltd v Palmer |
[2006] Ch 79 |
animus possidendi(Lat) |
|
Beavers v Mason |
(1978) 37 P & CR 452 |
rent |
|
Beck v Scholz |
[1953] 1 QB 570 (CA) |
residence |
|
Beckley v Newland |
(1723) 2 P Wms 182, 186, 24 Eng Rep 691 |
legacy |
|
Beech v Kennerley |
[2012] EWCA Civ 158 (CA) |
boundary line |
|
Beevers v Mason |
(1978) 37 P & CR 452 at 458 (CA) |
check(AmE) or cheque(BrE) |
|
Belfast Corporation v 0. D. Cars Ltd |
[1960] 1 All ER 69 |
compensation for planning restrictions(Eng) |
|
Bell v Alfred Franks and Bartlett Co Ltd |
[1980] 1 All ER 362 |
consent |
|
Bell v General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corpn Ltd |
[1998] 1 EGLR 69, 72 |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Bell v Lever Brothers, Limited |
[1932] AC 161, 206, 217 (HL) |
mistake |
|
Bellcourt Estates Ltd v Adesina |
[2005] EWCA Civ 208, [2005] 18 EG 150 (CA) |
surrender |
|
Belmont Farm v Minister of Housing and Local Government |
(1962) 106 Sol J 996 |
agriculture |
|
Belton v Bass, Ratcliffe & Gretton Ltd |
[1922] Ch 449, 466, [1922] 91 LJ Ch 216 |
power of sale |
|
Belvedere Court Management Ltd v Frogmore Developments Ltd |
[1997] QB 858 |
company letting(Eng) |
|
Bennett v Bennett |
[1952] 1 KB 249, 260 (CA) |
void contract |
|
Bennett v Copeland Borough Council |
[2004] EGCS 140, (2004) The Times, May 28 (CA) |
residence |
|
Bennett v Wormack |
(1828) 3 Car & P 96, 98, 172 Eng Rep 339 |
net rent or net rental |
|
Bennett, Walden & Co v Wood |
[1950] 2 All ER 134, 137 (CA) |
offer |
|
Bentall, Horsley and Baldry v Vicary |
[1931] 1 KB 253 |
exclusive agency |
|
Bentall, Horsley and Baldry v Vicary |
[1931] 1 KB 253 |
sole agency |
|
Bentall, Horsley and Baldry v Vicary |
[1931] 1 KB 253, 261n. |
exclusive right to sell(AmE) |
|
Bentley Bros v Metclafe & Co |
[1906] 2 KB 548 (CA) |
rent |
|
Berger v Jenkinson |
[1905] 1 Ch 456, 459 |
restraint on alienation |
|
Berkley v Poulett |
(1976) 241 EG 911 |
fixture |
|
Bernays v Prosser |
[1963] 2 QB 592 (CA) |
agricultural tenancy |
|
Bernhard Schulte v Nile Holdings |
[2004] Lloyds's Rep 352 |
expert |
|
Bernstein of Leigh (Baron) v Skyviews & General Ltd |
[1978] QB 479, 485, [1977] 2 All ER 902, 905 |
cujus est solum, ejus est usque ad coelum et ad inferos(Lat) |
|
Bernstein of Leigh (Baron) v Skyviews & General Ltd |
[1978] QB 479, 485, [1977] 2 All ER 902, 905 |
land |
|
Bernstein of Leigh (Baron) v Skyviews & General Ltd |
[1978] QB 479, 487, [1977] 2 All ER 902, 906 |
trespass |
|
Bernstein of Leigh (Baron) v Skyviews & General Ltd |
[1978] QB 479, 488, [1977] 2 All ER 902, 907 |
air rights |
|
Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd |
[2012] 1 AC 955, [2011] 3 WLR 1091 (SC) |
periodic tenancy |
|
Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd |
[2012] 1 AC 955, [2011] 3 WLR 1091 (SC) |
term |
|
Beswick v Beswick |
[1968] AC 58, [1967] 2 All ER 1197 (HL) |
restrictive covenant |
|
Betterment Properties (Weymouth) Ltd v Dorset County Council |
[2012] EWCA Civ 250, [2012] 11 EG 93 (CA) |
nec vi, nec clam, nec precario(Lat) |
|
Bettison v Langton |
[2002] 1 AC 27 (HL) |
profit à prendre |
|
Bettison v Langton |
[2002] 1 AC 27 (HL) |
right of common |
|
Bettison v Langton |
[2002] 1 AC 27, 31 (HL) |
levant et couchant(Eng) |
|
Bettisworth's Case |
(1580) 2 Co Rep 31b, 76 Eng Rep 482 |
house |
|
Betty's Cafés Ltd v Phillips Furnishing Stores Ltd |
[1959] AC 20, 51 (HL) |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
BHP Petroleum Great Britain Ltd v Chesterfield Properties Ltd |
[2002] Ch 194, 211-2 (CA) |
privity of contract |
|
Bickel v Duke of Westminster |
[1977] QB 517, 524, [1976] 3 All ER 801 (CA) |
restraint on alienation |
|
Bickmore v Dimmer |
[1903] 1 Ch 158 |
alteration |
|
Biggs v Hoddinott |
[1898] 2 Ch 307 |
equity of redemption |
|
Biggs v Hoddinott |
[1898] 2 Ch 307, 314 |
clog |
|
Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd |
[1992] 1 AC 494, 510 (HL) |
forfeiture |
|
Binions v Evans |
[1972] Ch 359) |
licence(BrE) or license(AmE) |
|
Binions v Evans |
[1972] Ch 359, 368 |
constructive trust |
|
Bircham & Co Nominees (No 2) Ltd v Worrell Holdings Ltd |
(2001) 82 P & CR 34 |
writing |
|
Bird v MGahey |
(1849) 2 Car & K 707, 175 Eng Rep 296 |
quantum meruit(Lat) |
|
Birmingham Corporation v Allen |
(1877) 6 Ch D 284, 289 (CA) |
neighbor(AmE) or neighbour(BrE) |
|
Birmingham Corporation v West Midland Baptist (Trust) Association (Inc.) |
[1970] AC 874, [1969] 3 All ER 172 (HL) |
equivalent reinstatement(Eng) |
|
Birmingham Corporation v West Midland Baptist (Trust) Association (Inc.) |
[1970] AC 874, [1969] 3 All ER 192 (HL) |
valuation date |
|
Birmingham Midshires Mortgage Services Limited v Sabherwal |
(2000) 80 P & CR 256 (CA) |
overreachable interest(Eng) |
|
Birmingham, Dudley and District Banking Co v Ross |
(1888) 38 Ch D 295, 313 (CA) |
derogation from grant |
|
Bishop of Bath's Case |
(1605) Co Rep 34b, 35b, 77 Eng Rep 303, 305-6 |
term of years |
|
Bishop of Peterborough v Catesby |
(1608) Cro Jac 166, 79 Eng Rep 145 |
year |
|
Blackmore v Butler |
[1954] 2 QB 171, 177 |
agricultural land |
|
Blackpool and Fylde Aero Club Ltd v Blackpool Borough Council |
[1990] 1 WLR 1195 (CA) |
offer |
|
Blades v Higgs |
(1865) 11 HL Cas 621 |
ratione soli(Lat) |
|
Bland v Moseley |
(1587) |
easement |
|
Blankley v Godley |
[1952] 1 All ER 436 |
air rights |
|
Blaydes v Selby |
(1891) 7 TLR 567, 568 |
tenant for life |
|
Blemain Finance Ltd v E.Surv Ltd |
[2012] EWHC 3654 (TCC) |
professional negligence |
|
Blockbuster Entertainment Ltd v Leakcliff Properties Ltd |
[1997] 1 EGLR 28 |
restraint on alienation |
|
Blount v Layard |
[1891] 2 Ch 681 |
right to fish |
|
Blue Haven Enterprises Ltd v Tully |
[2006] UKPC 17 (PC) |
estoppel |
|
Bluestorm Ltd v Portvale Holdings Ltd |
[2004] 2 EGLR 34, [2004] 22 EG 142 (CA) |
set-off or setoff |
|
Blundell v Catterall |
(1821) 5 B & Ald 268, 275, 106 ER 1190 |
littoral rights |
|
Blundell v Osdale Ltd |
(1958) 171 EG 491 |
structural repair |
|
Blunden v Frogmore Investments Ltd |
[2002] 29 EG 153, [2003] 2 P & CR 84, [42]-[45] (CA) |
service |
|
Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Co |
(1856) 11 Exch 781, 784, 156 Eng Rep 1047 |
negligence |
|
Bocardo SA v S and M Hotels Ltd |
[1980] 1 WLR 17, 22, [1979] 3 All ER 737, 741 |
restraint on alienation |
|
Bocardo SA v Star Energy UK Onshore Ltd |
[2010] UKSC 35, [2010] 31 EG 63 (SC) |
ad coelum usque ad centrum(Lat) |
|
Bocardo SA v Star Energy UK Onshore Ltd |
[2010] UKSC 35, [2010] 31 EG 63 (SC) |
trespass |
|
Bole v Huntsbuild Ltd |
[2009] EWCA Civ 1146, [2009] 127 Con LR154 (CA) |
fit for habitation(Eng) |
|
Bolton Corp'nv Owen |
[1962] 1 QB 471 (CA) |
blight notice(Eng) |
|
Bolton MBC v Torkington |
[2004] Ch 66 (CA) |
delivery |
|
Bolton Partners v Lambert |
(1889) 41 Ch D 295 |
ratification |
|
Bolton v Mahadeva |
[1972] 2 All ER 1322, 1324 (CA) |
entire contract |
|
Boodle v Campbell |
(1844) 7 Man & G 386, 135 Eng Rep 161 |
constructive eviction |
|
Borg v Khan |
(1965) 17 P & CR 144 |
boarding house |
|
Borman v Griffith |
[1930] 1 Ch 493 |
agreement for a lease |
|
Boroughes' Case, Boroughes v Taylor |
(1596) 4 Co Rep 72b, 76 Eng Rep 1043 |
rent |
|
Boscawen v Bajwa |
[1996] 1 WLR 328, 335 (CA) |
subrogation |
|
Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd; Malett & Sons (Antiques) Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties |
[2006] EWCA Civ 594, [2006] 27 EG 156 (CA) |
house |
|
Bostock v Bryant |
[1990] 2 EGLR 101 |
rent |
|
Boswell v Crucible Steel Co |
[1925] 1 KB 119, 121 (CA) |
internal |
|
Botham v TSB Bank plc |
(1996) 73 P & CR D1 (CA) |
fixture |
|
Bottin (International) Investments Ltd v Venson Group plc |
[2004] EWHC Civ 1368 |
personally |
|
Bourne v Norwich Crematorium Ltd |
[1967] 1 WLR 691, 696, [1967] 2 All ER 576, 578 |
noscitur a sociis(Lat) |
|
Bow's Emporium Ltd v AR Brett & Co Ltd |
(1927) 44 TLR 194, 197, 199 (HL) |
procuring cause(AmE) or effective cause(BrE) |
|
Bowes v Foster |
(1858) 27 LJ Ex 262, 266 |
release |
|
Bowker v Burdekin |
(1843) 11 M & W 147 |
escrow |
|
Bowles Case |
(1615) 11 Co Rep 79b, 77 Eng Rep 1252 |
issue |
|
Boyer v Warby |
[1953] 1 QB 234, 244-55 (CA) |
abandonment |
|
BP Refinery (Westpoint) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings |
[1977] 180 CLR 266, 16 ALR 363, 376 (PC) |
implied term or implied condition |
|
Bracewell v Appleby |
[1975] Ch 408 |
easement |
|
Bracey v Read |
[1963] Ch 88, [1962] 3 All ER 472 |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Bracey v Read |
[1963] Ch 88, 94, [1962] 3 All ER 472, 476-7 |
premises |
|
Bradford & Anor v Keith James & Ors |
[2008] EWCA Civ 837 (CA) |
plan |
|
Bradford & Bingley v Rashid |
[2006] UKHL 37, [2006] 1 WLR 2066, 2086 (HL) |
without prejudice |
|
Bradley v Carritt |
[1903] AC 253 (HL) |
equity-participation loan or equity-participation mortgage |
|
Bradshaw v Pawley |
(1979) 253 EG 693 |
apportionment |
|
Brakespear (W.H.) & Sons v Barton |
[1924] 2 KB 88 |
time |
|
Bramwell v Bramwell |
[1942] 1 All ER 137, 138 (CA) |
mesne profits |
|
Brazil (Concrete) Ltd v Amersham RDC |
(1967) 18 P & CR 396, 399 (CA) |
planning unit(Eng) |
|
Brazil (Concrete) Ltd v Amersham RDC |
(1967) 18 P & CR 396, 399 (CA) |
Use Classes Order(Eng) |
|
Breams Property Investment Co Ltd v Stroulger |
[1948] 2 KB 1, 1 All ER 758 (CA) |
term |
|
Breams Property Investment Co Ltd v Stroulger |
[1948] 2 KB l, 7, [1948] 1 All ER 758, 759 (CA) |
covenant |
|
Brew Brothers Ltd v Snax (Ross) Ltd |
[1970 1 QB 612, [1970] 1 All ER 587, 602 (CA) |
repair |
|
Bridge v Campbell Discount Co |
[1962] AC 600, 620 (HL) |
termination |
|
Bridgewater Canal Company Ltd v Geo Networks Ltd |
[2010] EWCA 1348, [2010] 1 WLR 1487 (CA) |
wayleave |
|
Bright v Walker |
(1834) 1 Cr M & R 221, 149 Eng Rep 1057 |
prescription |
|
Brightlife Ltd., In re |
[1987] Ch 200, 205 |
floating charge or floating lien |
|
Brighton & Hove Council v Collinson |
[2004] EWCA Civ 678, [2004] 28 EG 178 |
contracted-out tenancy(Eng) |
|
Brinkinbon Ltd v Stahag Stahl |
[1983] 2 AC 34 (HL) |
acceptance |
|
British and Foreign Marine Insurance Co v Gaunt |
[1921] 2 AC 41 (HL) |
all-risks insurance |
|
British Anzani (Felixstowe) Ltd v International Marine Management (UK) Ltd |
[1980] QB 137, [1979] 2 All ER 1063, 1070 |
set-off or setoff |
|
British Broadcasting Corporation v Ioannu |
[1975] 2 All ER 999, 1005 |
fixed-term tenancy(Eng) |
|
British Car Auctions v Wright |
[1972] 1 WLR 1519 |
auction |
|
British Movietonenews Ltd v London and District Cinemas Ltd |
[1952] AC 166, [1952] 1 All ER 208 (HL) |
quantum meruit(Lat) |
|
British Railways Board v Glass |
[1965] Ch 538, [1964] 3 All ER 418 (CA) |
prescription |
|
British Railways Board v Glass |
[1965] Ch 538, 568 [1964] 3 All ER 418 (CA) |
easement |
|
British Railways Board v Herrington |
[1972] AC 877, 907, [1972] 1 All ER 749, 765 (HL) |
negligence |
|
British Railways Board v Herrington |
[1972] AC 877, 907, [1972] 1 All ER 749, 765 (HL) |
trespass |
|
British Russian Gazette and Trade Outlook Ltd v Associated Newspapers Ltd |
[1933] 2 KB 616, 643-4 (CA) |
accord and satisfaction |
|
British Shipbuilders v VSEL Consortium plc |
[1997] 1 Lloyds Rep 106, 109 |
expert |
|
British Steel Corp'n v Cleveland Bridge and Engineering Co Ltd |
[1984] 1 All ER 504) |
quantum meruit(Lat) |
|
British Wagon Co v Lea |
(1880) 5 QBD 149 |
general contractor (GC) |
|
British Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Co Ltd v Underground Rys Co of London Ltd |
[1912] AC 673, 689 (HL) |
damages |
|
Brogden v Directors of the Metropolitan RyCo |
(1877) 2 App Cas 666, 672 (HL) |
acceptance |
|
Bromley Park Garden Estates Ltd v Moss |
[1982] 2 All ER 890, [1982] 1 WLR 1019 (CA) |
restraint on alienation |
|
Brooke v Bool |
[1928] 2 KB 578, 587-8 |
strict liability |
|
Brooke v Clarke |
(1818) 1 B & Ald 396, 399, 106 Eng Rep 146, 147 |
extension |
|
Brookes v Drysdale |
(1877) 3 CPD 52, 57-8 |
covenant |
|
Brooks and Burton v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1978] 1 WLR 1294 |
material change in the use(Eng) |
|
Broughton v Snook |
[1938] Ch D 505, [1938] 1 All ER 411 |
part performance |
|
Brown v Brash and Ambrose |
[1948] 2 KB 247 (CA) |
occupation |
|
Brown v Brash and Ambrose |
[1948] 2 KB 247, 255 (CA) |
residence |
|
Brown v Cole |
(1845) 14 LJ Ch 167 |
prepayment privilege |
|
Brown v Gould |
[1972] Ch 53, [1971] 2 All ER 1505 |
rent |
|
Brown v Gould |
[1972] Ch 53, [1971] 2 All ER 1505 |
right of pre-emption |
|
Browne v Flower |
[1911] 1 Ch 219, 227 |
derogation from grant |
|
Brown v Pretot |
[2011] EWCA Civ 1421, [2012] 16 EG 104 (CA) |
boundary line |
|
Browne v Ryan |
[1901] IR 653 (CA) |
equity-participation loan or equity-participation mortgage |
|
Browne v Ryan |
[1901] IR 653, 676 (CA) |
fetter |
|
Broxbourne BC v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1979] 2 All ER 17 |
certificate of lawfulness(Eng) |
|
Brumwell v Powys County Council |
[2011] EWCA Civ 1613 |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Brunner v Greenslade |
[1971] Ch 993, 1003, [1970] 3 All ER 836 |
scheme of development |
|
Bruton v London & Quadrant Housing Trust |
[2000] 1 AC 406, 413E (HL) |
lease |
|
Bryanston Property Co Ltd v Edwards |
[1944] KB 32, 36 |
progressive rent |
|
Bryant v Lefever |
(1879) 4 CPD 172 (CA) |
right to air |
|
Bryant, Powis, and Bryant, Limited v La Banque du Peuple |
[1893] AC 170, 177 (HL) |
agent |
|
Buchanan v Harrison |
(1861) 31 LJ Ch 74 |
personal estate |
|
Buchmann v May |
[1978] 2 All ER 993 |
holiday let(Eng) |
|
Buckingham County Council v Callingham |
[1952] 2 QB 515 (CA) |
building |
|
Buckinghamshire County Council v Moran |
[1990] Ch 623 (CA) |
adverse possession |
|
Budd v Marshall |
(1880) 5 CPD 481 (CA) |
tax |
|
Bull v Bull |
[1955] 1 QB 234 |
tenancy in common |
|
Bullen v Denning |
(1826) 5 B & C 842, 851, 108 Eng Rep 313 |
tree |
|
Bullen v Denning |
(1826) 5 B & C 847, 108 Eng Rep 313 |
timber |
|
Bullock v Secretary of State for the Environment |
(1980) 40 P & CR 246, (1980) 254 EG 1097 |
tree preservation order (TPO)(Eng) |
|
Bulstrode v Lambert |
[1953] 1 WLR 1064, 1069, 1071 |
easement |
|
Burchell v Hornsby |
(1808) 1 Camp 360, 170 Eng Rep 985 |
waste |
|
Burdle v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1972] 1 WLR 207 |
planning unit(Eng) |
|
Burgess v Rawnsley |
[1975] Ch 429, [1975] 3 All ER 142, 147 (CA) |
joint tenancy |
|
Burgess v Rawnsley |
[1975] Ch 429, [1975] 3 All ER 142, 147 (CA) |
severance |
|
Burgess v Wheate A-G v Wheate |
(1759) 1 Eden 177, 241-4, 28 Eng Rep 677 |
escheat |
|
Burman v Mount Cook Land Ltd |
[2001] EWCA Civ 1712 (CA) |
notice |
|
Burnett v Lynch |
(1826) 5 B & C 589, 108 Eng Rep 220 |
demise |
|
Burrows v Brent London Borough Council |
[1996] 1 WLR 1448 (HL) |
holding over |
|
Burrows v Brent London Borough Council |
[1996] 1 WLR 1448 (HL) |
secure tenancy(Eng) |
|
Burt v Claude Cousins & Co Ltd |
[1971] 2 QB 426, 435 (CA) |
stakeholder |
|
Burton v Camden LBC |
[1968] 1 FLR 681, 684 |
joint tenancy |
|
Burton v Winter |
[1993] 1 WLR 1077 |
self-help |
|
Bury v Thompson |
[1895] 1 QB 696, 697 (CA) |
notice to quit |
|
Business Environment Bow Lane Ltd v Deanwater Estates Ltd |
[2007] 19 EG 166, 168 |
subject to contract |
|
Bussey v Barnett |
(1842) 9 M & W 312, 152 Eng Rep 132 |
receipt |
|
Butler and Baker's Case |
(1591) 3 Co Rep 25a, 26b, 27a, 77 Eng Rep 285 |
gift |
|
Butler and Baker's Case |
(1591) 3 Co Rep 25a, 76 Eng Rep 684 |
escrow |
|
Butler Machine Tool Co Ltd v Ex-Cell-O Corp'n (England & Wales) Ltd |
[1979] 1 WLR 401, [1979] 1 All ER 965 (CA) |
counter offer |
|
Butler v Butler |
(1884) 28 Ch D 66 |
leasehold or leasehold interest |
|
Butler v Butler |
(1884) 28 Ch D 66 |
real estate |
|
Bybrook Barn Centre Ltd v Kent County Council |
[2001] BLR 55, (2001) The Times, 5 January (CA) |
nuisance |
|
Byrne & Co v Van Tienhoven & Co |
(1880) 5 CPD 344 |
revocation |
|
Byrne v Rowbottom |
(1969) 210 EG 823 |
residence |
Top
|
C.I.R. v Muller & Co.'s Margarine, Limited |
[1901] AC 217, 223-4 (HL) |
goodwill |
|
CA Webber (Transport) Limited v Railtrack PLC |
[2004] 14 EG 142, 1 WLR 320 (CA) |
service |
|
Cadogan Estates Ltd v Shahgholi |
[1999] 1 EGLR 95 (LT) |
extended lease |
|
Cadogan v McGirk |
[1996] 2 EGLR 75, [1996] 4 All ER 634 (CA) |
extended lease |
|
Cadogan v Morris |
[1999] 1 EGLR 59, [1999[ 77 P & CR 336, 340-1 (CA) |
extended lease |
|
Caerphilly Concrete Products Ltd v Owen |
[1972] 1 WLR372, 376, [1972] 1 All ER 248, 252 (CA) |
perpetual lease |
|
Caerphilly Concrete Products Ltd v Owen |
[1972] 1 WLR372, 376, [1972] 1 All ER 248, 252 (CA) |
perpetually renewable lease |
|
Cafeteria (Keighley) Ltd v Harrison |
(1956) 168 EG 689 |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Calcaria Construction Co (York) Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1974] 27 P & CR 435, (1974) 118 Sol J 421 |
warehouse |
|
Calladine-Smith v Saveorder Ltd |
[2011] EWHC 2502, [2011] 44 EG 108, 112 |
service |
|
Calthorpe v McOscar |
[1924] 1 KB 716, 729 (CA) |
tenantable repair |
|
Calye's Case |
(1584) 8 Co Rep 683, 77 Eng Rep 520 |
inn |
|
Camberwell and South London Building Society v Holloway |
(1879) 13 Ch D 759; |
lease |
|
Cambridge University (Downing College) v Cambridge City Council and Allsop |
(1971) 208 EG 805, 915 |
contractor's basis or contractor's method(BrE) |
|
Cambridge Water Co v Eastern Leather Plc |
[1994] 2 WLR 53 (HL) |
strict liability |
|
Camden London Borough Council v Gunby |
(1999) The Times, July 12 |
owner |
|
Cameron v Boggiano |
[2012] EWCA Civ 157, [2012] 1 EGLR 127 (CA) |
boundary line |
|
Camfield v Gilbert |
(1803) 3 East 516, 102 Eng Rep 694 |
devise |
|
Campbell v Banks |
[2011] EWCA Civ 61, 1 P & CR DG24 (CA) |
quasi-easement |
|
Campbell v Edwards |
[1976] 1 WLR 402, 407G (CA) |
expert |
|
Campbell v Holyland |
(1877) 7 Ch D 166, 172-5 |
foreclosure |
|
Campden Hill Towers Ltd v Gardner |
[1977] QB 823 |
external |
|
Camrose (Viscount) v Basingstoke Corporation |
[1966] 3 All ER 161, 164 |
planning assumptions(Eng) |
|
Canonical UK Ltd v TST Milbank LLC |
[2012] EWHC 3710, [2013] PLSCS 37 |
break clause |
|
Cantrell v Wycombe District Council |
(2008) The Times, October 10 (CA) |
positive covenant |
|
Caparo Industries plc v Dickman |
[1990] 1 All ER 568, [1990] 2 AC 605 (HL) |
duty of care |
|
Capita Alternative Fund Services (Guernsey) Ltd v Drivers Jonas |
[2012] EWCA Civ 1417 (CA) |
professional negligence |
|
Cardiff Rating Authority v Guest, Keen Baldwin's Iron and Steel Co Ltd |
[1949] 1 KB 385, 396 (CA) |
structure |
|
Cardigan Properties Ltd v Consolidated Property Investments Ltd |
[1991] 1 EGLR 64, 67 |
service |
|
Cardshops Ltd v Davies |
[1971] 1 WLR 591 (CA) |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Cardwell v Walker |
[2004] 2 P & CR 9 at [41] |
covenant running with the land |
|
Carey-Morgan v Trustees of Sloane Stanley Estate |
[2012] EWCA Civ 1181, [2012] 48 EG 64 (CA) |
deferment rate(BrE) |
|
Carey-Morgan v Trustees of Sloane Stanley Estate |
[2012] EWCA Civ 1181, [2012] 48 EG 64 (CA) |
leasehold enfranchisement(Eng) |
|
Cargill v Bower |
(1878) 10 Ch D 502 |
joint agent or joint broker |
|
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co |
[1893] 1 QB 256 (CA) |
unilateral contract |
|
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co |
[1893] 1 QB 256, 268 (CA) |
general offer |
|
Carlisle and Cumberland Banking Company v Bragg |
[1911] 1 KB 489 (CA) |
non est factum(Lat) |
|
Carr v Inland Revenue Commissioners |
[1944] 2 All ER 163, 166 |
profession |
|
Carr-Saunders v Dick McNeil Associates Ltd |
(1986) 279 EG 1359, [1986] 1 WLR 922 |
damages |
|
Carr-Saunders v Dick McNeil Associates Ltd |
(1986) 279 EG 1359, [1986] 1 WLR 922, 928G-H |
daylight factor(Eng) |
|
Carr-Saunders v Dick McNeil Associates Ltd |
(1986) 279 EG 1359, [1986] 1 WLR 922, 928G-H |
right of light(BrE) or right to light(AmE) |
|
Carter v Boehm |
(1766) 3 Burr 1905, 1909, 97 Eng Rep 1162 |
insurance |
|
Carter v Carter |
[1896] 1 Ch 62, 67 |
disposal |
|
Carter v Cole |
[2006] EWCA Civ 398 (CA) |
easement |
|
Carter v Secretary of State for the Environment and Carrick DC |
[1995] 1 JPL 311 (CA) |
caravan |
|
Cassell & Co Ltd v Broome |
[1972] AC 1027, 1073-74, [1972] 1 All ER 801, 825-6 (HL) |
damages |
|
Cassell & Co Ltd v Broome |
[1972] AC 1027, 1079, [1972] 1 All ER 801, 831 (HL) |
rachmanism(Eng) |
|
Castellain v Preston |
(1883) 11 QBD 380, 403 (CA) |
surety |
|
Castellain v Preston |
(1883) 11 QBD 380, 387, 388 (CA) |
subrogation |
|
Catesby's Case |
(1607) 6 Co Rep 61b, 62a, 77 Eng Rep 346 |
six months |
|
Catesby's Case |
(1607) 6 Co Rep 61b, 77 Eng Rep 346 |
twelve months |
|
Caunce v Caunce |
[1969] 29 P & CR 877, [1969] 1 WLR 286, [1969] 1 All ER 722 |
constructive notice |
|
Caunce v Caunce |
[1969] 29 P & CR 877, [1969] 1 WLR 286, [1969] 1 All ER 722, 724 |
bona fide purchaser (BFP) |
|
Cavalier v Pope |
[1906] AC 428 (HL) |
duty of care |
|
Cave v Horsell |
[1912] 3 KB 533, 544 (CA) |
adjoining |
|
Cave v Horsell |
[1912] 3 KB 533, 544 (CA) |
contiguous |
|
Cave v Mills |
(1862) 7 Hurl & N 913, 927-8, 158 Eng Rep 740 |
estoppel |
|
Cawkwell v Russell |
(1856) LR 22 LJ Ex 34 |
easement |
|
Caxton Publishing Co v Sutherland Publishing Co |
[1939] AC 178, 201-2 (HL) |
conventional loan or conventional mortgage(US) |
|
CDC2020 plc v Ferreira |
[2005] 3 EGLR 15 |
abandonment |
|
Cedar Holdings Ltd v Green |
[1981] Ch 129, 138 |
alienatio rei praefertur juri accrescendi(Lat) |
|
Cedar Rapids Manufacturing Power Company v Lacoste |
[1914] AC 569 (PC) |
special suitability or adaptability(Eng) |
|
Celsteel Ltd v Alton House Holdings Ltd (No. 2) |
[1987] 1 WLR 291, [1987] 2 All ER 290 |
quiet enjoyment |
|
Celsteel Ltd v Alton House Holdings Ltd (No. 2) |
[1987] 1 WLR 291, [1987] 2 All ER 290 |
overriding interest(Eng) |
|
Central Estates (Belgravia) Ltd v Woolgar (No. 2) |
[1972] 1 WLR 1048, [1972] 3 All ER 610 (CA) |
waiver |
|
Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd |
[1947] 1 KB 130 |
estoppel |
|
Centrovincial Estate plc v Bulk Storage Ltd |
(1983) 268 EG 59, (1983) 46 P & CR 393 |
privity of contract |
|
CGIS City Paza Shares Ltd v Britel Fund Trustees Ltd |
[2012 EWHC 1594 (Ch), [2012] 5 EG 89 |
right of light(BrE) or right to light(AmE) |
|
CH Bailey v Memorial Enterprises |
[1974] 1 WLR 728, 732 |
rent |
|
Chalmers v Pardoe |
[1963] 1 WLR 670, 681-2 (PC) |
estoppel |
|
Chamberlain & Willows v HBS (Trust) Ltd |
(1962) 184 EG 849 (CA) |
commission |
|
Chamberlain & Willows v Rose |
(1924), unreported cited in Bentall Horsley and Baldry v Vicary [1931] 1 KB 261 n. |
exclusive right to sell(AmE) |
|
Chamberlain v Lee |
(1840) 8 LJ Ch 266 |
moiety |
|
Chambers v Kingham |
(1878) 10 Ch D 743 |
merger |
|
Channel Shipping (Newport) v Newport Borough Council |
[1988] 16 EG 87 |
exclusive occupation |
|
Chapelton v Barry UDC |
[1940] 1 KB 532 |
exclusion clause(Eng) |
|
Chappell & Co Ltd v Nestlé Co Ltd |
[1960] AC 87, 114 (HL) |
consideration |
|
Chappell v Gregory |
(1863) 34 Beav 250, 55 Eng Rep 631 |
fit for the purpose or fit for the use |
|
Charles Richards Ltd v Oppenheimer |
[1950] 1 KB 616, [1950] 1 All ER 420 |
time is of the essence |
|
Charrington v Simons and Co |
[1970] 1 WLR 725, 730 |
specific performance |
|
Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd |
[2009] UKHL 38, [2009] 3 WLR 267 (HL) |
|
|
Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd |
[2009] UKHL 38, [2009] 3 WLR 267, 278, 283 (HL) |
|
|
Chartered Trust plc v Davies |
[1997] 49 EG 135, [1997] 2 EGLR 83 (CA) |
derogation from grant |
|
Chasemore v Richards |
(1859) 7 HL Cas 349, 11 Eng Rep 140 (HL) |
surface water |
|
Chasemore v Richards |
(1859) 7 HL Cas 349, 11 Eng Rep 140 (HL) |
water rights |
|
Chasemore v Richards |
(1859) 7 HL Cas 349, 379, 11 Eng Rep 140, 153 (HL) |
natural rights |
|
Chasen Ryder & Co v Hedges |
[1993] 08 EG 119 |
procuring cause(AmE) or effective cause(BrE) |
|
Chastey v Ackland |
[1897] AC 155 (HL) |
right to air |
|
Chatsworth Estates Ltd v Fewell |
[1931] Ch 224 |
restrictive covenant |
|
Chaudry v Prabhakar |
[1988] 3 All ER 718 |
agent |
|
Chelsea Yacht & Boat Co Ltd v Pope |
[2000] 22 EG 147, [2000] 1 WLR 1941, [2001] 2 All ER 409 (CA) |
fixture |
|
Chelsea Yacht & Boat Co Ltd v Pope |
[2000] 22 EG 147, [2000] 1 WLR 1941, [2001] 2 All ER 409 (CA) |
mobile home |
|
Chelsfield MH Investments v British Gas plc |
[1995] NPC 169 |
use clause or user clause |
|
Cheltenham & Gloucester plc v Appleyard |
[2004] EWCA Civ 291, [2004] 13 EG 127 (CA) |
subrogation |
|
Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Norgan |
[1996] 1 All ER 449, 461, 462, [1996] 1 WLR 343, 357 (CA) |
mortgagee |
|
Cheryl Investments Ltd v Saldanha, Royal Life Saving Society v Page |
[1979] 37 P & CR 349, [1979] 1 All ER 5 (CA) |
business premises |
|
Cheryl Investments Ltd v Saldanha, Royal Life Saving Society v Page |
[1979] 37 P & CR 349, [1979] 1 All ER 5 (CA) |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Cheshire County Council v Woodward |
[1962] 2 QB 133-4 |
development |
|
Chester v Buckingham Travel |
[1981] 1 WLR 96, 101 |
usual covenant |
|
Chhokar v Chhokar |
[1984] FLR 313, 317, [1984] Fam Law 269 (CA) |
occupation |
|
Chilton v London Corp'n |
(1878) 7 Ch D 562 |
common of pannage(Eng) |
|
China Pacific S.A. v Food Corporation of India, The Winston |
[1981] 3 All ER 688 |
agency of necessity |
|
Chrisdell Ltd v Johnson |
[1987] 2 EGLR 123, (1987) P & CR 257 (CA) |
waiver |
|
Christie Owen & Davies plc v Raobgle Trust Corporation [2011] EWCA Civ 1151 (CA) |
[2011] EWCA Civ 1151 (CA) |
purchaser |
|
Christie Owen & Davies Ltd v Rapacioli |
[1974] QB 781, [1974] 2 All ER 311 (CA) |
exclusive agency |
|
Christie Owen & Davies Ltd v Rapacioli |
[1974] QB 781, [1974] 2 All ER 311 (CA) |
ready, able and willing or ready, willing and able |
|
Christie Owen & Davies plc v Ryelance |
[2005] 18 EG 148 |
purchaser |
|
Christie Owen & Davies plc v Ryelance |
[2005] 18 EG 148 |
sole selling right(BrE) |
|
Christie v Ovington |
(1875) 1 Ch D 279 |
bare trust(Eng) |
|
Church of England & Wales Building Society v Piskor |
[1954] Ch 553, [1954] 2 All ER 85 (CA) |
tenancy by estoppel |
|
Church v Brown |
(1808)15 Ves 258, 33 Eng Rep 752, [1803-13] All ER Rep 440 (LC Ct) |
unusual covenant(Eng) |
|
Churchill v Evans |
(1809) 1 Taunt 529, 127 Eng Rep 939 |
fence |
|
Churchill v Temple |
[2010] EWHC 3369, [2011] 17 EG 72 |
restrictive covenant |
|
Churchward v Ford |
[1857] 2 Hurl & N 446, 157 Eng Rep 184 |
holding over |
|
Churchward & Blight v Ford |
[1857] 2 Hurl & N 446, 450, 157 Eng Rep 184, 186 |
landlord |
|
Cinderella Rockerfellas v Rudd |
[2003] 1 WLR 2423 (CA) |
hereditament |
|
City and Metropolitan Properties Ltd v Greycroft |
[1987] 1 WLR 1085 |
privity of contract |
|
City of Bradford District Council v Yorkshire Water Services Ltd |
[2001] 10 EG 159 |
sewer |
|
City of London Building Society v Flegg |
[1988] AC 54, [1987] 3 All ER 435 (HL) |
overreachable interest(Eng) |
|
City of London Building Society v Flegg |
[1988] AC 54, [1987] 3 All ER 435 (HL) |
tenancy in common |
|
City of London Corporation v Fell |
[1994] 1 AC 458 (HL) |
make good |
|
City of London Real Property Co Ltd v War Damage Commission |
[1957] 1 All ER 526 |
privity of contract |
|
Cityland and Property (Holdings), Ltd v Dabrah |
[1968] Ch 166, [1967] 2 All ER 639 |
charge by way of a legal mortgage(Eng) |
|
Cityland and Property (Holdings), Ltd v Dabrah |
[1968] Ch 166, [1967] 2 All ER 639 |
equity of redemption |
|
Clarence House Ltd v National Westminster Bank plc |
[2010] 08 EG 106, 1 WLR 1216, 1228 (CA) |
possession |
|
Clarence House Ltd v National Westminster Bank plc |
[2010] 08 EG 106, 1 WLR 1216, 1219 (CA) |
virtual assignment |
|
Clark v Smith |
(16 July 1920, unreported) |
suitable alternative accommodation(Eng) |
|
Clarke v Dickson |
(1858) 27 LJ QB 223, 225 |
rescission |
|
Clarke v Grant |
[1950] 1 KB 104, [1949] 1 All ER 768 (CA) |
waiver |
|
Clarke v Ramuz |
[1891] 2 QB 456, 462 (CA) |
contract for sale |
|
Clayton v Blakey |
(1798) 8 Term Rep 3, 101 Eng Rep 1234 |
tenancy at will |
|
Clifton Securities v Huntley |
[1948] 2 All ER 283) |
mesne profits |
|
Clothier v Snell |
(1966) 198 EG 27 |
bungalow |
|
Clowes Developments (UK) Ltd v Walters |
[2006] 1 P & CR 1 |
adverse possession |
|
Clun's Case |
(1613) 10 Co Rep 127a, 77 Eng Rep 1117 |
constructive eviction |
|
Clun's Case |
(1613) 10 Co Rep 127a, 128a, 77 Eng Rep 1117 |
apportionment |
|
Coatsworth v Johnson |
(1886) 55 LJ QB 220 |
agreement for a lease |
|
Cobb v Stokes |
(1807) 8 East 358, 103 Eng Rep 380 |
tenancy for a fixed term |
|
Cochrane v Moore |
(1890) 25 QBD 57, 67 (CA) |
gift |
|
Cole v Harris |
[1945] 1 KB 474, 479 |
dwelling house or dwelling-house |
|
Cole v Sury |
(1627) Latch 264, 82 Eng Rep 378 |
rent in advance or rent in arrears |
|
Colin Dawson Windows Ltd v King's Lynn & West Norfolk Borough Council |
[2005] EWCA Civ 9, [2005] P & CR 333, 343 |
permission |
|
Collen v Wright |
(1857) 8 El & Bl 647, 120 Eng Rep 241 |
breach of warranty of authority |
|
Colles v Evanson |
(1865) 19 CB (NS) 372, 19 Eng Rep 831 |
abandonment |
|
Collett v Curling |
(1847) 10 QB 785, 116 Eng Rep 298 |
rent in advance or rent in arrears |
|
Collings v Lee and another |
(2001) 82 P & CR 3, [2001] 2 All ER 332 (CA) |
equitable interest |
|
Collins v Collins |
(1858) 26 Beav 306, 312, 53 Eng Rep 916, 918 |
arbitration |
|
Collins v Howard de Walden Estates |
[2003] 37 EG 137 (CA) |
house |
|
Colls v Home and Colonial Stores Ltd |
[1904] AC 179, 204 (HL) |
daylight factor(Eng) |
|
Colls v Home and Colonial Stores Ltd |
[1904] AC 179, 204 (HL) |
right of light(BrE) or right to light(AmE) |
|
Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd v Melbourne Harbour Trust Commissioners |
[1927] AC 343, 359 (PC) |
compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) |
|
Combe v Combe |
[1951] 2 KB 215, 220, [1951] 1 All ER 767, 770 (CA) |
estoppel |
|
Commercial and Residential Property Development Co Ltd v Secretary of State |
(1982) 80 LGR 443 |
hostel |
|
Commission for the New Towns v Cooper (Great Britain) Ltd |
[1995] 2 EGLR 113, [1995] 2 All ER 929, 950-1 (CA) |
exchange of contract(Eng) |
|
Commissioners of Crown Lands v Page |
[1960] 2 QB 274, [1960] 2 All ER 726 (CA) |
constructive eviction |
|
Commissioners of Crown Lands v Page |
[1960] 2 QB 274, [1960] 2 All ER 726 (CA) |
partial eviction |
|
Commissioners of Crown Lands v Page |
[1960] 2 QB 274, 280-2, [1960] 2 All ER 726, 728-9 (CA) |
eviction |
|
Compton Group Ltd v Estates Gazette |
(1977) 244 EG 799, 801, [1977] 1 EGLR 73, 74 (CA) |
rent review clause(BrE) |
|
Connaught Restaurants v Indoor Leisure Ltd |
[1993] 46 EG 184, [1994] 1 WLR 501 (CA) |
set-off or setoff |
|
Conquest v Ebbetts |
[1896] AC 490 (HL) |
damages |
|
Constable's Case |
(1601) 5 Co Rep 106a, 77 Eng Rep 218 |
flotsam or flotsan |
|
Constable's Case |
(1601) 5 Co Rep 106a, 77 Eng Rep 218 |
jetsam or jetsom |
|
Cook v Bath Corp'n |
(1868) LR 6 Eq 177, 18 LT 123 |
abandonment |
|
Cook v JD Wetherspoon |
[2006] 2 P & CR 18, [2006] EWCA Civ 330 (CA) |
plan |
|
Cook v Shoesmith |
[1951] 1 KB 752 (CA) |
sublease or sub-lease |
|
Cook v Taylor |
[1942] 2 All ER 85, 87, [1942] Ch 349 |
vacant possession |
|
Cooke v Cholmondeley |
(1858) 4 Drew 326, 328, 62 Eng Rep 126 |
good repair |
|
Cooper v Critchley |
[1955] Ch 431, [1955] 1 All ER 520 (CA) |
joint tenancy |
|
Cooper v Critchley |
[1955] Ch 431, [1955] 1 All ER 520 (CA) |
interest |
|
Cooper v Critchley |
[1955] Ch 431, [1955] 1 All ER 520 (CA) |
land |
|
Cooper v Straker |
(1888) 40 Ch D 27 |
enjoyment |
|
Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd v Argyll Stores (Holdings) Ltd |
[1997] 2 WLR 898, [1997] 3 All ER 297 (HL) |
continuous operation clause |
|
Copeland v Greenhalf |
[1952] 1 All ER 809 |
easement |
|
Corby Borough Council v Scott; West Kent Housing Association |
[2012] EWCA Civ 276, [2012] 21 EG 100 (CA) |
introductory tenancy |
|
Corisand Investments Ltd v Druce and Co |
(1978) 248 EG 315, 322 |
mortgage value |
|
Cornish v Abingdon |
(1859) 4 Hurl & N 549, 157 Eng Rep 956 |
mistake |
|
Cornish v Searell |
(1828) 8 B & C 471, 476, 108 Eng Rep 1118, 1119 |
attornment |
|
Corporation of City of London v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1971] 23 P & CR 169 |
Use Classes Order(Eng) |
|
Corpus Christi College, Oxford v Gloucestershire County Council |
[1983] QB 360, 365, [1982] 3 All ER 995, 999 (CA) |
common land |
|
Corpus Christi College, Oxford v Gloucestershire County Council |
[1983] QB 360, 365, [1982] 3 All ER 995, 998-9 (CA) |
manor |
|
Corson v Rhuddlan Borough Council |
(1989) 59 P & CR 185 (CA) |
rent |
|
Cory (William) & Sons, Ltdv City of London Corp'n |
(1951) 2 All ER 85 |
breach of contract |
|
Cosser v Collinge |
(1832) 3 My & My 283, 40 Eng Rep 108 |
insurance |
|
Cottage Holiday Associates Ltd v Customs and Excise Comrs |
[1983] QB 735 |
discontinuous lease |
|
Cottee v Richardson |
(1851) 7 Exch 143, 149, 155 Eng Rep 892 |
assignment |
|
Cottrell v Watkins |
(1839) 1 Beav 361, 365-6, 48 Eng Rep 980 |
possessory title(Eng) |
|
Cottrill v Steyning and Littlehampton Building Society |
[1966] 2 All ER 265 |
damages |
|
Coulter's Case |
(1598) 5 Co Rep 30a, 77 Eng Rep 98 |
compensation for improvements |
|
Countess of Rutland's Case |
(1604) 5 Co Rep 25b, 26a, 77 Eng Rep 89, 90 |
literal construction or literal meaning |
|
Covas v Bingham |
(1853) 23 LJ QB 26, 29 |
as is or as it stands |
|
Cox v Glue |
(1848) 5 CB 533, 136 ER 987 |
close |
|
CPC Group Ltd v Qatari Diar Real Estate Investments Co |
[2010] EWHC 1535 |
reasonable effort or reasonable endeavour |
|
Crabb v Arun District Council |
[1976] Ch 179, [1975] 2 All ER 865 |
equitable easement(Eng) |
|
Crabb v Arun District Council |
[1976] Ch 179, 187, [1975] 3 All ER 865, 871 (CA) |
easement by estoppel |
|
Crabb v Arun District Council |
[1976] Ch 179, 187, [1975] 3 All ER 865, 871 (CA) |
estoppel |
|
Crago v Julian |
[1992] 1 WLR 372, [1992] 1 All ER 744 (CA) |
legal lease(Eng) |
|
Crago v Julian |
[1992] 1 WLR 372 |
equitable assignment |
|
Crancour v Da Silvaesa |
[1986] 1 EGLR 80, 85 |
exclusive possession |
|
Crancour v Da Silvaesa |
[1986] 1 EGLR 80, 85 |
lodger |
|
Crane v Morris |
[1965] 3 All ER 77 |
tenancy at will |
|
Craven (Builders) Ltd v Secretatry of State |
[2000] 1 EGLR 128 |
repairs notice(Eng) |
|
Crawford v Newton |
(1886) 36 WR 54) |
tenantable repair |
|
Crawley v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1990] JPL 742) |
shop |
|
Credit Suisse v Beegas Nominees Ltd |
[1994] 4 All ER 803 |
repair |
|
Creska Ltd v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC |
[1998] 37 EG 165 (CA) |
repair |
|
Cresswell v Potter |
[1978] 1 WLR 255 |
fraudulent conveyance |
|
Crest Nicholson Residential (South) Ltd v McAllister |
[2004] 2 All ER 991n at [31]-[34], [2004] 1 WLR 2409 (CA) |
restrictive covenant |
|
Cresta Holdings Ltd v Karlin |
[1958] 1 WLR 1055, [1959] 3 All ER 656, 657 (CA) |
notice |
|
Crewe Services and Investment Corporation v Silk |
[1998] 2 EGLR 1 (CA) |
schedule of dilapidations(BrE) |
|
Cricket Ltd v Shaftesbury |
[1999] 28 EG 127 |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Cricklewood Property and Investment Trust Ltd v Leighton's Investment Trust Ltd |
[1945] 1 All ER 252 |
frustration |
|
Crofts v Haldane |
(1867) LR 2 QB 194 |
make good |
|
Cromwell Development Ltd v Godfrey |
[1998] EG 72, 75 (CA) |
constructive re-entry |
|
Croshaw v Pritchard |
(1899) 16 TLR 45 |
estimate |
|
Crowborough Parish Council v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1981] JPL 281 |
allotment |
|
Crown Estate Commissioners v Mark Roberts & Trelleck Estate |
[2008] P & CR 255 |
adverse possession |
|
Crown Estate Commissioners v Signet Group plc |
[1996] 2 EGLR 200 |
change of use |
|
Croydon London Borough Council v Boston |
(1991) 24 HLR 36 |
assignment |
|
Cruse v Mount |
[1933] Ch 278 |
dwelling house or dwelling-house |
|
Cruttwell v Lye |
(1810) 17 Ves Jun 335, 339, 34 Eng Rep 129, 131 |
goodwill |
|
Cryer v Scott Brothers (Sunbury) Ltd |
(1988) 55 P & CR 183, 191 (CA) |
building |
|
Cubitt v Porter |
(1828) 8 B & C 257, 8 Eng Rep 1039 |
party wall |
|
Cuckmere Brick Co Ltd v Mutual Finance Ltd |
[1971] Ch 949, 965 (CA) |
power of sale |
|
Cuddon v Tite |
(1858) 1 Giff 395, 398 |
constructive trust |
|
Cull v Backhouse |
(1793) 6 Taunt 149, 128 Eng Rep 990 |
subagent or sub-agent |
|
Culley v Daegan Properties Ltd |
[2009] UKUT 235, [2009] PLSCS 260 (LC) |
marriage value (MV)(BrE) |
|
Cullinane v British "Rema" Manufacturing Co Ltd |
[1954] 1 QB 292, 308 (CA) |
damages |
|
Cunliffe v Goodman |
[1950] 2 KB 237, [1950] 1 All ER 720 (CA) |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Cumberland Consolidated Holdings Ltd v Ireland |
[1946] KB 264 |
vacant possession |
|
Currie v Misa |
(1875) LR 10 Ex 153, 162, aff'd (1876) 1 App Cas 554 (HL) |
valuable consideration |
|
Currie v Misa |
(1875) LR 10 Ex 153, 162, aff'd (1876) 1 App Cas 554 (HL) |
consideration |
|
Curtis v Chemical Cleaning and Dyeing Co Ltd |
[1951] 1 KB 805, [1951] 1 All ER 631 (CA) |
misrepresentation |
|
Curtis v London Rent Assessment Committee |
[1999] QB 92 (CA) |
fair rent |
|
Cutter v Powell |
(1795) 6 Term Rep 320, 101 Eng Rep 573 |
lump-sum contract |
|
Cutter v Powell |
(1795) 6 TR 320, 101 ER 573 |
entire contract |
|
Cutts v Head |
[1984] Ch 290, 306 |
without prejudice |
|
D & C Builders Ltdv Rees |
[1966] 2 QB 617, [1965] 3 All ER 837 (CA) |
estoppel |
Top
|
D & F Estates Ltd v The Church Commissioners for England & Wales |
[1989] AC 177 (HL) |
vicarious liability |
|
D'Almaine v Moseley |
(1853) 1 Drew 629, 632, 61 Eng Rep 592 |
estate |
|
Daejan Investments Ltd v Benson |
[2013] UKSC 14 (SC) |
service charge |
|
Dacorum Borough Council v Sims |
[2013] EWCA Civ 12, [2013] 15 EG 106 (CA) |
joint tenancy |
|
Dagger v Shepherd |
[1946] KB 223 (CA) |
time |
|
Dakin (H.) & Co Ltd v Lee |
[1916] 1 KB 566 (CA) |
entire contract |
|
Dakin (H.) & Co Ltd v Lee |
[1916] 1 KB 566 (CA) |
part performance |
|
Dakin (H.) & Co Ltd v Lee |
[1916] 1 KB 566 (CA) |
performance |
|
Dallman v King |
(1837) 4 Bing NC 105, 109, 132 Eng Rep 729, 731 |
satisfactory completion |
|
Dalton v Angus |
(1881) 6 App Cas 740 (HL) |
right of support or right to support |
|
Dalton v Angus |
(1881) 6 App Cas 740 (HL) |
lateral support |
|
Dalton v Angus |
(1881) 6 App Cas 740, 774 (HL) |
nec vi, nec clam, nec precario(Lat) |
|
Dalton v Angus |
(1881) 6 App Cas 740, 773 (HL) |
lost modern grant |
|
Dalton v Angus |
(1881) 6 App Cas 740, 773 (HL) |
prescription |
|
Dalton v Angus |
(1881) 6 App Cas 740, 821 (HL) |
natural rights |
|
Dalton v Angus |
(1881) 6 App Cas 740, 821 (HL) |
servitude |
|
Dare v Heathcote |
(1856) 25 LJ Ex 256 |
prescription |
|
Dashwood v Dashwood |
[1927] WN 276, 71 Sol J 911 |
Tomlin order(Eng) |
|
Dashwood v Magniac |
[1891] 3 Ch 306, 336 (CA) |
good repair |
|
Dashwood v Magniac |
[1891] 3 Ch 306, 357 (CA) |
waste |
|
Davenport v Hammersmith & Fulham London Borough Council |
[1999] 2 PLR 96 |
planning condition(Eng) |
|
Davey v Durrant |
(1857) 26 LJ Ch 830 |
undervalue |
|
David Blackstone Ltd v Burnetts (West End) Ltd |
[1973] 1 WLR 1487, [1973] 3 All ER 610 |
waiver |
|
Davies v Collins |
[1945] 114 LJ KB 199, 1 All ER 248 (CA) |
subcontractor |
|
Davies v Davies |
(1888) 38 Ch D 499 |
waste |
|
Davies v Directloans |
[1986] 1 WLR 823, 831) |
usury |
|
Davill v Pull |
[2009] EWCA Civ 1309, [2009] NPC 142 (CA) |
easement |
|
Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham UDC |
[1956] AC 696, [1956] 2 All ER 145 (HL) |
quantum meruit(Lat) |
|
Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham UDC |
[1956] AC 696, [1956] 2 All ER 145 (HL) |
frustration |
|
Davis v Gyde |
(1835) 2 Ad & E 623, 111 Eng Rep 240 |
payment |
|
Davis v Gyde |
(1835) 2 Ad & E 623, 111 Eng Rep 240 |
cash |
|
Davis v Jones |
(1856) 17 CB 625, 139 Eng Rep 1222 |
date |
|
Dawes v Hawkins |
(1860) 8 CB(NS) 845 |
highway |
|
Dawkins (V.O.) v Royal Lemington Spa Corporation and Warwickshire County Council |
(1961) 178 EG 461 |
contractor's basis or contractor's method(BrE) |
|
Dayani v Bromley London Borough Council |
[1999] 3 EGLR 144 |
waste |
|
De Busche v Alt |
(1878) 8 Ch D 286, 310 (CA) |
subagent or sub-agent |
|
De Medina v Norman |
(1842) 11 LJ Ex 320, 322 |
ready, able and willing or ready, willing and able |
|
de Mulder v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1974] QB 792 |
material change in the use(Eng) |
|
De Nicholls v Saunders |
(1870) LR 5 CP 89 |
rent in advance or rent in arrears |
|
Deacon v South-Eastern Railway Co. |
(1889) 61 LT 377 |
easement of necessity |
|
Deacon v South-Eastern Railway Co. |
(1889) 61 LT 377 |
easement |
|
Dean v Upton |
(1990) The Times, 10 May (CA) |
time is of the essence |
|
Dear v Reeves |
[2002] Ch 1 (CA) |
right of pre-emption |
|
Dear v Reeves |
[2002] Ch 1, 10 (CA) |
property |
|
Dearle v Hall |
(1828) 3 Russ 1, 38 ER 475 |
equitable mortgage |
|
Dearle v Hall |
(1823) 3 Russ 1 |
priority of a mortgage |
|
Deerfield Travel Services Ltd v Wardens and Society of the Mistery or Art of Leather Sellers of the City of London |
(1983) 46 P & CR 132 (CA) |
compensation for improvements |
|
Delaware Mansions Ltd v Westminster City Council |
[2001] UKHL 55, [2001] 44 EG 150 (HL) |
tree |
|
Dellafiora v Lester |
[1962] 1 WLR 1208, [1962] 3 All ER 393 (CA) |
ready, able and willing or ready, willing and able |
|
Demetriou v Poolaction Ltd |
[1991] 1 EGLR 100 (CA) |
repair |
|
Dendy v Evans |
[1910] 1 KB 263 (CA) |
relief |
|
Dennis Reed Ltd v Goody |
[1950] 2 KB 277, 287, 288 (CA) |
ready, able and willing or ready, willing and able |
|
Department of the Environment v Allied Freehold Property Trust |
[1992] 45 EG 156 |
interim rent(Eng) |
|
Department of the Environment v Royal Insurance |
(1987) 54 P & CR 26 |
occupation |
|
Derby & Co Ltd v I.T.C. Pension Trust Ltd |
[1977] 2 All ER 890 |
subject to contract |
|
Derrick Barr and Others v Biffa Waste Services Limited |
[2011] EWCA Civ 312 (CA) |
nuisance |
|
Derry v Peek |
(1889) 14 App Cas 337, 374 (HL) |
fraud |
|
Dewar v Dewar |
[1975] 2 All ER 728,[1975] 1 WLR 1532 |
gift |
|
D'Eyncourt v Gregory |
(1866) LR 3 Eq 396 |
fixture |
|
Di Luca v Juraise (Springs) Ltd |
[1998] 2 EGLR 125 (CA) |
time is of the essence |
|
Dibble v Bowater |
(1853) 2 E & B 564 |
rent |
|
Dimmock v Hallett |
(1866) 2 Ch App 21 |
misrepresentation |
|
Director of Buildings and Lands v Shun Fung Ironworks Ltd |
[1995] 2 AC 111, 125 (PC) |
compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) |
|
Dodd v Churton |
[1897] 1 QB 562 |
time is of the essence |
|
Dodds v Acklom |
(1843) 6 Man & G 672, 134 Eng Rep 1063 |
surrender |
|
Dodds v Walker |
[1981] 1 WLR 1027, [1981] 2 All ER 609, 611 (HL) |
month |
|
Doe d Ambler v Woodbridge |
(1829) 9 B & C 376, 109 Eng Rep 140 |
waiver |
|
Doe d Baker v Coombes |
(1850) 9 CB 718, 137 Eng Rep 1073 |
possession |
|
Doe d Belasyse v Lucan |
(1808) 9 East 448, 103 Eng Rep 644 |
farm |
|
Doe d Cheny v Batten |
(1775) 1 Cowp 243, 98 Eng Rep 1066, [1775-1802] All ER Rep 594 |
waiver |
|
Doe d Clements v Collins |
(1788) 2 Term Rep 498, 100 Eng Rep 268 |
messuage |
|
Doe d Clements v Collins |
(1788) 2 Term Rep 498, 502, 100 Eng Rep 268 |
house |
|
Doe d Dymoke v Withers |
(1831) 2 B & Ad 896, 902, 109 Eng Rep 1375 |
rebuild |
|
Doe d Hemming v Willetts |
(1849) 7 CB 709, 715, 137 Eng Rep 280, 283 |
premises |
|
Doe d Holland v Worsley |
(1807) 1 Camp 20, 170 Eng Rep 862 |
assignment |
|
Doe d Patrick v Beaufort (Duke of) |
[1851] 6 Exch 498, 503, 155 Eng Rep 640 |
holding over |
|
Doe d Robertson v Gardiner |
(1952) 12 CB 319, 138 Eng Rep 927 |
perpetual lease |
|
Doe d Shore v Porter |
(1789) 3 Term Rep 13, 100 Eng Rep 429 |
tenancy from year to year |
|
Doe d Wilson v Phillips |
(1824) 2 Bing 13, 130 Eng Rep 208 |
forfeiture |
|
Doherty v Allman |
(1878) 3 App Cas 709, 733-5 (HL) |
waste |
|
Domb v Isoz |
[1980] Ch 557 |
exchange of contract(Eng) |
|
Dominion Corporate Trustees Ltd v Debenham Properties Ltd |
[2010] NPC 63, [2010] All ER (D) 264 |
literal construction or literal meaning |
|
Doncaster BC v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1996] 2 PLR 39, 42-4 |
sewer |
|
Doran v Carroll |
(1860) 11 Ir Ch Rep 379 |
injunction |
|
Dowling Kerr Ltd v Scott |
[1996] EGCS 177 |
sole selling right(BrE) |
|
Downsview Nominees Ltd v First City Corp Ltd |
[1993] AC 295 |
power of sale |
|
Dowty Boulton Paul Ltd v Wolverhampton Corpn |
(No 2) [1976] Ch 13 |
easement |
|
Drebbond Ltd v HorshamDC |
(1978) 246 EG 1013 |
time is of the essence |
|
Dresden Estates Ltd v Collinson |
(1988) 55 P & CR 47 |
exclusive possession |
|
Drewery v Ware-Lane |
[1960] 3 All ER 529, 532 (CA) |
prospective purchaser |
|
Dubai Aluminium Co Ltd v Salaam and Others |
[2002] 3 WLR 1913 (HL) |
vicarious liability |
|
Dudley (Lord) v Dudley (Lady) |
(1705) Prec Ch 241, 244, 24 Eng Rep 118, 119 |
equity |
|
Dudley and District Benefit Building Society v Emerson |
[1949] Ch 707 |
landlord |
|
Duke of Norfolk's Case, Howard v Duke of Norfolk |
(1681) 3 Ch Cas 1, 22 Eng Rep 931) |
rule against perpetuities (RAP) |
|
Duke of Westminster v Birrane |
[1995] 2 WLR 270, [1995] QB 262, 271A-D (CA) |
house |
|
Duke of Westminster v Guild |
[l985] 1 QB 689 |
repair |
|
Dumpor's Case |
(1603) 4 Co Rep 119b, 76 Eng Rep 1110 |
partial release |
|
Dungannon (Lord) v Smith |
(1846) 12 Cl & F 546, 563, 8 Eng Rep 1523 (HL) |
rule against perpetuities (RAP) |
|
Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage and Motor Co Ltd |
[1915] AC 79, 86 (HL) |
penalty |
|
Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v Selfridge Co Ltd |
[1915] AC 847, 855 (HL) |
consideration |
|
Dunton Properties Ltd v Coles, Knapp & Kennedy Ltd |
(1959) 174 EG 723 |
commission |
|
Durham County Council v Secretary for the Environment |
[1990] JPL 280 |
abandonment |
|
Durrell v Evans |
(1862) 1 Hurl & C 174, 191, 158 Eng Rep 848 |
signature |
|
Dyer v Dorset CC |
[1989] 1 QB 346, 351 (CA) |
curtesy |
|
Dyer v Dyer |
(1788) 2 Cox 92, 30 Eng Rep 42 |
implied trust |
|
Dyer v Dyer |
(1788) 2 Cox 92, 30 Eng Rep 42 |
resulting trust |
|
Dyer v Dyer |
(1788) 2 Cox 92, 30 Eng Rep 42 |
trust |
|
Dyment v Boyden |
[2005] 1 WLR 792, [2005] 06 EG 142 |
relation back |
Top
|
E.P. Nelson & Co v Rolfe |
[1950] 1 KB 139 |
exclusive agency |
|
E.R. Ives Investments Ltd v High |
[1967] 2 QB 379 (CA) |
equitable easement(Eng) |
|
E.R. Ives Investments Ltd v High |
[1967] 2 QB 379 (CA) |
estoppel |
|
E.R. Ives Investments Ltd v High |
[1967] 2 QB 379 (CA) |
licence by estoppel(Eng) |
|
E.W.P. Ltd v Moore |
[1992] 1 All ER 880 (CA) |
agricultural tenancy |
|
E.W.P. Ltd v Moore |
[1992] 1 All ER 880 (CA) |
term of years |
|
Eagle v Charing Cross Ry Co |
(1867) LR 2 CP 638 |
set-off or setoff |
|
Eagling v Gardner |
[1970] 2 All ER 838 |
scheme of development |
|
Earl of Cadogan v Sportelli |
[2007] 1 EGLR, para. 2 (LT), [2008] 1 WLR 2142, 2147 (CA) |
deferment rate(BrE) |
|
Earl of Cadogan v Sportelli |
[2010] UKUT 427 (LC), [2007] 1 EGLR 155 |
deferment rate(BrE) |
|
Earl of Cadogan v Sportelli |
[2007] EWCA Civ 1042, [2007] RVR 314 (CA) |
deferment rate(BrE) |
|
Earl of Cadogan v Sportelli |
[2008] UKHL 71, at [113], [2009] 1 EGLR 153 (HL) |
marriage value (MV)(Eng) |
|
Earl of Cadogan v Sportelli |
[2007] EWCA Civ 1042, [2007] RVR 314 (CA) |
marriage value (MV)(Eng) |
|
Earl of Dunraven v Llewellyn |
(1850) 15 QB 791 |
right of common |
|
Earl of Normanton v Giles |
[1980] 1 WLR 28, [1980] 1 All ER 106 (HL) |
agriculture |
|
East Lindsey District Council v Thompson |
(2001) 82 P & CR 33 |
owner |
|
Eastern Telegraph Co. Ltd v Dent |
[1899] 1 QB 835 |
restraint on alienation |
|
Easton v Alce |
(1861) 7 Hurl & N 452, 158 Eng Rep 549 |
per annum (p.a.)(Lat) |
|
Eastwood v Ashton |
[1915] AC 900 (HL) |
plan |
|
Eastwood v Ashton |
[1915] AC 900, 915-6 (HL) |
parcels clause |
|
Eastwood v Kenyon |
(1840) 11 Ad & E 438, 113 Eng Rep 482 |
duty of care |
|
Eaton Mansions (Westminster) Ltd v Stinger Companies de Inversion SA |
[2011] EWCA Civ 607 (CA) |
improvement |
|
Eaton Square Properties Ltd v Shaw |
[2011] EWHC 2115, 42 EG 122 |
consideration |
|
Ebbetts v Conquest |
[1895] 2 Ch 377, 382 |
schedule of dilapidations(BrE) |
|
Eccles v Bryant and Pollock |
[1947] 2 All ER 865, [1948] Ch 93 (CA) |
subject to contract |
|
EDF Energy Networks (EPN) plc v BOH Ltd [2009] EWHC 3198 (Ch), [2010] P & CR 3 |
[2009] EWHC 3198 (Ch), [2010] P & CR 3 |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Edge Hill Light Ry Co v Secretary of State for War |
(1956) 6 P & CR 211 (LT) |
equivalent reinstatement(Eng) |
|
Edgell v Day |
(1865) LR 1 CP 80 |
stakeholder |
|
Edginton v Clark |
[1964] 1 QB 367 (CA) |
adverse possession |
|
Edinburgh Street Tramways Co v Lord Provost, etc. of Edinburgh |
(1894) AC 459, 475-6 (HL) |
profits method of valuation(BrE) |
|
Edlington Properties Ltd v JH Fenner & Co Ltd |
[2006] EWCA Civ 403 (CA) |
set-off or setoff |
|
Edmund v Bushell and Jones |
(1865) LR 1 QB 97 |
undisclosed principal |
|
Edward Owen Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd |
[1977] 3 WLR 764 |
performance bond |
|
Edwards v Newland &Co (E Burchett Ltd), Third Parties |
[1950] 1 All ER 1072 |
general contractor (GC) |
|
Edwards v Skyways Ltd |
[1964] 1 All ER 494, 500 |
ex gratia(Lat) |
|
Ee v Kakar |
(1979) 40 P & CR 223) |
subject to survey |
|
E.ON UK plc v Gilesport |
[2012] EWHC 2172 |
service |
|
Egan Lawson Ltd v Standard Assurance Co |
[2001] 08 EG 168, 172 (CA) |
procuring cause(AmE) or effective cause(BrE) |
|
Electricity Supply Nominees Ltd v London Clubs |
[1998] 2 EGLR 152, [2011] 3 WLR 755 |
interim rent(Eng) |
|
Elitestone Ltd v Morris |
[1997] 1 WLR 687, 698A, [1997] 2 All ER 513, 525 (HL) |
caravan |
|
Elitestone Ltd v Morris |
[1997] 1 WLR 687, 698A, [1997] 2 All ER 513, 525 (HL) |
fixture |
|
Elitestone Ltd v Morris |
[1997] 1 WLR 687, [1997] 2 All ER 513 (HL) |
mobile home |
|
Elliot v Burn |
[1935] AC 84 (HL) |
right to let down the surface |
|
Elliott v Bishop |
(1854) 10 Exch 496, 156 ER 534 |
trade fixture |
|
Elliott v Bishop |
(1854) 10 Exch 496, 509, 156 ER 534, 540 |
fixture |
|
Elliott v Popular Playhouse Ltd |
(1909) April 1 |
time |
|
Ellis v Goulton |
[1893] 1 QB 350 |
deposit |
|
Ellis v Loftus Inn Co |
(1874) LR 10 CP 10, 12 |
trespass |
|
Elliston v Reacher |
[1909] 2 Ch 384 |
scheme of development |
|
Elmcroft Developments Ltd v Tankersley-Sawyer |
(1984) 270 EG 140 (CA) |
repair |
|
Elmdene Estates Ltd v White |
[1960] AC 528, 538, [1960] 1 All ER 306, 309 (HL) |
lease |
|
Elmdene Estates Ltd v White |
[1960] AC 528, 538, [1960] 1 All ER 306, 309 (HL) |
licence(BrE) or license(AmE) |
|
Elmdene Estates Ltd v White |
[1960] AC 528, [1960] 1 All ER 306 (HL) |
premium |
|
Eastern Telegraph Co. Ltd v Dent |
[1899] 1 QB 835 |
restraint on alienation |
|
Ellis v Rowbotham |
[1900] 1 QB 740 |
apportionment |
|
Elwes v Maw |
(1802) 3 East 38, 102 Eng Rep 510 |
agricultural tenant's fixture(Eng) |
|
Embrey v Owen |
(1851) 6 Exch 353, 155 Eng Rep 579 |
water rights |
|
Ener-G Holdings plc v Hormell [2012] EWCA Civ 1059, [2012] 45 EG 96, 98 (CA) |
[2012] EWCA Civ 1059, [2012] 45 EG 96, 98 (CA) |
personally |
|
Englewood Properties Ltd v Patel |
[2005] 1 WLR 1961, [2005] 25 EG 194 |
auction |
|
Englewood Properties Ltd v Patel |
[2005] 1 WLR 1961, [2005] 25 EG 194, 199-202 |
contract for sale |
|
English China Clays v Plymouth Corp'n |
[1974] 2 All ER 243 |
adjacent |
|
English Exporters (London) Ltd v Eldonwall Ltd |
[1973] Ch 415, 422B, [1973] 1 All ER 726 |
hearsay |
|
English Exporters (London) Ltd v Eldonwall Ltd |
[1973] Ch 415, 422B, [1973] 1 All ER 726 |
interim rent(Eng) |
|
Entick v Carrington |
(1765) 2 Wils KB 275, 291, 95 Eng Rep 807, 817 |
trespass |
|
Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corp'n |
(1955) 2 All ER 495 |
acceptance |
|
Erewash Borough Council v Ilkeston Consumer Co-operative Society |
(1989) 87 LGR 96) |
shop |
|
Errington v Aynesley |
(1788) 2 Bro CC 341, 21 Eng Rep 440 |
specific performance |
|
Errington v Errington and Woods |
[1952] 2 KB 290, 298, [1952] 1 All ER 149, 155 (CA) |
licence(BrE) or license(AmE) |
|
Errington v Errington and Woods |
[1952] 2 KB 290, 298, [1952] 1 All ER 149, 154-5 (CA) |
lease |
|
Escalus Properties Ltd v Robinson |
[1996] QB 231, 243, [1995] 3 WLR 524, 532 (CA) |
rent |
|
Espin v Pemberton |
(1859) De GF & J 547, 554, 44 Eng Rep 1380 |
constructive notice |
|
Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Harper's Garage (Stourport) Ltd |
[1968] AC 269, [1967] 1 All ER 699 (HL) |
equity of redemption |
|
Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Harper's Garage(Stourport) Ltd |
[1968] AC 269, [1967] 1 All ER 699 (HL) |
solus agreement(BrE) |
|
Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon |
[1976] QB 801, 820, [1976] 2 All ER 5, 16 (CA) |
misrepresentation |
|
Estafnous v London & Leeds Business |
[2009] EWHC 1308 (Ch), [2009] PLSCS 203 |
commission |
|
Etam plc v Baker Almond (a firm) |
[2001] EGCS 21 |
letter of comfort |
|
Evans v Enever |
[1920] 2 KB 315 |
waiver |
|
Ex parte Gilchrist |
[1886] 17 QBD 521, 531 (CA) |
power |
|
Ex parte Lewis |
(1888) 21 QBD 191, 197 |
highway |
|
Eyre v New Forest Highway Board |
(1892) 56 JP 517 |
dedication |
|
Eyre v New Forest Highway Board |
(1892) 56 JP 517, 518 |
highway |
|
Ezekiel v Kohali |
[2008] EWHC 734, [2009] 1 P & CR DG18 |
open contract |
Top
|
FW Woolworth & Co Ltd v Lambert |
[1937] Ch 37, [1936] 2 All ER 1523, 1533 (CA) |
improvement |
|
FW Woolworth & Co Ltd v Lambert |
[1937] Ch 37, [1936] 2 All ER 1523 (CA) |
restraint on alienation |
|
Fairclough v Swan Brewery Co Ltd |
[1912] AC 565, [1911-13] All ER Rep 397 (PC) |
equity of redemption |
|
Fairlie v Fenton |
(1870) LR 5 Exch 169 |
broker |
|
Fairman v Perpetual Investment Building Society |
[1923] AC 74, 80 (HL) |
invitee |
|
Fairweather v St Marylebone Property Co Ltd |
[1963] AC 510 (HL) |
adverse possession |
|
Farr Smith & Co Ltd v Messers Ltd |
[1928] 1 KB 397, 408 |
earnest money |
|
Farr v Millerston Investments Ltd |
(1971) P & CR 1055 |
modern ground rent(Eng) |
|
Faviell v Gaskoin |
(1852) Exch 273, 155 Eng Rep 949) |
tenant-right |
|
Fawcett Properties Ltd v Buckingham County Council |
[1961] AC 636, 663 (HL) |
option |
|
Fawcett Properties Ltd v Buckingham County Council |
[1961] AC 636, 663 (HL) |
price |
|
Fawcett Properties Ltd v Buckingham County Council |
[1961] AC 636, 674 (HL) |
planning condition(Eng) |
|
Federated Homes Ltd v Mill Lodge Properties Ltd |
(1979) 254 EG 39, [1980] 1 WLR 594 |
restrictive covenant |
|
Feist v Societe Intercommunale Belge D'Électricité |
[1934] AC 161; [1933] All ER Rep 228 |
gold clause |
|
Ferrihurst Ltd v Wallcite |
[1999] Ch 355, 372) |
interest |
|
Festiniog Ry Co v Central Electricity Generating Board |
(1962) 13 P & CR 248 (CA) |
equivalent reinstatement(Eng) |
|
Fibrosa Spolka Akoyjna v Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barbour Ltd |
[1943] AC 32, 61 (HL) |
quasi-contract |
|
Field v Barkworth |
[1986] 1 All ER 362 |
assignment |
|
Finchbourne Ltd v Rodrigues |
[1976] 3 All ER 581 (CA) |
service charge |
|
Fir Mill Ltd v Royton UDC and Jones (V.O.) |
(1960) 175 EG 1029, 1033 |
rebus sic stantibus(Lat) |
|
Firle Investments Ltd v Datapoint International Ltd |
[2001] NPC 106, [2001] EWCA Civ 1106 |
damages |
|
Firle Investments Ltd v Datapoint International Ltd |
[2001] NPC 106, [2001] EWCA Civ 1106 |
dilapidation |
|
Firle Investments Ltd v Datapoint International Ltd |
[2001] NPC 106, [2001] EWCA Civ 1106 |
repairs notice(Eng) |
|
First Garden City Ltd v Letchworth Garden City Corporation |
(1966) 200 EG 123, 460 |
residual method of valuation(BrE) |
|
First National Securities Ltd v Hegerty |
[1985] QB 850, [1984] 3 All ER 641 |
equitable charge |
|
First National Securities Ltd v Hegerty |
[1985] QB 850, [1984] 3 All ER 641 |
jus accrescendi praefertur oneribus(Lat) |
|
First National Securities v Jones |
[1978] Ch 109 |
seal |
|
First Plus Financial Group plc v Hewett |
[2010] 23 EG 108, [2010]All ER 248 (CA) |
undue influence |
|
First Secretary of State v Arun Distirct Council |
[2006] 1 WLR 523, (2006) The Times, September 21 (CA) |
enforcement notice |
|
Firstpost Homes Ltd v Johnson |
[1995] 1 WLR 1567, 1575-6 (CA) |
memorandum |
|
Firstpost Homes Ltd v Johnson |
[1995] 1 WLR 1567, 1575-6 (CA) |
signature |
|
Firth v Staines |
[1897] 2 QB 70, 75 |
ratification |
|
Fisher v Bell |
[1961] 1 QB 394, [1960] 3 All ER 731, 733 |
invitation to trade(AmE) or invitation to treat(BrE) |
|
Fisher v CHT Ltd |
[1966] 2 QB 475 |
occupier |
|
Fisher v Dixon |
(1845) 12 Cl & F 312, 8 Eng Rep 1426 (HL) |
fixture |
|
Fisher v Dixon |
(1845) 12 Cl & F 312, 8 Eng Rep 1426 (HL) |
trade fixture |
|
Fitzgerald v Firbank |
[1897] 2 Ch 96, 104 (CA) |
disturbance |
|
Fitzkriston LLP v Panayi |
[2008] EWCA Civ 283, [2008] All ER (D) 165 (CA) |
best rent |
|
Fitzroy House Epworth Street (No 1) Ltd v Financial Times Ltd |
[2006] EWCA Civ 329; [2006] 1 WLR 2207 (CA) |
break clause |
|
Fleming v Bank of New Zealand |
[1900] AC 577, 586 (PC) |
valuable consideration |
|
Fletcher v Ashburner |
(1779) 1 Bro CC 497, 499, 28 Eng Rep 1259, 1260 |
conversion |
|
Fletcher v Nokes |
[1897] Ch 217, 274 |
notice |
|
Flexman v Corbett |
[1930] 1 Ch 672 |
usual covenant |
|
Flight v Bolland |
(1828) 4 Russ 298, 38 Eng Rep 817) |
specific performance |
|
Flight v Booth |
(1834) 1 Bing NC 370, 377, 131 Eng Rep 1160, LJ 4 CP 66, 69 |
misdescription |
|
Flint v Brandon |
(1803) 8 Ves Jun 159, 32 Eng Rep 314) |
specific performance |
|
Flower v Allan |
(1863) 33 LJ Ex 33 |
reasonable effort or reasonable endeavour |
|
Floyer v Banks |
(1863) 33 LJ Ch 3 |
succession |
|
Foakes v Beer |
(1884) 9 App Cas 605, 616 (HL) |
accord and satisfaction |
|
Foley v Classique Coaches Ltd |
[1934] 2 KB 1, [1934] All ER Rep 88 (CA) |
conditional contract |
|
Footwear Corporation Ltd v Amplight Properties Ltd |
[1998] 2 EGLR 38 |
restraint on alienation |
|
Ford v Lacy |
(1861) 7 Hurl & N 151, 158 Eng Rep 429 |
avulsion |
|
Fordham v Christie, Manson and Woods |
(1977) 244 EG 213 |
auctioneer |
|
Formby v Barker |
[1903] 2 Ch 539, 553 (CA) |
restrictive covenant |
|
Forty-Five Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor (Mayfair) Estate |
[2009] UKUT 234, [2010] 02 EG 84 (LC) |
marriage value (MV)(BrE) |
|
Forward v Pittard |
(1785) Term Rep 27, 99 Eng Rep 953, 956 |
act of God |
|
Foster v Wright |
(1878) 4 CPD 438 |
accretion |
|
Fouldes v Willoughby |
(1841) 8 M & W 540, 551, 151 Eng Rep 1153 |
conversion |
|
Foundling Hospital Governors and Guardians v Crane |
[1911] 2 KB 377 (CA) |
escrow |
|
Four-Maids Ltd v Dudley Marshall (Properties) Ltd |
[1957] Ch 317, 320 |
mortgagee |
|
Fowler v Hollins |
(1872) LR 7 QB 616 |
broker |
|
Fox v Jolly |
[1916] 1 AC 1, 17 (HL) |
notice |
|
Foxtons Ltd v Pelkley Bicknell |
[2008] EWCA Civ 419, [2008] All ER D 328 (CA) |
procuring cause(AmE) or effective cause(BrE) |
|
Foxtons Ltd v Thesleff |
[2005] EWCA Civ, [2005] EG 140 (CA) |
purchaser |
|
Frank Warr & Co v London County Council |
[1904] 1 KB 713 (CA) |
licensee |
|
Frawley (M & F) Ltd v Ve-Ri-Best Manufacturing Co Ltd |
[1953] 1 All ER 51 (CA) |
shop |
|
Freeman & Lockyer v Bockhurst Park Properties |
[1964] 2 QB 480, 502-3 (CA) |
actual authority |
|
Freeman d Vernon v West |
(1763) 2 Wils KB 165, 95 Eng Rep 745 |
abeyance |
|
Freetown Ltd v Assethold Ltd |
[2012] EWHC 1351, [2012] 33 EG 44, 46 |
service |
|
Freme v Clement |
(1881) 18 Ch D 499, 504 |
power of appointment |
|
French v Elliott |
[1960] 1 WLR 40, [1959] 3 All ER 866 |
double rent |
|
Friary Holroyd v Singleton |
[1899] 1 Ch 86, 90 |
assignee |
|
Friend v Shaw |
(1887) 20 QBD 374) |
legal notice |
|
Friends' Provident Life Office v British Railways Board |
[1996] 1 All ER 336 (CA) |
privity of contract |
|
Frost v Feltham |
[1981] 1 WLR 453 |
residence |
|
Fry v Lane |
(1888) 40 Ch D 312, 321 |
unconscionable bargain |
|
Fry v Lane |
(1888) 40 Ch D 312, 322 |
undervalue |
|
Fuller v Happy Markets Ltd |
[2001] 25 EG 159 |
distress |
|
Fuller v Happy Shopper Markets Ltd |
[2001] 1 WLR 1681 |
distress |
|
Fullwood v Hurley |
[1928] 1 KB 504 |
dual agency |
|
Furmedge v Chester-Le-Street District Council |
[2011] EWHC 1226, [2011] All ER (D) 162 |
negligence |
|
Furmedge v Chester-Le-Street District Council |
[2011] EWHC 1226, [2011] All ER (D) 162 |
visitor |
Top
|
G.E. Stevens (High Wycombe), Ltd v High WycombeCorporation |
[1961] 2 All ER 738, 741 |
private dwelling house |
|
Gaidowki v Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge |
[1975] 1 WLR 1066, 1069 |
flying freehold(Eng) |
|
Gallie v Lee |
[1969] 2 Ch 37 |
precedent |
|
Galloway v London Corporation |
(1986) LR 1 HL 34 (HL) |
compulsory purchase(Eng) |
|
Gardiner v Williamson |
(1831) 2 B & Ad 336, 109 Eng Rep 1168 |
deed |
|
Gardner v Hodgsons's Kingston Brewery Co Ltd |
[1903] AC 229 (HL) |
as of right |
|
Gardner v Hodgsons's Kingston Brewery Co Ltd |
[1903] AC 229 (HL) |
enjoyment |
|
Gardner v Ingram |
(1889) 61 LTNS 729, 730, [1886-90] All ER Rep 258, 260 |
notice to quit |
|
Garrard v Frankel |
(1862) 30 Beav 445, 54 Eng Rep 961 |
undervalue |
|
Gas Light and Coke Co v Turner |
(1840) 6 Bing NC 324, 133 Eng Rep 127 |
change of use |
|
Gaved v Martyn |
(1865) 19 CB (NS) 732, 758 |
easement of drainage(BrE) |
|
Geary v JD Weatherspoon PLC |
[2011] All ER (D) 97 (Jun), [2011] EWHC 1506 |
invitee |
|
Gedye Montrose |
(1858) 26 Beav 45, 49 |
constructive trust |
|
General Estates Co Ltd v MHLG |
[1965] EGD 98 |
reasonably beneficial use(Eng) |
|
George Wimpey Bristol Ltd v Gloucestershire Housing Association Ltd |
[2011] UKUT 91 (LC) |
restrictive covenant |
|
Ghaldan v Godin-Mendoza |
[2004] UKHL 30, (2004) The Times June 24 (HL) |
statutory tenancy(Eng) |
|
Gibbs and Houlder Bros & Co Lease, In re |
[1925] 1 Ch 575, 583 (CA) |
restraint on alienation |
|
Gibson v Manchester City Council |
[1979] 1 WLR 294, [1979] 1 All ER 972 (HL) |
invitation to trade(AmE) or invitation to treat(BrE) |
|
Gilbert (V.O.) v Hickinbottom & Sons Ltd |
[1956] 2 QB 40, 48, [1956] 2 All ER 101, 103 (CA) |
hereditament |
|
Gilje v Chalgrove Securities Ltd |
[2001] EWCA Civ 1777, [2002] EGLR 41 (CA) |
service charge |
|
Gillett v Holt |
[2001] Ch 210, 225-6 [2000] 2 All ER 289 (CA) |
estoppel |
|
Gissing v Gissing |
[1971] AC 886 (HL) |
matrimonial home(Eng) |
|
Gissing v Gissing |
[1971] AC 886 (HL) |
resulting trust |
|
Gissing v Gissing |
[1971] AC 886, 905B-C (HL) |
implied trust |
|
Gladstone v Bower |
[1960] 2 QB 384, [1959] 3 All ER 479 (CA) |
agricultural tenancy |
|
Gladstone v Bower |
[1960] 2 QB 384, [1960] 3 All ER 353, 357 (CA) |
tenancy from year to year |
|
Glamorgan County Council v Carter |
[1963] 1 WLR 1 |
use |
|
Glentree Estates Ltd v Favermead Ltd |
[2010] EWCA Civ 1473, [2011] EGLR (CA) |
procuring cause(AmE) or effective cause(BrE) |
|
Goding v Frazer |
[1967] 1 WLR 293 |
gentleman's agreement |
|
Goldeneagle Properties Ltd v Thornbury Court Ltd |
[2008] EWCA Civ 864, [2008] 45 EG 102 (CA) |
leasehold enfranchisement(Eng) |
|
Goldsmiths' Company v West Metropolitan Railway |
[1903] 1 KB 1, 5 (CA) |
date |
|
Goldsmiths' Company v West Metropolitan Railway |
[1903] 1 KB 1, 5 (CA) |
time |
|
Goldstein v Levy Gee (a firm) |
[2003] EWHC 1574 (Ch), [2003] PNLR 35 |
valuer |
|
Goodman v Harvey |
(1835) 4 Ad & El 870, 111 Eng Rep 1011 |
bona fide purchaser (BFP) |
|
Goodrich v Paisner |
[1957] AC 65, [1956] 2 All ER 176, 187 (HL) |
living room |
|
Goodtitle v Gibbs |
(1826) 5 B & C 709, 717, 108 Eng Rep 264 |
habendum |
|
Gordon v Selico Co Ltd |
[1976] EG [1986] 53, 1 EGLR 71 (CA) |
caveat emptor(Lat) |
|
Gordon v Selico Co Ltd |
[1976] EG [1986] 53, 1 EGLR 71 (CA) |
repair |
|
Gordon v Selico Co Ltd |
[1976] EG [1986] 53, 1 EGLR 71 (CA) |
specific performance |
|
Gore v Standard (t/a Wyvern Tyres |
[2012] EWCA Civ 1248, 42 EG 133 (CA) |
strict liability |
|
Goss v Chilcott |
[1996] AC 788, [1997] 2 All ER 110 (PC) |
restitution |
|
Gott v Gandy |
(1853) El & Bl 845, 118 Eng Rep 984, 985 |
implied covenant |
|
Gott v Gandy |
(1853) El & Bl 845, 118 Eng Rep 984, 985 |
repair |
|
Government of the State of Penang v Beng Hong Oon |
[1972] AC 425, 437-9, [1971] 3 All ER 1163, 1172-3 (PC) |
foreshore |
|
Government Stock and Other Securities Investment CoLtdv Manila Ry CoLtd |
[1897] AC 81, 86 (HL) |
floating charge or floating lien |
|
Governors of the Peabody Donation Fund v Higgins |
[1983] 1 WLR 1091, 1095E-G |
restraint on alienation |
|
Graham & Scott (Southgate) Ltd v Oxlade |
[1950] 2 KB 257 (CA) |
ready, able and willing or ready, willing and able |
|
Graham & Scott (Southgate) Ltd v Oxlade |
[1950] 2 KB 257 (CA) |
subject to survey |
|
Grampian Regional Council v. Secretary of State for Scotland [1993] 1 WLR 1340, 1345A-1346C (HL) |
|
certificate of appropriate alternative development(Eng) |
|
Granada Theatres v Freehold Investments (Leytonstone) Ltd |
[1959] Ch 592, [1959] 1 All ER 176 (CA) |
repairs notice(Eng) |
|
Granada Theatres v Freehold Investments (Leytonstone) Ltd |
[1959] Ch 592, [1959] 1 All ER 176 (CA) |
right of entry |
|
Granada Theatres v Freehold Investments (Leytonstone) Ltd |
[1959] Ch 592, [1959] 1 All ER 176 (CA) |
structural repair |
|
Grand v Gill |
[2010] EWCA Civ 554, [2011] 21 EG 95 (CA) |
structure |
|
Graves v Weld |
(1833) 5 B & Ad 105, 119, 110 Eng Rep 731 |
emblements |
|
Graves v Weld |
(1833) 5 B & Ad 105, 110 Eng Rep 731 |
way-going crop |
|
Gray v Spyer |
[1922] 2 Ch 22 |
tenancy from year to year |
|
Graysim Holdings Ltd v P&O Property Holdings Ltd |
[1996] AC 329 (HL) |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Graysim Holdings Ltd v P&O Property Holdings Ltd |
[1996] AC 329 (HL) |
occupation |
|
Great Estates Group Ltd v Digby |
[2011] EWCA Civ, [2011] 43 EG 104 (CA) |
ready, able and willing or ready, willing and able |
|
Great Estates Group Ltd v Digby |
[2011] EWCA Civ, [2011] 43 EG 104 (CA) |
sole agency |
|
Great Western Forests of Dean Collieries Co Ltd v Trafalgar Colliery Co Ltd |
(1887) 3 TLR 725 |
gale |
|
Great Western Ry Co v Smith |
(1876) 2 Ch D 235, aff'd (1877) 3 App Cas 165 (HL) |
sublessee or sub-lessee |
|
Great Yarmouth Corporation v Groom |
(1862) 1 Hurl & C 102, 158 Eng Rep 818 |
stallage(Eng) |
|
Greatrex v Hayward |
(1858) 8 Ex 291 |
easement of drainage(BrE) |
|
Green v Baverstock |
(1863) 32 LJ CP 181 |
puffer |
|
Green v Eales |
(1841) 2 QB 225, 237 |
external |
|
Green v King |
(1778) 2 Bl W 1212, 1214, 96 Eng Rep 713, 714 |
tenancy by the entirety |
|
Greenaway v Adams |
(1806) 12 Ves Jun 395, 33 Eng Rep 149 |
assignment |
|
Greenhalgh v British Railways Board |
[1969] 2 QB 286, 293 , [1969] 2 All ER 114, 117 (CA) |
visitor |
|
Greenwich Healthcare National Health Service Trust v London and Quadrant Housing Trust |
[1998] 1 WLR 1749, 1754 |
easement |
|
Greenwood v Martins Bank Ltd |
[1933] AC 51, 57 (CA) |
representation |
|
Greer v Downs |
[1927] 2 KB 238 (CA) |
undisclosed principal |
|
Gregg v Richards |
[1926] Ch 521 |
habendum |
|
Gregg v Wells |
(1839) 10 Ad & E 90, 98, 113 Eng Rep 35, 38 |
representation |
|
Grey v Pearson |
(1857) 6 HL Cas 61, 106, 10 Eng Rep 1216, 26 LJ Ch 472, 481 (HL) |
literal construction or literal meaning |
|
Grice v Dudley |
[1958] Ch 329 |
compulsory purchase order (CPO)(Eng) |
|
Griffith v Pelton |
[1958] Ch 205, 225, [1957] All ER 75, 83 (CA) |
option |
|
Griffiths v Young |
[1970] Ch 675 |
memorandum |
|
Grimes v Hawkins |
[2011] EWHC 2004 |
duty of care |
|
Grossman v Hooper |
[2001] EGLR 82, [35]-[36], [2001] 27 EG 135 (CA) |
writing |
|
Grosvenor (Lord) v Hampstead Junction Ry Co |
(1857) De GF & J 446, 44 Eng Rep 796 |
house |
|
Grosvenor Hotel Co v Hamilton |
[1894] 2 QB 836 |
derogation from grant |
|
Groveside Properties Ltd v Westminster Medical School |
(1983) 267 EG 593 |
business premises |
|
Guildford RDC v Fortescue |
[1959] 2 QB 112, 125 (CA) |
material change in the use(Eng) |
|
Gundry v Dunham |
(1916) 85 LJ KB 416, 422 (CA) |
rack rent |
|
Gurton v Parrott |
[1981] 18 EG 161 |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Gutteridge v Munyard |
(1834) 7 Car & P 129, 173 Eng Rep 57 |
keep in repair |
Top
|
Hackney Borough Council v Dore |
[1922] 1 KB 431 |
force majeure(Civ) |
|
Hadley v Baxendale |
(1854) 23 LJ Ex 179, 9 Ex 341, 156 Eng Rep 145 |
consequential damages |
|
Hadley v Baxendale |
(1854) 23 LJ Ex 179, 9 Ex 341, 156 Eng Rep 145 |
damages |
|
Haffner v Cordingly |
(1908) 8 WLR 743 (CA) |
completion |
|
Hagee (London) Ltd v A.B. Erikson and Larson |
[1975] All ER 234 (CA) |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Haines v Welch |
(1868) LR 4 CP 91 |
emblements |
|
Halford v Brooks |
[1991] 3 All ER 559, 573 (CA) |
knowledge |
|
Halifax Building Society v Keighley |
[1931] 2 KB 248 |
mortgagee clause |
|
Halifax Building Society v Thomas |
[1996] Ch 217 |
power of sale |
|
Hall v Warren |
(1804) 9 Ves Jun 605, 32 Eng Rep 738 |
specific performance |
|
Halsall v Brizell |
[1957] Ch 169 |
positive covenant |
|
Hamer v Sharp |
(1874) LR 19 Eq 113 |
estate agent(BrE) |
|
Hammersmith & Fulham LBC v Monk |
[1991] 1 EGLR 263, 269, [1992] 1 AC 478, 484 (HL) |
joint tenancy |
|
Hammerton v Honey |
(1874) 24 WR 603 |
custom |
|
Hammonds v Barclay |
(1802) 2 East 227, 235, 102 Eng Rep 356 |
lien |
|
Hampshire County Council v Milburn |
[1991] 1 AC 325 [1990] 2 All ER 257, 258 (HL) |
waste land |
|
Hampshire v Wickens |
(1878) 7 Ch D 555 |
tax |
|
Hampshire v Wickens |
(1878) 7 Ch D 555 |
usual covenant |
|
Hampstead Way Investments Ltd v Lewis-Weare |
[1985] 1 WLR 164, [1985] 1 All ER 164 (HL) |
residence |
|
Hampton and Sons, Ltd v George |
[1939] 3 All ER 627 |
exclusive agency |
|
Hancock and Wills (a firm) v GMS Syndicate Ltd |
(1983) 265 EG 469 |
occupation |
|
Hancock v B. W. Brazier (Anerley) Ltd |
[1966] 1 WLR 1317 |
fit for human habitation(Eng) |
|
Hanson v Newman |
[1934] Ch 298, 305 |
damages |
|
Hanson v Newman |
[1934] Ch 298, 305 |
schedule of dilapidations(BrE) |
|
Harbert's Case |
(1584) 3 Co Rep 11b, 76 Eng Rep 647 |
inverse order of alienation |
|
Hare v Nicoll |
[1966] 2 QB 130, [1966] All ER 285 (CA) |
time is of the essence |
|
Harington v Hoggart |
(1830) 1 B & Ad 577, 109 Eng Rep 902 |
deposit |
|
Harley Queen v Forsyte Kerman |
[1985] 1 EGLR 82 |
business premises |
|
Harmer v Jumbil (Nigeria) Tin Areas Ltd |
[1921] 1 Ch 200, 225 (CA) |
derogation from grant |
|
Hammersmith & Fulham LBC v Monk |
[1991] 1 EGLR 263, 269, [1992] 1 AC 478, 484 (HL) |
joint tenancy |
|
Harold Wood Brick Co v Ferris |
[1935] 2 KB 198 |
time is of the essence |
|
Harper v Aplin |
(1886) 54 LTNS 383 |
waste |
|
Harris v Birkenhead Corporation |
[1975] 1 WLR 379, [1976] 1 All ER 279 (CA) |
duty of care |
|
Harris v De Pinna |
(1886) 33 Ch D 238 (CA) |
right of light(BrE) or right to light(AmE) |
|
Harris v De Pinna |
(1886) 33 Ch D 238, 249-50 |
easement |
|
Harris v Flower |
(1904) LT 816, 819, (1904) 74 LJ Ch 127 |
easement |
|
Harris v Nickerson |
(1873) 26 LTNS 410 |
auction |
|
Harrison & Hetherington Ltd v Cumbria County Council |
(1985) 275 EG 457 (HL) |
equivalent reinstatement(Eng) |
|
Harrods v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions |
(2002) The Times, April 3 (CA) |
development |
|
Hart v Windsor |
(1843) 12 M & W 68, 87, 152 Eng Rep 1114 |
fit for the purpose or fit for the use |
|
Hartley v Minister of Housing and Local Government |
[1970] 1 QB 413, 420, 421 (CA) |
abandonment |
|
Harvey v Crawley Development Corporation |
[1957] 1 QB 485, 494, [1957] 1 All ER 504, 507 (CA) |
compensation for disturbance(Eng) |
|
Harvey v Truro Rural District Council |
[1903] 2 Ch 638) |
highway |
|
Haskell v Marlow |
[1928] 2 KB 45 |
fair wear and tear(BrE) |
|
Hatfield v Moss |
[1988] 2 EGLR 58, [1988] 40 EG 112 (CA) |
plan |
|
Havant International Holdings Ltd v Lionsgate (H) Investment Ltd |
[2000] L&TR 297, [1999] All ER (D) 1344 |
notice |
|
Hawkesbrook Leisure Ltd v The Reece-Jones Partnership |
[2003] EWHC 3333, [2004] 25 EG 172, 175 |
business |
|
Hayne v Cummings |
(1864) 16 CB (NS) 421, 143 Eng Rep 1191,1194 |
covenant |
|
Haynes v Ford |
[1911] 2 Ch 237, 256 |
warehouse |
|
Haynes v Harwood |
[1935] 1 KB 146, [1934] All ER Rep 103 (CA) |
volenti non fit injuria(Lat) |
|
Haynes v Vaughan |
[1985] 50 P & CR 444 |
vacant possession |
|
Haywood v Brunswick Permanent Benefit Building Society |
(1881) 8 QBD 403 (CA) |
restrictive covenant |
|
Heath v Milward |
(1835) 4 LJCP 292 |
close |
|
Heaven v Pender |
(1883) 11 QBD 502, 509 (CA) |
negligence |
|
Heaven v Pender |
(1883) 11 QBD, 503, 509 (CA) |
duty of care |
|
Hedley Byrne and Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd |
[1964] AC 465, 503 (HL) |
duty of care |
|
Heffer v Martyn |
(1867) 36 LJ Ch 327 |
bidding agreement |
|
Hely-Hutchinson v Brayhead Ltd |
[1968] 1 QB 549, 583 (CA) |
actual authority |
|
Hely-Hutchinson v Brayhead Ltd |
[1968] 1 QB 549, 583 (CA) |
agent |
|
Henderson v Arthur |
[1907] 1 KB 10 (CA) |
rent |
|
Henderson v Easton |
(1851) 17 QB 701 |
tenancy in common |
|
Henniker (Doe d) v Watt |
(1828) 8 B & C 308, 108 Eng Rep 1057 |
covenant |
|
Henniker (Doe d) v Watt |
(1828) 8 B & C 308, 315, 108 Eng Rep 1057, 1060 |
condition |
|
Henry Boot Construction Ltd. v Alstom Construction Ltd. |
[2005] EWCA Civ 814, [2005] 1 WLR 3850 (CA) |
entire contract |
|
Henry Boot v Alstom |
[2000] 16 Const LR 27, 69 Con LR 27, [2000] Build LR 247 (CA) |
fair rates and prices(Eng) |
|
Henthorn v Fraser |
[1892] 2 Ch 27 |
offer |
|
Herbert v Doyle |
[2008] EWHC 1950, [2009] WTLR 589 |
subject to contract |
|
Heron Corporation Ltd v Manchester City Council |
[1978] 3 All ER 1240 |
planning permission(Eng) |
|
Hesketh v Willis Cruisers Ltd |
(1968) 19 P & CR 573 (CA) |
ad medium filum aquæ(Lat) |
|
Heslop v Bishton |
[2009] EWHC 607 (Ch) |
easement |
|
Heslop v Burns |
[1974] 1 WLR 1247 |
exclusive possession |
|
Hexstone Holdings Ltd v AHC Westlink Ltd |
[2001] EWHC 1280, [2001] 32 EG 62 |
notice |
|
Heyman v Darwins Ltd |
[1942] AC 356 (HL) |
repudiation |
|
Hidderley v Warwick County Council |
(1963) 107 Sol J 156 |
agriculture |
|
Hiern v Mill |
(1806) 13 Ves Jun 114, 33 Eng Rep 237 |
imputed notice |
|
Hiern v Mill |
(1806) 13 Ves Jun 120, 33 Eng Rep 237, 239 |
notice |
|
Highland & Universal Properties v Safeway Properties |
(2000) SC 297 |
continuous operation clause |
|
HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd v Chase Manhattan Bank |
[2003] 1 All ER (Comm) 349, [2003] Lloyd's Rep 61 (HL) |
misrepresentation |
|
Hildron Finance Ltd v Sunley Holdings Ltd |
[2010] EWHC 1681 40 EG 104 |
frustration |
|
Hill v Barclay |
(1810) 16 Ves Jun 404, 33 Eng Rep 1037 |
specific performance |
|
Hill v Booth |
[1930] 1 KB 381 (CA) |
additional rent |
|
Hill v Debenham, Tewson & Chinnocks |
(1958) 171 EG 835 |
structural survey |
|
Hill v Harris |
[1965] 2 QB 601, [1965] 2 All ER 358 (CA) |
fit for the purpose or fit for the use |
|
Hill v Harris |
[1965] 2 QB 601, [1965] 2 All ER 358 (CA) |
use clause or user clause |
|
Hill v Hasier |
[1921] 3 KB 643 |
entitled |
|
Hill v Rochard |
[1983] WLR 478, [1983] 2 All ER 21 (CA) |
suitable alternative accommodation(Eng) |
|
Hillingdon Estates Co v Stonefield Estate |
[1952] Ch 677 |
frustration |
|
Hilton v Plustitle Ltd |
[1989] 1 WLR 149 |
company letting(Eng) |
|
Hindcastle v Barbara Attenborough Associates Ltd |
[1996] 2 WLR 262 |
disclaimer |
|
HKRUK II (CHC) Limited v Marcus Alexander Heaney |
(2010) EWHC 2245, [2010] 44 EG 126 |
damages |
|
HKRUK II (CHC) Limited v Marcus Alexander Heaney |
(2010) EWHC 2245, [2010] 44 EG 126 |
daylight factor(Eng) |
|
HKRUK II (CHC) Limited v Marcus Alexander Heaney |
[2010] EWHC 2245, [2010] 44 EG 126 |
right of light |
|
Hobbs v Midland Ry Co |
(1882) 20 Ch D 431) |
superfluous land(Eng) |
|
Hoddell v Smith |
(1976) 240 EG 295, 301 |
negotiation |
|
Hodges & Sons (G. T.) v Hackbridge Park Residential Hotel Ltd |
,[1940] 1 KB 404, [1939] 4 All ER 347 (CA) |
commission |
|
Hodgkinson v Crowe |
(1875) LR 19 Eq 591) |
unusual covenant(Eng) |
|
Hodgson v Marks |
[1971] Ch 892, [1971] 2 All ER 684 (CA) |
interest |
|
Hodgson v Marks |
[1971] Ch 892, [1971] 2 All ER 684 (CA) |
occupation |
|
Hoenig v Isaacs |
[1952] 2 All ER 176, 181-2 (CA) |
lump-sum contract |
|
Hoenig v Isaacs |
[1952] 2 All ER 176 (CA) |
substantial performance |
|
Hogarth Health Club v Westbourne Investments Ltd |
[1990] 02 EG 69, [1990] 1 EGLR 89 (CA) |
compensation for improvements |
|
Hoggan v Esquimalt & Nanaimo Ry Co |
[1894] AC 429, 434 (PC) |
squatting |
|
Holbeck Hall Hotel Ltd v Scarborough Council |
[2000] 2 QB 836, [2000] 2 WLR 1396 (CA) |
right of support or right to support |
|
Holden v White |
[1982] 2 QB 679, 683 (CA) |
easement |
|
Holding & Barnes plc v Secretary of State for the Environment Transport and the Regions |
[2003] 2 AC 295 295 (HL) |
called-in planning application(Eng) |
|
Holdings & Management (Solitaire) Ltd v Norton |
[2012] UKHT 1 (LC) |
restraint on alienation |
|
Holding Management Ltd v Property Holdings plc |
[1990] 1 All ER 938, 945 |
repair |
|
Holland v Hodgson |
(1872) LR 7 CP 335 |
fixture |
|
Holles v Wyse |
(1693) 2 Vern 289, 290, 23 Eng Rep 787 |
penalty |
|
Homes Ltd v Robinson |
[2004] EGLR 93, [2005] 1 P & CR 30 (CA) |
easement |
|
Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha |
[1962] 2 QB 26, 1 All ER 474 (CA) |
term |
|
Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha |
[1962] 2 QB 26, 1 All ER 474 (CA) |
lump-sum contract |
|
Honywood v Honywood |
(1874) LR 18 Eq 306, 309 |
timber |
|
Hooper v Oates |
[2013] EWCA Civ 91, [2013] 16 EG 108, 112-113 (CA) |
damages |
|
Hooper v Ramsbottom |
(1815) 6 Taunt 12, 128 Eng Rep 936 |
escrow |
|
Hopper v Liverpool Corp'n |
(1943) 88 Sol J 213 |
determinable fee simple(Eng) |
|
Horn v Sunderland Corporation |
[1941] 2 KB 26, 42, [1941] 1 All ER 480, 491 (CA) |
compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) |
|
Horn v Sunderland Corporation |
[1941] 2 KB 26, 53, [1941] 1 All ER 480, 499 (CA) |
disturbance |
|
Horn v SunderlandCorporation |
[1941] 2 KB 26, 42, [1941] 1 All ER 480, 491 (CA) |
compensation for disturbance(Eng) |
|
Horsey Estates Ltd v Steiger |
[1899] 2 QB 79, 68 LJ QB 743 (CA) |
sublease or sub-lease |
|
Horsey Estates Ltd v Steiger |
[1899] 2 QB 79, 68 LJ QB 743 (CA) |
personal covenant |
|
Hosebay Ltd v Day; Lexgorge Ltd v Howard de Walden Estates |
[2010] EWCA Civ 1281, [2010] 15 EG 174 (CA) |
house |
|
Hotgroup plc v Royal Bank of Scotland plc |
[2010] EWHC 1241, [2010] 23 EG 107 |
notice |
|
Household Fire & Accident Insurance Co v Grant |
(1879) LR 4 Ex D 216 |
acceptance |
|
Hoveringham Gravels Ltd v Chiltern DC |
(1979) 252 EG 815 |
compensation for severance(Eng) |
|
Howard de Walden Estates Ltd v Aggio |
[2008] 4 All ER 382, [2009] 1 AC 39 (HL) |
leasehold enfranchisement(Eng) |
|
Howard v Earl of Digby |
(1834) 2 Cl & F 634, 6 Eng Rep 1293 (HL) |
pin money |
|
Howe v Smith |
(1844) 27 Ch D 89 |
deposit |
|
Howe v Smith |
(1844) 27 Ch D 89, 101 |
earnest money |
|
Howell v Richards |
(1809) 11 East 633, 641-2, 103 Eng Rep 1150, 1154 |
quiet enjoyment |
|
Howell v Richards |
(1809) 11 East 633, 642, 103 Eng Rep 1150 |
covenant for possession(US) |
|
Howkins v Jardine |
[1951] 1 All ER 320 |
agricultural holding(Eng) |
|
HSBC Bank plc v Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (UK) Ltd |
(2001) The Times, June 11 |
literal construction or literal meaning |
|
Hua Chiao Commercial Bank Ltd v Chiaphua Industries Ltd |
[1987] AC 99, 107, [1987] 1 All ER 1110, 1112 (HL) |
covenant running with the land |
|
Hudson v Temple |
(1860) 29 Beav 536, 54 Eng Rep 735 |
time is of the essence |
|
Hughes v Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council |
[1991] 1 AC 382, 392, [1991] 1 All ER 295, 301 (HL) |
compensation for disturbance(Eng) |
|
Hughes v Metropolitan Ry Co |
[1877] 2 App Cas 439, 448 (HL) |
estoppel |
|
Hughes v Pump House Hotel Co |
[1902] 2 KB 190 (CA) |
absolute assignment |
|
Hughes v Robotham |
(1593) Cro Eliz 302, 78 Eng Rep 554 |
surrender |
|
Hughes v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions |
[2000] 1 PLR 76, [2000] JPL 826, (2000) The Times, February 18 (CA) |
abandonment |
|
Hughes v Young |
(1863) 32 LJ Ch 137 |
entitled |
|
Hull and Humber Investment Co v Hull Corporation |
[1965] 2 QB 145 |
notice to treat(Eng) |
|
Hunter Oil Terminals Ltd v Associated British Ports |
[2012] EWCA Civ 596, [2012] 30 EG 76 (CA) |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Humber Oil Terminals Ltd v Associated British Ports |
[2012] 1 P & CR DG1, [2011] EWHC 2043 |
interim rent(Eng) |
|
Humble v Hunter |
(1848) 12 QB 310 |
undisclosed principal |
|
Hunt v Luck |
[1902] 1 Ch 428 |
constructive notice |
|
Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd |
[1997] AC 655, 695B, [1997] 2 All ER 426 (HL) |
nuisance |
|
Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd |
[1997] AC 655, [1997] 2 All ER 426 (HL) |
right to air |
|
HXRUK II (CHC) Limited v Marcus Alexander Heaney |
(2010) EWHC 2245, [2010] 44 EG 126 |
daylight factor(Eng) |
|
Hyatt v Griffiths |
(1851) 17 QB 509 |
holding over |
|
Hyde v Wrench |
(1840) 3 Beav 334, 49 Eng Rep 132 |
counter notice(Eng) |
|
Hynes v Vaughan |
[1985] 50 P & CR 444 |
vacant possession |
|
Hyundai Shipping & Heavy Industries Co Ltd v Papadopoulos |
[1980] 1 WLR 1129 (HL) |
deposit |
Top
/td> |
IBM United Kingdom Ltd v Rockware Glass Ltd |
[1980] FSR 335 (CA) |
reasonable effort or reasonable endeavour |
|
Ibrahim v Roversions Ltd |
[2001] 30 EG 116 |
main structure |
|
Ibrend Estates BV v NYK Logistics (UK) Ltd |
[2011] EWCA Civ 683, [2011] 25 EG 104 (CA) |
vacant possession |
|
IDCGroup Ltd v Clark |
[1992] 1 EGLR 187 (CA) |
easement |
|
Illingworth v Houldsworth |
[1904] AC 355, 358 (HL) |
floating charge or floating lien |
|
Imperial College of Science and Technology v Ebdon |
[1986] RA 233, (1987) 281 EG 419 (CA) |
contractor's all-risks insurance |
|
In re Scott & Alvarez's Contract, Scott v Alvarez |
[1865] 2 Ch 633 (CA) |
specific performance |
|
In re Southern Rhodesia |
[1991] AC 211, 233-4 (PC) |
terra nullius(Lat) |
|
Indermaur v Dames |
(1866) LR 1 CP 288 |
invitee |
|
Industrial Properties (Barton Hill) Ltd v Associated Electrical Industries Ltd |
[1977] QB 58, [1977] 2 WLR 747 (CA) |
equitable lease |
|
Industrial Properties (Barton Hill) Ltd v Associated Electrical IndustriesLtd |
[1977] QB 58, [1977] 2 WLR 747 (CA) |
tenancy by estoppel |
|
Inglis v John Buttery & Co |
(1878) 3 App Cas 552, 577 (HL) |
literal construction or literal meaning |
|
Inland Revenue Commissioners v Buchanan |
[1958] Ch 289, 296 (CA) |
disposition |
|
Inland Revenue Commissioners v Clay and Buchanan |
[1914] 3 KB 466, 475 (CA) |
open market |
|
Inland Revenue Commissioners v Clay and Buchanan |
[1914] 3 KB 466, 475 (CA) |
open market value (OMV)(BrE) |
|
Inland Revenue Commissioners v Clay and Buchanan |
[1914] 3 KB 466, 478 (CA) |
willing buyer or willing seller |
|
Inland Revenue Commissioners v Gribble |
[1913] 3 KB 212, 218 (CA) |
purchaser |
|
Inland Revenue Commissioners v Maxse |
[1919] 1 KB 647, 657 (CA) |
profession |
|
Inner London Education Authority v The Secretary of the Environment |
[1990] JPL 200, 213-214 |
office |
|
International Drilling Fluids Ltd v Louisville Investments (Uxbridge) Ltd |
[1986] Ch 513, 519-22 (CA) |
improvement |
|
International Drilling Fluids Ltd v Louisville Investments (Uxbridge) Ltd |
[1986] Ch 513, 519-22 (CA) |
restraint on alienation |
|
International Traders Ferry Ltd v Adur District Council |
[2004] 2 PLR 106, [2004] 23 EG 122 (CA) |
interest |
|
International Traders Ferry Ltd v Adur District Council |
[2004] 2 PLR 106, [2004] 23 EG 122 (CA) |
occupier |
|
Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society |
[1998] 1 WLR 896, 912, 1 All ER 98, 114 (HL) |
words |
|
Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society |
[1998] 1 WLR 896, 912, 1 All ER 98, 114 (HL) |
literal construction or literal meaning |
|
Inwards v Baker |
[1965] 2 QB 29, [1965] 1 All ER 446 (CA) |
licence by estoppel(Eng) |
|
Iqbal v Thakrar |
[2004] 3 EGLR 21 (CA) |
improvement |
|
Irani Finance Ltd v Singh |
[1971] Ch 59, 80 |
conversion |
|
IRC v Bullock |
[1976] 1 WLR 1178 |
domicile |
|
Iron Co v Dodson |
7 Lea 373 |
contractor |
|
Irvine v Moran |
[1991] 1 EGLR 261, 262 |
structure |
|
J. A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd v Graham |
[2003] 1 AC 419, [2002] 3 All ER 865 (HL) |
adverse possession |
|
J. A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd v Graham |
[2003] 1 AC 419, 448, [2002] 3 All ER 865, 887-8 (HL) |
animus possidendi(Lat) |
|
J. A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd v Graham |
[2003] 1 AC 419, 435-6, [2002] 3 All ER 865, 875-6 (HL) |
possession |
|
J. A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd v Kingswood Borough Council |
[2000] RVR 40 (CA) |
compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) |
|
Jackson v Mulvaney |
[2003] 1 WLR 360 |
jus spatiandi(Lat) |
|
Jacobs v Batavia and General Plantations Trust |
[1924] 1 Ch 287, 295 |
express term or express condition |
|
Jacobs v Revell |
[1900] 2 Ch 858) |
misdescription |
|
Jaggard v Sawyer |
[1995] 13 EG 132, [1995] 1 WLR 269 (CA) |
damages |
|
Jaggard v Sawyer |
[1995] 13 EG 132, [1995] 1 WLR 269, 288 (CA) |
injunction |
|
James v Heim Gallery (London) Ltd |
(1980) 41 P & CR 269, 280 |
estoppel |
|
James v James |
(1873) LR 16 Eq 153 |
equitable mortgage |
|
James v James |
(1869) 19 LT 809 |
gift |
|
James v Smith (1921) |
[1931] 2 KB 317 n., 322 (CA) |
ready, able and willing or ready, willing and able |
|
James v United Kingdom |
(1986) EHRR 123 |
leasehold enfranchisement(Eng) |
|
Jarvis & Sons Ltd v Westminster City Corporation |
[1970] 1 WLR 643, 647-8 (HL) |
practical completion |
|
Jarvis Interiors ltd v Galliard Homes Ltd |
[2000] BLR, 71 Con LR 219 (CA) |
letter of intent (LOI) |
|
Javad v Aqil |
[1991] 1 WLR 1007, 1012, [1991] 1 All ER 243 |
tenancy at will |
|
Jeakes v White |
(1851) 6 Exch 873, 881, 155 Eng Rep 800, 803 |
good title |
|
Jelly v Buckman |
[1974] 3 All ER 73 |
severance |
|
Jenkin R Lewis & Sons Ltd v Kerman |
[1971] Ch 477 |
surrender |
|
Jenkins v Jackson |
(1889) 40 Ch D 74) |
peaceably and quietly |
|
Jennings v Broughton |
(1854) 5 De GM & G 126, 43 Eng Rep 818 |
puffing |
|
Jenson v Faux |
[2011] EWCA Civ 423, [2011] PLSCS 107 (CA) |
dwelling house or dwelling-house |
|
Jenson v Faux |
[2011] EWCA Civ 423, [2011] PLSCS 107 (CA) |
fit for habitation(Eng) |
|
Jervis v Harris |
[1996] 1 All ER 303, [1996] Ch 195 (CA) |
repairs notice(Eng) |
|
Jessamine Investment Co. v Schwartz |
[1978] QB 264, 271 (CA) |
statutory tenancy(Eng) |
|
Jeune v Queens Cross Properties Ltd |
[1974] Ch 97 |
specific performance |
|
Jeune v Ward |
(1818) 1 B & Ald 653, 659, 106 Eng Rep 240, 242 |
acceptance |
|
John Laing Construction Ltd v Amber Pass Ltd |
[2004] 12 EG 97, [2004] 2 EGLR 128 |
vacant possession |
|
John Laing Construction Ltd v Amber Pass Ltd |
[2004] 12 EG 97, [2004] 2 EGLR 128 |
yield-up clause or yielding-up clause |
|
Johnson v Agnew |
[1980] AC 367 (HL) |
damages |
|
Johnson v Agnew |
[1980] AC 367 (HL) |
rescission |
|
Johnson v Agnew |
[1980] AC 367, 398E (HL) |
election |
|
Johnson v Humphrey |
[1946] 1 All ER 460, 174 LT 324 |
time is of the essence |
|
Johnston & Sons Ltd v Holland |
[1988] 1 EGLR 264 |
derogation from grant |
|
Johnston v Duke of Westminster |
[1986] AC 839, 845 (HL) |
letting value |
|
Joint London Holding Ltd v Mount Cook Ltd |
(2005) The Times, October 11 |
ordinary meaning rule |
|
Jolley v Sutton London Borough Council |
[2000] 1 WLR 1082 (HL) |
negligence |
|
Jones v Green |
[1925] 1 KB 659 |
fit for human habitation(Eng) |
|
Jones v Jones |
[1977] 1 WLR 438) |
tenancy in common |
|
Jones v Kaney |
[2011] 2 All ER 671, 698, 714, [2011] 2 WLR 823, 850-1, 867, [2011] 14 EG 95 (SC) |
expert witness |
|
Jones v Kaney |
[2011] 2 All ER 671, 698 [2011] 2 WLR 823, ?? , [2011] 14 EG 95 (SC) |
professional negligence |
|
Jones v Kernott |
[2011] 46 EG 104, [2012] 1 All ER 1265, [2012] 1 AC 776, 3 WLR 1121 (SC) |
constructive trust |
|
Jones v Lavington |
[1903] 1 KB 253, 257-8 (CA) |
let |
|
Jones v Lowe |
[1945] KB 73, 77, [1945] 1 All ER 194, 197 |
prospective purchaser |
|
Jones v Manchester Passenger Transport Executive |
[1998] 36 EG 150 (LT) |
blighted land(Eng) |
|
Jones v Morgan |
[2001] EWCA Civ 995, (2001) The Times, July 24 (CA) |
clog |
|
Jones v Morgan |
[2001] EWCA Civ 995, (2001) The Times, July 24 (CA) |
equity of redemption |
|
Jones v Price & Morgan |
(1992) 64 P & CR 404 |
as of right |
|
Jones v Price |
[1965] 2 QB 618, 631 (CA) |
easement |
|
Jones v Ruth |
[2011] EWCA Civ 804, [2011] PLSCS 180 (CA) |
harassment |
|
Jones v Sherwood Computer Services plc |
[1992] 2 All ER 170, [1992] 1 WLR 277 (CA) |
expert |
|
Jordeson v Sutton Southcoates and Drypool Gas Company |
[1899] 2 Ch 217 (CA) |
right of support or right to support |
|
Joyce v Rigolli |
[2004] 1 P & CR DG22 |
writing |
|
Joyner v Weeks |
[1881] 2 QB 31 |
schedule of dilapidations(BrE) |
|
K/S Lincoln v CB Richard Ellis Hotels Ltd |
[2010] EWHC 1156, [2010] All ER (D) 138 |
professional negligence |
|
K/S Victoria Street v House of Fraser (Stores Management) Limited |
[2011] EWCA 330, 32 EG 56 (CA) |
authorised guarantee agreement (AGA)(Eng) |
|
Kammins Ballrooms Co Ltd v Zenith Investments (Torquay) Ltd |
[1971] AC 850, 873, 883, [1970] 2 All ER 871, 886, 894 (HL) |
waiver |
|
Kaye v Lawrence |
[2011] 1 All ER 1088, [2011] EG 66 |
party wall |
|
Kaye v Massbetter Ltd |
(1990) 62 P & CR 558, [1991] 39 EG 129 |
company letting(Eng) |
|
Keen v Mear |
[1920] 2 Ch 579 |
estate agent(BrE) |
|
Keeves v Dean |
[1924] 1 KB 685, 686 (CA) |
statutory tenancy(Eng) |
|
Keighley, Maxsted and Co v Durant |
[1901] AC 240 (HL) |
undisclosed principal |
|
Keighley, Maxsted and Co v Durant |
[1901] AC 240 (HL) |
ratification |
|
Kelley v Battershell |
[1949] 2 All ER 830 |
letting scheme |
|
Kelly v Rodgers |
[1892] 1 QB 910 |
quiet enjoyment |
|
Kelsen v Imperial Tobacco Co Ltd |
[1957] 2 QB 334, [1957] 2 All ER 343 |
air rights |
|
Kelsen v Imperial Tobacco Co Ltd |
[1957] 2 QB 334, [1957] 2 All ER 343 |
trespass |
|
Kemp v Ballachulish Estate Co Ltd |
(1933) SC 478, 488 |
agricultural holding(Eng) |
|
Kendal v Micfield |
(1740) Barn C 46, 47-8, 27 Eng Rep 549 |
habendum |
|
Kendall v Hamilton |
(1879) 4 App Cas 504 (HL) |
election |
|
Kenney v Wexham |
(1822) 6 Madd 355, 357, 56 ER 1126, 1127 |
specific performance |
|
Kenny v Preen |
[1963] 1 QB 499, [1962] 3 All ER 814 (CA) |
quiet enjoyment |
|
Kenny v Preen |
[1963] 1 QB 499, 511 (CA) |
enjoyment |
|
Kent County Council v Secretary of State for the Environment and Canterbury City Council |
[1995] JPL 610 |
conservation area(Eng) |
|
Kenyon Stevenson v Kenyon |
[1946] 2 All ER 595 |
living room |
|
Keppel v Wheeler |
[1927] 1 KB 577, 584 (CA) |
subject to contract |
|
Keppel v Wheeler |
[1927] 1 KB 577, 586 (CA) |
estate agent(BrE) |
|
Keppel v Wheeler |
[1927] 1 KB 577 (CA) |
commission |
|
Keppell v Bailey |
(1834) 2 My & K 517, 537, 39 Eng Rep 1042, 1046 |
covenant running with the land |
|
Keppell v Bailey |
(1834) 2 My & K 517, 537, 39 Eng Rep 1042, 1046 |
jus spatiandi(Lat) |
|
Keppell v Bailey |
(1834) 2 My & K 517, 535, 39 Eng Rep 1042, 1049 |
numerus clausus(Lat) |
|
Kerkslake v White |
(1819) 2 Stark 509, 171 Eng Rep 719, 720) |
messuage |
|
Kilmartin SCI (Hulton House) Ltd v Safeway Stores plc |
[2006] EWHC 60, [2006] 09 EG 184 |
usable area |
|
King v Travellers' Insurance Association Ltd |
[1931] 48 TLR 53 |
ejusdem generis(Lat) |
|
King v Wilson |
(1843) 6 Beav 124, 126, 49 Eng Rep 772 |
time is of the essence |
|
King's Motors (Oxford) Ltd v Lax |
[1969] 3 All ER 665 |
option |
|
King's Motors (Oxford) Ltd v Lax |
[1969] 3 All ER 665 |
price |
|
Kingsbury v Collins & Elmes |
(1827) 4 Bing 202, 130 Eng Rep 746 |
emblements |
|
Kingsnorth Finance Co Ltd v Tizard |
[1986] 2 All ER 54, [1986] 1 WLR 783 |
imputed notice |
|
Kingsnorth Finance Co Ltd v Tizard |
[1986] 2 All ER 54, [1986] 1 WLR 783 |
occupation |
|
Kingston v Ambrian Investment Co |
[1975] 1 All ER 120, 125 (CA) |
escrow |
|
Kingston-upon-Hull Corporation v Clayton |
[1963] AC 28 (HL) |
rateable occupation(Eng) |
|
Kingsway Investments Ltd v Kent County Council |
[1969] 2 QB 332, 349 (CA) |
planning permission(Eng) |
|
Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corp |
(1989) 43 BLR 40, 48, [1989] 1 WLR 379, 391 (CA) |
letter of comfort |
|
Kling v Keston Properties Ltd |
(1983) 49 P & CR 212, 215 |
interest |
|
Kling v Keston Properties Ltd |
(1983) 49 P & CR 212, 215 |
right of pre-emption |
|
Knight Sugar Co Ltdv Alberta Ry and Irrigation Co |
[1938] 1 All 266, 269 (PC) |
merger |
|
Knightsbridge Estates Trust Ltd v Byrne |
[1939] Ch 441, [1938] 4 All ER 618, 626 (CA), aff'd [1940] AC 613, [1940] 2 All ER 401 (HL) |
usury |
|
Knightsbridge Estates Trust Ltd v Byrne |
[1939] Ch 441, 455, 457, [1938] 2 All ER 444, 455, 457 when interest rate fixed (CA), aff'd [1940] AC 613, [1940] 2 All ER 401 (HL) |
equity of redemption |
|
Knightsbridge Estates Trust Ltd v Byrne |
[1939] Ch 441, 457 [1938] 4 All ER 618, 626 (CA), aff'd [1940] AC 613, [1940] 2 All ER 401 (HL) |
unconscionable bargain |
|
Koufos v Czarnikow, The Heron II |
[1969] 1 AC 350, [1967] 3 All ER 686 (HL) |
damages |
|
Kreglinger v New Patagonia Meat and Cold Storage Co Ltd |
[1914] AC 25 (HL) |
equity of redemption |
|
Kreglinger v New Patagonia Meat and Cold Storage Co Ltd |
[1914] AC 25, 53, 61 (HL) |
once a mortgage, always a mortgage |
|
Krell v Henry |
[1903] 2 KB 740 (CA) |
frustration |
|
Kruse v Johnson |
[1898] 2 QB 91, 96 |
bylaw or by-law |
|
Kurtz and Co v Spence and Sons |
(1887) 57 LJ Ch 238, 241 |
without prejudice |
Top
|
Lace v Chandler |
[1944] KB 368, 370 (CA) |
term |
Top
|
Ladies Hosiery and Underwear v Parker |
[1930] 1 Ch 304 |
week-to-week tenancy(AmE) or weekly tenancy(BrE) |
|
Ladyman v Wirral Estates Ltd |
[1968] 2 All ER 197, 19 P & CR 781 |
time |
|
Laing (John) and Sons Ltd v Assessment Committee for Kingswood Assessment Area |
[1949] 1 KB 344, 350 (CA) |
rateable occupation(Eng) |
|
Laiqat v Majid |
[2005] EWHC 1305, [2005] 26 EG 130 |
trespass |
|
Lake v Bayliss |
[1974] 1 WLR 1073, 1076D-E, 2 All ER 1114 |
constructive trust |
|
Lake v Bennet |
[1970] 1 QB 663 (CA) |
house |
|
Lake v Craddock |
(1732) 3 P Wms 158, 159, 24 Eng Rep 1011 |
tenancy in common |
|
Lake v Craddock |
(1732) 3 P Wms 158, 160, 24 Eng Rep 1011 |
partnership |
|
Lake v Dean |
(1860) 28 Beav 607, 54 Eng Rep 499 |
possession |
|
Lake v Dean |
(1860) 28 Beav 607, 54 Eng Rep 499 |
taking possession |
|
Lakeman v Mountstephen |
(1874) LR 7 HL 17, 23 (HL) |
guarantee or guaranty |
|
Lamb v Boyden |
[1961] CLY 4906) |
year capped |
|
Lambe v Secretary of State for War |
[1955] 2 QB 612 (CA) |
special suitability or adaptability(Eng) |
|
Lambe v Secretary of State for War |
[1955] 2 QB 612 (CA) |
compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) |
|
Lambert v Barratt Homes Ltd [Manchester Division] |
[2011] HLR 1, [2010] EG 72, 75 (CA) |
encroachment or incroachment |
|
Lambert v Barratt Homes Ltd [Manchester Division] |
[2011] HLR 1, [2010] EG 72, 75 (CA) |
nuisance |
|
Lampleigh v Braithwait |
(1615) Hob 105, 80 Eng Rep 255 |
consideration |
|
Lampson v City of Quebec |
[1921] 1 AC 294, 295 (PC) |
emphyteotic lease |
|
Land Reclamation Co Ltd v Basildon DC |
[1978] 2 All ER 1162, 1166-7, aff'd [1979] 2 All ER 993 (CA) |
use and occupation |
|
Land Reclamation Co Ltd v Basildon DC |
[1979] 3 WLR 767, [1979] 2 All ER 993 |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Landcaster and Cheshire Telephone Exchange Co v Manchester Overssers |
(1884) 14 QBD 267 |
wayleave |
|
Landeau v Marchbank |
[1949] 2 All ER 172 |
damages |
|
Lane (W. J.) v Spratt |
[1970] 2 QB 486-7 |
warranty |
|
Langford Property CoLtd v Tureman |
[1949] 1 KB 29 (CA) |
residence |
|
Langham House Developments Ltd v Brompton Securities Ltd |
(1980) 256 EG 719 |
expert |
|
Lanoy v Athol |
(1742) 2 Atk 444, 446, 26 Eng Rep 668, 669 |
marshalling |
|
Lanphier v Phipos |
[1838] 8 Car & P 475, 479, 173 Eng Rep 581, 583 [1835-42] All ER Rep 421, 422 |
professional negligence |
|
Latham v Johnson (Richard) and Nephew Ltd |
[1913] 1 KB 398, 416 (CA) |
trespass |
|
Latimer v Garney |
[2006] EWCA Civ, [2006] 50 EG 86 |
damages |
|
Law v Jones |
[1974] Ch 112, [1973] 2 All ER 437 (CA) |
subject to contract |
|
Law v Redditch Local Board |
[1892] 1 QB 132 |
liquidated damages |
|
Lawntown Limited v Camenzuli |
[2007] 1 WLR 2656, [2008] 1 All ER 446 (CA) |
restrictive covenant |
|
Lawton v Lawton |
(1743) 3 Atk 13 |
trade fixture |
|
Leakey v National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or National Beauty |
[1980] QB 485, 524 (CA) |
encroachment or incroachment |
|
Leakey v National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or National Beauty |
[1980] QB 485 (CA) |
nuisance |
|
Leakey v National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or National Beauty |
[1980] QB 485 (CA) |
right of support or right to support |
|
Lebeaupin v Richard Crispin & Co |
[1920] 2 KB 714, 719 |
force majeure(Civ) |
|
Lee v Barrey |
[1957] 1 All ER 191 |
boundary |
|
Lee v Ministry of Transport |
[1966] 1 QB 111, [1965] 2 All ER 986 (CA) |
compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) |
|
Lee-Parker v Izzet |
[1971] 1 WLR 1688 |
set-off or setoff |
|
Lee-Parker v Izzet (No. 2) |
[1972] 1 WLR 775, [1972] 2 All ER 800 |
conditional contract |
|
Lee-Parker v Izzet (No. 2) |
[1972] 1 WLR 775, [1972] 2 All ER 800 |
subject to finance or subject to financing |
|
Lee-Verhulst (Investments) Ltd v Harwood Trust |
[1973] 1 QB 204 (CA) |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Lee-Verhulst (Investments) Ltd v Harwood Trust |
[1973] 1 QB 204 (CA) |
occupation |
|
Legal & General Assurance Society v Expeditors International (UK) Ltd |
[2006] EWHC 1008 (Ch), [2007] 2 P & CR 10 (CA) |
vacant possession |
|
Leicester (Earl of) v Wells-next-the-Sea UDC |
[1973] Ch 110, 119) |
incorporeal hereditament |
|
Leicester City Council v Leicestershire County Council |
(1995) 70 P & CR 435) |
set-off or setoff |
|
Leigh v Dickeson |
(1884-85) 15 QBD 60, 65 |
tenancy in common |
|
Lemmon v Webb |
[1895] AC 1 (HL) |
tree |
|
Lemmon v Webb |
[1894] 3 Ch 1, 11, 24 (CA) |
tree |
|
Lemon v Lardeur |
[1946] KB 613 (CA) |
time |
|
Lennon v Napper |
(1802) 2 Sch & L 684 |
time is of the essence |
|
Leonora Investments Co Ltd v Mott McDonald Ltd |
[2008] EWCA Civ 857, [2008] PLSCS 217 (CA) |
service charge |
|
Leschallas v Woolf |
[1908] 1 Ch 641 |
trade fixture |
|
Lever Brothers, Limited v Bell |
[1931] 1 KB 557, 564 (CA) |
mistake |
|
Lewin v End |
[1906] AC 299, 304 (HL) |
dwelling house or dwelling-house |
|
Lewis (Jenkin R) & Sons Ltd v Kerman |
[1971] Ch 477, 496, [1970] 3 All ER 414, 419 (CA) |
surrender |
|
Lewis Bowles Case |
(1615) 11 Co Rep 79b |
waste |
|
Lewis v Baker |
[1905] 1 Ch 46 |
lease |
|
Lewis v Mid Glamorgan CC |
[1995] 1 All ER 760, 776 (HL) |
waste land |
|
Lewis v South Western Ry |
(1852) 22 LJ Ch 209 |
completion |
|
Lewis v Stephenson |
(1898) 67 LJ QB 296 |
option to renew |
|
Lewis v Weldcrest |
[1978] 1 WLR 1107, [1978] 3 All ER 1226 (CA) |
business premises |
|
Lewis v Weldcrest |
[1978] 1 WLR 1107, [1978] 3 All ER 1226 (CA) |
business |
|
Liford's Case |
(1614) 11 Co Rep 46b, 77 Eng Rep 1206, 1215 |
mill |
|
Liggins v Inge |
(1831) 7 Bing 682, 131 Eng Rep 263 |
water rights |
|
Lim Teng Huan v Ang Swee Chuan |
[1992] 1 WLR 113, 117 (PC) |
estoppel |
|
Linden Gardens Trust Ltd v Lenesta Sludge Disposals Ltd |
[1994] 1 AC 85, 108 (HL) |
lease |
|
Lindenau v Desborough |
(1828) 8 B & C 586, 592, 108 Eng Rep 1160 |
utmost good faith |
|
Lindsay Petroleum Co v Hurd |
(1874) LR 5 PC 221, 239, 240 (PC) |
laches |
|
Line v Stephenson |
(1838) 5 Bing NC 678, 132 Eng Rep 950 |
demise |
|
Link Lending Ltd v Bustard |
[2010] EWCA Civ 424, [2010] 28 EG 86, 88 (CA) |
occupation |
|
Link Lending Ltd v Hussein |
[2010] WLR (D) 424, [2010] 18 EG 98 (CA) |
occupation |
|
Lister v Lane and Nesham |
[1893] 2 QB 212 (CA) |
repair |
|
Lister v Pickford |
(1865) 3 Beav 576, 580, 55 Eng Rep 757 |
appurtenance |
|
Little v Courage Ltd |
(1995) 70 P & CR 469 |
reasonable effort or reasonable endeavour |
|
Littlewood etc. Stores v I.R.C |
[1961] 3 All ER 259, 264 (CA) |
convertible security |
|
Littlewoods Mail Order Stores Ltd v Inland Revenue Cmrs |
[1963] AC 135 [1962] 2 WLR 1228 (PC) |
excambion(Scot) |
|
Liverpool City Council v Irwin |
[1977] AC 239, [1976] 2 All ER 39 (HL) |
duty of care |
|
Liverpool City Council v Irwin |
[1977] AC 239, [1976] 2 All ER 39 (HL) |
implied covenant |
|
Liverpool City Council v Irwin |
[1977] AC 239, [1976] 2 All ER 39 (HL) |
repair |
|
Llewellyn v Earl of Jersey |
(1843) 11 M & W 183, 189, 152 Eng Rep 767 |
falsa demonstratio non nocet cum de corpore constat(Lat) |
|
Lloyd v Banks |
(1868) 37 LJ Ch 882 |
actual notice |
|
Lloyd v Grace, Smith & Co |
[1912] AC 716 (HL) |
vicarious liability |
|
Lloyd v Jones |
(1848) 6 CB 81, 90, 136 Eng Rep 1182 |
hereditament |
|
Lloyd v Nowell |
(1895) 2 Ch 744 |
waiver |
|
Lloyd v Sadler |
[1978] 1 QB 774, 783B/D |
tenant |
|
Lloyd v Stanbury |
[1971 2 All ER 267, 275 |
damages |
|
Lloyd v Sutcliffe |
[2007] EWCA Civ 153, [2007] 22 EG 162 (CA) |
estoppel |
|
Lloyd v Sutcliffe |
[2007] EWCA Civ 153, [2007] 22 EG 162, 166 (CA) |
entire agreement clause (EAC) |
|
Lloyds Bank Ltd v Bundy |
[1975] QB 326, [1974] 3 All ER 757, 767 (CA) |
undue influence |
|
Lloyds Bank plc v Hawkins |
[1998] 47 EG 137 |
all monies mortgage |
|
Lloyds Bank plc v Rosset |
[1991] 1 AC 107, [1990] 1 All ER 1111 (HL) |
overriding interest(Eng) |
|
Lloyds Bank plc v Rosset |
[1991] 1 AC 107, [1990] 1 All ER 1111 (HL) |
constructive trust |
|
Lock v Bell |
[1931] 1 Ch 35 |
time is of the essence |
|
Lockhart v Hardy |
(1846) 9 Beav 379, 50 Eng Rep 389 |
recourse |
|
Lockwood v Wood |
(1844) 6 QB 50, 64 |
customary right(Eng) |
|
London & Blenheim Estates Ltd v Ladbroke Retail Parkes Ltd |
[1992] 1 WLR 1278 |
easement |
|
London & Blenheim Estates Ltd v Ladbroke Retail Parkes Ltd |
[1992] 1 WLR 1278 |
easement |
|
London & Suburban Land and Building Co. (Holdings) Ltd v Carey |
(1991) 62 P & CR 480 |
deferment rate(BrE) |
|
London (City of) v Greyme |
(1607) Cro Jac 181, 79 Eng Rep 158 |
waste |
|
London (City of) v Nash |
(1747) 3 Atk 512, 26 Eng Rep 1095) |
rebuild |
|
London and Cheshire Insurance Co Ltd v Laplagrene Property Co Ltd |
[1971] Ch 499 |
overriding interest(Eng) |
|
London and Cheshire Insurance Co Ltd v Laplagrene Property Co Ltd |
[1971] Ch 499, 514C-D |
constructive trust |
|
London and County (A. & D.) Ltd v Wilfred SportsmanLtd |
[1971] Ch 764 |
concurrent lease |
|
London and Harrogate Securities Ltd v Pitts [ |
1976] 3 All ER 809, 814-5 |
per cent or percent |
|
London and South Western Rly Co v Gomm |
(1882) 20 Ch D 562 |
rule against perpetuities (RAP) |
|
London Corporation v Riggs |
(1880) 13 Ch D 798 |
easement of necessity |
|
London County Council v Allen |
[1914] 3 KB 642 |
restrictive covenant |
|
London County Council v Marks and Spencer |
[1953] AC 535 (HL) |
building operations(Eng) |
|
London Diocesan Fund v Phithwa |
[2005] 1 WLR 3956, [2006] 05 EG 97 (HL) |
privity of contract |
|
London Regional Transport v Imperial Group Pension Trust Ltd |
(1987) 284 EG 1593 |
notice to treat(Eng) |
|
London Tara Hotel Ltd v Kensington Close Hotel Ltd |
[2011] EWCA Civ 1356, [2011] 48 EG 86 (CA) |
as of right |
|
London Tara Hotel Ltd v Kensington Close Hotel Ltd |
[2011] EWCA Civ 1356, [2011] 48 EG 86 (CA) |
implied licence |
|
Longbottom v Berry |
(1869) LR 5 QB 137 |
fixture |
|
Longman v Viscount Chelsea |
(1989) 2 EGLR 242 |
delivery |
|
Lord Chichester v Coventry |
(1867) 36 LJ Ch 673, 685 (HL) |
satisfaction |
|
Lord v Colvin |
(1859) 28 LJ Ch 366 |
domicile |
|
Lory v London Borough of Brent |
[1971] 1 WLR 823, [1971] 1 All ER 1042 |
grazing licence(Eng) |
|
Lory v London Borough of Brent |
[1971] 1 WLR 823, 827, [1971] 1 All ER 1042, 1046 |
good husbandry(Eng) |
|
Lott v Outhwaite |
(1803) 10 TLR 76) |
quantum meruit(Lat) |
|
Lotus Ltd v British Soda Co Ltd |
[1972] Ch 123) |
right of support or right to support |
|
Lovell and Christmas Ltd v Wall |
[1911] 104 LTNS 88, 93 |
rectification |
|
Lowe (Inspector of Taxes) v J.W. Ashmore Ltd |
[1971] 1 All ER 1057, 1068 |
profit à prendre |
|
Lowe v Mack |
(1905) 92 LTNS 349, 350 |
valuer |
|
Lower v Sorrell |
[1963] 1 QB 959, 975, [1962] 3 All ER 1074, 1083 (CA) |
notice to quit |
|
LTSS Print and Supply Ltd v Hackney LBC |
[1976] QB 663 (CA) |
planning permission(Eng) |
|
Lucena v Craufurd |
(1806) 2 Bos & PNR 269, 301, 127 Eng Rep 630, 642 (HL) |
insurance |
|
Lucena v Craufurd |
(1806) 2 Bos & PNR 269, 322-3, 127 Eng Rep 630, 643 (HL) |
insurable interest |
|
Luganda v Service Hotels Ltd |
[1969] 2 Ch 209, 219, [1969] 2 All ER 692, 695 (CA) |
exclusive occupation |
|
Luganda v Service Hotels Ltd |
[1969] 2 Ch 209, [1969] 2 All ER 692 (CA) |
dwelling house or dwelling-house |
|
Luganda v Service Hotels Ltd |
[1969] 2 Ch 209 [1969] 2 All ER 692 (CA) |
residence |
|
Lunn Poly Ltd v Liverpool & Lancashire Properties Ltd |
[2006] EG 210, (2007) L &TR 6 (CA) |
damages |
|
Lurcott v Wakeley |
[1911] 1 KB 905, 923 (CA) |
repair |
|
Luxor (Eastbourne) Ltd v Cooper |
[1941] AC 108, 137 (HL) |
implied term or implied condition |
|
Luxor (Eastbourne) Ltd v Cooper |
[1941] AC 108, 141 (HL) |
quantum meruit(Lat) |
|
Luxor (Eastbourne) Ltd v Cooper |
[1941] AC 108, 142 (HL) |
sale |
|
Luxor (Eastbourne) Ltd v Cooper |
[1941] AC 108, 142 (HL) obiter |
commission |
|
Luxor (Eastbourne) Ltd v Cooper |
[1941] AC 108, 129 (HL) |
ready, able and willing or ready, willing and able |
|
Lynall v IRC |
(1972) AC 680 (HL) |
open market |
|
Lynch v Dalzell |
(1729) 4 Bro PC 431, 2 Eng Rep 292 (HL) |
insurable interest |
|
Lynch v Thorne |
[1956] 1 WLR 303, [1956] 1 All ER 744 (CA) |
implied term or implied condition |
|
Lyon & Co v London City & Midland Bank |
[1903] 2 KB 135, 139 |
fixture |
|
Lyon v Fishmongers' Co |
(1876) App Cas 662 (HL) |
riparian rights |
|
Lyon v Greenhow |
(1892) 8 TLR 457 |
tax |
|
Lyon v Reed |
(1844) 13 M & W 285, 305-8, 153 Eng Rep 118 |
surrender |
|
Lyons v Central Commercial Properties Ltd |
[1958] 2 All ER 767, [1958] 1 WLR 869 (CA) |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Lysaght v Edwards |
(1876) 2 Ch D 499, 506 |
contract for sale |
|
Lysaght v Edwards |
(1876) 2 Ch D 499, 506 |
constructive trust |
|
Lyus v Prowsa Developments Ltd |
[1982] 1 WLR 1044 |
constructive trust |
Top
|
M.E.P.C. Ltd. v. Christian-Edwards |
[1981] AC 205 |
good title |
|
M'Alister (Donaghue) v Stevenson |
[1932] AC 562, 580 (HL) |
duty of care |
|
M'Alister (Donaghue) v Stevenson |
[1932] AC 562, 580 (HL) |
neighbor(AmE) or neighbour(BrE) |
|
Mackenzie v Duke of Devonshire |
[1896] AC 400, 408 (HL) |
recital |
|
Macnab v Richardson |
[2008] EWCA Civ 163, [2009] 35 EG 108, 112 (CA) |
self-help |
|
Maddison v Alderson |
(1883) 8 App Cas 485 (HL) |
part performance |
|
Madrassa Anjuman Islamia of Kholwad v Municipal Council of Johannesburg |
[1922] 1 AC 500, 504 (PC) |
occupation |
|
Magnohard Ltd v Cadogan Estates Ltd |
[2012] EWCA Civ 594 (CA) |
house |
|
Majorstake Ltd v Curtis |
[2008] UKHL 10, [2008] 14 EG 102 (HL) |
leasehold enfranchisement(Eng) |
|
Majorstake Ltd v Curtis |
[2008] UKHL 10, [2008] 14 EG 102 (HL) |
premises |
|
Malayan Credit Ltd v Jack Chia-MPH Ltd |
[1986] AC 549, 560 (PC) |
tenancy in common |
|
Malcomson v O'Dea |
(1863) 10 HL Cas 593, 11 Eng Rep 1155 (HL) |
riparian rights |
|
Malekshad v Howard de Walden Estates Ltd |
[2003] 1 AC 1013, 1027 (HL) |
house |
|
Malekshad v Howard de Walden Estates Ltd |
[2003] 1 AC 1013, 1027 (HL) |
leasehold enfranchisement(Eng) |
|
Mallick v Liverpool City Council |
[1999] 33 EG 77, 80 (CA) |
compensation for disturbance(Eng) |
|
Malone v Laskey |
[1907] 2 KB 141, 151 (CA) |
nuisance |
|
Manchester City Council v Pinnock |
[2010] UKSC 45, [2010] 3 WLR 1441 (SC) |
demoted tenancy(Eng) |
|
Manchester Corporation v The Countess Ossalinsky |
(1883) QBD unreported |
compensation for disturbance(Eng) |
|
Manchester Diocesan Council for Education v Commercial and General Investments Ltd |
[1969] 3 All ER 1593 |
offer |
|
Manchester Ship Canal Co v Manchester Racecourse Co |
[1900] 2 Ch 352 |
right of first refusal |
|
Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Ry v Anderson |
[1958] 2 Ch 394 |
quiet enjoyment |
|
Manjang v Drammeh |
(1990) 61 P & CR 194, 197 (PC) |
easement of necessity |
|
Mannai Investments Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd |
[1997] AC 749, [1997] 2 WLR 945 (HL) |
literal construction or literal meaning |
|
Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Insurance Co Ltd |
[1997] AC 749, 780 [1997] 2 WLR 945, 975 (HL) |
notice |
|
Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Insurance Co Ltd |
[1997] AC 749, [1997] 2 WLR 945 (HL) |
time is of the essence |
|
Mansi v Elstree RDC |
[1965] JPL 596, (1964) 16 P & CR 153 |
enforcement notice |
|
Marchant v Chartes |
[1977] 1 WLR 1181, [1977] 3 All ER 918 (CA) |
exclusive possession |
|
Marchant v Chartes |
[1977] 1 WLR 1182, 1185, [1977] 3 All ER 918, 922 (CA) |
lease |
|
Marchday Group plc v British Telecommunications plc |
[2003] EWHC 2627 |
damages |
|
Marchday Group plc v British Telecommunications plc |
[2003] EWHC 2627 |
dilapidations |
|
Marcroft Wagons Ltd v Smith |
[1951] 2 KB 496, 501 (CA) |
statutory tenancy(Eng) |
|
Maredelanto Camania Naviera SA v Bergbau-Handel Gmbh, The Mihalis Angelos |
[1971] 1 QB 164, 196, [1970] 3 All ER 125, 131 (CA) |
breach of contract |
|
Mareva Compania Naviera SA of Panama v International Bulk Carriers SA |
[1975] 2 Lloyd's Rep 509 (CA) |
Mareva injunction(Eng) |
|
Mark Rowlands Ltd v Berni Inns |
[1986] QB 211, 225-8 |
named insured |
|
Markham v Paget |
[1908] 1 Ch 697 |
demise |
|
Marks and Spencer Ltd v Chandler (V.O.) |
(1959) R & IT 639 |
quantity allowance(BrE) |
|
Marks and Spencer v Collier (V.O.) |
[1966] RA 107, 122 (LT) |
zoning method(BrE) |
|
Marks and Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd |
[2013] EWHC 1279 |
break clause |
|
Marks v Board |
(1830) 46 TLR 424 |
subject to survey |
|
Marks v Warren |
[1979] 1 All ER 29, 31 |
assignment |
|
Marks v Warren |
[1979] 1 All ER 29, 31 |
sublease or sub-lease |
|
Marlborough Park Services Ltd v Rowe |
[2006] EWCA Civ 436, [2006] 23 EG 166 (CA) |
structural repair |
|
Marquess of Devonshire v O'Brien |
(1887) 19 LR Ir 390 |
market |
|
Marsden v Edward Heyes Ltd |
[1927] 2 KB 1 (CA) |
implied covenant |
|
Marsden v Edward Heyes Ltd |
[1927] 2 KB 1 (CA) |
improvement |
|
Marsden v Edward Heyes Ltd |
[1927] 2 KB 1 (CA) |
repair |
|
Marsh v Curteys |
(1596) Cro Eliz 528, 78 Eng 775 |
waiver |
|
Marsh Ltd v Cooper |
[1969] 1 WLR 803, [1969] 2 All ER 498, 500 (CA) |
living room |
|
Marsh Ltd v Cooper |
[1969] 1 WLR 803, [1969] 2 All ER 498, 500 (CA) |
assured tenancy(Eng) |
|
Marshall v Green |
(1875) 1 CPD 40 |
fructus(Lat) |
|
Martin Grant & Co Ltd v Sir Lindsay Parkinson & Co Ltd |
(1985) 3 Con LR 12 (CA) |
implied term or implied condition |
|
Martyn v Clue |
(1852) 18 QB 661 |
covenant running with the land |
|
Martyn v Williams |
(1857) 1 Hurl & N 817, 827, 156 Eng 1430 |
tenement |
|
Mary Portington's Case |
(1613) 10 Co Rep 35b, 41b, 42a, 77 Eng Rep 976 |
conditional fee simple(Eng) |
|
Mary Portington's Case |
(1613) 10 Co Rep 35b, 42a, 77 Eng Rep 976 |
fee simple conditional |
|
Maryland Estates v Abbathure Flat Management Co Ltd |
[1999] 06 EG 177 |
marriage value (MV)(Eng) |
|
Maryland Estates v Joseph |
[1998] 1 WLR 83 |
rent in advance or rent in arrears |
|
Mason v Armitage |
(1800) 13 Ves Jun 25, 33 Eng Rep 204 |
chilling a sale |
|
Mason v Clarke |
[1954] 1 All ER 189, 191 (CA) |
reservation |
|
Mason v Hill |
(1833) 5 B & Ad 1, 110 Eng Rep 692 |
water rights |
|
Mason v TotalFinaElf UK Ltd |
[2003] 3 EGLR 19, [17]-[23] |
repair |
|
Mason v TotalFinaElf UK Ltd |
[2003] 3 EGLR 19 |
repairs notice(Eng) |
|
Masters and Great Western Railway Co, Re |
[1900] 2 QB 687 |
injurious affection |
|
Matsoukis v Priestman & Co |
[1915] 1 KB 681 |
force majeure(Civ) |
|
Mattey Securities Ltd v Ervin |
[1998] 34 EG 91 (CA) |
surrender |
|
Matthews v Goodday |
(1861) 31 LJ Ch 282, 282-3 |
equitable charge |
|
Matthews v Smallwood |
[1910] 1 Ch 777, 784 |
reddendum |
|
Matthews v Smallwood |
[1910] 1 Ch 777, 786 |
waiver |
|
Matthey v Curling |
[1922] 2 AC 180, 200 (HL) |
eviction |
|
Maunsell v Olins |
[1975] AC 373, 383, 386, 392 (HL) |
premises |
|
May and Butcher Ltd v R |
[1934] 2 KB 17, [1929] All ER Rep 679 (CA) |
conditional contract |
|
Mayflower Cambridge Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment |
(1975) 30 P & CR 28, 31-2 |
hotel |
|
Mayho v Buckhurst |
(1617) Cro Jac 438, 79 Eng Rep 374 |
covenant running with the land |
|
Mayor, etc. of Southend-on-Sea v White |
(1900) 65 JP 7 |
rateable occupation(Eng) |
|
Mayson v Clouet |
[1924] AC 980 (PC) |
deposit |
|
McAusley v Bristol City Council |
[1992] QB 134, [1991] 45 EG 155 |
duty of care |
|
McCall v Abelesz |
[1976] QB 585, 594E (CA) |
quiet enjoyment |
|
McCallum v Hicks |
[1950] 2 KB 271 (CA) |
ready, able and willing or ready, willing and able |
|
McCann & Co (John) v Pow |
[1975] 1 All ER 129 (CA) |
subagent or sub-agent |
|
McCarthy v Metropolitan Board of Works |
(1872) LR 8 CP 191, 208, aff'd (1874) LR 7 HL 243 (HL) |
injurious affection |
|
McCartney v Londonderry and Lough Swilly Ry Co |
[1904] AC 301, 306-7 (HL) |
water rights |
|
McCausland v Duncan Lawrie |
[1997] 1 WLR 38, [1996] 4 All ER 995 (CA) |
writing |
|
McClinton v McFall |
(1974) 232 EG 707 |
agricultural land |
|
McCombie v Grand Junction Co Ltd |
[1962] 1 WLR 581, [1962] 2 All ER 65, Note (CA) |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
McDermott v Department of Transport |
(1984) 48 P & CR 351 |
blight notice(Eng) |
|
McDonald v Fernandez |
[2003] EWCA Civ 1219, [2003] 42 EG 128 (CA) |
notice |
|
McDonald's Property Co Ltd v HSBC Bank plc |
[2001] 36 EG 181, 185 |
time is of the essence |
|
McEllistrim v Ballymacelligott Co-operative Agricultural and Dairy Society |
[1919] AC 548, 562 (HL) |
non-competition clause |
|
McEllistrim v Ballymacelligott Co-operative Agricultural and Dairy Society |
[1919] AC 548, 562 (HL) |
restrictive covenant |
|
McHale v Earl of Cadogan |
[2011] 1 P & CR 14 [2010] EG 75 (CA) |
marriage value (MV)(BrE) |
|
McIlkenny v Chief Constable of the West Midlands |
[1980] 2 All ER 227, 235 |
estoppel |
|
McInnes v Clarke |
[1955] 1 All ER 346 |
accommodation agent(Eng) |
|
McKaskie v Cameron |
Blackpool County Court, 1 July 2009 |
strict liability |
|
McKenzie v McKenzie |
[2003] EWHC 601 |
joint tenancy |
|
McLaughlin v Duffill |
[2009] EWCA Civ 1627, [2009] 34 EG 80 (CA) |
writing |
|
McManus v Cooke |
(1887) 35 Ch D 681 |
equitable easement(Eng) |
|
McManus v Cooke |
(1887) 35 Ch D 681 |
part performance |
|
McManus v Fortescue |
[1907] 2 KB 1, 6 (CA) |
reserve price(BrE) or reserved price(AmE) |
|
McNerny v Lambeth London Borough Council |
[1989] 19 EG 77, Caf |
furnished tenancy(Eng) |
|
McPhail v persons, names unknown, Bristol Corporation v Ross and another |
[1973] 3 All ER 393, 395 (CA) |
squatter |
|
McPhail v Philips |
[1904] 1 IR 155, 159 |
effects |
|
Medford v Blake |
[2000] Ch 86, 102F-H (CA) |
receiver |
|
Medforth v Blake |
[1999] 29 EG 119, 124 (CA) |
power of sale |
|
Medforth v Blake |
[1999] 29 EG 119, 126 (CA) |
receiver |
|
Mellor v Walmesley |
[1905] 2 Ch 164 |
foreshore |
|
Mellor v Watkins |
(1874) LR 9 QB 400 |
sublessee or sub-lessee |
|
MEPC Ltd v Christian Edwards |
[1979] 3 WLR 713, 720 |
good title |
|
Mercantile Marine Insurance Co v Titherington |
(1864) 5 B & S 765, 767, 122 Eng Rep 1015 |
day |
|
Mercer v Denne |
[1904] 2 Ch 534 |
customary right(Eng) |
|
Mercer v Liverpool, St Helens and South Lancashire Rail Co |
[1904] AC 461 (HL) |
notice to treat(Eng) |
|
Mercury Communications Ltd v Director General of Telecommunications |
[1996] 1 WLR 48, [1996] 1 All ER 575 (HL) |
expert |
|
Merivale Moore plc v Strutt & Parker |
[1999] 2 EGLR 171, [2000] PNLR 498, (CA) |
valuer |
|
Merivale Moore plc v Strutt & Parker |
[1999] 2 EGLR 171, [2000] PNLR 498, 515-6 (CA) |
professional negligence |
|
Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Liverpool Overseers |
(1873) LR 9 QB 84, 97 |
profits method of valuation(BrE) |
|
Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Proctor |
[1923] AC 253 (HL) |
invitee |
|
Methuen-Campbell v Walters |
[1979] 247 EG 899, [1979] 1 All ER 606 (CA) |
curtilage |
|
Methuen-Campbell v Walters |
[1979] 247 EG 899, [1979] 1 All ER 606, 621 (CA) |
house |
|
Metropolitan Board of Works v McCarthy |
(1874) 43 LJCP 390 |
compensation for injurious affection(Eng) |
|
Metropolitan Police District Receiver v Palacegate Properties Ltd |
[2000] EWCA Civ 3, (2000) 13 EG 187 (CA) |
contracted-out tenancy(Eng) |
|
Metropolitan Property Holdings v Finegold |
[1975] 1 WLR 349; |
fair rent |
|
Metropolitan Water Board v Paine |
[1907] 1 KB 285, 291 |
premises |
|
Meux v Cobley |
[1892] 2 Ch 253, 263 |
waste |
|
Meux v Cobley |
[1892] 2 Ch 253, 262 |
waste |
|
Michael v Miller |
[2004] EWCA Civ 282, [2004] 2 P & CR D12 (CA) |
power of sale |
|
Michell v Michell |
(1820) 5 Madd 69, 71, 56 Eng Rep 821 |
effects |
|
Micklethwait v Micklethwait |
(1858) 28 LJ CP 121, 127 |
settled estate(Eng) |
|
Micklethwait v Newlay Bridge Co |
[1886] 33 Ch D 133 |
contiguous |
|
Midill Ltd v Park Lane Estate Ltd |
[2008] 03 EG 178, [2009] 2 All ER 1067 (CA) |
deposit |
|
Midland Bank Ltd v Farmpride Hatcheries Ltd |
[1980] 260 EG 494 (CA) |
constructive notice |
|
Midland Bank Trust Co Ltd v Green |
[1981] AC 513, 531-2, [1981] All ER 153 (HL) |
bona fide purchaser (BFP) |
|
Midland Bank Trust Co Ltd v Green |
[1981] AC 513, [1981] 1 All ER 153 (HL) |
money's worth(Eng) |
|
Midland Bank Trust Co Ltd v Green |
[1981] AC 513, [1981] 1 All ER 153 (HL) |
money or money's worth(Eng) |
|
Midland Bank Trust Co Ltd v Green |
[1981] AC 513, [1981] 1 All ER 153 (HL) |
value |
|
Midland Railway Co v Checkley |
(1867) LR 4 Eq 19, 25 |
mineral |
|
Midland Ry Co v Haunchwood Brick and Tile Co |
(1880) 20 Ch D 552 |
mine |
|
Midtown Ltd v City of London Real Property Co Ltd |
[2005] All ER (D) 33, [2005] 14 EG 130 |
restrictive covenant |
|
Migotti v Colvill |
(1879) 4 CPD 233 (CA) |
month |
|
Mikeover Ltd v Brady |
[1989] 3 All ER 618 |
joint tenancy |
|
Miller and Aldworth v Sharp |
[1899] 1 Ch 622 |
part performance |
|
Miller v Cannon Hill Estates Ltd |
[1931] 2 KB 113 |
implied warranty |
|
Miller v Jackson |
[1977] QB 966, 980, [1977] 3 All ER 338, 344 (CA) |
nuisance |
|
Miller v Race |
(1758) 1 Burr 452, 97 Eng Rep 398 |
cash |
|
Millman v Ellis |
(1996) 71 P & CR 158; |
quasi-easement |
|
Mills v Brooker |
[1919] 1 KB 555, 557 |
tree |
|
Milman v Lane |
[1901] 2 KB 745, 747 (CA) |
heirs and assigns |
|
Milmo v Carreras |
[1946] KB 306, 310, [1946] 1 All ER 288, 290 (CA) |
assignment |
|
Milmo v Carreras |
[1946] KB 306, 310, [1946] 1 All ER 288, 290 (CA) |
privity of estate |
|
Milmo v Carreras |
[1946] KB 306, 311-2, [1946] 1 All ER 288, 290 (CA) |
sublease or sub-lease |
|
Minister for Public Works v Thistlethwayte |
(1954) AC 490, 491 (PC) |
market value (MV) |
|
Ministry of Transport v Lee |
[1966] 1 QB 111, 122, [1965] 2 All ER 986, 990 (CA) |
compensation for disturbance(Eng) |
|
Mint v Good |
[1951] 1 KB 517 |
landlord's access |
|
Mirvahedy v Henley |
(2003) The Times, March 24 (HL) |
strict liability |
|
Mitchell v Mosley |
[1914] 1 Ch 450 |
corporeal hereditament |
|
Mixnam's Properties v Chertsey UDC |
[1964] 1 QB 214, 226-7 (CA) |
planning condition(Eng) |
|
Mixnam's Properties v Chertsey UDC |
[1965] AC 735, 751, 761 (HL) |
planning condition(Eng) |
|
Moffatt v Kazana |
[1969] 2 QB 151 |
fixture |
|
Moir v Williams |
[1892] 1 QB 264 |
building |
|
Monomart (Warehouses) Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment |
(1977) 34 P & CR 305 |
warehouse |
|
Monson (Lord) v Bound |
[1954] 1 All ER 228 |
agricultural holding(Eng) |
|
Montague v Browning |
[1954] 1 WLR 1039, [1954] 2 All ER 601 (CA) |
rent |
|
Moore and Co v Landauer and Co |
[1921] 1 KB 73) |
performance |
|
Moore v Bennett |
(1678) 2 Ch Cas 246 [22 Eng Rep 928]) |
notice |
|
Moore v Rawson |
(1824) 3 B & C 332, 107 Eng Rep 756 |
easement |
|
Moore v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government |
[2012] EWCA Civ 1202, [2012] 46 EG 122 (CA) |
material change in the use(Eng) |
|
Moorhouse v Colvin |
[1851] 15 Beav 341, 349, 51 Eng Rep 570 |
conditional contract |
|
Morcom v Campbell-Johnson |
[1956] 1 QB 106, 115, [1955] 3 All ER 264, 266 (CA) |
improvement |
|
Morcom v Campbell-Johnson |
[1956] 1 QB 106, 115, [1955] 3 All ER 264, 266 (CA) |
repair |
|
Moresk Cleaners Ltd v Hicks |
[1966] 2 Lloyd's Rep 338, 342 |
architect |
|
Morgan v Davies |
(1878) 3 CPD 260 |
half a year or half year |
|
Morgan v Liverpool Corporation |
[1927] 2 KB 131 |
fit for human habitation(Eng) |
|
Morgan v Swansea Urban Sanitary Authority |
(1878) 9 Ch D 582, 585-6 |
bare trust(Eng) |
|
Morrison Holdings v Manders Property (Wolverhampton) Ltd |
[1976] 2 All ER 205, 210 (CA) |
occupation |
|
Mortimer v Bailey |
[2005] 02 EG 102, [2005] 2 P & CR 9 |
injunction |
|
Morton v Copeland |
(1855) 16 CB 535, 139 Eng 861 |
signature |
|
Morton v Copeland |
(1855) 16 CB 535, 139 Eng 861 |
X |
|
Moschi v Lep Air Services Ltd |
[1973] AC 331, 344G, 351G (HL) |
surety |
|
Moses v Macferlan |
(1760) 2 Burr 1005, 97 Eng Rep 676 |
restitution |
|
Moskovitz v 75 Worple Road RTM Co Ltd |
[2010] UKUT 393, [2010] 13 EG 108 (LC) |
service |
|
Moss v Hancock |
[1899] 2 QB 111 |
cash |
|
Moss v Hancock |
[1899] 2 QB 111, 116 |
money |
|
Mote v Gould |
(1935) 152 LT 347 |
commission |
|
Mount Carmel Investments v Peter Thurlow Ltd |
[1988] 1 WLR 1078 |
tacking |
|
Mount Eden Land Ltd v Straudley Investments Ltd |
(1996) 74 P & CR 306, 310 |
restraint on alienation |
|
Mountford v Scott |
[1974] 1 All ER 248, 254, aff'd [1975] Ch 258 (CA) |
option |
|
Mountford v Scott |
[1974] 1 All ER 248, aff'd [1975] Ch 258 (CA) |
option to purchase |
|
Mountview Estates Ltd v London Borough of Enfield |
(1968) 20 P & CR 729, 733 |
compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) |
|
MSM Consulting Ltd v United Republic of Tanzania |
[2009] EWHC 121, 123 Con LR 154 |
procuring cause(AmE) or effective cause(BrE) |
|
Muldoon v Mays of Lilliput Ltd |
(1993) 14 EG 100 |
valuer |
|
Mullens v Miller |
(1882) 22 Ch D 199 |
estate agent(BrE) |
|
Multiplex Constructions (UK) Ltd v Cleveland Bridge UK Ltd |
[2006] EWHC 1341 |
reasonable effort or reasonable endeavour |
|
Multiservice Bookbinders Ltd v Marden |
[1979] Ch 84, [1978] 2 All ER 489 |
unconscionable bargain |
|
Multiservice Bookbinding Ltd v Marden |
[1979] Ch 84, [1978] 2 All ER 489 |
equity of redemption |
|
Murdoch Lownie Ltd v Newman |
[1949] 2 All ER 783 |
ready, able and willing or ready, willing and able |
|
Murphy v Brentwood DC |
[1991] 1 AC 398 (HL) |
duty of care |
|
Murrayfield Real Estate Co v Edinburgh Magistrates |
[1912] SC 217, 221-2 |
back-to-back house |
|
Muscat v Smith |
[2003] 1 WLR 2853, 40 EG 148 (CA) |
set-off or setoff |
|
Mustafa v Baptist Union Corporation Ltd |
(1983) 266 EG 813 |
particulars of sale |
Top
|
Nailrile v Earl of Cadogan |
[2009] EGLR 151 (LC) |
extended lease |
|
Nash v Eads |
(1880) 25 Sol J 95 |
power of sale |
|
National Association of Local Government Officers v Bolton Corporation |
[1943] AC 166, 185 (HL) |
trade |
|
National Bank of Greece SA v Pinios Shipping Co |
(No 1) [1990] 1 AC 637 (HL) |
simple interest |
|
National Car Parks v The Trinity Development Company (Banbury) Limited |
[2002] 2 P & CR 18 |
licence(BrE) or license(AmE) |
|
National Carriers Ltd v Panalpina (Northern) Ltd |
[1981] AC 675, [1981] 1 All ER 161 (HL) |
reinstatement clause |
|
National Carriers Ltd v Panalpina Ltd |
[1981] 1 All ER 161 |
frustration |
|
National Electric Theatres v Hudgell |
[1939] Ch 553 |
compensation for improvements |
|
National Justice Compania Naviera SA v Prudential Assurance Co Ltd "Ikarian Reefer" |
[1995] 1 Lloyd's Rep 455, [1993] 37 EG 158 |
expert witness |
|
National Provincial Bank Ltd v Hastings Car Mart Ltd |
[1964] 1 Ch 665, 686, [1964] 1 All ER 688, 695 (CA) |
licence by estoppel(Eng) |
|
National Provincial Bank v Ainsworth Ltd |
[1965] AC 1175, 1237-8, [1965] 2 All ER 472, 478 (HL) |
equitable interest |
|
|
|
|
|
National Westminster Bank Ltd v Hart |
[1983] QB 773, [1983] 2 All ER 177 (CA) |
estoppel |
|
National Westminster Bank plc v Morgan |
[1985] 1 AC 686, [1985] 1 All ER 821 (HL) |
undue influence |
|
NCR Ltd v Riverland Portfolio No 1 Ltd |
[2004] EWHC 921, {2004] EG 110 |
reverse premium |
|
NCR v Riverland Portfolio No 1 Ltd (No 2) |
[2004] EWHC 2073, [2004] PLSCS 181 |
restraint on alienation |
|
NCR v Riverland Portfolio No 1 Ltd (No 2) |
[2005] EWCA Civ 312, [2005] 22 EG 134, 139 (CA) |
restraint on alienation |
|
Neale v Del Soto |
[1945] 1 KB 144 |
living room |
|
Nelson Developments v Taboada |
(1992) 24 HLR 462 |
attendance(Eng) |
|
New Windsor Corp'n v Mellor |
[1975] Ch 380, 392H, [1975] 3 All ER 44 (CA) |
customary right(Eng) |
|
New Zealand Government Property Corporation v H M and S Ltd |
[1982] QB 1145, [1982] 262 EG 765, [1982] 1 All ER 624 (CA) |
fixture |
|
New Zealand Government Property Corporation v H M and S Ltd |
[1982] QB 1145, [1982] 262 EG 765, [1982] 1 All ER 624 (CA) |
trade fixture |
|
Newbury DC v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1981] AC 578, [1980] 1 All ER 73 (HL) |
planning condition(Eng) |
|
Newbury DC v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1981] AC 578, 599-600, [1980] 1 All ER 731, 739 (HL) |
planning purpose(Eng) |
|
Newcastle City Council v Royal Newcastle Hospital |
[1959] AC 248 (PC) |
use |
|
Newcastle City Council v Royal Newcastle Hospital |
[1959] AC 248, 255 (PC) |
occupier |
|
Newham LBC v Hawkins |
[2005] 2 EGLR 51 |
holding over |
|
Newham LBC v Hawkins |
[2005] 2 EGLR 51 |
secure tenancy(Eng) |
|
Newlon Housing Trust v Alsulaimen |
[1998] 3 WLR 451, 455, [1998] 4 All ER 1 (HL) |
disposition |
|
Newman v Bennett |
[1981] QB 726, [1980] 3 All ER 449, 452 |
vicinage |
|
Newman v Dorrington Developments Ltd |
[1975] 1 WLR 1642, [1975] 3 All ER 928) |
rack rent |
|
Newman v Lawson |
(1971) 22 P & CR 852, 859 |
right of light(BrE) or right to light(AmE) |
|
Newman v Lawson |
(1971) 22 P & CR 852 |
rule against perpetuities (RAP) |
|
Newman v Real Estate Debenture Corp'n Ltd |
[1940] 1 All ER 131 |
derogation from grant |
|
Newman v Rogers |
(1793) 4 Bro CC 391, 29 Eng Rep 950 |
time is of the essence |
|
Newman v Slade |
[1926] 2 KB 328 |
week-to-week tenancy(AmE) or weekly tenancy(BrE) |
|
Newnham v Willison |
(1987) 56 P & CR 8, 17 (CA) |
nec vi, nec clam, nec precario(Lat) |
|
News Group Newspapers Ltd v SOGAT'82 |
[1986] IRLR 346 |
nuisance |
|
Nicholas Prestige Homes v Neal |
[2010] All ER (D) 22 (CA) |
sole agency |
|
Nicholson v Chapman |
(1793) 2 Bl H 254, 126 Eng Rep 536) |
quasi-contract |
|
Nickerson v Barraclough |
[1981] Ch 426, [1979] 3 All ER 312 (CA) |
appurtenance |
|
Nickerson v Barraclough |
[1981] Ch 426, [1979] 3 All ER 312 (CA) |
easement of necessity |
|
Nikko Hotels (UK) Ltd v MEPC plc |
[1991] 128 EG 86, 2 EGLR 103, 108B |
expert |
|
Noakes & Co Ltd v Rice |
[1902] AC 24, [1900-3] All ER Rep 34 (HL) |
clog |
|
Noakes & Co Ltd v Rice |
[1902] AC 24, [1900-3] All ER Rep 34 (HL) |
equity of redemption |
|
Noakes & Co Ltd v Rice |
[1902] AC 24, 33-4, [1900-3] All ER Rep 34, 36 (HL) |
once a mortgage, always a mortgage |
|
Nocton v Lord Ashburton |
[1914] AC 932, 962 (HL) |
misrepresentation |
|
Nonentities Society Trustees v Kidderminster Borough Council |
(1970) 22 P & CR 224 (LT) |
equivalent reinstatement(Eng) |
|
North Eastern Properties Ltd v Coleman and another |
[2010] 12 EG 97 (CA) |
writing |
|
North Shore Rly Co v Pion |
(1889) 14 App Cas 612, 620 (PC) |
riparian rights |
|
North Staffordshire Railway Co v Lawton |
(1863) 3 NR 31 |
immediate possession |
|
North West Metropolitan Regional Hospital Board v T A Bickerton & Son Ltd |
[1970] 1 WLR 607, [1970] 1 All ER 1039 (HL) |
nominated subcontractor |
|
Northland Airliners v Dennis Ferranti Meters |
[1970] 114 Sol J 845 |
acceptance |
|
Northumberland v A-G |
[1905] AC 406, 410 (HL) |
disposition |
|
Norwich Union Life Insurance Society v Shopmoor Ltd |
[1999] 1 WLR 531, 545, [1998] All ER Rev 282 |
personal covenant |
|
Norwich Union Life Insurance Society v Shopmoor Ltd |
[1999] 1 WLR 531, 545, [1998] All ER Rev 282 |
restraint on alienation |
|
Nugent v Smith |
(1875) 1 CPD 19, 34, (1876) 1 CPD 423, 434 (CA) |
act of God |
|
Nweze Nwoko |
[2004] 2 P & CR 33 (CA) |
writing |
Top
|
O'Brien v Robinson |
(1984) 13 HLR 7 (HL) |
repair |
|
O'Connor v Old Etonian Housing Association Ltd |
[2002] EWCA Civ 150, [2002] 14 EG 127, 129 (CA) |
proper working order |
|
O'May v City of London Real Property Co Ltd |
[1983] 2 AC 726, 747, [1982] 1 All ER 660, 670 (HL) |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
O'May v City of London Real Property Co Ltd |
[1983] 2 AC 726, 748, [1982] 1 All ER 660, 671 (HL) |
clear lease(Eng) |
|
Oakden v Pike |
(1865) 34 LJ Ch 620, 12 LT 527 |
deducing title(Eng) |
|
Ocean Estates Ltd v Pinder |
[1969] 2 AC 19, 25 (PC) |
absolute title |
|
Oceanbulk Shipping & Trading SA v TMT Asia Limited |
[2011] 1 AC 662, ??, [2010] 4 All ER 1011, ?? (SC) |
without prejudice |
|
Oceanseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock & Engineering Co Ltd |
[1961] AC 388, 442-3 (PC) |
negligence |
|
Office of Fair Trading v Foxtons Ltd |
[2009] EWHC 1681 (Ch), [2009] 29 EG 98 |
exclusion clause(Eng) |
|
Ofulue v Bossert |
[2009] UKHL 16, [2009] WLR (D) 91 (HL) |
adverse possession |
|
Ofulue v Bossert |
[2009] UKHL 16, [2009] WLR (D) 91 (HL) |
without prejudice |
|
Ofulue v Bossert |
[2009] AC 990 (HL) |
without prejudice |
|
Ogilvie v Foljambe |
(1817) 3 Mer 53, 36 Eng Rep 21 |
signature |
|
Old Gate Estates Ltd v Toplis |
[1939] 3 All ER 209 |
valuer |
|
Oldfield (or Bowles) v Round |
(1800) 5 Ves Jun 509, 31 Eng Rep 707 |
defect of title |
|
Olivant v Wright |
(1875) 1 Ch D 650 |
deed |
|
Olivant v Wright |
(1875) 1 Ch D 650 |
will |
|
Oliver v Nautilus Steam Shipping Co |
[1903] 2 KB 639 (CA) |
without prejudice |
|
Oliver v Symonds |
[2012] EWCA Civ 267, [2012] 22 EG 86 (CA) |
easement |
|
Olympia & York Canary Wharf Ltd v Oil Property Investments Ltd |
(1994) 29 EG 121, (1994) 29 P & CR 43, 48-50 (CA) |
restraint on alienation |
|
Oppenheimer v Minister of Transport |
[1942] 1 KB 242 |
notice to treat(Eng) |
|
Oppenheimer v Minister of Transport |
[1942] 1 KB 242 |
interest |
|
Orakpo v Manson Investments Ltd |
[1978] AC 95, [1977] 3 All ER 1 (HL) |
subrogation |
|
Orlik G (Meat Products) v Hastings & Thanet Building Society |
(1974) 29 P & CR 126 |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Orman Bros v Greenbaum |
[1955] 1 WLR 248, [1954] 3 All ER 731, 732 (CA) |
termination |
|
Oscar Chess, Ltd v Williams |
[1957] 1 All ER 325, 328 (CA) |
warranty |
|
Osman v J Ralph Moss Ltd |
[1970] 1 Lloyd's Rep 313 (CA) |
breach of warranty of authority |
|
Otter v Norman |
[1989] AC 129, 143, 146 (CA) |
board |
|
Overseas Buyers v Granadex |
[1980] 2 Lloyd's Rep 608 |
reasonable effort or reasonable endeavour |
|
Owen v Gadd |
[1956] 2 QB 99 (CA) |
quiet enjoyment |
|
Oxley v Hiscock |
[2005] 3 WLR 715 at [69] |
resulting trust |
Top
|
Paddington Basin Developments Ltd v West End Quay Estate Management Ltd |
[2010] 27 EG 86 |
service charge |
|
Page v More |
(1850) 15 QB 684 |
time |
|
Paine v Cork Co |
(1900) 69 LJ Ch 158) |
sell |
|
Paine v Meller |
(1801) 6 Ves Jun 350, 31 Eng Rep 1088, 1089 |
constructive trust |
|
Paine v Meller |
(1801) 6 Ves Jun 350, 31 Eng Rep 1088, 1089 |
damnum fatale(Lat) |
|
Paine v Meller |
(1801) 6 Ves Jun 350, 31 Eng Rep 1088, 1089 |
property insurance |
|
Palacath v Flanagan |
[1985] 2 All ER 161) |
expert |
|
Palk v Mortgage Services Funding plc |
[1993] Ch 330) |
power of sale |
|
Palmer v Johnson |
(1884) 13 QBD 351 (CA) |
merger |
|
Palmer v McNamara |
[1991] 1 EGLR 121 |
living room |
|
Palser v Grinling |
[1948] AC 291 (HL) |
material change in the use(Eng) |
|
Palser v Grinling |
[1948] AC 291, 310 (HL) |
attendance(Eng) |
|
Panagopoulos v Earl of Cadogan |
[2011] 2 EG 76 [2011] 2 All ER 21 (CA) |
common parts |
|
Panayi v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1985] JPL 783 |
hostel |
|
Pandorf v Hamilton |
(1886) 12 App Cas 518, 17 QBD 670, 675 (HL) |
act of God |
|
Paradine v Jane |
(1647) Aleyn 26, 82 Eng Rep 897 |
reinstatement clause |
|
Parc Battersea Ltd v Hutchinson |
[1999] 2 EG 149 |
assignment |
|
Parente v Bayville Marine Inc., etc. |
[1975] 1 Lloyd's Rep 333 |
latent defect |
|
Parker v Camden LBC |
[1986] Ch 162, 174C (CA) |
specific performance |
|
Parker v Flint |
(1699) 12 Mod 254, 88 Eng Rep 1303 |
hotel |
|
Parker v McKenna |
(1874) 10 Ch App 96, 119, [1874-80] All ER Rep 443, 456 (CA) |
agency |
|
Parker v Webb |
(1693) 3 Salk 5, 91 ER 656 |
covenant running with the land |
|
Parkes v Secretary of State |
[1979] 1 All 213 |
building operations(Eng) |
|
Parkes v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1978] 1 WLR 1308, 1311 (CA) |
operations(Eng) |
|
Parkes v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1978] 1 WLR 1308, 1311 (CA) |
use |
|
Parkus v Greenwood |
[1950] Ch 644, [1950] 1 All ER 436 |
perpetually renewable lease |
|
Parris v Williams |
[2008] EWCA Civ 1147, [2008] 43 EG 194 (CA) |
constructive trust |
|
Parsons v Trustees of Henry Smith's Charity |
[1974] 1 WLR 435 (HL) |
house |
|
Pascoe v Turner |
[1979] 1 WLR 431 |
estoppel |
|
Patel v Hooper & Jackson |
[1999] 1 WLR 1792, [1999] 1 All ER 992 (CA) |
damages |
|
Patel v Keles |
[2010] Ch 332, 346, [2010] 2 WLR 1159, 1172 (CA) |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Patton v Todd |
[2012] EWHC 1248, [2012] 31 EG 48 |
ad medium filum or ad medium filum viæ(Lat) |
|
Pavey v Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul |
(1987) 182 CLR 221, 256-7 (Aus) |
restitution |
|
Payne v Cardiff RDC |
[1932] 1 KB 241 |
power of sale |
|
Payne v Cave |
(1789) 3 Term Rep 148, 100 Eng Rep 502 |
auction |
|
Payne v Cave |
(1789) 3 Term Rep 148, 100 Eng Rep 502 |
offer |
|
Payne v Cave |
(1789) 3 Term Rep 148, 100 Eng Rep 502 |
revocation |
|
Payne v Inwood |
(1997) P & CR 42, 47 (CA) |
quasi-easement |
|
PCE Investors Ltd v Cancer Research UK |
[2012] EWHC 884 |
break clause |
|
Peacock v Custins |
(2002) 81 P & CR 479, [2001] 2 All ER 827 (CA) |
easement |
|
Peacock v Freeman |
(1888) 4 TLR 541 |
sale |
|
Peardon v Underhill |
(1850) 16 QB 120 |
common of turbary(Eng) |
|
Pearks v Moseley |
(1880) 5 App Cas 714, 723 (HL) |
class gift |
|
Pearson v Dublin Corporation |
[1907] AC 351, 365 (HL) |
exclusion clause(Eng) |
|
Pearson v IRC |
[1981] AC 753, 772 (HL) |
contingent estate or contingent interest |
|
Pearson v IRC |
[1981] AC 753, 772 (HL) |
possession |
|
Pearson v IRC |
[1981] AC 753, 772 (HL) |
remainder |
|
Pearson v IRC |
[1981] AC 753, 772 (HL) |
vested estate |
|
Peckham v Ellison |
(2000) 79 P & CR 276, 291 |
implied grant |
|
Peel Land and Property (Ports No 3) Ltd v TS Sheerness Steel Ltd |
[2013] EWHC 1658, [2013] PLSCS 139 |
trade fixture |
|
Pemberton v Southwark LBC |
[2000] 1 WLR 1672 (CA) |
secure tenancy(Eng) |
|
Pembery v Lamdin |
[1940] 2 All ER 434 |
external |
|
Peninsular Maritime Ltd v Padseal Ltd |
(1981) 259 EG 860, 866 |
forfeiture |
|
Pennine Raceway Ltd v Kirklees Metropolitan Council |
[1983] QB 382, [1982] 3 All ER 628 (CA) |
proprietary interest |
|
Pennington v Crossley & Sons Ltd |
(1897) 13 TLR 513 |
check(AmE) or cheque(BrE) |
|
Pennock v Hodgson |
[2010] EWCA Civ 873, [2010] PLSCS 223 (CA) |
boundary line |
|
Penton v Barnett |
[1898] 1 QB 276) |
waiver |
|
Penton v Roberts |
(1801) 2 East 88, 102 Eng Rep 302 |
trade fixture |
|
Percival Ltd v LCC Asylums and Mental Deficiency Committee |
(1918) 87 LJ KB 677 |
tender |
|
Percy Bilton Ltd v Greater London Council |
[1980] 2 All ER 623 (HL) |
liquidated damages |
|
Performing Rights Society Ltd v Mitchell and Booker (Palais de Danse), Ltd |
[1924] 1 KB 762, 768 (citing Pollock on Torts, 12th ed. p. 80) |
independent contractor |
|
Perkins v McIver |
[2012] EWCA Civ 735 (CA) |
restrictive covenant |
|
Perkins v West Wiltshire DC |
(1976) 31 P & CR 427 |
blight notice(Eng) |
|
Perrin v Northampton Borough Council |
[2006] EWHC 2331, [2006] 48 EG 232 (TCC) |
tree preservation order (TPO)(Eng) |
|
Perry v Clissold |
[1907] AC 73 (PC) |
tacking |
|
Perry v Davis |
(1858) 3 CB (NS) 769, 773, 140 Eng Rep 945 |
waiver |
|
Perry v Sidney Phillips & Son |
[1982] 1 All ER 1005, 1010 |
structural survey |
|
Petre v Petre |
(1853) 1 Drew 371, 397-8, 61 Eng Rep 493 |
fraud |
|
Petticoat Lane Rentals Ltd v Secretary of State |
[1971] 1 WLR 1112, 1117 |
planning unit(Eng) |
|
PGF II SA v Royal & Sun Alliance plc |
[2011] 1 P & CR 11 |
dilapidation |
|
Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd |
[1953] 1 QB 401, [1953] 1 All ER 482 (CA) |
invitation to trade(AmE) or invitation to treat(BrE) |
|
Phelps v City of London Corporation |
[1916] 2 Ch 255 |
quiet enjoyment |
|
Phene v Popplewell |
(1862) 12 CB (NS) 334, 142 Eng Rep 1171 |
abandonment |
|
Phene v Popplewell |
(1862) 12 CB (NS) 334, 342, 142 Eng Rep 1171 |
surrender |
|
Philips Electronic Grand Public SA v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd |
[1995] EMLR 472, 481-2 |
implied term or implied condition |
|
Philips v Francis |
[2010] 24 EG 118, [2010] L & TR 28 |
dwelling or dwelling-house |
|
Philips v Mobil Oil Co Ltd |
[1989] 1 WLR 888 (CA) |
estate contract(Eng) |
|
Phillips v Beal |
(1858) 25 Beav 25, 27, 53 Eng Rep 545 |
devise |
Philips v Francis |
[2013] EWHC 3650 (Ch), [2013] 1 EGLR 47 |
service charge |
|
Phillips v Phillips |
(1862) 4 De GF & J 211, 218, 45 Eng Rep 1164) |
mere equity(Eng) |
|
Phipps v Boardman |
[1965] Ch 992, 1018-9 (CA) |
agent |
|
Phipps v Boardman |
[1965] Ch 992, 1018-9 (CA) |
fiduciary |
|
Phipps v Pears |
[1965] 1 QB 76, 83, [1964] 2 All ER 35, 37 (CA) |
easement |
|
Phipps v Pears |
[1965] 1 QB 76, 82G-83A, [1964] 2 All ER 35 (CA) |
negative easement |
|
Phipps v Pears |
[1965] 1 QB 76, 83, [1964] 2 All ER 35, 37 (CA) |
right of support or right to support |
|
Phipps v Pears |
[1965] 1 QB 76, 83, [1964] 2 All ER 35, 37 (CA) |
right of view or right to view |
|
Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd |
[1980] AC 827, 846 (HL) |
breach of contract |
|
Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd |
[1980] AC 827, 846 (HL) |
contra proferentem(Lat) |
|
Pickering v Busk |
(1812) 15 East 38, 43, 104 Eng Rep 758 |
auctioneer |
|
Pilcher v Rawlins |
(1872) 7 Ch App 259 (CA) |
priority of a mortgage |
|
Pilcher v Rawlins |
(1872) 7 Ch App 259, 268 (CA) |
bona fide purchaser (BFP) |
|
Pimms Ltd v Tallow Chandlers Company |
[1964] 2 All ER 145, [1964] 2 QB 547, 564 (CA) |
restraint on alienation |
|
Pinnel's Case |
(1602) 5 Co Rep 117a, 77 Eng Rep 237 |
part payment or partial payment |
|
Pinner v Everett |
[1962] 3 All ER 257, 258 (HL) |
words |
|
Pioneer Aggregates (UK) Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1985] AC 132, [1984] 2 All ER 358 (HL) |
abandonment |
|
Pips (Leisure Productions) Ltd v Walton |
(1982) 43 P & CR 415, 420 |
reasonable effort or reasonable endeavour |
|
Pitcher v Tovey |
(1692) 4 Mod 71, 87 Eng Rep 268 |
rent |
|
Pitt v PHH Asset Management Ltd |
[1994] 1 WLR 327, [1993] 4 All ER 961 |
writing |
|
Pitt v PHH Asset Management Ltd |
[1994] 1 WLR 327, [1993] 4 All ER 961 |
lock-out agreement |
|
Planché v Colburn |
(1831) 8 Bing 14, 131 Eng Rep 305 |
quantum meruit(Lat) |
|
Platform Home Loans Ltd v Oyston Shipways Ltd [2000] 2 AC 190 (HL) |
|
damages |
|
Platt v London Underground Ltd |
[2001] 2 EGLR 121, 122F-G |
derogation from grant |
|
Pledge v White |
[1896] AC 187, 198 (HL) |
consolidation |
|
Plough Investments Ltd v Manchester City Council |
[1989] 1 EGLR 244 |
right of entry |
|
Plymouth and South Devon Co-operative Society Ltd v Plymouth City Council |
[1993] 67 P & CR 78 |
planning obligation(Eng) |
|
Pointe Gourde Transport and Quarrying Co Ltd v Sub-Intendent of Crown Lands |
[1947] AC 565 (PC) |
compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) |
|
Pointon York Group plc v Poulton |
[2006] EWCA Civ 1001, [2006] 38 EG 192 (CA) |
occupation |
|
Pointon York Group plc v Poulton |
[2006] EWCA Civ 1001, [2006] 38 EG 192 (CA) |
premises |
|
Poland v Earl of Cadogan and another |
[1980] 3 All ER 544 (CA) |
residence |
|
Pole v Leask |
(1863) 33 LJ Ch 892 |
power of attorney |
|
Pollard v Gare |
[1901] 1 Ch 834 |
derogation from grant |
|
Pomfret v Ricroft |
(1669) 1 Wms Saund 321, 85 Eng Rep 454 |
easement of necessity |
|
Ponsford v HMS Aerosols Ltd |
[1979] AC 63, 83 (HL) |
reasonable rent(Eng) |
|
Poole's Case |
(1703) 1 Salk 368, 91 Eng Rep 320 |
fixture |
|
Poole's Case |
(1703) 1 Salk 368, 91 Eng Rep 320 |
trade fixture |
|
Port of London v Orsett Union Assessment Committee |
[1920] AC 273 (HL) |
rebus sic stantibus(Lat) |
|
Port v Griffiths |
[1938] 1 All ER 295 |
derogation from grant |
|
Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trustees v Hampshire County Council |
(1980) 253 EG 1236 |
set-off or setoff |
|
Posner v Scott-Lewis |
[1987] 1 Ch 25 |
specific performance |
|
Patton v Todd |
[2012] EWHC 1248, [2012] 31 EG 48 |
ad medium filum or ad medium filum viæ(Lat) |
|
Post Office v Aquarius Properties Ltd |
[1987] 281 EG 798, [1987] 1 All ER 1055 (CA) |
inherent defect or inherent vice |
|
Post Office v Aquarius Properties Ltd |
[1987] 281 EG 798, [1987] 1 All ER 1055 (CA) |
repair |
|
Powell v McFarlane |
(1977) 38 P & CR 452, 470-1 |
possession |
|
Powell v McFarlane |
(1977) 38 P & CR 452, 471-2 |
animus possidendi(Lat) |
|
Powys v Blagrave |
(1854) 4 De GM & G. 448, 43 Eng Rep 582 |
waste |
|
Prasad v Wolverhampton Borough Council |
[1983] 2 WLR 946, [1983] 2 All ER 140 (CA) |
disturbance payment(Eng) |
|
Prasad v Wolverhampton Borough Council |
[1983] 2 WLR 946, [1983] 2 All ER 140 (CA) |
compensation for disturbance(Eng) |
|
Precious v Reedie |
[1924] 2 KB 149, 150 |
month-to-month tenancy(AmE) or monthly tenancy(BrE) |
|
Prenn v Simmonds |
[1971] 1 WLR 1381, 1384 (HL) |
literal construction or literal meaning |
|
Prest v Secretary of State for Wales |
(1983) 266 EG 527, 528 |
compulsory purchase(Eng) |
|
Price v West London Investment Building Society |
[1964] 1 WLR 616, 621 (CA) |
abode |
|
Price v Worwood |
(1859) 4 Hurl & N, 157 ER 941, 942-3 |
waiver |
|
Prickett v Badger |
(1856) 1 CB (NS) |
quantum meruit(Lat) |
|
Pritchard v Briggs |
[1980] Ch 338, [1980] 1 All ER 294 (CA) |
equitable interest |
|
Pritchard v Briggs |
[1980] Ch 338, [1980] 1 All ER 294 (CA) |
right of pre-emption |
|
Proctor & Gample Technical Centres Ltd v Brixton plc |
[2002] All ER (D) 305, [2002] 32 EG 69 |
notice |
|
Propert v Parker |
(1832) 3 My & K 280, 40 Eng Rep 107 |
usual covenant |
|
Property and Bloodstock Ltd v Emerton |
[1967] 3 All ER 321, 330-1 [1968] 1 Ch 94, 118 (CA) |
conditions of sale |
|
Property Holding and Investment Trusty v London Rent Assessment Board (or Lewis) |
(1969) 20 P & CR 808 |
service charge |
|
Prospect Estates Ltd v Grosvenor Estates Ltd |
[2008] EWCA Civ 1281, [2009] 02 EG 29 (CA) |
house |
|
Proudfoot v Hart |
(1890) 25 QBD 42 (CA) |
repair |
|
Proudfoot v Hart |
(1890) 25 QBD 42, 52 (CA) |
tenantable repair |
|
Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Exel Ltd |
[2009] EWHC 1350 (Ch), [2009] All ER (D) 122 |
joint tenancy |
|
Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body |
[1992] 2 AC 386, [1992] 3 All ER 504 (HL) |
term |
|
Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body |
[1992] 2 AC 386, [1992] 3 All ER 504 (HL) |
lease |
|
Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Mount Eden Land Ltd |
[1997] 14 EG 130 (CA) |
restraint on alienation |
|
Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Waterloo Real Estate Inc |
[1999] 2 EGLR 85 (CA) |
adverse possession |
|
Pugh v Arton |
(1869) LR 8 Eq 626 |
fixture |
|
Pugh v Duke of Leeds |
(1777) 2 Cowp 714, 717, 98 Eng Rep 1323, 1324) |
time |
|
Pugh v Duke of Leeds |
(1777) 2 Cowp 714, 720, 98 Eng Rep 1323 |
date |
|
Pugh v Savage |
[1970] 2 QB 373 |
easement |
|
Pumpernicks of Piccadilly Ltd v Land Securities Ltd |
[2002] Ch 332, 3 All ER 609 (CA) |
eggshell tenancy(BrE) |
|
Purefoy v Rogers |
(1671) 2 Wms Saund 380, 85 Eng Rep 1181 |
executory interest |
|
Pwllbach Colliery Co Ltd v Woodman |
[1915] AC 634, 646 (HL) |
implied easement |
|
Pwllbach Colliery Co Ltd v Woodman |
[1915] AC 634, 646 (HL) |
implied grant |
|
Pyrke v Waddingham |
(1852) 10 Hare 1 |
good title |
|
Pyx Granite Co Ltd v Ministry of Housing and Local Government |
[1958] 1 QB 554, 572 (CA) |
planning condition(Eng) |
|
Pyx Granite Co Ltd v Ministry of Housing and Local Government |
[1958] 1 QB 554, 572 (CA) |
planning gain(Eng) |
|
Pyx Granite Co Ltd v Ministry of Housing and Local Government |
[1958] 1 QB 554, 572 (CA) |
ultra vires(Lat) |
|
Queen's Club Gardens Estates Ltd v Bignell |
[1924] 1 KB 126 |
week-to-week tenancy(AmE) or weekly tenancy(BrE) |
|
Quennell v Maltby |
[1979] 1 WLR 318, 322, [1979] 1 All ER 568, 571 (CA) |
mortgagee |
|
Quick v Taff-Ely Borough Council |
[1986] QB 809, [1985] 3 All ER 321 (CA) |
inherent defect or inherent vice |
Top
|
R (Alconbury Developments Limited) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions |
[2003] 2 AC 295, 325 [2001] 2 All ER 929, 981 (HL) |
compensation for planning restrictions(Eng) |
|
R (Alconbury Developments Limited) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions |
[2003] 2 AC 295, 325 [2001] 2 All ER 929, 981 (HL) |
compulsory purchase(Eng) |
|
R (Alconbury Developments Limited) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions |
[2003] 2 AC 295, 325 [2001] 2 All ER 929, 981 (HL) |
police power(US) |
|
R (Barker) v Bromley London Borough Council |
[2006] UKHL 52, [2006] 3 WLR 1209 (HL) |
environmental impact assessment (EIA)(BrE) |
|
R (Beresford) v Sunderland City Council |
[2004] 1 AC 889 at [57]-[59] (HL) |
as of right |
|
R (James Powell) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council [2007] EWHC 2051 |
[2007] EWHC 2051 |
compensation for planning restrictions(Eng) |
|
R (James Powell) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council [2007] EWHC 2051 |
[2007] EWHC 2051 |
compulsory purchase(Eng) |
|
R (Laing Homes Ltd) v Buckinghamshire County Council |
[2003] 3 EGLR 69 |
green(Eng) |
|
R (Lewis) v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council |
[2009] EWCA Civ 3, [2009] EG 15 EG 200 (CA) |
green(Eng) |
|
(R (on the application of Fidler) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government |
[2010] EWHC Civ 26, [2010] 6 EG 115 |
enforcement notice |
|
R (on the application of Ling (Bridlington) Ltd) v East Riding of Council of Yorkshire Council |
[2007] JPL 396 |
planning permission(Eng) |
|
R (on the application of Newhaven Port & Properties Ltd) v East Sussex County Council |
[2012] EWHC 647, [2012] 14 EG 63 |
green(Eng) |
|
R (on the application of Elvington Park Ltd) v York City Council |
[2011] EWHC 2213, [2011] PLSCS |
abatement notice(Eng) |
|
R (on the application of Telford Trustees No 1 Ltd) v Telford and Wrekin Council |
[2011] EWCA Civ 896, [2011] PLSCS 200 |
planning permission(Eng) |
|
R (Sainsbury's Supermarket Ltd) v Wolverhampton City Council |
[2011] EWHC 2856, [2012] 04 EG 108, 118 |
compulsory purchase |
|
R (Smith) v Land Registry |
[2010] 11 EG 121, [2010] WLR (D) 72 (CA) |
highway |
|
R (Westminster City Council) v National Asylum Support Service |
[2002] 4 All ER 654, 657, [2002] 1 WLR 2956, 2959 (HL) |
tender |
|
R v Architects' Registration Tribunal, ex parte Jaggar |
(1945) 61 TLR 445, 446 |
architect |
|
R v Arkwright |
(1848) 12 QB 960, 970, 116 Eng Rep 1130 |
upon |
|
R v Barnsley Metropolitan BC, ex p Hook |
[1976] 3 All ER 452 |
market |
|
R v Bethnal Green and Paddington Rent Tribunals, ex parte Rowton Houses Ltd |
(1947) 91 Sol J 255 |
residence |
|
R v Boyesen |
[1982] 2 All ER 161, 163 |
possession |
|
R v Brettell |
(1832) 3 B & Ad 424, 427, 110 Eng Rep 152 |
mine |
|
R v Burke |
[1991] 1 AC 135 (HL) |
harassment |
|
R v Corby DC, ex parte McLean |
[1975] 1 WLR 735 |
redevelopment |
|
R v Ditcheat |
(1829) 9 B & C 176, 183, 109 Eng Rep 66 |
holding |
|
R v Dyer |
(1703) 6 Mod 41, 87 Eng Rep 803 |
year |
|
R v Harfield |
[1993] 2 PLR 23 |
enforcement notice |
|
R v Hendon RDC, ex parte Chorley |
[1933] 2 KB 696 |
ultra vires(Lat) |
|
R v Hillingdon LBC, ex parte Royco Homes Ltd |
[1974] 2 All ER 643 |
planning gain(Eng) |
|
R v Hinks |
[2001] 2 AC 241, (2000) The Times, Oct 27 (HL) |
appropriation |
|
R v IRC, Re Nathan |
(1884) 12 QBD 461, 478-9 |
mandamus(Lat) |
|
R v Jones, R v Smith |
[1976] 1 WLR 672, [1976] 3 All ER 54 (CA) |
trespass |
|
R v Langford |
(1842) Car & M 602, 604, 174 Eng Rep 653, 654 |
demolition |
|
R v Lewis |
(1869) 15 Digest (Repl) 1179 |
mock auction |
|
R v London Borough of Camden, ex parte Bellamy |
[1992] JPL 255) |
listed building(Eng) |
|
R v London School Board |
(1886) 17 QBD 738, 741 (CA) |
hypothetical |
|
R v Mayor and Commonality and the Citizens of London v Royal London Mutual Insurance Company, ex p Barbers of London |
[1996] 2 EGLR 128 |
restrictive covenant |
|
R v Minister of Housing and Local Government, ex parte Chichester RDC |
[1960] 2 All ER 407, 410 |
reasonably beneficial use(Eng) |
|
R v Morton |
(1873) 42 LJ MC 58 |
deed |
|
R v Oxfordshire County Council, ex parte Sunningwell |
[2000] 1 AC 335, 350 (HL) |
as of right |
|
R v Oxfordshire County Council, ex parte Sunningwell |
[2000] 1 AC 335, 358 (HL) |
enjoyment |
|
R v Oxfordshire County Council, ex parte Sunningwell |
[2000] 1 AC 335, 358 (HL) |
nec vi, nec clam, nec precario(Lat) |
|
R v Paddington (V.O.), ex parte Peachey Property Corp'n Ltd |
[1966] 1 QB 380, 412, [1965] 2 All ER 836 (CA) |
rateable value (RV)(Eng) |
|
R v Paddington (V.O.), ex parte Peachey Property Corp'n Ltd |
[1966] 1 QB 380, 412, [1965] 2 All ER 836, 848 (CA) |
hypothetical |
|
R v Paulson |
[1921] AC 271 (PC) |
waiver |
|
R v Rent Officer of the Nottinghamshire Registration Area, ex parte Allen |
(1986) 52 P & CR 41 |
caravan |
|
R v Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council, ex parte Milne |
[1999] EGCS 70 |
environmental impact assessment |
|
R v Saintiff |
(1704) 6 Mod 255, 87 Eng Rep 1002 |
highway |
|
R v Secretary of State for the Environment, ex p Billson |
[1999] QB 374 |
common land |
|
R v Silverlock |
(1894) 2 QB 766 |
expert witness |
|
R v South Middlesex Rent Tribunal, ex parte Beswick |
(1976) 32 P & CR 67 |
exclusive occupation |
|
R v St Pancras Assessment Committee |
(1877) 2 QBD 581, 588 |
occupation |
|
R v St Pancras Assessment Committee |
(1877) 2 QBD 581, 588 |
rateable occupation(Eng) |
|
R v Tower Hamlets LBC, ex p Von Goetz |
[1999] QB 1019, 1024A-D, 1025B-C (CA) |
equitable lease |
|
R v Tower Hamlets LBC, ex parte Subhan (Abdul) |
(1992) 24 HLR 541 |
suitable alternative accommodation(Eng) |
|
R v West Oxfordshire DC, ex parte Pearce Homes Ltd |
[1986] JPL 523) |
planning permission(Eng) |
|
R v Westbrook, R v Everist |
(1847) 10 QB 203 |
royalty |
|
R v Wicks |
[1997] 2 All ER 801 (HL) |
enforcement notice |
|
R v Williams |
[1942] AC 541, 555 (PC) |
specialty contract |
|
R v Yeovil Borough Council, ex parte Trustees of Elim Pentecostal Church |
(1972) 23 P & CR 39 |
planning permission(Eng) |
|
Race v Ward |
(1855) 4 El & Bl 702, 119 Eng Rep 259 |
water rights |
|
Rainbow Estates Ltd v Tokenhold Ltd |
[1998] 2 EGLR 34, 24 EG 123 |
specific performance |
|
Raineri v Miles |
[1981] AC 1050, [1980] 2 All ER 145 (CA) |
specific performance |
|
Raineri v Miles |
[1981] AC 1050, [1980] 2 All ER 145 (CA) |
time is of the essence |
|
Rains v Buxton |
(1880) 14 Ch D 537, 539-40 |
dispossession |
|
Rainy Sky SA & Orsd v Kookmin Bank |
[2011] UKSC 50 at para 14, [2012] 1 All ER 1137 (SC); |
|
|
Rainy Sky SA & Orsd v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50 at para 14, [2012] 1 All ER 1137 (SC); |
|
|
|
Rama Corp'n v Proved Tin and General Investments Ltd |
[1952] 2 QB 147, 149 |
ostensible authority |
|
Ramsden v Dyson |
(1866) LR 1 HL 129, 170 (HL) |
licence by estoppel(Eng) |
|
Ramsden v Dyson |
(1866) LR 1 HL 129, 170 (HL) |
mistaken improver |
|
Ramsden v Dyson |
(1866) LR 1 HL 129, 170 (HL) |
estoppel |
|
Ramsey v Blair |
(1876) 1 AC 701 (HL) |
outstroke |
|
Ratcliffe v McConnell |
[1999] 1 CL 472 (CA) |
trespass |
|
Ratners (Jewelers) Ltdv Lemnoll Ltd |
(1980) 255 EG 987 |
interim rent(Eng) |
|
Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Davstone (Holdings) Ltd |
[1980] QB 12, 21, [1979] 1 All ER 929, 937 |
inherent defect or inherent vice |
|
Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Hillingdon LBC |
(1968) 20 P & CR 483, 493 (LT) |
severance |
|
Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Hillingdon LBC |
(1968) 20 P & CR 483 (LT) |
house |
|
Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Newham LBC |
(1975) RA 410 |
completion notice(Eng) |
|
Rawlence v CroydonCorporation |
[1952] 2 QB 803, [1952] 2 All ER 543 (CA) |
rack rent |
|
Rawlings v General Trading Co |
[1920] 3 KB 30 |
bidding agreement |
|
Rawlinson v Ames |
[1925] Ch 26 |
part performance |
|
Ray v Fairway Motors (Barnstable) Ltd |
(1968) P & CR 261 |
easement |
|
Ray v Fairway Motors (Barnstable) Ltd |
(1968) P & CR 261 |
overburdening(US) |
|
RB Policies at Lloyd's v Butler |
[1950] 1 KB 76, 81 |
adverse possession |
|
Re 1-4 White Row Cottages Bewerley |
[1991] 4 All ER 50, 53 |
dwelling house or dwelling-house |
|
Re 88 Berkeley Road, London NW9 |
[1971] Ch 648, [1977] 1All ER 254 |
service |
|
Re a Debtor (No 13A/10/95) |
[1996] 1 All ER 691, [1995] 1 WLR 1127 |
waiver |
|
Re Arnold |
(1863) 33 Beav 163, 172-3, 55 Eng Rep 329 |
vested estate |
|
Re Barnes's Will Trusts, Prior v Barnes |
[1975] 1 WLR 515, [1972] 2 All ER 639 |
money |
|
Re Beddoe, Downes v Cottam |
[1893] 1 Ch 554 |
cost |
|
Re Boyle's Claim |
[1961] 1 WLR 339 |
alteration |
|
Re Bradford City Premises |
[1928] Ch 138, 143 |
open space |
|
Re Bruce Halsey and Bruce |
[1905] 2 Ch 378 |
enfranchisement |
|
Re Casey's Patents, Stewart v Casey |
[1892] 1 Ch 104 |
consideration |
|
Re Couston, ex parte Watkins |
(1873) 8 Ch App 520, 529 |
reputed owner |
|
Re Crispin's Will Trusts |
[1975] Ch 245, [1974] 3 All ER 299 |
chattel |
|
Re Daintrey, ex parte Holt |
[1893] 2 QB 116 |
without prejudice |
|
Re Dance's Way |
[1962] 1 Ch 490 |
reservation |
|
Re Darnley's Will Trusts |
[1970] 1 All ER 319 |
protector of the settlement(Eng) |
|
Re Davies |
[1956] Ch 131 |
jus spatiandi(Lat) |
|
Re Davis, ex parte Rawlings |
(1888) 22 QBD 193 (CA) |
licence(BrE) or license(AmE) |
|
Re Dolphin's Conveyance |
[1970] Ch 654, 662, [1970] 2 All ER 664 |
scheme of development |
|
Re Douglas's Will Trusts, Lloyd's Bank v Nelson |
[1959] 2 All ER 620, 623 |
security |
|
Re Dowsett |
[1901] 1 Ch 398 |
ademption |
|
Re Doyle and O'Hara Contract |
[1899] 1 IR 113 |
assignment |
|
Re Draper's Conveyance |
[1969] 1 Ch 486 |
severance |
|
Re Dugdale |
(1888) 38 Ch D 176 |
restraint on alienation |
|
Re Dummelow, ex parte Ruffle |
(1873) 8 Ch App 1001 (CA) |
contingent liability |
|
Re Ecclesiastical Commissioners for England & Wales's Conveyance |
[1936] Ch 430, 440 |
adjoining |
|
ReEllenborough Park |
[1956] Ch 131 (CA) |
easement |
|
Re Ellenborough Park |
[1956] Ch 131, 176 (CA) |
jus spatiandi(Lat) |
|
Re Ellis and Ruislip-Northwood UDC |
[1920] 1 KB 343, 370 (CA) |
amenity |
|
Re Guyton and Rosenberg's Contract |
[1901] 2 Ch D 591 |
leasehold or leasehold interest |
|
Re Harker's Will Trusts |
[1938] Ch 323 |
dotard |
|
Re Harker's Will Trusts |
[1938] Ch 323 |
timber |
|
Re Harrison's Trusts, Harrison v Harrison |
(1884) 28 Ch D 227 |
timber |
|
Re Hector Whaling Ltd |
[1936] Ch 208 |
clear day |
|
Re Holliday |
[1922] 2 Ch 698 |
subinfeudation(Eng) |
|
Re Hollis' Hospital Trustees and Hague's Contract |
[1912] 1 Ch 337 |
condition subsequent |
|
Re Hoyle |
[1893] 1 Ch 84 |
memorandum |
|
Re Hull and Selby Ry Co |
(1839) 5 M & W 327, 151 Eng Rep 139, 140 |
dereliction |
|
Re Hunter's Lease, Giles v Hutchings |
[1942] Ch 124, [1942] 1 All ER 27, 29 |
privity of estate |
|
Re Jones |
(1884) 26 Ch D 736, 743 (CA) |
entitled |
|
Re King |
[1963] Ch 459, 497 (CA) |
covenant |
|
Re Leach |
[1912] 2 Ch 422 |
determinable interest |
|
Re Leeds and Batley Breweries Ltd v Bradbury's Lease |
[1920] 2 Ch 548 |
covenant running with the land |
|
Re Lees, ex parte Collins |
(1875) 10 Ch App 367, 372 (CA) |
condition |
|
Re Leveson-Gower's Settled Estate |
(1905) 2 Ch 95, 98 |
addition |
|
Re Longlands Farm, Long Common, Botley, Hants, Alford v Superior Developments Ltd |
[1968] 3 All ER 552, [1968] 207 EG 847 (CA) |
option |
|
Re Lucas and Chesterfield Gas and Water Board |
[1909] 1 KB 16, 35 (CA) |
special suitability or adaptability(Eng) |
|
Re Macgowan, Macgowan v Murray |
[1891] 1 Ch 105, 116 (CA) |
negotiation |
|
Re Martin's Application |
[1989] 05 EG 85 |
interest |
|
Re Maughan, Ex parte Monkhouse |
(1885) 14 QBD 950, 958 |
agreement for a lease (AGL) |
|
Re Mayo |
[1943] 2 All ER 440 |
joint tenancy |
|
Re Mellor |
[1929] 1 Ch 46 |
money |
|
Re National Jazz Centre |
[1988] 2 EGLR 57 |
waiver |
|
Re National Savings Bank Association |
(1867) 15 WR 753 |
part performance |
|
Re Niyazi's Will Trusts |
[1978] 3 All ER 785, 788-9 |
hostel |
|
Re Ogle's Settled Estate |
[1927] 1 Ch 229, 233-4 |
compound settlement(Eng) |
|
Re Palmiero: debtor 3666 of 1999 |
[1999] 38 EG 195, 196 |
fixture |
|
Re Polemis and Furness, Withy and Co |
[1921] 3 KB 560, 577 (CA) |
damages |
|
Re Puckett and Smith's Contract |
[1902] 2 Ch 258 |
misdescription |
|
Re Ray |
[1896] 1 Ch 476 |
assurance |
|
Re Richmond Borough Justices |
(1893) 10 TLR 68 |
rent |
|
Re Riggs |
[1901] 2 KB 16 |
forfeiture |
|
Re Russ and Brown's Contract |
(1934) Ch 34 |
misdescription |
|
Re Sandbach |
[1951] Ch 791, 803 (CA) |
redemption |
|
Re Sandilands |
[1871] LR 6 CP 411, 413 |
seal |
|
Re Searle |
[1912] 1 Ch 610 |
tenancy from year to year |
|
Re Spollon and Long's Contract |
[1936] Ch 713, 718 |
good title |
|
Re Stanley, Stanley v Tenant |
[1906] 1 Ch 131, 134 |
company |
|
Re Strand and Savoy Properties Ltd |
[1960] Ch 582, [1960] 2 All ER 327 |
reversionary lease |
|
Re Tamplin and Son, ex parte Barnett |
(1890) 59 LJ QB 194, 195 |
true owner |
|
Re The Duty on the Estate of the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales |
(1889) 22 LR QBD 279, 293 |
trade |
|
Re Thompson and Cottrell's Contract |
[1943] Ch 97 |
misdescription |
|
Re Vince's Application |
(2007) 151 SJLB 1264 (LT) |
restrictive covenant |
|
Re Webb's Lease |
[1951] Ch 808 |
implied reservation |
|
Re Wells (Sir Thomas Spencer) |
[1933] Ch 29 (CA) |
equity of redemption |
|
Re Wembley Park Estate Co Ltd's Transfer |
[1968] Ch 491, [1968] 1 All ER 457 |
scheme of development |
|
Re Weston and Thomas' Contract |
[1907] 1 Ch 244 |
without prejudice |
|
Re Whaley, Whaley v Roehrich |
[1908] 1 Ch 615 |
fixture |
|
Re White Rose Cottage |
[1965] Ch 951 |
equitable mortgage |
|
Re Windle |
[1975] 1 WLR 1628 |
part performance |
|
Re Y |
[1985] Fam 136 |
home |
|
Re Yates |
(1888) 38 Ch 112, 120-212 |
fixture |
|
Reading v A-G |
[1951] AC 507, 516 |
fiduciary |
|
Record v Bell |
[1991] 1 WLR 853, [1991] 4 All ER 471 |
writing |
|
Redspring v Francis |
[1973] 1 WLR 134, [1973] 1 All ER 640 (CA) |
suitable alternative accommodation(Eng) |
|
Rees v Skerrett |
[2001] 1 WLR 1541 (CA) |
right of support or right to support |
|
Reeve v Hartlepool BC |
(1975) 30 P & CR 517, 524 |
occupation |
|
Reeve v Lisle |
[1902] AC 461 (HL) |
equity of redemption |
|
Reeve v Lisle |
[1902] AC 461 (HL) |
once a mortgage, always a mortgage |
|
Reeve v Lisle |
[1902] AC 461 (HL) |
option |
|
Regan v Paul Properties Ltd |
[2006] 3 WLR 1131, [2007] 4 All ER 48 (CA) |
damages |
|
Regan v Paul Properties Ltd |
[2006] 3 WLR 1131, [2007] 4 All ER 48 (CA) |
injunction |
|
Regent Oil Co v J.A. Gregory (Hatch End) Ltd |
[1966] Ch 402, 431, [1965] 3 All ER 673, 681 |
charge by way of a legal mortgage(Eng) |
|
Regent Oil Co v J.A. Gregory (Hatch End) Ltd |
[1966] Ch 402, 432-3, [1965] 3 All ER 673, 680 |
solus agreement(BrE) |
|
Regis Property Co v Dudley |
[1959] AC 370, 410 (HL) |
fair wear and tear(BrE) |
|
Regus (UK) Limited v Epcot Solutions Limited |
[2007] All ER (D) 93 |
exclusion clause(Eng) |
|
Reichman v Beveridge |
[2006] EWCA Civ 1659, [2007] 08 EG 138 (CA) |
abandonment |
|
Reid v Bickerstaff |
[1909] 2 Ch 305, 319, [1908-10] All ER Rep 298 (CA) |
scheme of development |
|
Reniger v Fogassa |
(1550) 1 Plowd 1, 17a, 75 Eng Rep 1, 27 |
agreement |
|
Republic of India v India Steamship Co Ltd (No 2) |
[1998] AC 878, 891 (HL) |
estoppel |
|
Reynolds v Ashby & Sons |
[1904] AC 466, 473-4 (HL) |
fixture |
|
Reynolds v Clarke |
(1725) 1 Stra. 634, 93 Eng Rep 747 |
trespass |
|
Rhodes v Macalister |
(1923) 29 Com Cas 19, 28 |
dual agency |
|
Rhone v Stephens |
[1994] 2 AC 310, 317B-C, [1994] 2 All ER 65 (HL) |
restrictive covenant |
|
Rhone v Stephens |
[1994] 2 AC 310, 321, [1994] 2 All ER 65, 71 (HL) |
positive covenant |
|
Rice v Rice |
(1853) 2 Drew 73, 78, 61 Eng Rep 646, 648) |
qui prior est tempore, potior est jure or qui prior est in tempore, prior est in jure(Lat) |
|
Richards v Rose |
(1853) 9 Exch 218, 156 ER 93, 94-5 |
implied grant |
|
Riches v Westminster Bank Ltd |
[1947] 1 AC 390, 398, 400 (HL) |
interest |
|
Ridgen v Vallier |
(1751) 2 Ves Sen 282, 28 Eng Rep 163 |
tenancy in common |
|
Ridley v Oster |
[1939] 1 All ER 618) |
misdescription |
|
Rigby v Connol |
(1880) 14 Ch D 482, 487 |
specific performance |
|
Right d Flower v Darby and Bristow |
(1786) 1 Term Rep 159, 162, 99 Eng Rep 1029 |
tenancy for a fixed term |
|
Right d Flower v Darby and Bristow |
(1786) 1 Term Rep 159, 99 Eng Rep 1029 |
tenancy at sufferance |
|
Rimmer v Knowles |
(1874) 30 LTNS 496 |
commission |
|
Rimmer v Liverpool City Council |
[1985] QB 1 |
negligence |
|
Riverside Housing Association Ltd v White |
[2007] UKHL 20 (HL) |
time is of the essence |
|
RMC (UK) Ltd and Ace v Greenwich LBC |
[2008] RVR 12, 23 (LT) |
compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) |
|
Roadside Group Ltd v Zara Commercial Ltd |
[2010] EWHC 1950 (Ch), [2010] 33 EG 70 |
use clause |
|
Robbins v Jones |
(1863) CB (NS) 221, 240 |
duty of care |
|
Robert Addie & Sons (Collieries) Ltd v Dumbreck |
[1929] AC 365, 376 (HL) |
trespass |
|
Roberts (A) and Co v Leicestershire County Council |
[1961] Ch 555, [1961] 2 All ER 545 |
rectification |
|
Roberts v Church Commissioners for England |
[1972] 1 QB 278, 284C, 285 B-D (CA) |
leasehold enfranchisement(Eng) |
|
Roberts v Church Commissioners for England |
[1972] 1 QB 278, 285B-D (CA) |
long tenancy(Eng) |
|
Roberts v J Hampson & Co |
[1989] 2 All ER 504, 513 |
structural survey |
|
Roberts v Swangrove Estates Ltd |
[2008] Ch 439, [2008] 2 WLR 1111 (CA) |
adverse possession |
|
Robertson v French |
(1803) 4 East 130, 135, 102 Eng Rep 779 |
ordinary meaning rule |
|
Robinson Brothers (Brewers) Ltd v Houghton and Chester le Street Assessment Committee |
[1937] 2 KB 445, 468 (CA) |
rebus sic stantibus(Lat) |
|
Robinson v Harman |
(1848) 1 Exch 850, 855, 154 Eng Rep 363, 365 |
breach of contract |
|
Robinson v Jenkins |
(1890) 24 QBD 275 |
chattel |
|
Robinson v Wall |
[1847] 2 Ph 372, 375, 41 Eng Rep 986 |
without reserve |
|
Rochester (Dean and Chapter) v Pierce |
(1808) 1 Camp 466, 170 Eng Rep 1023 |
use and occupation |
|
Roddy v Fitzgerald |
(1858) 6 HL Cas 823, 10 Eng Rep 1518 (HL) |
issue |
|
Rodway v Landy |
[2001] Ch 703 |
trust of land(Eng) |
|
Rogers v Hosegood |
[1900] 2 Ch 388, 396 |
restrictive covenant |
|
Rogers v Islington London Borough Council |
[1999] 37 EG 178 (CA) |
house in multiple occupation (HMO)(Eng) |
|
Rogers v Kingston-upon-Hull Dock Co |
(1864) 34 LJ Ch 165 |
six months |
|
Roland House Gardens Ltd v Cravitz |
(1974) P & CR 432 |
occupier |
|
Rolfe v Peterson |
(1772) 2 Bro P C 436, 1 Eng Rep 1048 |
acceleration clause |
|
Rolls v Miller |
(1884) 27 Ch D 88 |
business |
|
Romulus Trading Co Ltd v Comet Properties Ltd |
[1996] 2 EGLR 70 |
derogation from grant |
|
Rondel v Worsley |
[1967] 1 AC 191, 244, [1967] 3 All ER 993, 1009 (HL) |
professional negligence |
|
Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank plc |
[2000] QB 263 (CA) |
foreclosure |
|
Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank plc |
[2000] QB 263 (CA) |
mortgagee |
|
Roscorla v Thomas |
(1842) 3 QB 234 |
consideration |
|
Rose v Spice |
[1911] 2 KB 234, 241-2 (CA) |
relief |
|
Rosenbaum v Belson |
[1900] 2 Ch 271 |
sell |
|
Rowles v Mason |
(1612) 2 Brownl & G 192, 198, 123 Eng Rep 892 |
prescription |
|
Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No. 2) |
[2002] 2 AC 773 at [11] (HL) |
undue influence |
|
Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors v Shepherd |
(1947) 149 EG 370 |
quantity surveyor(BrE) |
|
Rozanes v Bowen |
(1928) 32 Ll L Rep 98, 102 |
utmost good faith |
|
Rush and Tompkins v Greater London Council |
[1989] AC 1280, 1287, 1299-1300 (CA) |
without prejudice |
|
Russel v Russel |
(1783) 1 Bro CC 269, 28 Eng Rep 1121 |
mortgage |
|
Rust v Goodale |
[1957] Ch 33 |
equitable mortgage |
|
Rutter v Michael John Ltd |
(1967) 201 EG 299 |
subject to contract (STC) |
|
Ryan v Mutual Tontine Westminster Chambers Association |
(1893) 62 LJ Ch 252 (CA) |
specific performance |
|
Ryan v Thomas |
(1911) 55 Sol J 364 |
option |
|
Rye v Rye |
[1962] AC 496, [1962] 1 All ER 146 (HL) |
conveyance |
|
Rylands v Fletcher |
(1868) LR 1 Ex 265, 279 |
strict liability |
Top
|
Safehaven Investments Inc v Springbok Ltd |
(1995) 71 P& CR 59 |
deposit |
|
Safestore v RSN Property Ltd |
[2009] PLSCS 292 |
easement |
|
Salt v Marquess of Northampton |
[1892] AC 1, 5 (HL) |
equity of redemption |
|
Samarenko v Dawn Hill House Limited |
[2011] EWCA Civ 1445 (CA) |
deposit |
|
Sampson v Hodson-Pressinger |
[1981] 3 All ER 710, 714, [1981] 261 EG 895 (CA) |
quiet enjoyment |
|
Samuel v Jarrah Timber and Wood Paving Corp'n Ltd |
[1904] AC 323 (HL) |
option |
|
Samuel v Jarrah Timber and Wood Paving Corp'n Ltd |
[1904] AC 323 (HL) |
equity of redemption |
|
Sanders v Anglia Building Society |
[1971] AC 1004 (HL) |
non est factum(Lat) |
|
Sanderson v Berwick-on-Tweed Corp'n |
(1884) 13 QBD 547 (CA) |
quiet enjoyment |
|
Sanderson v Collins |
[1904] 1 KB 628 (CA) |
vicarious liability |
|
Sandill v Franklin |
(1875) LR 10 CP 377 |
time |
|
Saner v Bilton |
(1878) 7 Ch D 815 |
landlord's access |
|
Saner v Bilton |
(1878) 7 Ch D 815 |
repair |
|
Sansom v Metcalfe Hambleton & Co |
[1998] PNLR 542, 547 [1998] 26 EG 154 (CA) |
professional negligence |
|
Santley v Wilde |
[1899] 2 Ch 474 (CA) |
equity of redemption |
|
Santley v Wilde |
[1899] 2 Ch 474 (CA) |
equity-participation loan or equity-participation mortgage |
|
Santley v Wilde |
[1899] 2 Ch 474 (CA) |
mortgage |
|
Santley v Wilde |
[1899] 2 Ch 474, 475 (CA) |
once a mortgage, always a mortgage |
|
Sargeant v Macepark (Whittlebury) Ltd |
[2004] EWHC 1333, [2004] 38 EG 164, 169-71 |
improvement |
|
Sarson v Roberts |
[1895] 2 QB 395 |
furnished tenancy(Eng) |
|
Sarson v Roberts |
[1895] 2 QB 395 |
fit for human habitation(Eng) |
|
Saunders v Maltby |
(1976) 239 EG 205 |
rebus sic stantibus(Lat) |
|
Saunders v Soper |
[1975] AC 239 (HL) |
accommodation agent(Eng) |
|
Savil Bros Ltd v Bethell |
[1902] 2 Ch 523 |
exception |
|
Savills Land & Property Ltd v Kibble |
[1998] EGCS 170 (CA) |
ready, able and willing or ready, willing and able |
|
Sawyer v H and G Simmonds Ltd |
(1966) 197 EG 879 |
negligence |
|
Saxon v Blake |
(1861) 29 Beav 438, 54 Eng Rep 697 |
undisclosed principal |
|
Say v Smith |
(1530) 1 Plow Rep 269, 75 ER 410, 417 |
id certum est quod certum reddi potest(Lat) |
|
Scala House and District Property Co Ltd v Forbes |
[1974] 74 QB 575 |
service |
|
Scales v Pickering |
(1829) 4 Bing 453 |
footway |
|
Scarf v Jardine |
(1882) 7 App Cas 345, 351 (HL) |
novation |
|
Scarfe v Adams |
[1981] 1 All ER 843 (CA) |
plan |
|
Scatterwood v Edge |
(1699) 1 Salk 229, 91 Eng Rep 203 |
perpetuity |
|
Schiller v Peterson & Co Ltd |
[1924] 1 Ch 394 (CA) |
month |
|
Schnabel v Allard |
[1967] 1 QB 627, 631, [1966] 3 All ER 816 (CA) |
week-to-week tenancy(AmE) or weekly tenancy(BrE) |
|
Schroeder (A) Music Co Ltd v Macaulay |
[1974] 1 WLR 1308, 1316, [1974] 3 All ER 616, 624 (HL) |
adhesion contract |
|
Scoble v Secretary of State in Council for India |
[1903] 1 KB 494, 504 (CA) |
annuity |
|
Scottish & Newcastle plc v Rogue (No 2) |
[2007] EWCA Civ 150, [2007] 15 EG 148 (CA) |
privity of contract |
|
Scottish CWS Ltd v Ulster Farmers' Mart Co Ltd |
[1959] 2 All ER 486, 495 (HL) |
market |
|
Scottish Mutual Assurance Society Ltd v British Telecommunications plc |
March 18 1994, unreported |
damages |
|
Scullion v Bank of Scotland (t/a Colleys) |
[2011] EWCA Civ 693, [2011] 25 EG 105 (CA) |
duty of care |
|
Sebag v Abitbol |
(1816) 4 M & S 462, 463, 105 Eng Rep 905 |
laches |
|
Secretan v Hart |
[1969] 3 All ER 1196, 1199 |
money's worth(Eng) |
|
Secretarial & Nominees Co Ltd v Thomas |
[2005] EWCA Civ 1008, [2005] 44 EG 136 (CA) |
tenant |
|
Security Trust Co v Royal Bank of Canada |
[1976] AC 503, 517 (PC) |
escrow |
|
Seddon Properties v Secretary of State for the Environment |
(1978) 248 EG 949 |
ultra vires(Lat) |
|
Seddon v Smith |
(1877) 36 LT 168, 169 |
adverse possession |
|
Seddon v Smith |
(1877) 36 LT 168, 169 |
animus possidendi(Lat) |
|
Sedleigh-Denfield v O'Callaghan |
[1940] AC 880, 903 (HL) |
nuisance |
|
Sedleigh-Denfield v O'Callaghan |
[1940] AC 880, 903 (HL) |
sic utere tuo ut alienum non lædas(Lat) |
|
Segal Securities Ltd v Thoseby |
[1963] 1 QB 887, [1963] 2 WLR 403 |
waiver |
|
Selkirk v Romar Investments Ltd |
[1963] 1 WLR 1415, 1422 (PC) |
rescission |
|
Sen v Headley |
[1991] 2 All ER 636 (CA) |
donatio mortis causa(Lat) |
|
Serjeant v Nash, Field & Co |
[1903] 2 KB 304, 315 (CA) |
assignment |
|
Seton v Slade |
(1802) 7 Ves Jun 265, 273, 32 Eng Rep 108 |
once a mortgage, always a mortgage |
|
Sevenoaks, Maidstone and Tunbridge Ry Co v London: Chatham and Dover Ry Co |
(1879) 11 Ch D 625, 634-5 |
maintenance |
|
Sevenoaks, Maidstone and Tunbridge Ry Co v London: Chatham and Dover Ry Co |
(1879) 11 Ch D 625, 634-5 |
perpetual lease |
|
Severn Trent Water Ltd v Barnes |
[2004] EWCA Civ 570, [2004] 26 EG 194, 197 (CA) |
damages |
|
Shanklin Pier Ltd v Detel Products |
[1951] 2 KB 854, [1951] 2 All ER 471 |
collateral warranty |
|
Shallcross v Oldham |
(1862) 2 Johns & Hem 609, 70 Eng Rep 1202 |
fiduciary |
|
Shanly v Ward |
(1913) 29 TLR 715 |
restraint on alienation |
|
Shareford Supplies v Edge |
[1987] Ch 305, 325, 2 WLR 363, ?? (CA) |
vacant possession |
|
Sharpe v Duke Street Securities NV |
[1987] 55 P & CR 331 (CA) |
house |
|
Sharpe v Manchester City Council |
(1982) 5 HLR 71 |
repair |
|
Shaw v Foster |
(1872) LR 5 HL 321 (HL) |
constructive trust |
|
Sheffield District Railway Co v Great Central Railway Co |
(1911) 27 TLR 451, 452 |
reasonable effort or reasonable endeavour |
|
Sheikh v O'Connor |
[1987] 2 EGLR 269 |
vacant possession |
|
Shelfer v City of London Electric Lighting Co |
[1895] 1 Ch 287 |
easement |
|
Shelfer v City of London Electric Lighting Co |
[1895] 1 Ch D 287, 346 |
injunction |
|
Shelfer v City of London Electric Lighting Co |
[1895] 1 Ch 287 |
right of light(BrE) or right to light(AmE) |
|
Shell-Mex and BP Ltd v Manchester Garages |
[1971] 1 All ER 841 |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Shephard v Cartwright |
[1955] AC 431, [1954] 3 All ER 649, [1954] 3 WLR 967 |
advancement |
|
Shepherd v Croft |
[1911] 1 Ch 521, 529 |
patent defect |
|
Shiloh Spinners Ltd v Harding |
[1973] AC 691, [1973] 1 All ER 90 (HL) |
equitable easement(Eng) |
|
Shiloh Spinners Ltd v Harding |
[1973] AC 691, 721, [1973] 1 All ER 90, 99 (HL) |
equitable interest |
|
Shiloh Spinners Ltd v Harding |
[1973] AC 691, 719, [1973] 1 All ER 90, 97 (HL) |
legal interest |
|
Shiloh Spinners Ltd v Harding |
[1973] AC 691, [1973] 1 All ER 90 (HL) |
positive covenant |
|
Shiloh Spinners Ltd v Harding |
[1973] AC 691, 722, [1973] 1 All ER 90, ?? (HL) |
time is of the essence |
|
Shirlaw v Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd |
[1939] 2 KB 206, 227, [1939] 2 All ER 113, 124 |
implied term or implied condition |
|
Shirlcar Properties Ltd v Heinitz |
(1983) 268 EG 362 |
subject to contract |
|
Shirley v Newman |
(1795) 1 Esp 266, 170 Eng Rep 352 |
tenancy from year to year |
|
Shortlands Investments Ltd v Cargill Plc |
[1995] 08 EG 163, 1 EGLR 51 |
damages |
|
Shortlands Investments Ltd v Cargill Plc |
[1995] 08 EG 163, 1 EGLR 51 |
yield-up clause or yielding-up clause |
|
Shrewsbury's (Countess of) Case |
(1600) 5 Co Rep 13b, 77 Eng Rep 68 |
tenancy at will |
|
Shrewsbury's (Countess of) Case |
(1600) 5 Co Rep 13b, 77 Eng Rep 68 |
waste |
|
Siddiqui v Rashid |
[1980] 1 WLR 1018, 1023 |
suitable alternative accommodation(Eng) |
|
Sidebotham v Holland |
[1895] 1 QB 383 (CA) |
notice to quit |
|
Sidebotham v Holland |
[1895] 1 QB 383 (CA) |
tenancy from year to year |
|
Silven Properties Ltd v Royal Bank of Scotland plc |
[2003] 50 EG 96, [2004] 1 WLR 997 (CA) |
power of sale |
|
Silven Properties Ltd v Royal Bank of Scotland plc |
[2003] 50 EG 96, [2004] 1 WLR 997 at [23], [29] (CA) |
receiver |
|
Simmonds v Cockell |
[1920] 1 KB 843 |
unoccupied |
|
Simmons v Dobson |
[1981] 1 WLR 720, [1991] 4 All ER 25, 27 |
lost modern grant |
|
Simmons v Dobson |
[1981] 1 WLR 720, [1991] 4 All ER 25 |
prescription |
|
Simon v Anglo American Telegraph Co. |
(1879) 5 QBD 188 (CA) |
estoppel |
|
Simpson v Connolly |
[1953] 2 All ER 477 |
sale |
|
Sims v Landray |
[1894] 2 Ch 318, 320 |
auctioneer |
|
Sinclair Group Investments (Kensington) Ltd v Walsh |
[1995] EGSC 65 |
additional rent |
|
Sinclair-Lockhart's Trustees v Central Land Board |
(1951) 1 P & CR 320 |
curtilage |
|
Singer and Friedlander Ltd v John D. Wood and Co |
(1977) 243 EG 212, 213 |
valuer |
|
Sirius International Insurance (Publ) v FAI General Insurance Ltd |
[2005] 1 All ER 191, 200 (HL) |
literal construction or literal meaning |
|
Sitwell v Earl of Londesborough |
[1905] 1 Ch 460 |
right to let down the surface |
|
Six Carpenters' Case |
(1610) 8 Co Rep 146a, 77 Eng Rep 695 |
trespass |
|
Skaife v Jackson |
(1824) 3 B & C 421, 107 Eng Rep 790 |
receipt |
|
Skerrits of Nottingham Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[2000] JPL 1025 (CA) |
building operations(Eng) |
|
Skips A/S Nordheim v Petrofina SA (The Varenna) |
[1984] QB 599, 618 (CA) |
condition |
|
Slater v Clay Cross |
[1956] 2 QB 264 (CA) |
invitee |
|
Sleafer v Lambeth Borough Council |
[1960] 1 QB 43, [1959] 3 All ER 378 (CA) |
repair |
|
Sloan Stanley Estate Trustees v Barribal |
(1994) 9444 EG 237 (CA) |
set-off or setoff |
|
Smalley v Quarrier |
[1975] 1 WLR 938, 943, [1975] 2 All ER 688, 693 (CA) |
protected tenancy(Eng) |
|
Smith and Snipes Hall Farm Ltd v River Douglas Catchment Board |
[1949] 2 KB 500, [1949] All ER 179 (CA) |
positive covenant |
|
Smith and Snipes Hall Farm Ltd v River Douglas Catchment Board |
[1949] 2 KB 500, [1949] All ER 179 (CA) |
restrictive covenant |
|
Smith v Anderson |
(1880) 15 Ch D 247, 275 (CA) |
trustee |
|
Smith v Austin Lifts Ltd |
[1959] 1 WLR 100 |
volenti non fit injuria(Lat) |
|
Smith v Baker and Sons |
[1891] AC 325, 355 (HL) |
volenti non fit injuria(Lat) |
|
Smith v Bradford Metropolitan Council |
(1982) 44 P & CR 171 |
duty of care |
|
Smith v Bradford Metropolitan Council |
(1982) 44 P & CR 171 |
premises |
|
Smith v Brown |
(1871) 40 LJ QB 218 |
cycle |
|
Smith v Brudenell-Bruce |
[2001] EG 143, [2002] 2 P & CR 4 at [12] |
as of right |
|
Smith v City Petroleum Co Ltd |
[1940] 1 All ER 260 |
trade fixture |
|
Smith v Clay |
(1767) 3 Bro CC 646, 29 Eng Rep 743, 744 |
laches |
|
Smith v Eric S Bush a firm |
[1990] 1 AC 831, 847, [1989] 2 All ER 514 (HL) |
duty of care |
|
Smith v Giddy |
[1904] 2 KB 448 |
tree |
|
Smith v Hughes |
(1871) LR 6 QB 607 |
agreement |
|
Smith v Jafton Properties Ltd |
[2011] EWCA Civ 1251, [2012] 01 EG 56, 58 (CA) |
replevin |
|
Smith v Jafton Properties Ltd |
[2011] EWCA Civ 1251, [2012] 01 EG 56, 58 (CA) |
severance |
|
Smith v Lambeth Assessment Committee |
(1882) 10 QBD 327 (CA) |
exclusive occupation |
|
Smith v Land and House Property Corp'n |
(1884) 28 Ch D 7 (CA) |
auctioneer |
|
Smith v Land and House Property Corp'n |
(1884) 28 Ch D 7, 15 (CA) |
misrepresentation |
|
Smith v Marrable |
(1843) 11 M & W 5, 152 Eng Rep 693 |
fit for human habitation(Eng) |
|
Smith v Marrable |
(1843) 11 M & W 5, 152 Eng Rep 693 |
furnished tenancy(Eng) |
|
Smith v Marrable |
(1843) 11 M & W 5, 152 Eng Rep 693 |
warranty of habitability(US) |
|
Smith v Oliver |
(1989) 2 PLR 1 |
tree preservation order (TPO)(Eng) |
|
Smith v Peat |
(1853) 9 Exch 161, 156 Eng Rep 69 |
damages |
|
Smith v Scott |
[1973] Ch 314 |
nuisance |
|
Smith v Scott |
(1832) 1 LJ CP 143 |
hotel |
|
Smith v Smith |
[1939] 4 All ER 312, 315 |
outgoing |
|
Smith v Smith |
[1939] 4 All ER 312 |
tax |
|
Smith v Spaul |
[2003] QB 983 (CA) |
lessee |
|
Smith v The Mayor, etc. of Harwich |
(1857) 2 CB (NS) 651, 669, 140 Eng Rep 572 |
implied term or implied condition |
|
Smith v Titanate Ltd |
[2005] 20 EG 262 |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Smith v Titanate Ltd |
[2005] 20 EG 262 |
occupation |
|
Somerville v Somerville |
(1801) 5 Ves Jun 750, 787, 31 Eng Rep 839, 858 |
domicile |
|
Soper v Arnold |
(1887) 37 Ch D 96, 102, (1889) LR 14 App Case 429, 435 (CA) |
deposit |
|
Sorrell v Fitch |
[1977] AC 728 (HL) |
stakeholder |
|
Souglides v Tweedie |
[2012] EWHC 561, [2012] 20 EG 94 |
rule against perpetuities (RAP) |
|
South Australia Asset Management Corporation v York Montague Ltd ("SAAMCO") |
[1997] AC 191 (HL) |
damages |
|
South Eastern Railway v Cooper |
[1924] 1 Ch 211 |
easement |
|
South Eastern Rly Co v Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers |
(1990) Ltd [1910] 1 Ch 12, 33 |
rule against perpetuities (RAP) |
|
South Lakeland DC v Secretary of State for the Environment and Carlisle Diocesan Parsonages Board |
[1991] JPL 144, 151 |
conservation area(Eng) |
|
South Staffordshire Water Co v Sharman |
[1896] 2 QB 44 |
fixture |
|
Southby v Hutt |
(1837) My & C 213, 40 ER 616 |
deducing title(Eng) |
|
Southern Center of Theosophy Inc. v State of South Australia |
[1982] AC 706, 716, [1982] 1 All ER 238 (PC) |
accretion |
|
Southern Center of Theosophy Inc. v State of South Australia |
[1982] AC 706, 716, [1982] 1 All ER 238 (PC) |
reliction |
|
Southwark LBC v Mills |
[2001] 1 AC 1 (HL) |
enjoyment |
|
Southwark LBC v Mills |
[2001] 1 AC 1, 10 (HL) |
keep in repair |
|
Southwark LBC v Mills |
[2001] 1 AC 1 (HL) |
quiet enjoyment |
|
Southwark LBC v Mills |
[2001] 1 AC 1, 8C (HL) |
peaceably and quietly |
|
Southwark LBC v Mills; Baxter v Camden LBC |
[1999] 4 All ER 449, 453, 461, 45 EG 179, 180 (HL) |
fit for the purpose or fit for the use |
|
Sovmots Investments Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1979] AC 144, [1977] 2 All ER 385 (HL) |
land |
|
Sovmots Investments Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1979] AC 144, 168, [1977] 2 All ER 385, 391 (HL) |
derogation from grant |
|
Sovmots Investments Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1979] AC 144, [1977] 2 All ER 385, 393 (HL) |
compulsory purchase order (CPO)(Eng) |
|
Spackman v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1977] 1 All ER 257 |
road |
|
Sparks v Leeds City Council |
(1977) 244 EG 56 (LT) |
equivalent reinstatement(Eng) |
|
Spath Holme Ltd v Greater Manchester and Lancashire RAC |
(1995) 28 HLR 107 (CA) |
fair rent |
|
Speedwell Estates Ltd v Dalziel |
[2001] EWCA Civ 1277, [2002] 1 EGLR 55 (CA) |
notice |
|
Spencer v Harding |
(1870) LR 5 CP 561 |
request for bid (RFB) or request for proposal (RFP) |
|
Spencer v Registrar of Titles |
[1906] AC 503, 507 (PC) |
habendum |
|
Spencer's Case |
(1583) 5 Co Rep 16a, 77 Eng Rep 72 |
covenant |
|
Spencer's Case |
(1583) 5 Co Rep 16a, 16b, 77 Eng Rep 72, 74 |
covenant running with the land |
|
Spencer's Case |
(1583) 5 Co Rep 16a, 77 Eng Rep 72 |
let |
|
Spiro v Glencrown Properties Ltd |
[1991] Ch 537, [1991] 1 All ER 600 |
ready, able and willing or ready, willing and able |
|
Spitzel v Chinese Corporation Limited |
(1899) 80 LT 349, 351 |
escrow |
|
Spyer v Phillipson |
[1931] 2 Ch 183 |
trade fixture |
|
SS Global Ltd v Sava |
[2008] EWCA Civ 1308, [2008] 48 EG 101 (CA) |
adverse possession |
|
SS Global Ltd v Sava |
[2008] EWCA Civ 1308, [2008] 48 EG 101 (CA) |
animus possidendi(Lat) |
|
St Aubyn v St Aubyn |
(1861) 1 Drew & Sm 611, 618-9, 62 Eng Rep 512, 515 |
determination |
|
Stack v Dowden |
[2007] UKHL 17, [2007] 2 WLR 831 (HL) |
matrimonial home(Eng) |
|
Stack v Dowden |
[2007] UKHL 17, [2007] 2 WLR 831 (HL) |
resulting trust |
|
Stadium Capital [No 2] Ltd v St Marylebone Property Co plc |
[2011] EWHC 2856, [2012] 04 EG 108, 118 |
damages |
|
Stadium Capital [No 2] Ltd v St Marylebone Property Co plc |
[2011] EWHC 2856, [2012] 04 EG 108, 118 |
trespass |
|
Standard Chartered Bank v Walker |
[1982] 3 All ER 938, 1 WLR 1410, 1415 |
power of sale |
|
Standard Life & Co Ltd v Greycoat Devonshire Square Ltd |
[2000] EGCS 40 |
gross rent |
|
Starmark Enterprises v CPL Distributution Ltd |
[2002] 2 WLR 1009, [2002] 3 All ER 264 (CA) |
time is of the essence |
|
Startup v Macdonald |
(1843) 6 Man & G 593, 134 Eng Rep 1029 |
time |
|
State Bank of India v Sood |
[1997] Ch 276, 281, 288-92 (CA) |
overreachable interest(Eng) |
|
State Trust Corp'n of Victoria v Taylor |
[1993] 1 VR 282, 286) |
personal effects |
|
Staves & Staves v Leeds City Council |
(1990) 23 HLR 107 |
structure |
|
Steadman v Steadman |
[1976] AC 536, 2 All ER 977 (HL) |
part performance |
|
Steadman v Steadman |
[1976] AC 536, 2 All ER 977 (HL) |
writing |
|
Steadman v Steadman |
[1976] AC 536, 561, 2 All ER 977, 998 (HL) |
res gestae(Lat) |
|
Stearn v Twitchell |
[1985] 1 All ER 631 |
correlative water rights(US) |
|
Steinberg and Sykes v Secretary of State |
[1989] JPL 258 |
conservation area(Eng) |
|
Stephens v Cuckfield Rural District Council |
[1960] 2 All ER 716 |
open land |
|
Stevens v Bromley London Borough Council |
[1972] Ch 400 |
interest |
|
Stevens v Bromley London Borough Council |
[1972] Ch 400 |
occupier |
|
Stevens v Gourley |
(1859) 7 CB (NS) 99, 112, 141 Eng Rep 752 |
building |
|
Stevens v London Borough of Bromley |
[1972] 1 All ER 712 |
enforcement notice |
|
Stevens v Willing & Co Ltd |
[1929] WN 53 |
building |
|
Steyning & Littlehampton Building Society v Wilson |
[1951] Ch 1018, 1020 |
attornment |
|
Stickney v Keeble |
[1915] AC 386 (HL) |
time is of the essence |
|
Stickney v Keeble |
[1915] AC 386, 416 (HL) |
deposit |
|
Stock v Frank Jones (Tipton) Ltd |
[1978] 1 WLR 231, 235G (HL) |
literal construction or literal meaning |
|
Stockdale v Ascherberg |
[1904] 1 KB 447, 450 (CA) |
outgoing |
|
Stockholm Finance Ltd v Garden Holdings Inc |
[1995] NPC 163 |
occupation |
|
Stockport Corp'n v Rollinson |
(1910) 102 LTNS 567 |
abut |
|
Stokes v Cambridge |
(1961) 13 P & CR 77 |
compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) |
|
Stokes v Salomons |
(1851) 9 Hare 75, 80, 68 Eng Rep 421, 423 |
proceeds |
|
Stormdale & Ball Ltd v Burden |
[1952] Ch 223, [1952] 1 All ER 59 |
interest |
|
Strachey v Ramage |
[2008] EWCA Civ 384, [2008] P & CR 8 (CA) |
plan |
|
Strand Securities Ltd v Caswell |
[1965] Ch 958, 979-80 (CA) |
overriding interest(Eng) |
|
Street v Essex County Council |
(1965) 193 EG 537 |
development |
|
Street v Mountford |
[1985] AC 809, 816B-C, [1985] 2 All ER 289 (HL) |
exclusive possession |
|
Street v Mountford |
[1985] AC 809, 818, [1985] 2 All ER 289 (HL) |
licence(BrE) or license(AmE) |
|
Street v Mountford |
[1985] AC 809, 818, [1985] 2 All ER 289 (HL) |
lease |
|
Street v Mountford |
[1985] AC 809, 818A, [1985] 2 All ER 289 (HL) |
lodger |
|
Strode v Parker |
(1694) 2 Vern 316, 23 Eng Rep 804 |
penalty |
|
Stuart v Joy |
[1904] 1 KB 362 |
privity of contract |
|
Sudbrook Trading Estate Ltd v Eggleton |
[1983] 1 AC 444, [1982] 3 All ER 1 (HL) |
option |
|
Sudbrook Trading Estate Ltd v Eggleton |
[1983] 1 AC 444, 477, [1982] 3 All ER 1, 5 (HL) |
valuer |
|
Suffolk County Council v Mason |
[1979] AC 705, 710, [1979] 2 All ER 369, 371 (HL) |
cartway |
|
Suffolk County Council v Mason |
[1979] AC 705, 727, [1979] 2 All ER 369, 384 (HL) |
carriageway(BrE) |
|
Suffolk County Council v Mason |
[1979] AC 705, 710, [1979] 2 All ER 369, 371 (HL) |
highway |
|
Suffolk County Council v Mason |
[1979] AC 705, 727, [1979] 2 All ER 369, 384 (HL) |
driftway |
|
Suisse Atlantique Société d'Armement Maritime SA v NV Rotterdamsche Kolen Centrale |
[1966] 1 AC 361, 431-2 (HL) |
exclusion clause(Eng) |
|
Suleyman v Shahsavari |
[1989] 09 EG 69, [1989] 2 All ER 460 |
damages |
|
Sumeghovo v Mahon |
(2002) The Times, November 6 (CA) |
principal home(Eng) |
|
Summers v Salford Corp'n |
[1943] AC 283, 289 (HL) |
unfit for human habitation(Eng) |
|
Sutcliffe v Thackrah |
[1974] AC 727 (HL) |
certificate of valuation |
|
Sutton v Norwich Corporation |
(1858) 27 LJ Ch 742 |
sewer |
|
Suurpere v Nice |
[2011] EWHC 2003, [2011] 39 EG 110 |
tenancy deposit scheme |
|
Swan v Sinclair |
[1924] 1 Ch 254, 266, aff'd [1925] AC 227 (HL) |
abandonment |
|
Swift (P & A) Investments v Combined English Stores Group plc |
[1989] AC 632, 642, [1988] 2 All ER 885, 890 (HL) |
covenant running with the land |
|
Swindon Waterworks Co Ltd v Wilts and Berks Canal Navigation Co |
(1875) LR 7 HL 697 |
water rights |
|
Swiss Bank Corpn v Lloyds Bank Ltd |
[1982] AC 584, 594-5, [1980] 2 All ER 419, 425 (HL) |
equitable charge |
|
Sydall v Castings Ltd |
[1967] 1 QB 302, 314, [1966] 3 All ER 770, 774 (CA) |
word of art |
|
Sykes v Harry |
[2001] 1 QB 1014, 1025-6, [2001] EG 221 (CA) |
duty of care |
|
Sykes v Taylor-Rose |
[2004] EWCA Civ 299 (CA) |
caveat emptor(Lat) |
Top
|
Tailors of Aberdeen v Coutts |
(1840) 1 Robin 296 (HL) |
real burden(Scot) |
|
Take Harvest Ltd v Liu |
[1993] AC 552, [1993] 2 All ER 459 (PC) |
surrender |
|
Tamares (Vincent Square) Ltd v Fairpoint Properties (Vincent Square) Ltd |
[2006] 41 EG 226, 228 |
right of light(BrE) or right to light(AmE) |
|
Tameres (Vincent Square) Ltd v Fairpoint Properties (Vincent Square) Ltd |
[2007] [2007] EWHC 212, 07 EG 143 |
damages |
|
Tan v Sitkowski |
[2007] 06 EG 165 (CA) |
dwelling house or dwelling-house |
|
Tandon v Trustees of Spurgeons Homes |
[1982] AC 755, 761 (HL) |
house |
|
Target Homes Ltd v Clothier |
[1994] 1 All ER 439 |
mortgagee |
|
Tate v Latham and Son |
[1897] 1 QB 502, 506 (CA) |
defect |
|
Tatem (W.J.) Ltd v Gamboa |
[1939] 1 KB 139 |
frustration |
|
Taylor v Beal |
(1591) Cro Eliz 222, 78 Eng Rep 478 |
set-off or setoff |
|
Taylor v Caldwell |
(1863) 3 B & S 826, 121 Eng Rep 309 |
licence(BrE) or license(AmE) |
|
Taylor v Caldwell |
(1863) 3 B & S 826, 121 Eng Rep 309 |
reinstatement clause |
|
Taylor v Corporation of St Helens |
(1877) 6 Ch D 264, 277 (CA) |
watercourse or water course |
|
Taylor v Corporation St Helens |
(1877) 6 Ch D 264, 273 (CA) |
stream |
|
Taylor v Glasgow City Council |
[1922] 1 AC 44 (HL) |
negligence |
|
Taylor v Hall |
(1870) IR 4 CL 467 |
quantity surveyor(BrE) |
|
Taylor v Horde |
(1757) 1 Burr 60, 107, 97 ER 190, 216 |
seisin or seizin |
|
Taylor v Taylor |
(1875) LR 20 Eq 155, 157 |
advancement |
|
Taylor v Wilden |
(1868) LR 3 Ex 303 |
notice to quit |
|
Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Co Ltd |
[1982] QB 133, 151, [1981] 1 All ER 897, 915 |
estoppel |
|
Tecbild Ltd v Chamberlain |
(1969) 20 P & CR 633, 642 (CA) |
dispossession |
|
Tecbild Ltd v Chamberlain |
(1969) 20 P & CR 633, 642 (CA) |
adverse possession |
|
Tehidy Minerals Ltd v Norman |
[1971] 2 QB 528, [1971] 2 All ER 475 (CA) |
lost modern grant |
|
Tehidy Minerals Ltd v Norman |
[1971] 2 QB 528, 547-52, [1971] 2 All ER 475, 487-91 (CA) |
prescription |
|
Tenant v Adamczyk |
[2005] 41 EG 205 |
adverse possession |
|
Tenant v Trenchard |
(1869) 4 Ch App 537 |
equitable charge |
|
Tendier v Sproule |
[1947] 1 All ER 193 |
boarding house |
|
Tennant v Smith |
[1892] AC 150, 156 (HL) |
money's worth(Eng) |
|
Terrapin International Ltd v IRC |
[1976] 2 All ER 461, 465 |
escrow |
|
Terrell v Murray |
(1901) 17 TLR 570 |
fair wear and tear(BrE) |
|
Tesco Stores Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1995] 2 All ER 636, 642, 647, 657 (HL) |
planning application(Eng) |
|
|
|
|
|
Texaco Antilles Ltd v Kernochan |
[1973] AC 609, [1973] 2 All ER 118 (PC) |
scheme of development |
|
Thames and Mersey Marine Insurance Co v Hamilton, Fraser and Co |
(1887) 12 App Cas 484, 490 (HL) |
ejusdem generis(Lat) |
|
Thames Guaranty Ltd v Campbell |
[1985] 2 All ER 585 |
equitable charge |
|
Thames Guaranty Ltd v Campbell |
[1985] QB 210 |
equitable mortgage |
|
Thamesmead Town Ltd v Allotey |
[1998] 37 EG 161, (1998) 30 HLR 1052 (CA) |
positive covenant |
|
The Antaios Compania Neviera S.A. v. Salen Rederierna A.B. |
[1985] 1 AC 191, 201 [HL] |
literal construction or literal meaning |
|
The Carlgarth; The Otarania |
[1927] P 93, 110 (CA) |
invitee |
|
The Carlgarth; The Otarania |
[1927] P 93, 109 (CA) |
trespass |
|
The Five Steel Barges |
(1890) 15 PD 142, 146 |
quasi-contract |
|
The General Medical Council v Meadows |
[2007] 2 WLR 286, [2007] 1 All ER 1, [2007] QB 462 (CA) |
expert witness |
|
The Kanchenjunga |
[1990] 1 Lloyd's Rep 391, 398 |
rescission |
|
The Merak |
[1976] 1 Lloyd's Rep 81 |
subject to survey |
|
The Moorcock |
(1889) 14 PD 64, [1886-90] All ER Rep 530, 535 |
implied term or implied condition |
|
The Prior's Case |
(1368) YB 42 Edw. III, Pl. 14 |
positive covenant |
|
The Prior's Case |
(1368) YB 42 Edw. III, Pl. 14 |
restrictive covenant |
|
The Scaptrade (Scandinavian Trading Tanker Co AB v Flota Petrolera Ecuatoriana |
[1983] 2 All ER 763, 766, [1983] 2 AC 694, 700 (HL) |
time is of the essence |
|
The Trustees of the St Clement Danes Holborn Estate Charity v The Greater London Council |
(1966) 198 EG 1045 |
project valuation(BrE) |
|
Theed v Debenham |
(1876) 2 Ch D 165 |
day work or day-work |
|
Thomas v Cook |
(1818) 2 B & Ald 119, 106 Eng Rep 310 |
surrender |
|
Thomas v Hayward |
(1869) LR 4 Ex 311 |
privity of estate |
|
Thomas v Sorrell |
(1673) Vaugh 330, 351, 124 Eng Rep 1098, 1109 |
lease |
|
Thomas v Sorrell |
(1673) Vaugh 330, 351, 124 Eng Rep 1098, 1109 |
licence(BrE) or license(AmE) |
|
Thomas v Sorrell |
(1673) Vaugh 330, 351, 124 Eng Rep 1098, 1109 |
licensee |
|
Thomas v Thomas |
(1835) 2 Cr M & R 34, 150 Eng Rep 15 |
unity of possession |
|
Thomas v Thomas |
(1835) 2 Cr M & R 35, 39, 150 Eng Rep 15, 17 |
easement of eavesdrop or easement of eaves-dropping |
|
Thompson v Clive Alexander & Partners |
(1992) 59 BLR 77 |
fit for human habitation(Eng) |
|
Thompson v Lacy |
(1820) 3 B & Ald 283, 287, 106 Eng Rep 667 |
inn |
|
Thompson v McCullough |
[1947] 1 All ER 265 |
escrow |
|
Thompson v Ward |
(1871) 40 LJ CP 169, 188 |
lodger |
|
Thornborough v Baker |
(1675) 2 Swans App 628, 630, 36 Eng Rep 1000 |
equity of redemption |
|
Thorner v Major |
[2009] 13 EG 142, 1 WLR 776 (HL) |
estoppel |
|
Throckmerton v Tracy |
(1555) 1 Plowd 145, 160, 75 Eng Rep 222 |
reversion |
|
Tickle v Brown |
(1836) 4 Ad & E 369, 111 Eng Rep 826 |
as of right |
|
Tickle v Brown |
(1836) 4 Ad & E 369, 111 Eng Rep 826 |
enjoyment |
|
Tickle v Brown |
(1836) 4 Ad & E 369, 382, 11 Eng Rep 826 |
right |
|
Tidswell v Whitworth |
(1867) LR 2 CP 326 |
assessment |
|
Tiffany Investments Ltd v Bircham & Co Nominees (No 2) Ltd |
[2003] 12 EG 127, [2004] 2 EGLR 31 |
right of pre-emption |
|
Tilley v Thomas |
(1867) LR 3 Ch App 61 (CA) |
time is of the essence |
|
Times Fire Assurance Co v Hawke |
(1858) 1 F & F 407, 175 Eng Rep 783 |
reinstatement |
|
Timmins v Rowlinson |
(1765) 3 Burr 1603, 97 Eng Rep 1003) |
notice to quit |
|
Tingdene Holidays Parks Ltd v Cox |
[2011] UKUT 301, [2011] 46 EG 106 (LC) |
service charge |
|
Tito v Waddell (No. 2) |
[1977] Ch 106 |
beach |
|
Tiverton Estates Ltd v Wearwell Ltd |
[1975] Ch 146, 159 (CA) |
subject to contract |
|
Toff v McDowell |
(1993) 25 HLR 650 |
quiet enjoyment |
|
Toller v Law Accident Insurance Society Ltd |
[1936] 2 All ER 952, 956, 958 (CA) |
repudiation |
|
Tomlin v Standard Telephone and Cables Ltd |
[1969] 3 All ER 201 (CA) |
without prejudice |
|
Tomlinson v Congleton |
[2003] 1 AC 46 (HL) |
trespass |
|
Toms v Wilson |
(1862) 4 B & S 442, 122 Eng Rep 524 |
foreclosure |
|
Topfell Ltd v Galley Properties Ltd |
[1979] 1 WLR 447 |
vacant possession |
|
Tophams Ltd v Earl of Sefton |
[1967] 1 AC 50, 73, 81, [1966] 1 All ER 1039 (HL) |
use clause or user clause |
|
Tophams Ltd v Earl of Sefton [1967] 1 AC 50, 73, 81, [1966] 1 All ER 1039 (HL) |
|
restrictive covenant |
|
Torkington v Magee |
[1902] 2 KB 427, 430 |
chose |
|
Total Clothing Ltd v Guinea Properties & Management Ltd |
(1991) 64 P & CR 452) |
writing |
|
Tottenham UDC v Rowley |
[1912] 2 Ch 633, 646-7 (CA) |
dedication |
|
Toulmin v Millar |
(1887) 58 LT 96, 3 TLR 836 (HL) |
commission |
|
Toulmin v Millar |
(1887) 58 LT 96, 3 TLR 836 (HL) |
procuring cause(AmE) or effective cause(BrE) |
|
Town Centre Securities Ltd v Wm Morrison Supermarkets Ltd. |
(1982) 263 EG 435 |
hearsay |
|
Transco plc v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council |
[2003] UKHL 61, [2003] 3 WLR 1467, 1484 (HL) |
act of God |
|
Transco plc v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council |
[2003] UKHL 61, [2003] 3 WLR 1467, 1477 (HL) |
strict liability |
|
Trego v Hunt |
[1896] AC 7 (HL) |
goodwill |
|
Treloar v Nute |
[1977] 1 WLR 1295, [1977] 1 All ER 230, 234 (CA) |
ouster |
|
Treloar v Nute |
[1976] 1 WLR 1295, [1977] 1 All ER 230, 234 (CA) |
adverse possession |
|
Treseder-Griffin v Co-op Insurance Society Ltd |
[1956] 2 QB 127, 2 All ER 33 |
gold clause |
|
Trevail v C & A Modes Ltd |
[1967] RA 124, 132 (LT) |
zoning method(BrE) |
|
Trocette Property Co Ltd v Greater London Council |
(1974) 28 P & CR 408, 416 (CA) |
willing buyer or willing seller |
|
Trocette Property Co Ltd v Greater London Council |
(1974) 28 P & CR 408 (CA) |
compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) |
|
Trollope and Colls v North West Metropolitan Regional Hospital Board |
[1973] 1 WLR 601, 607, [1973] 2 All ER 260, 266 (HL) |
implied term or implied condition |
|
Trollope and Colls v North West Metropolitan Regional Hospital Board |
[1973] 1 WLR 601, 607, [1973] 2 All ER 260, 266 (HL) |
time is of the essence |
|
Trow v Ind Coope (West Midlands) Ltd |
[1967] 2 QB 899, [1967] 2 All ER 900 (CA) |
date |
|
Trow v Ind Coope (West Midlands) Ltd |
[1967] 2 QB 899, [1967] 2 All ER 900 (CA) |
time |
|
Trustees of Sloane Stanley Estate v Charles Carey-Morgan [2011] UKUT 415, [2011] 47 EG 104 (LC) |
[2011] UKUT 415, [2011] 47 EG 104 (LC) |
deferment rate(BrE) |
|
Trustees of the Methodist Secondary Schools Deed v O'Leary |
(1990) 23 HLR 418, [1992] NPC 149 (CA) |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Tse Kwong Lam v Wong Chit Sen |
[1983] 1 WLR 1349, [1983] 3 All ER 54, 59, 60 (PC) |
power of sale |
|
Tulk v Moxhay |
(1848) 2 Ph 774, 41 Eng Rep 1143 |
equitable servitude(US) |
|
Tulk v Moxhay |
(1848) 2 Ph 774, 41 Eng Rep 1143 |
real burden(Scot) |
|
Tulk v Moxhay |
(1848) 2 Ph 774, 41 Eng Rep 1143 |
scheme of development |
|
Tulk v Moxhay |
(1848) 2 Ph 774, 41 Eng Rep 1143 |
sublessee or sub-lessee |
|
Tulk v Moxhay |
(1848) 2 Ph 774, 41 Eng Rep 1143, 1444 |
restrictive covenant |
|
Turner v Barlow |
(1863) 3 F & F 950, 176 Eng Rep 430 |
month |
|
Turner v Jacob |
[2006] EWHC 1317 |
constructive trust |
|
Turner v Wright |
(1860) 2 De GF & J 234, 243, 45 Eng Rep 612 |
waste |
|
Tutton v Darke, Nixon v Freeman |
(1860) 5 Hurl & N 647, 157 Eng Rep 1338 |
day |
|
Tweedle v Atkinson |
(1861) 1 B & S 393, 121 Eng Rep 763 |
good consideration |
|
Tweedle v Atkinson |
(1861) 1 B & S 393, 121 Eng Rep 763 |
privity of contract |
|
Tweedle v Atkinson |
(1861) 1 B & S 393, 121 Eng Rep 763 |
consideration |
|
Twinsectra v Yardley |
[2004] 2 AC 164 (HL) |
resulting trust |
|
Tyne Boiler Works Co v Longbenton |
(1886) 56 LJ MC 8, 12 |
attached |
|
Tyrringham's Case |
(1584) 4 Co Rep 36b, 37a, 76 Eng Rep 973, 975 |
right of common |
|
Tyrringham's Case |
(1584) 4 Co Rep 36b, 38a, 76 Eng Rep 973, 980 |
unity of possession |
|
Tyrringham's Case |
(1584) 4 Co Rep 36b, 76 Eng Rep 973 |
vicinage |
Top
|
Ulster Bank v Synnott |
[1871] IR 5 Eq 595, 612 |
per pro or per procurationem(Lat) |
|
Unilever plc v The Procter and Gamble Company |
[2000] FSR 344 |
without prejudice |
|
Union Eagle Ltd v Golden Acheivement Ltd |
[1997] AC 514 (PC) |
time is of the essence |
|
Union Lighterage Co v London Graving Dock Co |
[1902] 2 Ch 557, 573 (CA) |
easement of necessity |
|
Union Lighterage Cov London Graving Dock Co |
[1902] 2 Ch 557, 571 (CA) |
prescription |
|
United Australia Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd |
[1941] AC 1, 30, [1940] 1 All ER 20 (HL) |
election |
|
United Bank of Kuwait Plc v Sahib |
[1997] Ch 107 (CA) |
mortgage |
|
United Bank of Kuwait Plc v Sahib |
[1997] Ch 107 (CA) |
equitable mortgage |
|
United Bank of Kuwait Plc v Sahib |
[1997] Ch 107 (CA) |
writing |
|
United Dominions Trust (Commercial) Ltd v. Eagle Aircraft Services Ltd |
[1968] 1 WLR 74, [1968] 1 All ER 104, 108 (CA) |
synallagmatic contract |
|
United Scientific Holdings Ltd v Burnley Borough Council |
[1978] AC 904, 935, [1977] 2 All ER 62, 76 (HL) |
rent |
|
United Scientific Holdings Ltd v Burnley Borough Council |
[1978] AC 904, 944-6, [1977] 2 All ER 62, 83-5 (HL) |
time is of the essence |
|
United Scientific Holdings Ltd v Burnley Borough Council |
[1978] AC 904, 948, [1977] 2 All ER 62, 87 (HL) |
rent review clause(BrE) |
|
United States of America v Motor Truck Ltd |
[1924] AC 196, 202 (PC) |
rectification |
|
Universe Tankships Inc. of Monrovia v International Transport Workers' Federation |
[1982] 2 All ER 88 |
duress |
|
Upton v Townsend |
(1855) 17 CB 65 |
constructive eviction |
|
Upton v Townsend |
(1855) 17 CB 65 |
eviction |
|
Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins |
[2001 UKHL 43, [2001] PLSCS 213 (HL) |
dwelling house or dwelling-house |
|
Urban I (Blonk Street) Ltd v Ayres |
[2013] EWCA Civ 816, [2013] PLSCS 159 (CA) |
term |
|
Uttlesford DC v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1992] JPL 171) |
planning unit(Eng) |
|
Van Dal Footwear Ltd v Ryman Ltd |
[2010] 1 All ER 883 (CA) |
damages |
|
Van Grutten v Foxwell |
[1897] AC 658, 675 (HL) |
heirs of the body |
|
Vanaston v Mackarly |
(1796) 2 Lev 99, 83 Eng Rep 468 |
quarterly |
|
Vane v Barnard (Lord) |
(1716) 2 Vern 738, 23 Eng Rep 1082 |
waste |
|
Vernon v Bethell |
(1762) 2 Eden 110, 113, 28 Eng Rep 838 |
duress |
|
Vernon v Bethell |
(1762) 2 Eden 110, 113, 28 Eng Rep 838 |
equity of redemption |
|
Vernon v Bethell |
(1762) 2 Eden 110, 113, 28 Eng Rep 838 |
unconscionable bargain |
|
Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd |
[1949] 2 KB 528 |
damages |
|
Victoria University of Manchester v Hugh Wilson |
(1984) 2 Con LR 430 |
latent defect |
|
Vincent v Premo Enterprises (Voucher Sales) Ltd |
[1969] 2 All ER 944 |
delivery |
|
Vine (R.A.) (Engineering) Ltd v Havant Borough Council |
[1989] 39 EG 164 (CA) |
before-and-after method |
|
Vowles v Miller |
(1810) 3 Taunt 137, 128 Eng Rep 54 |
hedge and ditch presumption(Eng) |
|
Vyner (Frank) and Sons Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1971] 243 EG 597, [1977] JPL 795 |
material change in the use(Eng) |
|
Vynior's Case |
(1609) 8 Co Rep 81b, 82a, 77 Eng Rep 597 |
will |
|
Vyvyan v Arthur |
(1823) 1 B & C 410, 107 Eng Rep 152) |
reddendum |
|
Waite v Jennings |
[1906] 2 KB 18 |
fine |
|
Waitt v Morris |
[1994] 2 EGLR 224) |
extended lease |
|
Walford v Miles |
[1992] 2 AC 128 (HL) |
lock-out agreement |
|
Walker v Boyle |
[1982] 1 All ER 634, 640) |
exclusion clause(Eng) |
|
Walker v Kenley |
[2008] EWHC 370 (Ch) |
residential |
|
Walker v Wilsher |
(1889) 23 QBD 335, 337 (CA) |
without prejudice |
|
Wallingford v Mutual Society |
(1880) 5 App Cas 685, 702, [1874-80] All ER Rep Ext 1386 (HL) |
penalty |
|
Wallis Fashion Group Ltd v CGU Life Assurance |
[2000] 2 EGLR 49, (2000) 81 P & CR 393, [24], [28] |
authorised guarantee agreement (AGA)(Eng) |
|
Wallis v Hands |
(1893) 2 Ch 75 |
interesse termini(Lat) |
|
Wallis v Russell |
[1902] 2 IR 585, 615 |
caveat emptor(Lat) |
|
Walsh v Allweather Mechanical Grouting Co Ltd |
[1959] 2 QB 300, 308 |
closed contract(Eng) |
|
Walsh v Lonsdale |
(1882) 21 Ch D 9 (CA) |
specific performance |
|
Walsingham's Case |
(1579) 2 Plowd 547, 555, 75 Eng Rep 805, 816-7 |
doctrine of estates |
|
Walsingham's Case |
(1579) 2 Plowd 547, 555, 75 Eng Rep 805, 816f |
estate |
|
Warburton v Loveland |
(1831) 2 Dow & Cl 480, 489, 6 Eng Rep 806 |
literal construction or literal meaning |
|
Ward v Paterson |
[1929] 2 Ch 396 |
bungalow |
|
Ware v Verderber |
(1978) 247 EG 1081 |
contract for sale |
|
Waring v Foden |
[1932] 1 Ch 276 (CA) |
mineral |
|
Warlow v Harrison |
(1858) 1 El & El 316, 120 Eng Rep 925 |
without reserve |
|
Warlow v Harrison |
(1859) 1 El & El 309, 120 Eng Rep 925 |
invitation to trade(AmE) or invitation to treat(BrE) |
|
Warmington v Miller |
[1973] QB 877 (CA) |
agreement for a lease |
|
Warnford Investments Ltd v Duckworth |
[1979] Ch 127, [1978] 1 All ER 517 |
privity of contract |
|
Warr (Frank) & Co v London CC |
[1904] 1 KB 713 (CA) |
use |
|
Warren v Keen |
[1954] 1 QB 15, [1953] 2 All ER 1118 (CA) |
waste |
|
Warren v Keen |
[1954] 1 QB 15, 20, [1953] 2 All ER 1118, 1121 (CA) |
tenant-like manner(Eng) |
|
Warren v Keen |
[1954] 1 QB 15, 20, [1953] 2 All ER 1118, 1121 (CA) |
wind and water tight(BrE) |
|
Warwickshire CC v Atherstone Common Right Proprietors |
(1964) 65 LGR 439 |
street works(Eng) |
|
Waters v Welsh Development Agency |
[2004] [2004] 1 WLR 1304 (HL) |
compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) |
|
Waters v Welsh Development Agency |
[2004] 1 WLR 1304 (HL) |
compulsory purchase compensation(Eng) |
|
Wates v Rowland |
[1952] 2 QB 12, 23 (CA) |
improvement |
|
Watkins v Nash |
(1875) LR 20 Eq 262 |
escrow |
|
Watson-Smyth v Secretary of State for the Environment |
(1991) 64 P & CR 156) |
ha-ha |
|
Watson v Gray |
(1880) 14 Ch D 192, 194-5 |
party wall |
|
Watson-Smyth v Secretary of State for the Environment |
(1991) 64 P & CR 156) |
ha-ha |
|
Watts v Morrow |
[1991] 1 WLR 1421, 1430, [1991] 4 All ER 937, 945 (CA) |
damages |
|
Webb v Bird |
(1862) 13 CB (NS) 841, 143 Eng Rep 332 |
natural rights |
|
Webb v London Borough of Barnet |
[1989] 11 EG 80, (1989) 25 HLR 257 (CA) |
dwelling house or dwelling-house |
|
Webb v Pollmount |
[1966] Ch 584, 595-6 |
interest |
|
Webb v Russell |
(1789) 3 Term Rep 393, 100 Eng Rep 639 |
restrictive covenant |
|
Webber v Lee |
(1882) 9 QBD 315 |
interest |
|
Wedd v Porter |
[1916] 2 KB 91 (CA) |
holding over |
|
Wedd v Porter |
[1916] 2 KB 91, 102 (CA) |
husband-like manner(Eng) |
|
Weir v Area Estates Ltd |
[2010] 10 EG 121 |
vacant possession |
|
Weld-Blundell v Synott |
[1940] 2 KB 107 |
power of sale |
|
Welden v Bridgewater |
(1595) Cro Eliz 421, 78 Eng Rep 662 |
lot meadows(Eng) |
|
Weldon Plant Ltd v The Commission for New Towns |
[2001] 77 Con LR 1, [2000] Build LR |
fair rates and prices(Eng) |
|
Weldon v Dicks |
(1878) 10 Ch D 247, 262 |
acquiescence |
|
Welford v EDF Energy network (LPN) Ltd |
[2007] EWCA Civ 293, [2007] 24 EG 170 (CA) |
compensation for disturbance(Eng) |
|
Wellington (Mayor of) v Lower Hutt (Mayor of) |
[1904] AC 773, 775-6 (PC) |
adjacent |
|
Welsh v Greenwich London Borough Council |
(2001) P & CR 12; [2000] EGCS 84 (CA) |
good condition |
|
Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government |
[2011] UKSC 15, [2011] 15 EG 93 (SC) |
enforcement notice |
|
Wenlock (Baroness) v River Dee Company |
(1885) 10 App Cas 354 (HL) |
ultra vires(Lat) |
|
West Bromwich Building Society v Bullock |
[1936] 1 All ER 887 |
assumption |
|
West Midland Baptist (Trust) Association (Inc.) v Birmingham Corporation |
[1968] 1 All ER 205, 216 (CA), aff'd [1970] AC 874, [1969] 3 All ER 172, 184 (HL) |
notice to treat(Eng) |
|
Western Heritable Investment Co Ltd v Husband |
[1983] 2 AC 849, 859, [1983] 268 EG 266 (HL) |
fair rent |
|
Westminster City Council v Great Portland Estates |
[1985] AC 661, 670 (HL) |
planning application(Eng) |
|
Westminster City Council v Southern Ry Co |
(1936) AC 511, 529 (HL) |
rateable occupation(Eng) |
|
Westminster City Council v Tomlin |
(1988) 28 RVR 196 |
rateable occupation(Eng) |
|
Westminster Corporation v Southern Ry Co |
(1936) AC 511, 532, [1936] 2 All ER 322 (HL) |
exclusive occupation |
|
Weston v Arnold |
(1873) 8 Ch App 1084, 1089 |
party wall |
|
Weston v Metropolitan Asylum District Managers |
(1882) 9 QBD 404 |
additional rent |
|
Wettern Electric Ltd v Welsh Development Agency |
[1983] 1 QB 796, [1983] 2 All ER 629 |
implied term or implied condition |
|
Whalley v Ramage |
(1862) 10 WR 315) |
instroke |
|
Wheat v E. Lacon and Co Ltd |
[1966] AC 552, 578 (HL) |
occupier |
|
Wheeldon v Burrows |
(1879) 12 Ch D 31, 49 (CA) |
implied grant |
|
Wheeldon v Burrows |
(1879) 12 Ch D 31, 49 (CA) |
quasi-easement |
|
Wheeldon v Burrows |
(1879) 12 Ch D 31, 49-50 (CA) |
implied reservation |
|
Wheeler v Keeble (1914) Ltd |
[1920] 1 Ch 57 |
forfeiture |
|
Wheeler v Mercer |
[1957] AC 426, 427, [1956] 3 All ER 631, 634 (HL) |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Wheeler v Mercer |
[1957] AC 426, 427, [1956] 3 All ER 631, 634 (HL) |
tenancy at will |
|
Wheeler v Smith |
[1926] EGD 194 |
sublease or sub-lease |
|
Whelton Sinclair (a firm) v Hyland |
[1992] 41 EG 112, [1992] 2 EGLR 158 |
time |
|
Whicker v Hume |
(1851) 14 Beav 509, 518, 50 Eng Rep 404 |
bequest or bequeath |
|
Whitbread plc v UCB Corporate Services |
(2000) The Times, June 22, [2000] 35 EG 136 (CA) |
simple interest |
|
White v Bijou Mansions Ltd |
[1938] Ch 351, 361, [1938] 1 All ER 546 (CA) |
scheme of development |
|
White v Elmdene Estates Ltd |
[1959] 2 All ER 605, 610-11 |
payment |
|
White v Foljambe |
(1805) 11 Ves 337, 345-6, 32 Eng Rep 1121 |
open contract |
|
White v Grand Hotel Eastbourne Ltd |
[1913] 1 Ch 113 (CA) |
easement |
|
White v Taylor (No. 2) |
[1969] 1 Ch 160 |
ancillary easement |
|
Whitgift Homes Ltd v Stocks |
[2001] EWCA Civ 1732, [2001] 48 EG 130 (CA) |
scheme of development |
|
Whitley & Sons v Secretary of State for Wales |
(1992) 64 P & CR 296 |
planning condition |
|
Whitley v Stumbles |
[1930] AC 544 (HL) |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
Whitley v Stumbles |
[1930] AC 544, 546 (HL) |
premises |
|
Whitman v Kershaw |
(1896) 16 QBD 613 (CA) |
security deposit |
|
Whittington v Corder |
(1852) 20 LT OS 175 |
occupation |
|
Whitsbury Farm and Stud Ltd v Hemens |
[1988] 1 AC 601, 615 (HL) |
agricultural building(Eng) |
|
Wickham Machine Tool Sales Ltd v Schuler AG |
[1972] 2 All ER 1181 |
condition |
|
Wickham v Hawker |
(1840) 7 M & W 63, 151 Eng Rep 679 |
reservation |
|
Wickman Machine Tools Sales Ltd v L Schuler AG |
[1974] AC 235 (HL) |
warranty |
|
Wigginton & Milner Ltd v Winster Engineering Ltd |
[1978] 1 WLR 1462, [1978] 3 All ER 436 (CA) |
plan |
|
Wildtree Hotels Ltd v Harrow LBC |
(2000) 150 NLJ 984 (HL) |
compensation for injurious affection(Eng) |
|
Wilkes v Goodwin |
[1923] 2 KB 86, 93 (CA) |
board |
|
Wilkinson v Kerdene Ltd |
[2013] EWCA Civ 44 (CA) |
positive covenant |
|
Wilkinson v Martin |
(1873) 8 Car & P 1, 5, 173 Eng Rep 373, 375 |
procuring cause(AmE) or effective cause(BrE) |
|
William Boyer & Sons Ltd v Adams |
(1976) 32 P & CR 89 |
business tenancy(Eng) |
|
William Boyer & Sons Ltd v Adams |
(1976) 32 P & CR 89 |
occupation |
|
William Boyer & Sons Ltd v Adams |
(1975) 32 P & CR 89 |
business premises |
|
William Cory & Sons Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners |
[1964] 3 All ER 66, 71A-C (CA) |
escrow |
|
William Hill (Southern) Ltd v Cabras Ltd |
[1987] 1 EGLR 37 |
easement |
|
William Lacey (Hounslow) Ltd v Davies |
[1957] 1 WLR 932 |
quantum meruit(Lat) |
|
Williams & Glyn's Bank Ltd v Boland |
[1979] Ch 312, 331, [1979] 2 All ER 697, 703 (CA) |
matrimonial home(Eng) |
|
Williams & Glyn's Bank Ltd v Boland |
[1981] AC 487, 505-6, [1980] 2 All ER 408, 413 (HL) |
occupation |
|
Williams & Glyn's Bank Ltd v Boland |
[1981] AC 487, 505, [1980] 2 All ER 408, 413 (HL) |
overreachable interest(Eng) |
|
Williams & Glyn's Bank Ltd v Boland |
[1981] AC 487, 505, [1980] 2 All ER 408, 413 (HL) |
overriding interest(Eng) |
|
Williams & Glyn's Bank Ltd v Boland |
[1981] AC 487, 505, [1980] 2 All ER 408, 413 (HL) |
possession |
|
Williams (VO) v Scottish and Newcastle Retail Ltd |
[2001] EGCS 26, (2001) The Times, March 6 (CA) |
rebus sic stantibus(Lat) |
|
Williams Brothers Direct Supply Ltd v Raftery |
[1958] 1 QB 159, 170-173 |
|
|
Williams v Burrell |
(1845) 1 CB 429, 135 Eng Rep 596 |
implied covenant |
|
Williams v Gabriel |
[1906] 1 KB 155 |
quiet enjoyment |
|
Williams v Hensman |
(1861) 1 John & Hem 546, 557, 70 Eng Rep 862 |
joint tenancy |
|
Williams v Hensman |
(1861) 1 John & Hem 546, 557, 70 Eng Rep 862 |
severance |
|
Williams v Kiley t/a CK Supermarkets Ltd |
[2003] 1 P & CR D38 |
letting scheme |
|
Williams v Lake |
[1859] 29 LJ QB 1, 3 |
note |
|
Williams v Ministry of Housing and Local Government |
(1967) 65 LGR 425 |
material change in the use(Eng) |
|
Williams v Sandy Lane (Chester) Ltd |
[2006] EWCA Civ 1738, [2007] 07 EG 144, 148 (CA) |
prescription |
|
Williams v Sandy Lane (Chester) Ltd |
[2006] EWCA Civ 1738, [2007] 07 EG 144, 154 (CA) |
abandonment |
|
Williams v Underwood |
(1983) 45 P & CR 235, 256 |
abandonment |
|
Willingale v Globalgrange Ltd |
[2002] 2 EGLR 55 |
notice |
|
Wilson v Finch Hatton |
(1877) 2 Exch D 336 |
furnished tenancy(Eng) |
|
Wilson v First County Trust Ltd (No 2) |
[2003] UKHL 40, [2003] 3 WLR 568 (HL) |
possessions |
|
Wimbledon and Putney Commons Conservators v Dixon |
(1875) 1 Ch D 374 |
easement |
|
Winn v Bull |
(1877) 7 Ch D 29 |
subject to contract |
|
Winter v Owens |
[1950] IR 225, 226-7 |
conacre(Irl) |
|
Winter v Traditional & Contemporary Contracts Ltd |
[2008] 03 EG 180 (CA) |
restrictive covenant |
|
Wipperman and Buckingham v London Borough of Barking |
(1965) 17 P & CR 225) |
material change in the use(Eng) |
|
Wirral Rural DC v Carter |
[1903] 1 KB 646, 651 |
reputed owner |
|
Wolfe v Shelley |
[1581] 1 Co Rep 93b, 76 Eng Rep 206 |
heir (f. heiress) |
|
Wolverhampton Corporation v Emmons |
[1901] 1 KB 515 (CA) |
specific performance |
|
Wong v Beaumont Properties Trust Ltd |
[1965] 1 QB 173, [1964] 2 All ER 119 |
implied easement |
|
Wong v Beaumont Property Trust Ltd |
[1965] 1 QB 173 |
easement of necessity |
|
Wood v Leadbitter |
(1845) 13 M & W 838, 845, 153 Eng Rep 351 |
licence(BrE) or license(AmE) |
|
Wood v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1973] 1 WLR 707, [1973] 2 All ER 404, 408-9 |
planning unit(Eng) |
|
Woodall v Clifton |
[1905] 2 Ch 257 |
rule against perpetuities (RAP) |
|
Woodford Land Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd |
[2011] EWHC 3109 |
expert |
|
Woodhouse v Walker |
(1880) 5 QBD 404, 406-7 |
waste |
|
Woods v Pope |
(1895) 6 C & P 732 |
damages |
|
Woods v Pope |
(1895) 6 C & P 732 |
schedule of dilapidations(BrE) |
|
Woodyer v Hadden |
(1813) 5 Taunt 125, 137, 128 Eng Rep 634 |
decrement |
|
Woollerton and Wilson Ltd v Richard Costain Ltd |
[1971] 1 WLR 411, [1970] 1 All ER 483 |
trespass |
|
Woolway (VO) v Mazars LLP |
[2013] EWCA Civ 368, [2013] PLSCS 73 (CA) |
hereditament |
|
Woozley v Woodall Smith |
[1950] 1 KB 325 |
low rent(Eng) |
|
Workers Trust & Merchant Bank Ltd v Dojap Investments Ltd |
[1993] AC 573, [1993] 2 All ER 370 (PC) |
deposit |
|
Wragg v Lovett |
[1948] 2 All ER 968, 969 (CA) |
estate agent(BrE) |
|
Wright v Carter |
[1903] 1 Ch 27 |
fraudulent conveyance |
|
Wright v Macadam |
[1949] 2 KB 744 |
quasi-easement |
|
Wright v Shelton |
(1853) 18 Jur 445 |
worldly estate or worldly goods |
|
Wringe v Cohen |
[1940] 1 KB 229 |
nuisance |
|
Wroth v Tyler |
[1974] Ch 30 |
damages |
|
Wrotham Park Estate Co Ltd v Parkside Homes Ltd |
[1974] 1 WLR 798, 815 |
damages |
|
Wyatt v Harrison |
(1823) 2 B & Ad 871, 110 Eng Rep 320 |
lateral support |
|
Wyatt v Harrison |
(1823) 2 B & Ad 871, 110 Eng Rep 320 |
natural rights |
|
Wyatt v Harrison |
(1823) 2 B & Ad 871, 110 Eng Rep 320 |
right of support or right to support |
|
Wycombe Health Authority v Barnett |
(1982) 47 P & CR 570, 264 EG 619 (CA) |
tenant-like manner(Eng) |
|
Wycombe Health Authority v Barnett |
(1982) 5 HLR 84, 91 |
proper working order |
|
Wyld v Silver |
[1962] 1 Ch 570 |
fair |
|
Xenos v Wickham |
(1866) LR 2 HL 296, 312 (HL) |
delivery |
|
Yandle and Sons v Sutton |
[1922] 2 Ch 199, 210 |
patent defect |
|
Yarmouth v France |
(1887) 18 QBD 647 |
plant |
|
Yates Building Company Ltd v R J Pulleyn & Sons (York) Ltd |
[1976] 1 EGLR 157 (CA) |
notice |
|
Yaxley v Gotts |
[2000] Ch 162, 176, 193 (CA) |
writing |
|
Yelloly v Morley |
(1910) 27 TLR 20 |
repairs notice(Eng) |
|
Yelloly v Morley |
(1910) 27 TLR 20 |
use clause or user clause |
|
Yeoman's Row Management Limited v Cobbe |
[2008] 1 WLR 1752, [2008] 4 All ER 713 (HL) |
subject to contract |
|
Yewbelle Ltd v London Green Developments Ltd |
[2007] EWCA Civ, [2007] 2 EGLR 152 (CA) |
reasonable effort or reasonable endeavour |
|
York v Stone |
(1709) 1 Salk 158, 91 Eng Rep 146 |
joint tenancy |
|
Yorkbrook Investments Ltd v Batten |
[1985] 2 EGLR 100 |
set-off or setoff |
|
Young v Secretary of State for the Environment |
[1983] 2 AC 662 (HL) |
planning permission(Eng) |
|
Yuen Kun Yeu v A-G of Hong Kong |
[1987] 1 AC 175, 194 (PC) |
duty of care |
|
Z Ltd v A and Others |
[1982] 1 All ER 556, 572 (CA) |
Mareva injunction(Eng) |
|
Zarb v Parry |
[2012] 2 All ER 320, [2012] 03 EG 88, 91 (CA) |
permission |
|
Zarb v Parry |
[2012] 2 All ER 320, [2012] 03 EG 88, 91 (CA) |
possession |
Top
|
Zuckerman v Trustees of the Calthorpe Estates |
[2009] UKUT 235, [2009] PLSCS 331 (LC) |
deferment rate(BrE) |